Products

Sulfur Sublimat Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions

    • Product Name: Sulfur Sublimat Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 863056
    Property 1 Chemical Name Sulfur (sublimed)
    Property 2 Chemical Formula S
    Property 3 Cas Number 7704-34-9
    Property 4 Molecular Weight 32.06 g/mol as S; 256.52 g/mol as S8
    Property 5 Appearance Fine pale-yellow crystalline powder with a characteristic slight odor
    Property 6 Solubility Practically insoluble in water; sparingly soluble in ethanol and ether; soluble in carbon disulfide
    Property 7 Melting Point 112.8°C to 120.0°C depending on crystalline form
    Property 8 Boiling Point 444.6°C
    Property 9 Assay Content 99.0% to 101.0% of S on a dried basis
    Property 13 Particle Size Fine micronized powder suitable for tablets, capsules, powders, granules, premix, and suspension formulations
    Property 14 Storage Conditions Store in well-closed airtight containers in a cool, dry place, protected from light
    Property 15 Shelf Life 24 months from manufacture date when stored under recommended conditions

    As an accredited Sulfur Sublimat Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Sulfur Sublimat Veterinary Grade API supplied in sealed 25 kg drums, suitable for tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premix, and solutions.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) 20′ FCL container loading of Sulfur Sublimat Veterinary Grade API: dry, safe, palletized packaging, secured for transport, avoiding moisture and contaminants.
    Shipping Ship in sealed, moisture-resistant containers, such as PE-lined bags or fiber drums, to protect purity. Avoid heat, sparks, and oxidizers. Transport by road, sea, or air with complete veterinary API documentation. Sulfur Sublimat is generally non-hazardous in normal conditions, but minimize dust exposure and store in a cool, dry area.
    Storage Store in tightly sealed, original containers in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, protected from direct sunlight and moisture. Keep away from strong oxidizers and open flames. Avoid generating dust during handling. Ensure the storage area is clean and inaccessible to unauthorized personnel or animals.
    Shelf Life Shelf life is 3 years in original tightly sealed containers, stored in a cool, dry place, protected from light and moisture.
    Application of Sulfur Sublimat Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions

    Compressed Veterinary Bolus Manufacture With Poorly Compactible Sulphur

    Direct compression of sulfur sublimatum with mean particle size below 150 µm produces tablets with capping tendency and low tensile strength because sulfur particles undergo brittle fracture at compaction pressures above 120 MPa and exhibit negligible plastic deformation. A wet granulation route using polyvinylpyrrolidone K30 at 3–5% w/w as binder improves compressibility when the granulation endpoint is controlled by impeller torque rather than fixed time. In production-scale high-shear mixers with bowl volumes of 300–600 L, batch-to-batch variance in granule density occurs when raw sulfur bulk density falls outside 0.60–0.75 g/cm³. The inclusion of 5–10% w/w microcrystalline cellulose reduces segregation during tablet press feed frame operation, but over-lubrication with magnesium stearate above 1.0% w/w extends disintegration time beyond 15 min as measured by Ph. Eur. 2.9.1. Tablet hardness is not a sufficient predictor of friability for sulfur-containing matrices; friability testing according to Ph. Eur. 2.9.7 at 25 rpm for 100 revolutions should be paired with visual inspection for edge chipping.

    Sulfur is practically insoluble in water, so disintegration and dispersion of the active in the gastrointestinal tract govern availability rather than dissolution rate. In ruminants, a portion of orally administered sulfur may be reduced to hydrogen sulfide by rumen microflora, which can produce neurotoxic effects at high doses; therefore, bolus products for cattle must be formulated with a defined maximum sulfur intake per animal per day, and published data for systemic absorption of elemental sulfur from oral bolus formulations is limited. A lactose-free granulation may be required for animals with lactose intolerance, but replacement with dibasic calcium phosphate dihydrate raises tablet weight and affects compaction force. The ejection force from 19.0 × 9.0 mm oval dies increases when sulfur is lubricated with sodium stearyl fumarate instead of magnesium stearate; this may require tooling with chromium nitride coating to prevent picking.

    Scale-up from laboratory V-blenders to 600 L high-shear granulators should not rely on geometric similarity alone because sulfur hydrophobicity produces dead zones on baffles. Cleaning validation limits for sulfur residues in shared facilities can be set using swab sampling and high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection after dissolution in carbon disulfide; carbon disulfide handling must comply with local explosive atmosphere directives. The API is combustible as a dust, and mills fitted with 70 °C maximum surface temperature motors should be used. Granule size distribution measured by sieve analysis should meet d10 > 75 µm, d50 150–250 µm, and d90 < 500 µm for consistent die fill.

    How Does Electrostatic Surface Charge Constrain Capsule Filling of Sublimed Sulphur?

    During semi-automatic capsule filling, sulfur flowers develop triboelectric charge when blended with lactose monohydrate in stainless steel vessels at relative humidity below 35% RH. The charged particles adhere to tamping pins and capsule bushings, producing fill weight variability greater than 5% RSD on intermittent-motion capsule machines. Conditioning the blend at 45–55% RH for 24 h reduces static accumulation but may hydrate hygroscopic excipients. Alternatively, 0.1–0.3% w/w colloidal silicon dioxide improves flow and charge dissipation, provided it is incorporated before final blending. For hard gelatin capsules containing sulfur at 50 mg or 100 mg per unit, the powder bed volume must be adjusted to the tapped density of the blend, which typically changes by 10–15% after vibration. Capsule disintegration testing under Ph. Eur. 2.9.1 is performed with discs only when the formulation contains sustained-release components; conventional sulfur-lubricant blends can pass without discs.

    Dust explosion hazards are a production-scale concern because sulfur dust has a minimum ignition energy below 10 mJ; NFPA 655 requires inerting or explosion venting for size reduction and transfer operations. Capsule filling machines should be equipped with conductive wheels and grounded discharge chutes to limit surface charge. In-process checks on fill weight are required every 30 min on machines operating above 6,000 capsules/h, because static variation can shift powder bed density without visible hopper bridging. Excipient selection for capsules differs from tablets because the force applied during plug formation is lower; brittle sulfur particles may not fragment, so the capsule plug can retain a high void fraction. This void fraction can be reduced by adding 10–20% w/w microcrystalline cellulose with a tapped density above 0.65 g/cm³. The final blend should have a Hausner ratio below 1.25 and a Carr index below 20% to ensure consistent capsule fill.

    Veterinary dusting powders containing sulfur sublimatum are compounded as nonsterile preparations under conditions aligned with USP <795> and are applied to superficial equine and bovine dermatological lesions. The active particle size is critical for both adherence and ectoparasite contact; a sieve fraction with d90 ≤ 75 µm is preferred because larger particles dislodge from hair shafts within 6–12 h of animal movement. Blending with zinc oxide at 10–20% w/w and talc at 30–50% w/w prevents agglomeration in high-humidity barn environments, but zinc oxide absorbs moisture above 75% RH and may form hard agglomerates that block a rotary powder sifter. Heavy metal limits for sulfur used in cutaneous veterinary formulations are specified in relevant pharmacopoeial monographs, and analytical confirmation by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after microwave digestion is accepted when the limit test is not sufficiently sensitive. Sulfur reacts with copper and copper alloys in storage bins; equipment contact surfaces should be stainless steel 316L or epoxy-lined steel. The keratolytic effect is concentration-dependent, and compounded preparations for food-producing animals require assignment of withdrawal periods based on tissue residue data where available; published data for sulfur residues after topical use is limited.

    Process control for dusting powders includes sieve retention, moisture content, and microbial limits. Sulfur sublimatum for cutaneous use is expected to comply with the pharmacopoeial limit for sulfated ash as determined by Ph. Eur. 2.4.14, and residual sulfite is controlled because sulfur exposed to air may form sulfur dioxide at elevated temperatures. The milling operation should use a pin mill with nitrogen purge if the target particle size is below 30 µm, since fine sulfur dust above the lower explosive limit can ignite from frictional heating in air-classifying mills. After blending, powder is discharged into lined fibre drums with antistatic polyethylene liners; the inner bag should be grounded before manual transfer. The apparent density after filling should be checked with a Scott volumeter, and packaging under 50% RH avoids compaction during storage. Topical sulfur powders are not sterile, but for application to abraded skin the aerobic microbial count should be controlled according to the relevant nonsterile preparation monograph. The absence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus is verified by membrane filtration enrichment.

    When Parenteral Exposure Is Considered for Sublimed Sulphur

    True aqueous solutions of sulfur sublimatum are not achievable because solubility in water at 25 °C is below 10 mg/L. Suspension formulations intended for parenteral administration face sterilization constraints: moist heat at 121 °C for 15 min exposes sulfur to temperatures above the orthorhombic-to-monoclinic transition at approximately 95.6 °C, and the melting range of sublimed sulfur begins near 112 °C. Dry heat sterilization at 160 °C exceeds the melting point and is therefore unsuitable. Sterile filtration through 0.22 µm membranes cannot accommodate the particle size needed for a depot suspension. Gamma irradiation at doses of 25 kGy may generate reactive sulfur species and change particle surface properties, but published data for veterinary injectable sulfur is limited. There is no harmonized pharmacopoeial monograph establishing purity or sterility acceptance criteria for sulfur sublimatum as a parenteral API. Consequently, the injectable route is not a practical downstream segment unless the sulfur is chemically modified or encapsulated in a validated carrier system. Formulators considering oily vehicles should first measure free sulfur content after terminal sterilization and confirm absence of degradation products generated by the sterilization process by high-performance liquid chromatography.

    Analytically, injectable-grade sulfur would require a particle number test under Ph. Eur. 2.9.19 for subvisible particles, but the method requires the active to be suspended in a vehicle with refractive index different from sulfur; method development is constrained because sulfur particles are opaque and settle rapidly. Bacterial endotoxin testing by Ph. Eur. 2.6.14 is applicable only after dissolution in a suitable organic solvent followed by aqueous dilution, which introduces recovery interference from sulfur-containing degradation products. Sterility testing by membrane filtration is not compatible with sulfur suspensions above 0.1% w/v because the filter becomes blocked and retains sulfur on the membrane. These constraints explain why the injectable route remains limited to experimental formulations and why commercial veterinary injectable products based on sulfur sublimatum are not widely marketed.

    In feed mills producing medicated premixes, sulfur sublimatum requires distribution over a carrier with high surface area and low oil absorption. Corn cob meal at 60–80% w/w and calcium carbonate at 10–20% w/w provide a base for sulfur loadings of 5–15% w/w, but mixing times in ribbon blenders of 500 kg capacity should be validated by sampling at 10 positions because sulfur tends to migrate to the top of the blend during prolonged blending due to density differences. The coefficient of variation for sulfur content should be below 5% in the finished premix, as determined by validated high-temperature combustion analysis. Granulation of sulfur premix with 5% w/w mineral oil reduces dust and improves pellet mill throughput, but lipid coating above 8% w/w delays release in the gastrointestinal tract and may reduce efficacy in monogastric species.

    Granule hardness measured by a tablet hardness tester on 1.0–1.4 mm sieve fractions should remain below 2 kp to allow disintegration in feed. Carryover between batches is a critical hazard; dedicated production lines or validated cleaning limits are required because sulfur dust accumulates in dead zones of bucket elevators and rotary valves. The finished premix should be packaged in antistatic bags equipped with conductive film to prevent electrostatic discharge during transport. The homogeneity testing plan should follow the principles of ISO 6497, with at least 10 sampling points per batch and a calculated coefficient of variation below 5%.

    Oral Suspension Rheology and Sedimentation Control

    Liquid veterinary preparations of sulfur sublimatum are suspensions rather than solutions because the API is practically insoluble in aqueous vehicles. The suspension stability depends on the particle size distribution and the continuous-phase yield stress. A dispersed phase with d50 ≤ 40 µm in a vehicle thickened with xanthan gum at 0.3–0.5% w/v achieves a sedimentation volume ratio above 0.90 after 24 h at 25 °C. Suspension viscosity is measured with a rotational viscometer at 25 °C and a shear rate of 10 s⁻¹; values below 1,500 mPa·s typically result in sedimentation zone formation, while values above 3,500 mPa·s make pourability difficult for dosing syringes.

    Preservative efficacy in sweetened oral suspensions must be confirmed by Ph. Eur. 5.1.3 because sulfur can adsorb parabens onto the particle surface and reduce free preservative concentration. Suspensions for young ruminants should be buffered to pH 4.5–6.5 with citrate or phosphate buffers to avoid esophageal irritation. Homogenization at 3,000–5,000 rpm in a rotor-stator mixer prior to filling prevents floating sulfur agglomerates, but batch size must be matched to mixer tip speed because scale-up based on rotational speed alone produces different shear rates. The fill volume tolerances should follow the relevant pharmacopoeial general chapter for oral liquids. The use of propylene glycol above 20% v/v increases the solubility of hydrophobic impurities from sulfur and may alter organoleptic acceptance; published data for taste masking of sulfur in veterinary species is limited.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Sulfur Sublimat Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Elemental sulfur supplied as Sulfur Sublimat Veterinary Grade API is released under model designations SSV-200 and SSV-325; the suffix denotes the target sieve endpoint after nitrogen-blanketed pin milling and does not indicate a separate chemical entity. Both models are orthorhombic α-S8 crystalline powders produced by sublimation and surface condensation, a route that avoids the aqueous polysulfide precipitation used for precipitated sulfur. The input technical sulfur is controlled at ≥99.0% total sulfur before sublimation; after double sublimation, the API meets the Ph. Eur. monograph 0958 for sulfur for external use. Release acceptance includes assay 99.0–101.0% on the dried basis, loss on drying ≤0.5%, total ash ≤0.1%, arsenic ≤2 ppm, and heavy metals ≤10 ppm. This differentiates the veterinary API from technical ground sulfur and wettable sulfur formulations, which may carry higher non-sulfur residues and surfactant-treated carriers that do not meet pharmacopoeial identity or purity criteria.

    The crystal surface is hydrophobic and non-porous. Nitrogen adsorption BET specific surface area is typically 0.5–3.0 m²/g for SSV-200 and 1.0–4.5 m²/g for SSV-325. The melting range is 112.8–119.0°C and the atmospheric sublimation point is 444.6°C. These thermal boundaries limit drying and dry-heat sterilization options. Because elemental sulfur has a Mohs hardness of 2.0, milling is relatively easy, but the material is combustible as a dust; handling systems must be designed for St 1 explosion severity with minimum ignition energy commonly below 30 mJ for fractions with D50 below 45 µm.

    Attribute SSV-200 SSV-325 Test method
    Appearance Yellow to greenish-yellow fine powder Yellow to greenish-yellow micronized powder Visual examination
    Assay as sulfur 99.0–101.0% 99.0–101.0% Ph. Eur. 0958
    Loss on drying ≤0.5% ≤0.5% Ph. Eur. 2.2.32
    Total ash ≤0.1% ≤0.1% Ph. Eur. 2.4.16
    Arsenic ≤2 ppm ≤2 ppm Ph. Eur. 2.4.2
    Heavy metals ≤10 ppm ≤10 ppm Ph. Eur. 2.4.8
    Particle size 95% through 75 µm sieve 95% through 45 µm sieve Ph. Eur. 2.9.38
    D50 target by laser diffraction 40–60 µm 15–25 µm ISO 13320:2020
    Bulk density 0.60–0.80 g/cm³ 0.55–0.70 g/cm³ Ph. Eur. 2.9.34

    The base API is supplied non-sterile and non-endotoxin-controlled. For parenteral suspensions, terminal sterilization or aseptic processing is required at the finished-drug stage. Dry-heat sterilization is not suitable above 120°C because sublimation rate increases; steam autoclaving at 121°C for 15 min is acceptable for sulfur suspensions only when headspace oxygen is excluded. The aqueous solubility of α-S8 is below 5 µg/L at 25°C, so aqueous preparations labeled as solutions cannot be produced by simple dissolution of this API; the product serves as the raw sulfur source only where conversion into soluble polysulfide or thiosulfate species is part of the manufacturing sequence.

    What Limits Direct Compression and Low-Shear Wet Granulation of SSV-325?

    In direct compression, SSV-325 displays a poured bulk density of 0.55–0.70 g/cm³ and a tapped bulk density of 0.75–0.95 g/cm³, corresponding to a Hausner ratio of 1.25–1.40. These values indicate marginal flow suitable only with forced feeders. On a 16-station rotary tablet press using 10 mm flat-faced B tooling and a compression speed of 30 rpm, high-sulfur blends containing ≥50 wt% SSV-325 exhibited punch-face sticking when magnesium stearate was used below 0.5 wt%. Ejection force exceeded 800 N, and tablet tensile strength remained below 1.5 MPa. Raising magnesium stearate to 1.0 wt% reduced ejection force by approximately 25% but extended disintegration beyond 15 min under Ph. Eur. 2.9.1. A more robust direct-compression design uses 0.5 wt% sodium stearyl fumarate and 2.5 wt% croscarmellose sodium, yielding tablet hardness above 50 N and disintegration below 10 min for 400 mg tablets.

    Low-shear wet granulation is preferred for high-dose sulfur tablets because sulfur does not swell or contribute binder plasticity. In a 100 L planetary mixer, a dry blend containing 70 wt% SSV-325 was granulated with pregelatinized starch solution 5% w/w. Granule D50 stabilised at 180–220 µm when total added water was held at 8–10% w/w. At water addition above 12% w/w, granule growth exceeded 500 µm and tray drying at 45°C produced case-hardened granules with surface sulfur enrichment. Fluid-bed drying must keep inlet air below 55°C; higher temperatures led to sulfur deposition in exhaust ducting and filter bags.

    For capsules and dry powders, SSV-325 is selected when low fill weight and content uniformity are critical. In a low-dose capsule filling operation with ≤250 mg sulfur per capsule, SSV-325 produced relative standard deviation <2.5% on a metering auger filler, while SSV-200 produced RSD <4.0% and occasional bridging at the hopper outlet. For bulk powders, the high true density of α-S8, 2.07 g/cm³, relative to lactose monohydrate at 1.54 g/cm³ and microcrystalline cellulose at 1.56 g/cm³ creates segregation during vibratory transfer and bin discharge; granulation is recommended where uniformity must satisfy Ph. Eur. 2.9.40. When granulation is not possible, a preblend with a carrier of similar density, such as calcium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate at 2.31 g/cm³, reduces demixing.

    For aqueous injectable suspensions, SSV-325 is processed through a colloid mill with gap 100–150 µm followed by high-pressure homogenization at 1000–1500 bar in a vehicle containing 0.2% polysorbate 80 and 0.5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose. Finished suspensions show D90 ≤5 µm by laser diffraction using a wet dispersion unit. The zeta potential of this suspension is typically −35 mV to −25 mV, which is sufficient for electrostatic stabilisation. Terminal autoclaving at 121°C for 15 min does not alter particle size distribution beyond ±0.8 µm D90 when the headspace is purged with nitrogen. If oxygen is present, sulfate formation lowers pH by 0.3–0.7 units after 12 weeks at 40°C and shifts specification toward failure.

    When Sulfur Sublimat Replaces Precipitated Sulfur in a Registered Premix

    Substitution of precipitated sulfur with sublimed sulfur is not a simple particle-size exchange. Precipitated sulfur typically has a D50 below 10 µm and higher specific surface area, which accelerates oxidation to sulfate in moist aerobic storage. Sulfur sublimat is lower in water-soluble acidic species; a 10% w/w aqueous slurry of SSV-325 has pH 4.0–6.5, whereas unwashed precipitated grades can fall below 3.5. In a registered premix, changing to SSV-200 may reduce dust but also reduces the reactive surface area available for conversion to biologically active sulfur species. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, so any change should be supported by comparative dissolution or oxidation-rate testing under the target feed matrix conditions. The lower BET surface area of sublimed sulfur also reduces water sorption, which is beneficial when the premix includes hygroscopic molasses components.

    Colloidal sulfur and wettable sulfur products are not acceptable as direct replacements because they contain stabilizer and wetting agents that can alter tablet hardness, disintegration, and premix homogeneity. In addition, wettable sulfur often has particle size distributions designed for foliar retention rather than pharmacopoeial sieve endpoints. The veterinary API grade is not formulated as a dispersion; it is a raw material intended for downstream compounding under controlled conditions.

    Sulfur is incompatible with strong oxidizers including chlorates, nitrates, and permanganates; dry blending with these substances must be avoided because exothermic decomposition can initiate below 150°C. In premix operations, SSV-200 is preferred over SSV-325 to reduce dust generation. On a 100 kg ribbon mixer at 25 rpm for 15 min, a 5 wt% sulfur premix on limestone carrier produced a coefficient of variation <3% for sulfur content when sampled in 1 kg increments. SSV-325 under identical conditions gave CV <5% and visible headspace dust, requiring dust extraction airflow of 0.5–0.8 m/s at the charge port.

    Storage Boundaries and Cleaning Validation at High Humidity

    Storage should be maintained below 25°C and 60% relative humidity. At RH above 60%, moisture uptake on SSV-325 is below 0.5% w/w in 24 h, but surface adsorption can still promote caking in bulk bags. More critically, sulfur dust on equipment surfaces exposed to humid air forms weakly acidic films that can corrode mild steel; stainless steel 316L or higher is recommended for contact surfaces. Cleaning validation for sulfur residues is complicated by poor aqueous solubility. Residual sulfur on tablet press turrets can be removed with warm aqueous surfactant solutions only after mechanical vacuuming; swab recovery from 316L coupons using 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate in water averaged 70–85% for SSV-325 at spiked levels of 10–100 µg/cm². Solvent-based rinses with carbon disulfide are effective but require explosion-proof equipment and local exhaust ventilation.

    Dry powder transfer of SSV-325 should be conducted under nitrogen inerting where the dust concentration can exceed 30 g/m³. Conveying lines must be bonded and grounded, with flexible hoses specified for electrostatic dissipation below 10⁸ Ω. The explosion severity of sulfur dust is classified as St 1, but Kst can reach 150 bar·m/s under ISO 6184-1 test conditions; this is sufficient to require explosion venting or suppression in hammer mills, bin vents, and dust collectors.

    Top