| HS Code | 834045 |
| Product Name | Qingjian Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions |
| Product Type | Veterinary Grade Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient |
| Grade | Veterinary Grade |
| Dosage Forms | Tablets, Injections, Capsules, Powders, Granules, Premix, Solutions |
| Active Ingredient | Qingjian Powder |
| Appearance | Powder |
| Solubility | Refer to batch certificate of analysis |
| Purity | Batch-specific; certificate of analysis provided |
| Standard | Veterinary grade / in-house standard |
| Storage Conditions | Cool, dry, ventilated place; protect from light and moisture |
| Shelf Life | Typically 24 months when stored properly |
| Packaging | 25 kg fiber drum or bag; customizable packaging available |
| Application | Manufacturing of veterinary tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premix, and solutions |
| Target Species | Livestock, poultry, and companion animals |
| Origin | China |
| Moq | Negotiable |
| Lead Time | Negotiable |
| Certification | GMP / ISO available |
| Sample | Available |
| Hs Code | 29420000 |
As an accredited Qingjian Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Competitive Qingjian Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Qingjian Powder Veterinary Grade API is supplied as a crystalline or milled bulk active pharmaceutical ingredient intended for formulation into tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premixes, and solutions. The product is governed by a route-specific specification framework in which particle-size class, residual solvent profile, elemental impurity burden, and endotoxin load are fixed at the purchase-order stage. In the absence of a publicly disclosed monograph for the exact active moiety, release testing is mapped to USP general chapters, Ph. Eur. methods, and VICH guidance so that the powder can be integrated into veterinary dosage forms without re-qualification of primary reference standards. The manufacturer’s model code is best interpreted as a route-dependent grade identifier, not as a separate chemical entity. Purchase documentation should fix the model to D90, polymorphic form, and whether the batch is designated for parenteral or oral use.
The primary difference is not chemical identity but the analytical and physical specification envelope applied before release. General-purpose veterinary API powders are frequently sold with a single upper sieve cut, broad particle-size distribution, and no defined endotoxin or residual solvent option. Qingjian Powder Veterinary Grade API is controlled across multiple physical attributes that influence downstream unit operations, including laser-diffraction particle-size distribution under USP <429>, bulk and tapped density under USP <616>, and powder flow parameters relevant to rotary tablet presses and capsule tamping machines. A route-specific class with D90 below 20 µm may be assigned for injectable or solution applications, while a solid-oral class with D90 between 75 µm and 150 µm is typically selected for direct compression or dry granulation.
Unlike technical-grade material, the veterinary API grade is evaluated for elemental impurities according to USP <232> and USP <233> and for bacterial endotoxins according to USP <85> when the batch is allocated to injectable manufacture. Residual solvent control follows VICH GL18(R) options, with Class 1 solvents absent and Class 2 solvents limited to option-based concentrations. These controls reduce the burden on downstream formulation laboratories and permit a single active pharmaceutical ingredient source to serve multiple finished-product dosage forms without separate vendor qualification for each route.
For solid oral dosage forms, particle-size distribution directly affects blend homogeneity, segregation tendency, flow through hoppers, and die-fill consistency. The powder is characterized by D10, D50, and D90 values from laser diffraction rather than by sieve analysis alone. Bulk density, tapped density, Hausner ratio, and Carr index are measured according to USP <616>. A Hausner ratio above 1.35 indicates a cohesive powder that may require forced feeders, glidants, or roller compaction before tablet compression. Production-scale rotary tablet presses equipped with paddle feeders generally handle powders with a Hausner ratio below 1.25 more reliably at turret speeds above 30 rpm, although the acceptable range depends on die geometry and fill depth.
Blend uniformity during tablet and capsule manufacture is assessed using USP <905> uniformity of dosage units principles, while process validation batches may additionally use stratified sampling under FDA 21 CFR 211.110. A process target of not more than 5.0% relative standard deviation is commonly applied for potent veterinary actives, but this is a process capability target rather than a compendial acceptance limit. Milled powders with excessive fines below 5 µm can build up on punch faces and cause sticking or picking, whereas coarse fractions above 250 µm can produce content uniformity failures. The route-specific grade designation is therefore the main tool for preventing tableting and capsule-filling defects.
| Parameter | Test Method | Representative Release Framework |
|---|---|---|
| Assay | HPLC or UV with reference standard | 98.0–102.0% on dried basis |
| Related substances | HPLC area percent | Individual ≤0.5%, total ≤1.0% |
| Water content | USP <921> Karl Fischer | ≤2.0% unless otherwise justified |
| Particle-size D90 | USP <429> laser diffraction | ≤20 µm injectable; 75–150 µm solid oral |
| Bulk density | USP <616> | 0.35–0.65 g/cm³ |
| Tapped density | USP <616> | 0.50–0.80 g/cm³ |
| Residual solvents | VICH GL18(R) / USP <467> | Class 1 absent; Class 2 below option limits |
| Elemental impurities | USP <232> / USP <233> | Target animal PDE based |
| Bacterial endotoxins | USP <85> | <0.25 EU/mg for injectable grade |
| Sterility | USP <71> | Sterile only if labeled and processed as sterile |
The acceptance limits above are representative of a controlled multi-route veterinary API release framework. Batch-specific limits must be fixed against the approved veterinary product dossier and the target species monograph.
The injectable or solution route imposes additional controls beyond solid oral powder specifications. The powder must be dispersed or dissolved in a compatible aqueous or non-aqueous vehicle, typically Water for Injection for parenteral products. Dissolution kinetics are influenced by particle size, polymorphic form, and pH of the final vehicle. If terminal sterilization is not feasible, the solution is filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane, and the redundant bacterial endotoxin limit under USP <85> is applied. Prefiltration bioburden must be controlled under FDA 21 CFR 211.113, and filter compatibility with PVDF, PES, or nylon membranes must be demonstrated because the API may interact with membrane polymers or leachables.
The finished injectable solution is tested for particulate matter according to USP <788>. Large-volume parenterals must meet the light obscuration particle count limits of not more than 25 particles per mL at ≥10 µm and not more than 3 particles per mL at ≥25 µm. Small-volume parenterals are evaluated using the same method or microscopic assay when the filled volume is limited. For oral solutions, potable water or purified water may be used as the vehicle, but the pH and buffering capacity must be matched to the stability range of the active moiety. High-shear homogenization should be limited if cavitation produces fines that alter particle-size distribution after reconstitution.
Injectable processing lines typically use jacketed mixing vessels with overhead impellers, aseptic filtration skids, and blow-fill-seal or glass vial filling equipment. The powder should be added slowly to the vortex to reduce foaming and prevent stratification of fines. Dissolution and pH adjustment are monitored with in-line conductivity and pH probes before the sterile filtration step. Batch records must record the maximum holding time between dissolution and terminal sterilization or aseptic filtration to prevent microbial proliferation.
For tablet manufacture, the API is blended with diluents, disintegrants, and lubricants in tumbling blenders or high-shear mixers. Direct compression is possible when the particle-size class and bulk density are controlled, but low-dose formulations may require a pre-blend or geometric dilution step to achieve content uniformity. Wet granulation is used when the API is moisture tolerant and the powder has poor compaction properties. Roller compaction is preferred when the active moiety is sensitive to moisture or elevated temperature. Compression forces on a rotary tablet press are typically maintained between 8 kN and 20 kN for standard concave tooling, with precompression set at 3 kN to 8 kN to remove air and reduce capping. Tablet hardness and friability are monitored according to USP <1216> and USP <1216> related tablet friability methods.
Capsule filling uses tamping-pin, auger, or dosator equipment depending on powder flow and plug formation. Low-density powders may require densification or slugging before encapsulation to achieve consistent fill weight. Dissolution performance is evaluated using USP <711> with apparatus 2 or apparatus 1, depending on the finished dosage form and target species. For oral powders and granules, the API is mixed with palatable carriers, and sachet or bulk container fill weight is controlled. Granulation improves flowability and reduces dust generation during packaging. Premix manufacture involves blending the API onto a feed carrier such as corn cob or lactose in a ribbon blender or twin-screw mixer. The target carrier blend must demonstrate uniform distribution in medicated feed at the intended inclusion rate, and carryover into subsequent non-medicated batches is controlled through cleaning validation under FDA 21 CFR 211.67.
Residual solvent testing under VICH GL18(R) is mandatory for a multi-route veterinary API because the solvent load may affect oral, injectable, and feed-exposure routes differently. Class 1 solvents such as benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and 1,2-dichloroethane should be absent; Class 2 solvents such as methanol, acetonitrile, and dichloromethane are limited by option-based calculations derived from permitted daily exposure. The supplier’s release documentation should include the specific manufacturing solvent system so that the finished-product formulator can compute carryover into the final dosage form and demonstrate compliance with the relevant VICH limits.
Elemental impurities are controlled using USP <232> and USP <233> procedures, with limits set according to the target animal species and route of administration. Parenterals require lower elemental impurity burdens than oral powders or feed premixes, but the assigning of limits must follow the product dossier. Residual catalysts such as palladium or nickel from synthetic routes are the most common risk elements and should be included in the certificate of analysis. If the synthetic pathway is not disclosed, the manufacturer should provide a risk assessment statement supporting the elemental impurity testing program.
Operational boundaries apply throughout storage and handling. Bulk powder should be kept in sealed, light-resistant containers at or below 40% RH unless the moisture sorption isotherm indicates otherwise. Pre-drying may be required if the powder is exposed to relative humidity above 60% for extended periods, but compendial loss-on-drying data alone does not predict whether a hydrate or solvate transition will occur. Compatibility with amine-functional excipients, acidic buffers, and oxidizing agents must be evaluated by forced degradation because no assumption of inertness is part of the product specification. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; therefore, the formulator should require batch-specific certificate-of-analysis data, stability-indicating chromatograms, and particle-size distribution overlays before locking the manufacturing process.