| HS Code | 331965 |
| Productname | Picrotoxin (Cocculin) Veterinary Grade API |
| Chemicalsynonym | Cocculin; Picrotox; Coccunin |
| Casnumber | 124-87-8 |
| Molecularformula | C30H34O13 |
| Composition | Equimolar mixture of picrotoxinin (C15H16O6) and picrotin (C15H18O7) |
| Molecularweight | 602.58 g/mol |
| Physicalappearance | White crystalline powder or colorless crystals |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Taste | Intensely bitter |
| Meltingpoint | 203-205 °C (decomposes) |
| Solubility | Sparingly soluble in water; freely soluble in ethanol, ether, chloroform, benzene, and glacial acetic acid; soluble in dilute acids |
| Stability | Stable in air and dilute acid; hydrolyzed by strong alkalis; degraded by light and high temperatures |
| Pharmacologicalproperty | GABA-A receptor antagonist; central nervous system and respiratory stimulant; barbiturate antidote |
| Purityassay | 98.0% to 102.0% on dried basis |
As an accredited Picrotoxin (Cocculin) Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Picrotoxin (Cocculin) Veterinary Grade API packaged in sealed double-layer polyethylene bags inside fibre drums, 25 kg net weight. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | One 20′ FCL container loading of Picrotoxin veterinary-grade API, securely packed, palletized, and braced for safe transport. |
| Shipping | Picrotoxin (Cocculin) Veterinary Grade API ships in sealed, light-resistant containers with tamper-evident seals. Store away from moisture and heat. Ship via expedited courier, temperature-controlled, with hazard documentation and chain-of-custody tracking. Non-returnable once opened. Ensure regulatory compliance for veterinary active pharmaceutical ingredients prior to dispatch. |
| Storage | Store Picrotoxin (Cocculin) Veterinary Grade API in tightly sealed, light-resistant containers in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Protect from moisture, heat, and direct sunlight. Keep away from incompatible substances and food/feed. Ensure secure storage under proper regulatory controls, labeled for veterinary use only, and clearly identified as toxic. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf Life: 36 months from manufacture date when stored in sealed, original containers below 25°C, protected from light and moisture. |
In veterinary emergency practice, picrotoxin (Cocculin) veterinary grade API is incorporated into sterile injectable solutions for reversal of central nervous system depression associated with barbiturate or chloral hydrate intoxication in companion animals and horses. Picrotoxin is a mixture of picrotoxinin and picrotin; picrotoxinin is the pharmacologically active lactone, and ring-opening hydrolysis products are the principal degradants. Picrotoxin acts at the GABA-A receptor chloride-channel complex as a non-competitive antagonist; blockade of chloride ion influx increases neuronal excitability, so terminal injectable concentrations are maintained in the microgram-to-low-milligram per millilitre range based on the approved species-specific indication. The picrotoxinin lactone ring is unstable under alkaline conditions, therefore the aqueous vehicle is acidified to pH 3.5–5.5 with hydrochloric acid or citrate buffer, and a co-solvent system of dehydrated ethanol or propylene glycol is used to achieve a clear solution. Compounding is performed in a 316L stainless-steel jacketed vessel under nitrogen overlay. The solution is clarified through a 0.22 µm PVDF or polyethersulfone membrane and sterilized by aseptic filtration rather than terminal steam sterilization, because product-specific thermal stability data for picrotoxin injectables is limited. Filling is carried out in an isolator or restricted-access barrier system into amber Type I glass ampoules or vials with elastomeric closures and nitrogen headspace. Release testing includes sterility per USP <1>, bacterial endotoxins per USP <85>, subvisible particulate matter per USP <788>, visible particulates per USP <790>, and container closure integrity per USP <1207>. cGMP compliance is maintained under 21 CFR 211.94 and EU GMP Annex 1. In-use stability after first puncture is evaluated for any multi-dose configuration; single-dose vials are preferred because published preservative compatibility data for picrotoxin is limited.
The sterile filtration train for this injectable is typically arranged as a 0.45 µm prefilter followed by a 0.22 µm sterilizing-grade membrane, with filter integrity testing by bubble point or diffusive flow performed before and after filling. Elastomeric closures are selected from halobutyl or bromobutyl formulations with low gas permeability, and extractables/leachables studies are required because the ethanol or propylene glycol co-solvent system may increase organic release from closure materials. Environmental monitoring in the fill zone includes settle plates, contact plates, active air sampling, and continuous particle monitoring under EU GMP Annex 1 grade A conditions. Line clearance, weigh-room verification, and equipment cleaning logs are compiled under 21 CFR 211.67 and 21 CFR 211.110. The terminal product is labelled for emergency veterinary use with storage at controlled room temperature and protection from light.
Low-dose oral tablets containing picrotoxin for canine, feline, or equine analeptic therapy are manufactured by dry granulation after serial geometric dilution because direct compression of API at microgram per tablet levels produces content uniformity failures. Picrotoxin is triturated with lactose monohydrate or microcrystalline cellulose in staged 1:10 or 1:100 dilutions, then blended with the remainder of the diluent in a bin blender. Magnesium stearate is used at 0.25–0.75% w/w as a lubricant, with total mixing time monitored to avoid overlubrication that would alter dissolution. The pre-blend is passed through a 500 µm screen before roller compaction; the roller compactor is fitted with a 0.8–1.2 mm granulator screen, and granule moisture is kept below 2.0% to reduce lactone hydrolysis. Compression is performed on a rotary tablet press with automatic weight control and force monitoring; tablet hardness and friability are controlled because the narrow therapeutic index makes dissolution variability a critical quality attribute. In-process testing includes content uniformity per USP <905>, disintegration per USP <701>, and dissolution per USP <711> where the approved specification requires. Dissolution testing, if specified, is performed in 0.1 N hydrochloric acid at 37 °C with paddle speed 50 rpm, although published data for this specific picrotoxin tablet configuration is limited. Final tablets are dedusted, metal-checked, and packaged in amber glass bottles with child-resistant closures. Sampling and in-process controls follow 21 CFR 211.110.
The tablet container closure system is amber glass with an induction-sealed liner, and stability studies are conducted at 25 °C/60% RH and 40 °C/75% RH according to ICH Q1A and VICH GL3. Batch-to-batch variance in tablet potency is controlled by pre-blend assay and weight adjustment before compression. The rotary press is operated at a speed that avoids powder segregation in the hopper, and paddle feeder speed is matched to die fill depth to maintain tablet mass uniformity. If content uniformity acceptance value exceeds the USP <905> limit, the batch is diverted for rejection or rework according to the approved standard operating procedure. The final tablets are subject to organic impurity profiling, and any untested hydrolytic degradant above the qualified threshold is treated as a product-quality failure.
In hospital compounding settings, hard gelatin or hypromellose capsules containing picrotoxin are prepared for individual veterinary patients when the prescribed dose cannot be met with commercially available tablet strengths. The capsule fill is prepared from a picrotoxin trituration in lactose monohydrate with 0.5% colloidal silicon dioxide to improve powder flow into a semi-automatic capsule filling machine. Filling is performed inside a negative-pressure glove box or isolator with HEPA-filtered exhaust because picrotoxin is a potent toxicant and dust exposure must be controlled. Content uniformity is tested per USP <905>; dissolution testing per USP <711> is applied only when the compounded preparation is validated for release, typically in dilute acidic medium because of the lactone stability profile. Compounding documentation includes master formulation records, geometric dilution steps, and weigh tickets; the beyond-use date is assigned using applicable pharmacy compounding standards such as USP <795> when adopted. Finished capsules are unit-dose packaged in amber blisters or glass vials to reduce handling exposure and cross-contamination risk. Storage is specified at controlled room temperature with desiccant because moisture ingress accelerates hydrolytic degradation.
When powder or granule presentations are required for oral suspension reconstitution or unit-dose sachets, picrotoxin is handled as a contained intermediate rather than as an in-feed additive because the high toxicity and narrow therapeutic index make undifferentiated feed inclusion incompatible with safe veterinary practice. Particle size reduction is performed by air-jet milling or controlled pin milling under inert conditions to a target D90 below 20 µm where dissolution or content uniformity requirements demand micronization. Particle size distribution is measured by laser diffraction or analytical sieving per USP <786>. Aqueous wet granulation is generally avoided because the picrotoxinin lactone ring hydrolyzes under prolonged moist-heat or alkaline conditions; non-aqueous granulation with isopropyl alcohol or dry roller compaction is preferred. For oral suspension powders, the suspending vehicle may include xanthan gum or microcrystalline cellulose/carboxymethylcellulose sodium dispersed in an acidic medium at pH 4.0–5.5 to maintain chemical stability and reduce sedimentation. Because picrotoxin has a different particle size and density from common diluents, segregation may occur after blending; therefore the powder is filled into sachets immediately after blending without extended hold times. Electrostatic charging is controlled by maintaining relative humidity at 40–60% in the filling suite, because lower humidity increases static adhesion of API to contact surfaces and can reduce assay recovery. Residual solvents are controlled under ICH Q3C and VICH GL18. The finished powder or granules are sealed in aluminium foil sachets with desiccant; moisture ingress above the specification limit accelerates degradation. Granule flow properties are evaluated by angle of repose and bulk/tapped density measurements, with acceptance limits tied to downstream tableting or capsule filling equipment.
Deagglomeration after milling is completed with a comill fitted with a screen size matched to the target granule fraction. If the powder is intended for reconstituted suspension, a preservative system is selected only after preservative efficacy testing per USP <51> demonstrates compatibility with picrotoxin and the suspending vehicle. Sachet filling is performed on vertical form-fill-seal equipment with product-contact surfaces of electropolished stainless steel or disposable film. In-process fill weight is checked at fixed intervals, and seal integrity is verified by dye-penetration or vacuum decay. Dedicated stainless-steel contact parts and disposable containment liners are used for these powder operations, and industrial hygiene monitoring for picrotoxin in air is performed after each campaign. The terminal sachet or granule intermediate is labelled for reconstitution with the specified acidic vehicle and is not suitable for direct feed addition.
As a contained intermediate, picrotoxin premix is designed to distribute the API into downstream tablet or capsule blends without requiring open handling of pure picrotoxin. Premix concentrations are typically prepared at 0.1–1.0% w/w using lactose monohydrate or dibasic calcium phosphate as the carrier. Mixing is performed in a bin blender or drum mixer fitted with containment valves, and the premix is discharged under split-valve transfer into intermediate bulk containers. Thief sampling at 10 or more validated locations is used to assess API homogeneity; acceptance is generally set at an assay mean of 90.0–110.0% of label with RSD not more than 5.0%, depending on the approved protocol. Because no widely published permitted daily exposure limit exists for picrotoxin, cleaning validation uses a health-based carry-over calculation developed from the known pharmacological threshold and an uncertainty factor; dedicated or campaign equipment is preferred to avoid cross-contact. Compliance is maintained under 21 CFR 211.67, 21 CFR 211.110, and ICH Q7 for intermediate handling, with analytical release per USP <905> or the equivalent internal monograph. Split-valve transfer with alpha-beta ports is used when moving premix from the blender to downstream charging stations, and containment performance is verified by industrial hygiene monitoring for picrotoxin in air. The premix is packaged in double polyethylene liners inside fibre drums with tamper-evident seals and labelled as an intermediate for further manufacture, not for direct administration.
Process analytical technology may be applied using near-infrared spectroscopy to verify premix homogeneity in real time; if NIR is used, the calibration set includes laboratory-prepared homogeneous and segregated samples. The premix bulk hold time is justified by stability data, because extended hold can lead to API migration to the container wall or carrier particle surfaces. For equipment cleaning, the analytical method is validated for low-level picrotoxin detection in rinse and swab samples, with recovery factors not less than 70% where the method is quantitative. Dirty hold time and clean hold time are established according to the site master cleaning validation plan. The premix is released only after assay, homogeneity, and moisture testing meet the internal specification, and the batch record includes a reconciliation of all toxic intermediate containers.
For non-sterile oral solutions of picrotoxin, the vehicle is prepared in an ethanol/propylene glycol/water system with pH adjusted to 3.5–5.0 to preserve lactone integrity. Dissolution is completed in a closed vessel with top-mounted agitator; the vessel is charged first with ethanol or propylene glycol, then the API is added under continuous agitation until visual clarity. The pH is adjusted with dilute hydrochloric acid after the API has dissolved, and the final volume is adjusted with purified water. The solution is transferred through a 5 µm polypropylene clarifying filter to the filling tank, then filled by peristaltic pump with inline check valves to reduce dose volume variability. The finished product is packaged in amber glass bottles with tamper-evident child-resistant closures and a calibrated dropper or oral syringe capable of delivering small incremental volumes. Because the API is extremely bitter, flavoring is generally omitted to avoid unpredictable interaction; the calibrated delivery device is the primary dosing control. Stability monitoring includes pH, assay, and related substances at 25 °C/60% RH and 40 °C/75% RH according to ICH Q1A/VICH GL3. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, so bracketing and matrixing protocols are used only after pilot stability studies.
The closed dissolution vessel is equipped with pH and temperature probes, and pH is measured at 25 °C after temperature correction. Oxygen-sensitive degradation is addressed by nitrogen sparging during dissolution and headspace flushing at filling. The dropper assembly is qualified for delivered dose uniformity by repeated weight measurement, with acceptance based on the approved dosing chart increments. The terminal oral solution is labelled as a veterinary critical-care product with a warning that dosing must be based on body weight and clinical response, and that the product is not suitable for feed dilution because of the narrow therapeutic index.
| Dosage form | Release or in-process test | Standard or guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Injectable solution | Sterility, bacterial endotoxins, particulate matter, container closure integrity | USP <1>, USP <85>, USP <788>, USP <790>, USP <1207> |
| Tablet | Uniformity of dosage units, disintegration, dissolution | USP <905>, USP <701>, USP <711> |
| Capsule | Uniformity of dosage units, dissolution | USP <905>, USP <711> |
| Powder/granule | Particle size distribution, residual solvents, moisture | USP <786>, ICH Q3C, VICH GL18 |
| Premix | Homogeneity, assay | 21 CFR 211.110, USP <905> |
| Oral solution | pH, assay, related substances, stability | ICH Q1A, VICH GL3 |
Competitive Picrotoxin (Cocculin) Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618963613625 or mail to sales10@ascent-petrochem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8618963613625
Email: sales10@ascent-petrochem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Picrotoxin (Cocculin) Veterinary Grade API is a plant-derived non-competitive GABAA receptor chloride-channel antagonist supplied as a white or almost white crystalline powder. The substance consists of picrotoxinin and picrotin in an approximately 1:1 molecular ratio, with the synonym cocculin and Chemical Abstracts Service registry number 124-87-8. The molecular formula C₃₀H₃₄O₁₃ corresponds to a relative molecular mass of 602.58 g/mol. The API is specified for compounding into tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premix, and solutions. Because picrotoxinin is the more pharmacologically active component in the chloride-channel block, the picrotoxinin-to-picrotin ratio is a relevant purity marker in batch release. The model designation of this veterinary grade is supplier-specific and not harmonized across pharmacopoeias; purchasing documents should therefore align the synonym, CAS registry number, dosage-form intent, and batch certificate of analysis. The material is released as a starting material under ICH Q7 and applicable veterinary GMP provisions. Where a current pharmacopoeial monograph is absent, the supplier’s registered specification defines identity, assay, water content, residual solvents, and related-substance limits. The powder is not supplied as a sterile API; sterility is achieved at the finished-product stage. Storage at 15–25 °C in airtight, light-resistant containers is the standard requirement. The source material is obtained from Anamirta cocculus seed, and the intensely bitter taste of the API often necessitates taste-masking or carrier adsorption in oral granules, premixes, and chewable tablets.
Because picrotoxin is potent and commonly incorporated at low mass fractions, content uniformity in tablets, capsules, powders, granules, and premixes is governed primarily by particle-size distribution and ordered mixing rather than by simple bulk dilution. The API is typically screened through a 150 µm aperture sieve before geometric pre-blending with lactose monohydrate, dicalcium phosphate dihydrate, or a similar diluent. For direct compression of sub-1 mg unit-dose tablets or capsules, jet milling to a median particle size below 20 µm may be required to reduce segregation and improve distribution across the blend. Published picrotoxin-specific particle-size and blend-uniformity data remain limited; manufacturers therefore establish acceptance criteria through blending studies and finished-product testing using Ph. Eur. 2.9.40 or USP <905>. An acceptance value above 15.0 triggers investigation of sieve residue, blender fill level, mixing time, sampling thief location, and analytical recovery from the sample matrix. Low-dose capsule filling on automatic tamping machines requires adequate powder flow; hydrophobic API particles may be dry-coated with 0.1%–0.5% w/w colloidal silicon dioxide before final blending. Tablet lubrication with 0.5%–1.0% w/w magnesium stearate is typical, but over-lubrication can delay disintegration and should be controlled through compression force and ejection force monitoring. Granular and premix forms require a two-step dilution sequence, with the active pre-blend first dispersed into a small carrier fraction and then layered into the full carrier bed. Blend sampling at multiple positions is necessary because low-dose APIs with high electrostatic charge can adhere to the walls of V-blenders, bin blenders, or ribbon mixers and later release as superpotent pockets.
In parenteral compounding, the narrow solubility envelope of picrotoxin constrains vehicle design and terminal sterilization route. The API is sparingly soluble in cold water; solution manufacture usually requires a co-solvent system containing ethanol, propylene glycol, or a macrogol, with gentle heating to 40–50 °C in a closed, light-shielded vessel under continuous stirring. Published solubility data for veterinary-specific picrotoxin co-solvent ratios are limited, so the formulator should confirm maximum achievable concentration, pH drift, filter compatibility, and subvisible particle formation before scale-up. Buffering should avoid strongly alkaline conditions; degradation is pH- and temperature-sensitive, and prolonged holding above 60 °C is generally undesirable. For injections, membrane filtration through 0.22 µm polyvinylidene fluoride or polyethersulfone filters is used before aseptic filling in ISO 14644-1 Grade A/ISO 5 conditions. Terminal steam sterilization is acceptable only when product-specific thermal exposure data support it; otherwise, aseptic processing is required. The finished parenteral solution should be filled into amber Type I glass vials and protected from light throughout storage. If the product is formulated as a concentrated solution for dilution, the formulator must verify physical stability after dilution in the intended vehicle because precipitation at the point of administration is a critical failure mode.
Picrotoxin is not a direct substitute for all GABAA antagonists because the binding site and kinetic profile differ. It blocks the GABAA receptor chloride-channel pore in a non-competitive manner, whereas bicuculline acts as a competitive antagonist at the GABA recognition site. Flumazenil occupies the benzodiazepine binding site and does not share the same broad convulsant potential. These mechanistic distinctions create practical constraints: picrotoxin generally requires lower mass-based dosage units and more aggressive particle-size control in solid forms, while flumazenil is available with established parenteral formulation routes. The comparative profile is used during formulation screening:
| Active substance | Receptor interaction | Primary compounding challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Picrotoxin (Cocculin) | Non-competitive block of GABAA chloride-channel pore | Low aqueous solubility; narrow safety margin; low-dose blend uniformity |
| Bicuculline | Competitive antagonist at GABA recognition site | Light sensitivity; high lipophilicity; non-aqueous vehicle often required |
| Flumazenil | Competitive benzodiazepine-site antagonist | Selective action; established parenteral formulation pathway |
| Pentylenetetrazol | GABAA channel modulation with convulsant activity | Different potency and stability profile; comparator data required before substitution |
The substitution of picrotoxin into a formulation designed for another analeptic should be preceded by compatibility screening for pH, buffer salts, antioxidants, headspace oxygen, and light exposure. Because picrotoxin has a narrow therapeutic index in published pharmacological literature, the final dose strength must be confirmed by validated analytical recovery and content-uniformity testing rather than volumetric conversion alone. Differences in assay response between the API and alternative actives also require a dedicated HPLC or spectrophotometric method rather than a general chromatographic method transfer.
Granulation of picrotoxin-containing powders requires low-moisture binders and controlled endpoint detection. Wet granulation with aqueous binder solutions can produce hard agglomerates and uneven active distribution if the API is partially solubilized during binder addition and migrates to the granule surface during drying. Hydroalcoholic binders or pre-dissolved polyvinylpyrrolidone in ethanol/water mixtures are used to limit active migration. In fluid-bed drying, inlet air temperature is commonly maintained at 45–55 °C, and residual moisture is controlled at ≤ 2.0% w/w by loss-on-drying to reduce the risk of granule hardening and subsequent tablet or capsule weight variation. For premixes, the active pre-blend is diluted into a feed carrier such as lactose, corn starch, or maltodextrin in a ribbon blender or paddle mixer; unit-dose sampling at multiple positions is required to verify additive layering. If the granules are intended for sachet or premix application, sieve retention above 850 µm should be minimised except where the target species requires larger carrier particles. Dry granulation by roller compaction may be preferred when moisture-sensitive excipients or pH modifiers are present; compact mill speed and screen size are adjusted to reproduce the target granule particle-size distribution. Published picrotoxin-specific granulation data are limited; therefore, pilot-batch feasibility studies are mandatory before scale-up to production equipment.
Quality release of veterinary grade picrotoxin for sterile and non-sterile dosage forms is governed by the intersection of API GMP, pharmacopoeial monographs where available, and the finished-product marketing authorization. Typical release attributes are summarised below:
| Attribute | Method / standard designation | Representative release criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Visual inspection | White or almost white crystalline powder |
| Identification | Infrared spectrophotometry / TLC with reference standard | Concordant with reference spectrum or spots |
| Assay on dried basis | HPLC or titration | 98.0%–101.0% w/w |
| Loss on drying | Halogen moisture analyser | ≤ 0.5% w/w |
| Residue on ignition | Sulphated ash | ≤ 0.1% w/w |
| Residual solvents | Ph. Eur. 5.4 / USP <467> | Per monograph options |
| Microbial limits | Ph. Eur. 5.1.4 / USP <61> / USP <62> | Per non-sterile acceptance criteria |
| Bacterial endotoxins, if parenteral use | Ph. Eur. 2.6.14 / USP <85> | Defined by finished-product risk assessment |
Each batch must be accompanied by a certificate of analysis that records actual values, analytical method references, retest date, and authorized signature. If the API is intended for parenteral compounding, additional endotoxin and sterility-supporting data are generated through the finished-product process; the API itself is not generally labelled sterile. The analytical release should not be considered complete without a documented comparison against the registered specification and a stability-indicating method for picrotoxinin and picrotin ratio.
Material reception and sampling procedures follow 21 CFR 211 subpart E and ICH Q7 chapter 7. Operators should wear nitrile gloves and use dust-control procedures because picrotoxin is a potent pharmacologically active substance. Weighing and dispensing are conducted in a downflow booth or containment isolator with face velocity per facility environmental monitoring. Sampling integrity is maintained by using stitched wands or thief samplers, and reserve samples are retained in sealed amber glass containers for the retention period defined by the license. If a mismatch in appearance, odour, or moisture clumping is observed, the batch should be quarantined pending investigation. The API should not be exposed to strong oxidizing agents or to prolonged alkaline conditions. Cleaning validation for non-dedicated equipment is required because trace residues can become airborne during dry blending and may contaminate subsequent batches. Waste and rinsates are handled according to local pharmaceutical waste regulations.