| HS Code | 974527 |
| Product Name | Houpo Powder Veterinary Grade API |
| Active Ingredients | Magnolol and Honokiol |
| Appearance | Brownish-yellow to light brown powder |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in water, soluble in ethanol and alkaline solutions |
| Bulk Density | 0.40 to 0.70 g/mL |
As an accredited Houpo Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Houpo Powder veterinary grade API is packed in sealed polyethylene-lined fiber drums, 25 kg net per drum, for use in tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premix, and solutions. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Houpo Powder Veterinary Grade API packed in sealed drums on pallets, loaded efficiently into a 20′ FCL container for safe transport. |
| Shipping | Shipping: Sealed, moisture-proof containers protect Houpo Powder during transit. Shipments comply with veterinary API regulations and customs requirements. Global freight options available with full tracking. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight after delivery. Not for human consumption. |
| Storage | Store Houpo Powder Veterinary Grade API in a tightly sealed container, protected from light, moisture, and heat. Keep in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area below 25°C. Avoid exposure to strong oxidizers and incompatible materials. Use clean equipment when handling. Ensure container remains closed when not in use to preserve stability, potency, and shelf life. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life: 24 months when stored unopened in a cool, dry place, protected from light and moisture. |
In injectable dosage development, the particle-size distribution of Houpo Powder entering a sterile manufacturing suite determines downstream filtration, viscosity, and endotoxin control. Magnolol and honokiol are low-aqueous-solubility biphenol compounds, and aqueous formulations at neutral pH typically show visible precipitation under refrigerated storage. For parenteral applications, pre-dissolution in a co-solvent system of propylene glycol and polyethylene glycol 400 is therefore used before dilution with Water for Injection. A working vehicle range observed in veterinary formulation records is 10–30% v/v propylene glycol with 20–40% v/v PEG 400, with the balance adjusted to pH 4.5–6.5 using citrate or phosphate buffer. The resulting solution is filtered through a 0.22 µm PVDF membrane under nitrogen pressure; polyethersulfone membranes may be used only after compatibility screening because lignans can adsorb to unmodified polymer surfaces and reduce recovery. Sterilization strategy requires a risk-based choice: aseptic filtration for thermolabile batches or terminal sterilization at 121°C for 15 min when pre-validation demonstrates assay loss below the acceptance limit. Bacterial endotoxins are controlled to ≤ 0.5 EU/mg for injectable-grade input, visible particulates are checked according to USP <790>, and sub-visible particulates are measured by USP <788>. The terminal injectable product is typically a single-dose or multi-dose vial for cattle or swine labelled with an approved withdrawal period; batch records specify fill volume, osmolality USP <785>, and pH stability over the shelf life. Because published data on terminal sterilization of magnolol/honokiol in mixed aqueous-organic vehicles remains limited, each formulation must be validated under worst-case load conditions rather than relying on class-based thermal-stability assumptions.
| Quality attribute | Reference method or standard | Release criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Assay, sum of magnolol and honokiol | HPLC/UV; external standard; validation per VICH GL2 | 90.0%–110.0% of declared content |
| Loss on drying | USP <731> | ≤ 5.0% at 105°C to constant weight |
| Elemental impurities | USP <233> ICP-MS; limits per USP <232> | Pb ≤ 20 ppm; Cd ≤ 2 ppm; Hg ≤ 2 ppm; As ≤ 5 ppm |
| Microbial limits | USP <61>, USP <62> | TAMC ≤ 10³ CFU/g; TYMC ≤ 10² CFU/g; no Salmonella or E. coli |
| Particle size | USP <786> | D90 ≤ 75 µm dry-milled; ≤ 45 µm suspension grade |
| Bacterial endotoxins, injectable grade | USP <85> | ≤ 0.5 EU/mg |
Before Houpo Powder can be used in a swine oral solution or suspension, the formulation chemist must resolve pH-dependent sedimentation and the precipitation risk when stock solutions are diluted in hard water at farm level. Houpo Powder is not freely soluble in water; therefore liquid products are generally prepared as concentrated suspensions rather than true solutions. The concentrate contains a wet-milled Houpo Powder with D90 ≤ 45 µm, a wetting agent such as polysorbate 80 at 0.1–1.0% w/v, a suspending aid such as xanthan gum at 0.2–0.5% w/v, a preservative system containing sodium benzoate 0.1% w/v and citric acid to pH 4.0–5.0, and deionized water. High-shear mixing at 15–25 m/s tip speed is applied for 20–30 min to reduce agglomerates before final pH adjustment. In medicator systems, dilution ratios between 1:50 and 1:128 are typical, but hard water with total hardness above 300 ppm CaCO₃ can destabilize the suspension unless a chelating agent such as citric acid or EDTA is included. Sedimentation volume and redispersibility after 24 h are tested by in-house protocols; a redispersibility of ≤ 10 inversions is a common release target. The terminal product is filled into HDPE or PET bottles and used through proportioner pumps; nozzle blockage is avoided by particle-size control and filtered intake lines. Compliance follows 21 CFR 210/211 for finished pharmaceuticals, microbial limits under USP <61> and USP <62>, and residual solvent limits under VICH GL18 if ethanol is used in processing.
Across broiler and layer premix lines, the primary engineering constraint is not active concentration but the segregation potential of Houpo Powder during pneumatic conveying and batch mixing. Houpo Powder has a bulk density typically between 0.30 g/cm³ and 0.55 g/cm³ depending on milling; this can differ sharply from calcium carbonate or rice hull carriers, leading to active stratification if the premix is not assembled in a phased order. The usual carrier system is a combination of ground corn cob or rice hull at 60–80%, limestone or calcium carbonate at 10–30%, and vegetable oil at 0.5–1.5% added after dry blending to reduce dust. A two-stage mixing sequence is required: Houpo Powder and a portion of carrier are first blended in a high-shear mixer for 5–8 min to produce a pre-blend, then transferred to a double-ribbon mixer for final dilution to a 0.5% or 1.0% premix. Mix homogeneity is measured by tracer recovery on 10 sampling points according to ISO 6497; target coefficient of variation is ≤ 5%. Carryover into subsequent batches is evaluated with a flush sequence using 2.0 kg of ground limestone per 100 kg mixer capacity. The terminal premix is packed in multi-wall paper bags with inner polyethylene liners and labelled for feed mill use. Compliance requirements include 21 CFR 507 for animal food CGMP and, where applicable in the EU, authorization under Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 if the product is placed on the market as a zootechnical feed additive; otherwise it may be used only under the legal status of a medicinal premix or veterinary non-approved ingredient in jurisdictions that permit such use.
Steam conditioning before pelleting exposes Houpo Powder to moisture, elevated temperature, and shear, which are the principal variables affecting lignan recovery in ruminant feed applications. Conditioning is typically operated at 70–85°C with residence times of 10–60 s, followed by compression through a ring die and post-pellet cooling to 5°C above ambient. Magnolol and honokiol are moderately hydrophobic; thermal degradation appears minimal below 80°C in dry formulations, but published data for humid steam conditioning and pellet die retention times above 30 s remains limited. To control risk, post-pelleting liquid application of a pre-emulsified Houpo concentrate is preferred because it avoids steam contact entirely. When incorporation in the meal is mandatory, the powder is mixed at 0.5–2.0 kg/tonne complete feed, adjusted to finished active content, and protected with a carrier such as calcium silicate at 1–2% before conditioning. Pellet durability and hardness are governed by feed formulation, not by Houpo Powder at these low inclusion rates. The terminal product is a pelleted complete feed or mineral pellet for dairy or beef cattle. Compliance for such feeds includes moisture by AOAC 930.15, sampling by ISO 6497, and residue checks where the ingredient is used under veterinary prescription. If the product is intended for an EU zootechnical claim, the absence of an approved feed-additive entry under Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 must be resolved before marketing; otherwise use must remain within veterinary pharmaceutical channels.
Because companion animal tablets, capsules, and dose-sachet oral powders often require active loads below 25 mg per unit, the milling and glidant strategy controls content uniformity more than the binder system. Houpo Powder is milled to a D90 ≤ 75 µm by jet milling or pin milling, then blended with microcrystalline cellulose at 20–40%, anhydrous lactose at 20–35%, croscarmellose sodium at 2–5%, and a glidant such as colloidal silicon dioxide at 0.5–1.0%. Magnesium stearate is added at 0.5–1.0% at the final blending stage for 3–5 min; over-lubrication can delay disintegration. Tablets are compressed on a rotary press with a target hardness of 5–8 kp and friability ≤ 1.0% by USP <1216>. Dissolution is tested in 900 mL of 0.1 N HCl with 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate using USP <711> apparatus II at 50 rpm; low aqueous solubility requires a surfactant-containing medium to achieve discriminatory release. Content uniformity follows USP <905>, and disintegration follows USP <701>. For capsules, the same blend can be filled into size 3 or 4 hydroxypropyl methylcellulose capsules after density verification; capsule fill weights are controlled to ± 3% of target. Palatability is addressed by dry coating with liver digest or brewer’s yeast at 2–5% of tablet mass. For oral powders, the milled API is diluted with dextrose or lactose to a target fill weight of 500 mg or 1 g and packed into unit-dose sachets. The terminal products are scored tablets, capsules, or oral powder sachets for dogs and cats, with batch release including organoleptic examination, assay, uniformity, dissolution, and microbial limits.
When Houpo Powder is wet granulated for oral veterinary granules, solvent viscosity and drying profiles define yield more than the active loading itself. A typical binder solution is povidone K30 at 5–10% w/w dissolved in purified water or a water–ethanol mixture; ethanol is used when water exposure leads to sticky agglomerates because of the extract’s hygroscopic carbohydrate fraction. The granulation fluid is added at 15–25% w/w of the dry powder mass, and the wet mass is passed through a 1.2 mm screen in a rotating granulator. Fluid-bed drying is operated at an inlet air temperature of 50–60°C until the loss on drying by USP <731> falls below 3.0%. Higher temperatures above 70°C can cause surface hardening, binder migration, and a wider particle-size distribution. After drying, the granules are sieved to collect the 100–300 µm fraction, while undersize fines are recycled into the next granulation batch at ≤ 20% of fresh material. Finished granules are filled into sachets or bulk containers; dose accuracy depends on achieving a poured bulk density between 0.35 g/cm³ and 0.60 g/cm³. The terminal product is an oral granule for horses, swine, or calves, administered by top-dressing on feed or by dosing spoon; batch release includes assay, moisture, sieve distribution, and microbial limits. Compliance follows 21 CFR 211 for finished pharmaceutical manufacturing if marketed as a drug, with residual solvent testing under VICH GL18 when ethanol is present.
Aquaculture extruded feed carriers subject Houpo Powder to high moisture, high temperature, and pressure, which creates a different stability envelope than pelleted livestock feed. Extrusion cooking for shrimp and fish feeds commonly operates at 90–130°C barrel temperature, 25–30% moisture in the preconditioner, and specific mechanical energy inputs above 20 Wh/kg; these conditions can degrade hydrophobic lignans if the ingredient is added before extrusion. The preferred method is vacuum coating after extrusion, in which Houpo Powder or a pre-dissolved lecithin–fish oil suspension is applied to the pellet surface at 0.5–1.5% oil uptake. Lecithin at 1–3% of the coating mixture improves dispersion of the powder and adherence to the pellet. If the Houpo Powder is included in the dry mix before extrusion, the formulation should be protected with calcium carbonate or zeolite carriers and the preconditioning residence time kept below 15 s where possible; published data on magnolol/honokiol recovery after extruded feed processing for aquaculture is limited, so pilot-scale recovery studies are required before commercial batch release. The terminal product is a sinking or floating extruded pellet for shrimp, tilapia, or carp, labelled with the required withdrawal or legal-use statement. Compliance for aquaculture feed includes 21 CFR 507 CGMP, Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 where a zootechnical claim is made, and residue monitoring priorities based on export-market requirements.
Competitive Houpo Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Houpo Powder Veterinary Grade Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) is a standardized dry extract of Magnolia officinalis Rehd. et Wils. bark supplied for formulation into tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premix, and solutions. The product-class name does not define a single particle size, assay limit, or dissolution profile; those parameters are batch-specific and must be taken from the supplier certificate of analysis. The principal specified constituents are the biphenolic neolignans magnolol and honokiol, each with a molecular weight of 266.33 g/mol. Both constituents are lipophilic, with calculated logP values near 5, and therefore exhibit low aqueous solubility. The API is not a direct substitute for crude Magnolia officinalis bark powder in feed because it is extracted, dried, milled, and standardized to marker content rather than sold as an unprocessed botanical.
The veterinary-grade designation indicates that residual solvents, elemental impurities, microbial enumeration, specified-organism absence, and botanical identity are controlled with recognized pharmacopoeial methods. It does not confer finished veterinary drug approval. The material differs from an isolated magnolol or honokiol reference standard in that it retains the broader extract matrix, including minor constituents that can influence color, solubility, hygroscopicity, and processability. Model codes assigned by distributors are not harmonized pharmacopoeial identifiers and should not replace identity testing.
Injectable dosage forms introduce multiple process conflicts compared with oral solids. The biphenolic neolignans in Magnolia officinalis bark have calculated logP values near 5, which favors partitioning into organic phases and limits aqueous dissolution. A formulation based only on water-for-injection and the dry API is likely to produce visible precipitation or non-uniform delivery. Solubilization may require a co-solvent system, a surfactant, a cyclodextrin inclusion complex, or pH adjustment; however, pH above 9 may promote phenolic oxidation and discoloration, so alkaline conditions should be evaluated for stability. Published formulation data for this specific extract in injectable matrices is limited; development batches should therefore include forced-degradation studies and subvisible particle monitoring.
For sterile injectables, the API must meet bioburden limits before aseptic processing or terminal sterilization. Bacterial endotoxins should be determined according to USP <85>, and the final filled product should be tested for sterility according to USP <71>. If terminal steam sterilization at 121 °C is proposed, heat-stressed samples should be assayed for magnolol and honokiol loss because heat-sensitive extract fractions may degrade; if thermal stability is insufficient, aseptic filtration may be required. Sterile filtration of a poorly soluble botanical extract can be complicated by membrane clogging from colloidal plant-derived polymers, so a pre-filtration step or a co-solvent-loaded bulk solution is commonly evaluated. Aseptic processing should occur in an ISO 14644-1 controlled environment, with the critical zone meeting ISO 5-equivalent conditions.
Particulate matter in the finished injection must be controlled to USP <788> or the applicable regional test. Because the API is a powder, any insoluble excipient or undissolved extract residue contributes directly to subvisible and visible particulate risk. The use of injectable Houpo Powder API is therefore constrained by solubility, filterability, endotoxin control, and terminal sterilization margin; these parameters are not interchangeable with those for oral premix or tablet applications.
In dry premix production, the API is dispersed onto a feed carrier such as ground corn cobs, lactose, or calcium carbonate. The critical process variables are particle-size distribution, bulk density, electrostatic charge, and blend segregation. If the API is milled to a fine powder with a D90 below 150 μm, dust generation may be severe during transfer, and the active material may adhere to mixer walls and transfer lines. Analytical sieving per USP <786> and bulk density measurement per USP <616> should be performed before setting the geometric dilution sequence.
In a horizontal ribbon mixer or paddle mixer, a stepwise blending sequence is used: a small portion of carrier is placed first, the API is added next, and the remaining carrier is layered above. Full-batch mixing times should be justified by blend uniformity sampling at multiple locations; the optimum time for a specific batch volume should not be inferred from a single-point average. Because botanical extract powders can exhibit batch-to-batch variation in hygroscopicity, the material should be pre-dried or held in a controlled environment when relative humidity exceeds 60%. End-point control based on blender wattage alone is insufficient when particle-size distribution varies; assay of multiple sampling thieves at the discharge point provides a more sensitive indication of segregation.
Direct compression and dry encapsulation require characterization of compressibility, ejection force, and moisture sensitivity. Because the extract contains amorphous hydrophilic fractions, low moisture may increase capping risk in tablets, while high moisture may promote sticking to punch faces. On a rotary tablet press with a forced feeder, the powder should be evaluated at the intended press speed, not only on a single-station instrument. Small-scale batches that compress without picking may fail during scale-up because longer dwell time and feed-shoe dynamics change the stress state in the die. If ejection force increases due to hygroscopic powder adhesion, a lubricant such as magnesium stearate may be required; at levels above 0.5 wt%, however, the lubricant may delay tablet disintegration and reduce tensile strength. The processing window should therefore be defined by compaction force, paddle speed in the forced feeder, and relative humidity rather than by compression time alone.
For capsule filling with an auger-driven or dosator-type machine, powder flow and bulk density control are more important than compressibility. If the Carr index exceeds 25%, glidants such as colloidal silicon dioxide may be added; if the API loading is too high, the powder bed may be too cohesive for consistent filling. The final blend should be tested for bulk density, tapped density, and flow through a standard funnel or shear cell. Capsule formulations can tolerate a broader particle-size distribution than injectables, but content uniformity risk remains if the API is not well distributed.
Oral granules prepared from the standardized API differ from crude bark powder formulations in their reduced fiber load and more precise marker input. This is useful when a defined magnolol/honokiol dose is needed in a small unit mass. Wet granulation may be performed in a high-shear mixer; common starting impeller tip speeds for botanical extract powders are 3–5 m/s, but the granulation endpoint should be controlled by impeller power draw or torque because water absorption by the extract can shift the endpoint rapidly. The wet mass is then dried, milled, and sieved to the desired granule particle-size range. If residual moisture after drying is too high, granules may cake during storage; if too low, the final granules may be friable and generate dust during packaging.
For liquid solutions, the API should be pre-dispersed in a solvent system with confirmed lignan solubility. Simple addition of the dry powder to water without a co-solvent may produce precipitation and dose non-uniformity because the lignans tend to partition to surfaces. Propylene glycol, ethanol, or a surfactant-based micellar system may be required, but the finished solution should be evaluated for clarity, color change, and precipitation under refrigeration and room-temperature cycling. If the solution is intended for oral administration to animals, palatability and pH should be checked; a pH below 4 may improve chemical stability of phenolic markers in some botanical extracts but may reduce voluntary intake in some species.
The following release profile is typical of the information requested to evaluate batch-to-batch suitability for the listed dosage forms. Acceptance limits are not shown because they should be set by the finished-product manufacturer according to the intended formulation and registration file.
| Parameter | Reference method | Formulation relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Botanical identity and marker identification | ChP 2020; USP <561> | Confirms Magnolia officinalis identity and detects substitution or adulteration. |
| Marker assay for total magnolol and honokiol | HPLC-UV/DAD validated per ICH Q2(R1) | Defines active loading in tablets, capsules, granules, premix, and solutions. |
| Loss on drying | USP <731> | High moisture may promote sticking, caking, and microbial growth. |
| Microbial enumeration and specified organisms | USP <61>; USP <62> | Limits bioburden for oral and injectable manufacturing. |
| Elemental impurities | USP <233> | Controls lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury residues. |
| Residual solvents | USP <467> | Controls extraction solvent residues. |
| Particle-size distribution | USP <786> | Influences flow, blend uniformity, and segregation in premix and dry blending. |
| Bulk density and tapped density | USP <616> | Influences capsule filling and carrier loading in premix production. |
| Bacterial endotoxins | USP <85> | Required if injectable or parenteral routes are proposed. |
Dosage-form-specific constraints vary according to the physical state and route. The following table summarizes critical process considerations rather than release specifications.
| Dosage form | Critical processing parameter | Typical equipment | Observed processing constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tablets | Compaction force, ejection force, moisture | Rotary tablet press with forced feeder | Punch sticking at high relative humidity; capping at low moisture. |
| Injections | Solubilization, filterability, endotoxin control | High-shear mixer, sterilizing filter, autoclave | Low aqueous solubility; thermal degradation risk at 121 °C. |
| Capsules | Powder flow, bulk density | Auger or dosator capsule filler | Cohesive flow if Carr index exceeds 25%. |
| Powders and granules | Blend uniformity, granulation endpoint | High-shear granulator, fluid-bed dryer | Endpoint drift due to water absorption by extract. |
| Premix | Dilution sequence, segregation | Ribbon or paddle mixer | Dusting and adhesion to walls; multiple sampling points required. |
| Solutions | Lignan solubility, pH, precipitation | Reactor with recirculation, homogenizer | Precipitation in water without co-solvent; pH above 9 may cause oxidation. |
For injectable applications, bacterial endotoxin and subvisible particle data should be reviewed against the finished-product specification before batch release.