| HS Code | 303741 |
| Product Name | Mubing Xiaohuang Powder |
| Product Type | Veterinary Grade API |
| Grade | Veterinary Grade |
| Physical Form | Powder |
| Dosage Forms | Tablets, Injections, Capsules, Powders, Granules, Premix, Solutions |
| Application | Veterinary pharmaceutical manufacturing |
| Target Species | Veterinary animals |
| Administration Route | As per final dosage form |
| Appearance | Powder |
| Storage Conditions | Cool, dry, protected from light |
As an accredited Mubing Xiaohuang Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Mubing Xiaohuang Powder Veterinary Grade API is supplied in 25 kg net fiber drums with double polyethylene liners, securely sealed. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL loaded with securely sealed, moisture-proof drums/pallets of Mubing Xiaohuang Powder Veterinary Grade API, optimized for safe export transport. |
| Shipping | Shipped in sealed, moisture-barrier drums or foil-lined bags, clearly labeled veterinary API. Transport dry, away from sunlight, heat, and moisture, at ambient temperature unless otherwise specified. Follow IATA/IMDG/ADR and local regulations. Include SDS, COA, and batch documents. Keep containers closed. Handle per SDS; not for human use. |
| Storage | Store Mubing Xiaohuang Powder Veterinary Grade API in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, protected from direct sunlight, moisture, and heat. Keep original containers tightly closed, clearly labeled, and away from incompatible substances, food, and feed. Maintain stable temperature and humidity; follow shelf-life and approved storage conditions. Keep out of reach of children and animals. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life is generally 24 months when stored sealed, protected from light and moisture, in a cool, dry place. |
In veterinary oral solid lines, Mubing Xiaohuang Powder is comminuted and classified before direct compression or granulation to prevent segregation across rotary press hoppers. The as-received powder may exhibit wide particle size distribution, so milling through a FitzMill-type hammer mill fitted with a 0.8 mm rasping screen and subsequent blending in a 500 L bin blender at 60% nominal fill are routine operational points. When the API fraction exceeds 20% w/w and the Hausner ratio rises above 1.35, direct compression risk shifts toward capping and weight variation failures; the corrective sequence is dry granulation by roller compaction at 18–25 kN roll force or aqueous wet granulation if the moisture limit of 5.0% loss on drying can be maintained. Lubrication uses 0.5–1.0% w/w magnesium stearate screened through a 0.5 mm mesh, with blending time capped at 5 min because hydrophobic film formation reduces tablet tensile strength. Tablets for cattle and sheep are compressed on 45-station rotary presses with precompression at 8–12 kN and main compression at 15–25 kN for large veterinary boluses, while poultry tablets may fall below 1 g target weight and require 10–15 kN main compression. Release testing follows current CVP 0101 tablet general chapter for hardness, friability, and disintegration, with weight uniformity aligned to USP <905>; friability is evaluated under USP <1216> using 100 revolutions and a 1.0% maximum loss boundary. Disintegration in 37 °C water should occur within 30 min for immediate-release veterinary boluses, although published product-specific dissolution data for this configuration is limited and should be generated during pilot registration batches.
Injectable route development with Mubing Xiaohuang Powder begins with particulate burden profiling rather than assay alone. Multi-constituent powders contain insoluble cell-wall fragments, mineral ash, and colloidal polysaccharides that can blind sterilizing-grade membranes; therefore a 0.45 μm polyethersulfone prefilter followed by a 0.22 μm sterilizing-grade filter is the minimum serial configuration. Filterability ratio should remain below 1.2 across a 50 L batch; ratios above 1.5 indicate blinding and require depth filtration or centrifugal clarification. Aqueous injectable vehicles may be pH-adjusted with citric acid or phosphate buffers to 4.5–6.5, but pH below 3.5 increases intramuscular pain and pH above 7.0 accelerates oxidative degradation of phenolic constituents. Co-solvent addition of propylene glycol is permitted up to 30% v/v for large-animal parenterals only after tissue tolerance studies because increasing viscosity to 15–25 cP affects syringeability through 16-gauge needles. Terminal sterilization at 121 °C for 15 min is acceptable only if forced-degradation data show no marker loss greater than 10%; otherwise aseptic filtration and container closure integrity under 21 CFR 211.113 are required. Endotoxin screening follows USP <85>, sterility follows USP <71> and CVP 0102, and particulate matter follows USP <788> for small-volume parenterals. Published product-specific injectable compatibility data for this exact powder in commercial parenteral vehicles is limited, so each vehicle must be screened by short-term forced degradation before pilot manufacture.
Medicated premix production with Mubing Xiaohuang Powder requires a loading sequence that restricts dusting and segregation before the active is diluted into Type B feed. The API is pre-blended with a compatible carrier such as ground corn or rice hulls in a 1:9 geometric dilution before entering a double-ribbon mixer. Mixer fill level is held between 30% and 70% of gross capacity; fill below 30% creates dead zones above the ribbon shaft, while fill above 70% reduces particle mobility and extends mixing time without improving uniformity. Sampling for assay uniformity uses 10 thief probes drawn at 3 depth points after 10–20 min mixing, and the coefficient of variation for the API marker should be ≤5.0% in a validated medicated premix line. Carryover into a subsequent non-medicated batch is controlled through cleaning validation under 21 CFR 211.67; where marker-specific limits are not established, a default residue limit of 1.0% of the lowest labeled active concentration in the next feed is screened by rinse sampling. Dust collection uses cartridge filters with reverse-pulse jet cleaning to prevent cross-batch contamination of the API powder, and operators handling the powder use negative-air booths because the multi-constituent powder produces respirable dust below 10 μm aerodynamic diameter. In tests of a 600 L ribbon mixer with 200 kg batch weight, assay CV values between 3.0% and 5.0% are often achievable when the API is pre-sieved through a 500 μm mesh; however, published batch-specific data for this exact powder in commercial medicated feed mills is limited.
| Mixer type | Working fill boundary | Common assay CV acceptance | Cleaning verification point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double-ribbon mixer | 30–70% of gross volume | ≤ 5.0% | Shaft ends and discharge gate |
| Paddle mixer | 20–50% of gross volume | ≤ 10% for medicated micro-ingredients | Dead spots below paddle hub |
| Double-cone blender | 40–60% of gross volume | ≤ 7.0% | Discharge valve and manway flange |
For companion animal capsule lines using dosator powder fillers, the tapped density and particle shape of Mubing Xiaohuang Powder determine whether auger filling is stable. Multi-constituent powders with high fiber content often show bulk density below 0.45 g/cm³; the powder should be densified by slugging or roller compaction to approach 0.6–0.8 g/cm³ before capsule filling on a 150,000 capsules/h tamping-pin machine. The addition of 0.2–0.5% w/w colloidal silicon dioxide and 0.5% w/w sodium stearyl fumarate reduces electrostatic adhesion to the dosing disc and lowers weight variation to ≤3.0% for size #1 gelatin capsules. Capsule shells are equilibrated to 12–16% moisture, and the filled powder loss on drying is kept below 6.0% to prevent shell cracking in low-humidity packrooms. Dissolution testing uses USP <711> apparatus 2 at 50 rpm in 900 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid or phosphate buffer at 37 °C, with sampling at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min; if the powder contains poorly wettable constituents, 0.1–0.3% w/w sodium lauryl sulfate may be added to the dissolution medium following method validation. Weight uniformity follows USP <905>, and content uniformity for low-dose capsules requires 10 dosage units with an acceptance value ≤15. Because capsule filling generates heat and fines, the filling room is held at 18–25 °C and 40–50% relative humidity to avoid softening of gelatin at the dosing station.
When stock solutions are prepared from the powder in drinking water systems, the first analytical checkpoint is resuspendability rather than solubility. The powder may contain insoluble fiber and mineral fractions that settle within 30 min in a 100 mL graduated cylinder; if sediment volume exceeds 2.0% after 1 h, the drinking water system requires continuous recirculation or a suspension tank with an agitator operating at 60–120 rpm. Water line filters of 100 μm mesh are installed upstream of nipple drinkers to prevent clogging of poultry and swine watering lines. Acidification with citric acid to pH 3.5–5.5 reduces microbial growth and chlorine demand but may protonate phenolic constituents and increase precipitation; hard water above 200 mg/L calcium carbonate equivalent should be softened or chelated before stock solution preparation. Dosage pumps with peristaltic silicone tubing are preferred over solenoid diaphragm pumps because abrasive particles below 50 μm cause tubing wear and flow drift. Stock solution stability is verified over 24 h at 25 °C; if marker assay loss exceeds 10%, the use period is shortened to 6 h or the solution is prepared twice daily. Inclusion of 0.01% w/w sodium metabisulfite may control oxidation, but only after compatibility testing because sulfite can react with aldehyde-functional constituents. Published product-specific drinking water stability data for this exact powder formulation is limited; farm-scale trials with sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h from the farthest drinker are required before multi-barn use.
Following aqueous wet granulation in a bottom-drive high-shear mixer equipped with a 10 L or 600 L bowl, the powder is agglomerated with purified water or 5–10% w/w starch paste added at 3–5 g/min/kg powder weight. Impeller speed is ramped from 100–150 rpm to 200–300 rpm with the chopper engaged at 1,500 rpm for 1–3 min; endpoint is determined by wet-mass consistency rather than fixed time, with overgranulation producing dense granules that resist disintegration. The wet mass is screened through a 2.0 mm sieve and dried in a fluid-bed dryer with inlet air at 55–65 °C until loss on drying is ≤5.0%. Drying temperatures above 70 °C should be avoided because multi-constituent powders may undergo thermal degradation of marker compounds. Dried granules are sized through a 1.0 mm oscillating granulator, and fines below 75 μm are limited to 20% w/w to maintain flow. Final granule bulk density is measured by USP <616>, and granule quality follows CVP 0104. Granules are filled into aluminum foil-lined bags with moisture permeability below 0.1 g/m²/day; the headspace oxygen is kept below 1.0% if oxidative markers are present. Dispersion testing follows CVP 0104 for granules and USP <711> when the granule is encapsulated. Batch records record inlet air temperature, outlet air temperature, and granule moisture at 15-min intervals. Published product-specific granulation trajectories for this exact powder are limited, so pilot-scale trials should establish the water addition endpoint via mixer power draw and loss-on-drying rather than transferring a fixed formula.
In drench formulations, the critical failure modes are sedimentation, preservative partitioning, and pH drift during long-term storage. Mubing Xiaohuang Powder is dispersed in a buffered aqueous vehicle containing 0.5–2.0% w/w sodium carboxymethylcellulose or 0.1–0.3% w/w xanthan gum to maintain a yield stress above 10 Pa; sedimentation rate is measured in a 100 mL graduate over 72 h and should remain below 5.0% clear supernatant. Preservative selection is constrained by pH because sodium benzoate is active only below pH 5.0, while potassium sorbate may degrade above pH 6.5; formulations buffered with citrate at pH 4.5–5.5 use 0.1% w/w sodium benzoate and 0.1% w/w potassium sorbate with a preservative efficacy test following USP <51>. Drench solutions for cattle, sheep, and goats are administered through oral dosing guns with nozzle diameter 4–8 mm, so viscosity is controlled between 20–60 cP at 25 °C to avoid operator fatigue while preventing immediate sedimentation. Polyethylene terephthalate or high-density polyethylene bottles with induction-sealed closures are used; oxygen permeability below 0.5 cm³/m²/day is preferred for multi-dose containers. If microbial challenge shows a 3-log reduction for bacteria within 14 days and a 1-log reduction for fungi within 28 days, the preserved system meets veterinary oral liquid criteria; if not, the headspace is nitrogen-flushed or the formulation is repackaged as single-dose sachets. Published compatibility data for this specific powder with veterinary drench preservative systems is limited, so antimicrobial effectiveness testing must be repeated on the commercial-scale batch.
Competitive Mubing Xiaohuang Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618963613625 or mail to sales10@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8618963613625
Email: sales10@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Mubing Xiaohuang Powder Veterinary Grade API is a botanical multi-component powder manufactured for further pharmaceutical processing into tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premixes, and solutions. The product is not a finished dosage form and is not dispensed directly to animals without additional manufacturing control. Its model designation is manufacturer-specific and normally appears as a lot-coded suffix after the product name; no international pharmacopoeial model code is assigned. Manufacturers may differentiate subgrades by intended downstream processing, for example a micronized grade with D90 ≤ 150 µm for capsule filling or injection extraction, and a coarser grade with D90 ≤ 250 µm for premix and granulation. The material is distinguished from feed-grade powders by the application of veterinary API quality criteria, including elemental impurity testing, microbial limits, chromatographic fingerprinting, and particle-size documentation. Published data for this specific named powder are limited, so the specification boundaries given below are drawn from pharmacopoeial and equipment-based criteria commonly applied to botanical veterinary APIs.
Because the material is not a single-entity synthetic molecule, assay values cannot be normalised by a fixed molecular weight or salt factor. The certificate of analysis should therefore include botanical identification, marker compound content by high-performance liquid chromatography, loss on drying, total ash, acid-insoluble ash, residual solvents where applicable, elemental impurities, and microbial enumeration. When a lot is intended for injection extraction, bacterial endotoxin testing per USP <85> or Ph. Eur. 2.6.14 is also required on the extracted intermediate rather than on the raw powder alone. The raw powder should be qualified against the intended dosage form because its native plant matrix contributes insoluble cellulosic fragments, hygroscopic constituents, and batch-to-batch marker variability.
Veterinary API grade is differentiated from feed-grade powder primarily by contaminant control and pharmaceutical documentation. Feed-grade material may be milled without the same foreign matter, mycotoxin, or microbial limits, and its particle-size range is often broader. The following table reflects general acceptance boundaries applied to botanical veterinary APIs under the cited standards. The manufacturer’s certificate of analysis remains normative for each individual lot.
| Parameter | Test method / standard | Acceptance boundary for botanical veterinary API |
|---|---|---|
| Identification | HPLC fingerprint against qualified botanical reference material | Marker compound retention time match within ±2.5% |
| Loss on drying | USP <731> / Ph. Eur. 2.2.32 | ≤ 5.0% |
| Total ash | USP <561> / Ph. Eur. 2.4.16 | ≤ 10.0% |
| Acid-insoluble ash | USP <561> / Ph. Eur. 2.4.16 | ≤ 2.0% |
| Lead | ICP-MS, USP <233> | ≤ 5 mg/kg |
| Cadmium | ICP-MS, USP <233> | ≤ 1 mg/kg |
| Arsenic | ICP-MS, USP <233> | ≤ 2 mg/kg |
| Total aerobic microbial count | USP <2021> / Ph. Eur. 2.6.12 | ≤ 103 CFU/g |
| Total yeast and mould count | USP <2021> / Ph. Eur. 2.6.12 | ≤ 102 CFU/g |
| Escherichia coli | ISO 16649-2:2018 | Absent in 1 g |
| Salmonella | ISO 6579-1:2017 | Absent in 25 g |
These boundaries are not universal for all botanical species. Regional monographs or manufacturer specifications may tighten elemental impurity limits when the powder is used in long-duration food-producing species. For injection-ready extracts, particulate matter should be confirmed by USP <788> or Ph. Eur. 2.9.19, and the extraction process must remove intact plant cells that can clog sterilising-grade filters.
In tablet manufacturing, the raw powder is rarely suitable for direct compression. Flowability data usually show cohesive behaviour when moisture content exceeds 5.0%, and plant-derived powders with bulk densities below 0.50 g/mL tend to require wet granulation or roll compaction. A typical wet granulation sequence uses a high-shear mixer with impeller tip speed between 1.0 m/s and 2.5 m/s and a binder such as povidone K30 at 2% to 5% wet mass. Drying in a fluid-bed dryer with inlet air temperature between 50°C and 60°C is common for botanical granulations; higher temperatures may discolour the granulate and reduce marker compound recovery. Tablet hardness is formulation-dependent, but a target of 50 N to 100 N has been used for botanical tablets to balance friability below 1.0% and disintegration below 15 min. The use of magnesium stearate above 1.0% can delay disintegration because of hydrophobic film formation on botanical particles. For capsules, particle-size reduction to a D90 of 150 µm or lower supports blend uniformity and reduces segregation. A low-shear tumble blender may require blending times of 10 min to 20 min, but the endpoint should be confirmed by uniformity of dosage units per USP <905>. Botanical powders can segregate when the particle-size ratio between active powder and filler exceeds 1:3; this is controlled by matching carrier particle size or by granulating the powder before encapsulation. In powders and granules, moisture control is critical because botanical powders may absorb moisture at relative humidity above 60%, causing caking and loss of blend uniformity. Silica-based carriers or microcrystalline cellulose at 10% to 30% can improve flow and maintain blend coefficient of variation below 5.0%. For premixes, the powder is generally dispersed onto a mineral or organic carrier and then diluted before use. The concentration of active marker in the final premix is determined by assay rather than by weight-to-weight addition alone because bulk density and particle-size differences can cause segregation during transport. Solutions are not prepared by simple reconstitution of the raw powder. Whole botanical powder leaves an insoluble matrix in aqueous media; clear solutions require either a standardised dry extract, a validated hydroalcoholic extraction step, or a particle-free liquid extract with filtration and preservative. If bulk solution is held for more than 24 h without preservative, water-soluble pectin or proteinaceous components can support microbial growth. Injections impose the strictest downstream requirements. The powder must first be extracted with a validated solvent system, often purified water or a water-ethanol mixture, at a temperature and extraction time demonstrated to recover the marker compound. The extract is clarified, pH-adjusted into the physiological range of 5.5 to 7.5, and passed through a 0.45 µm prefilter followed by a 0.22 µm sterilising-grade polyethersulfone or polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Unprocessed botanical cell fragments reduce filter throughput and contribute to particulate matter failures. Bacterial endotoxin limits are species- and route-specific and must be set according to the intended posology and route; the raw powder itself is not depyrogenated.Synthetic veterinary APIs such as amoxicillin trihydrate or enrofloxacin have defined molecular structures, assay limits, and impurity profiles. Mubing Xiaohuang Powder does not have a single defined molecule; therefore its specification is based on chromatographic fingerprint similarity against a qualified reference material and marker compound assay. The powder is not interchangeable with a purified extract unless the extraction ratio, solvent system, and marker compound recovery are documented. A purified extract may be water-soluble or ethanol-soluble, whereas the raw powder retains the native plant matrix and will leave insoluble residue in aqueous media.
| Attribute | Mubing Xiaohuang Powder Veterinary Grade API | Purified botanical extract | Synthetic single-entity API |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composition | Multi-component botanical matrix | Enriched fraction or marker compound | Single defined chemical entity |
| Assay basis | Marker compound plus chromatographic fingerprint | Marker compound content or extract ratio | Potency by HPLC, titration, or microbiological assay |
| Solubility in water | Partial; insoluble cellulosic matrix remains | Often improved, depending on fraction | Defined by salt form and pH |
| Dose adjustment | Extraction ratio and marker recovery required | Based on marker or dry extract ratio | Based on molecular potency and salt factor |
| Primary process risk | Batch-to-batch botanical variation, microbial burden, filtration loading | Over-extraction, solvent residue, marker loss | Impurity profile, polymorphism, particle-size consistency |
Compared with feed-grade powder, the veterinary API grade carries documentary traceability for active marker content and contaminant testing. Feed-grade powder may be acceptable for oral supplementation but is often milled with less control over foreign matter, mycotoxins, and particle size. The API grade intended for injections imposes additional downstream purification because the raw powder is not sterile and not depyrogenated. The difference from a standardised dry extract is also quantitative: dry extracts are generally adjusted to a fixed marker content or native extract ratio, while unmodified botanical API powder may require a larger mass to deliver an equivalent marker dose.
Processing boundaries for this specific named powder are constrained by the absence of a publicly available monograph. Every lot should be qualified against the intended dosage form. For liquid preparations, combination with strongly alkaline phosphate buffers may precipitate polyphenolic constituents; a compatibility study should be performed at the intended use concentration and storage temperature. The material should be stored in tightly closed containers at or below 25°C and protected from light. If ambient relative humidity exceeds 60%, a desiccant or sealed aluminium pouch is required. In food-producing species, residue depletion cannot be extrapolated from marker compound plasma data alone; withdrawal periods must be established under the applicable regulatory framework, such as FDA 21 CFR 500.84 or Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, using the final marketed formulation. Where the intended use is injection, the manufacturer must demonstrate sterility, endotoxin compliance, and particulate matter on the extracted solution, not on the original powder. Published data for this specific configuration are limited; therefore process validation batches should include assay of the marker compound at blend, granulation, and finished-product stages. To avoid cross-contamination in multi-product facilities, dedicated or validated cleaning procedures are required because botanical residues may be more difficult to remove from stainless steel surfaces than synthetic API powders. Swab and rinse sampling should target the marker compound or total organic carbon with limits based on health-based exposure data.