Products

Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions

    • Product Name: Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: sales10@sinochem-nanjing.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications
    HS Code 570548
    Product Name Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API
    Product Category Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)
    Grade Veterinary Grade
    Dosage Forms Tablets, Injections, Capsules, Powders, Granules, Premix, Solutions
    Target Species Veterinary animals
    Route Of Administration Oral, injectable, or topical depending on dosage form
    Appearance White to off-white powder
    Purity Typically ≥98%
    Storage Conditions Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from direct sunlight
    Shelf Life Typically 2 years when stored properly
    Packaging Foil bags, fiber drums, or as per customer requirements
    Solubility Soluble in water and/or organic solvents depending on formulation

    As an accredited Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API packaged in 25 kg double-lined fiber drums, securely sealed; also available in 1 kg and 5 kg quantities.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API for tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premix, solutions, securely palletized and loaded in sealed 20′ FCL container.
    Shipping Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API is shipped in sealed, tamper-evident, UN-approved containers labeled for veterinary use only. Transport under controlled temperature, dry conditions, away from light and incompatible materials. Includes SDS, certificate of analysis, and required documentation. Qualified carriers handle tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premixes, and solutions per regulatory standards.
    Storage Store Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API in tightly closed, light-resistant containers in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, away from direct sunlight, heat, moisture, and incompatible chemicals. Maintain segregation from feed, food, and other drugs. For injections, solutions, premix, or powders, follow manufacturer-specific temperature and humidity limits. Protect from freezing unless otherwise specified. Keep containers labeled, sealed, and out of reach of children and animals.
    Shelf Life Shelf life varies by dosage form; typically 24–36 months if stored sealed, protected from light, moisture, and heat per manufacturer.
    Application of Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions

    A Dimeopurcal-containing tablet formulation intended for companion-animal oral dosing is commonly developed by direct compression only after the API lot is pre-sieved to a particle-size distribution in which d90 does not exceed 75 µm and d10 remains above 15 µm. This particle-size window reduces segregation potential in low-dose formulations while maintaining sufficient surface area for dissolution testing under Ph. Eur. 2.9.3 and USP <711>. For direct compression, the active ingredient is typically incorporated at 10.0%–25.0% w/w of the core blend, corresponding to veterinary tablets of 10 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg label claim. The compliance framework for release includes USP <905> uniformity of dosage units, Ph. Eur. 2.9.5 uniformity of mass of single-dose preparations, and 21 CFR 211.110 in-process sampling requirements. On a production scale, the blended powder is discharged into a bin blender with a fill volume of 60%–75% and mixed for 15 min; magnesium stearate at 0.5% w/w is then added as a final lubricant and mixed for an additional 3 min. The lubricated blend is compressed on a rotary tablet press at 8–15 kN main compression force, with tablet hardness maintained between 40 N and 80 N and friability below 1.0% when tested by USP <1216>. Pre-drying of the API and excipients is required when ambient relative humidity exceeds 60%, and the use of unbuffered lactose monohydrate is avoided because moisture migration from the filler can induce API adhesion to punch faces. Terminal finished product types in this segment are non-coated veterinary tablets packed in PVC/aluminium blisters or HDPE bottles with desiccant.

    When Sterile Filtration Replaces Terminal Autoclaving in Dimeopurcal Injection Lines

    Injectable Dimeopurcal solutions for parenteral administration in large-animal practice are usually prepared as an aqueous formulation at 50 mg/mL or 100 mg/mL active content, with the pH adjusted to 4.5–6.0 using dilute hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide to maintain API solubility and reduce hydrolytic degradation during storage. The selection of aseptic filtration over terminal autoclaving is justified when accelerated stability data at 121 °C for 15 min shows assay loss greater than 2.0% or color intensification beyond the release limit. The manufacturing process begins with dissolution of the Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API in Water for Injection at 20–25 °C under nitrogen overlay to limit oxidation; disodium edetate at 0.01%–0.05% w/v may be added as a chelator, and sodium metabisulfite at 0.05%–0.1% w/v may be used only after compatibility is confirmed because sulfite sensitivity in some target species restricts their use. The solution is passed through a 0.45 µm prefilter and then a sterilizing-grade 0.22 µm PVDF membrane at a constant pressure below 1.0 bar to avoid filter bypass. Published data for filter-loading capacity of Dimeopurcal in this exact solvent system is limited; pilot-scale sizing with the selected membrane is required before scaling. Filling takes place in an isolator or laminar-flow unit meeting EU GMP Annex 1 and ISO 14644-1 class ISO 5 conditions. Release testing follows USP <85> for bacterial endotoxins, USP <788> for sub-visible particulate matter, and Ph. Eur. 5.1.1 for sterility. Terminal finished product types are borosilicate glass vials of 20 mL, 50 mL, and 100 mL sealed with bromobutyl rubber stoppers and aluminium flip-off caps. The fill volume is controlled at ≥100.0% of label volume for low-dose containers to compensate for syringe withdrawal losses.

    Injectable formulation variable50 mg/mL configuration100 mg/mL configuration
    Dimeopurcal content50 mg/mL100 mg/mL
    Solution pH range4.5–6.04.5–6.0
    Filling temperature20–25 °C20–25 °C
    Sterilizing filter grade0.22 µm PVDF0.22 µm PVDF
    Fill volume control≥100.0%≥100.0%

    Premix Carryover Control in Multi-Species Feed Milling

    A Dimeopurcal medicated premix is manufactured as a concentrated intermediate at 5.0%–20.0% w/w active content on a food-grade calcium carbonate or rice-hull carrier, then further diluted at the feed mill to a finished feed concentration of 50–200 g/tonne depending on the target species dose and withdrawal-period requirements. The regulatory basis for this segment includes 21 CFR 558.4 for medicated feed applications, EU Regulation 2019/6 Article 106 for veterinary medicinal products incorporated into feed, and ISO 6497 for sampling of animal feeding stuffs. Production at the premix plant uses a horizontal ribbon mixer with a working capacity of 500–2,000 kg and a mixing time of 12–15 min; the active is introduced by geometric dilution in three stages to limit dust generation and prevent localized aggregation. Batch uniformity is monitored by taking ten samples distributed along the mixer axis and requiring a coefficient of variation below 5.0%. Carryover is controlled by flushing the discharge gate and screw conveyor with 25 kg of coarse ground corn after each batch, and subsequent non-medicated batch testing must show residual Dimeopurcal below 0.5% of the labeled therapeutic concentration to avoid cross-contamination of withdrawal feeds. Terminal finished product types are multi-wall paper bags of 25 kg and 50 kg, sometimes with a polyethylene liner for moisture protection, and bulk tote bags of 500 kg for integrated feed mills.

    Water-soluble Dimeopurcal powder for mass medication is formulated with the active component dispersed onto a glucose or lactose carrier and then tested for wetting time and sedimentation in hard water at 500 ppm calcium carbonate equivalents. The formulation incorporates Dimeopurcal at 20.0%–40.0% w/w, with the carrier fraction and a low-dust binder adjusted to produce a final use concentration of 0.5–1.0 g/L in drinking water. The production process consists of low-shear ribbon blending for 10 min at 60% vessel fill, followed by passing the mixture through a 500 µm oscillating sieve and packaging in foil-lined sachets at relative humidity below 40% to prevent caking. Dissolution testing in potable water systems uses USP <711> apparatus II at 50 rpm, and release acceptance requires complete dispersion within 3 min without foaming or sediment. Compliance documentation for this dosage form typically references 21 CFR 211.110 for in-process blend uniformity, USP <711> for dissolution, and VICH GL 49 where residue depletion data are used to establish withdrawal times. Terminal finished product types are laminated foil sachets of 50 g, 100 g, and 1 kg, or bulk HDPE pails for large poultry and swine operations. A critical operational boundary is that the powder must not be mixed with chlorinated water above 2 mg/L free chlorine without prior dechlorination because oxidative degradation of the API can reduce assay recovery below the release limit.

    What Limits Capsule Potency Verification at Low Fill Weights?

    Capsule filling of Dimeopurcal at low dosage weights introduces two interdependent risks: particle segregation during hopper vibration and insufficient API assay recovery if the dosage unit is under-filled. To limit these risks, the powder blend is prepared at 5.0%–15.0% w/w Dimeopurcal in a direct-fill formulation containing pregelatinized starch and microcrystalline cellulose, targeting a fill weight of 100–500 mg in hard gelatin capsule sizes 0 to 3. The manufacturing process uses a gravimetric screw filler or dosator capsule filling machine operating at 30,000–60,000 capsules/hour, with in-process weight verification at intervals not exceeding 15 min. Release testing follows USP <905> for uniformity of dosage units, Ph. Eur. 2.9.5 for uniformity of mass, and 21 CFR 211.84 for identity verification of incoming excipients. When the active content per capsule falls below 25 mg, the API is pre-mixed with a portion of the filler at a 1:10 ratio in a low-shear tumble blender for 10 min before the complete batch is added. This step prevents assay recovery from falling below 95.0% in the initial batches. Terminal finished product types are hard gelatin capsules of 10 mg, 25 mg, and 50 mg label claim, packaged in cold-form aluminium blisters to protect against moisture ingress above 50% relative humidity. Powder demixing during long filling campaigns is controlled by limiting hopper hold-up to 30 min and maintaining the filling room at 20–25 °C and 35%–45% relative humidity.

    Wet granulation converts a cohesive Dimeopurcal oral powder into free-flowing granules, but the drying endpoint must be tightly controlled because residual moisture above 3.0% increases friability during high-speed sachet filling and compromises content uniformity. The granulation formulation contains Dimeopurcal at 5.0%–20.0% w/w, with povidone K30 at 3.0%–5.0% w/w as binder and purified water as granulation fluid; the wet mass is passed through an extruder-spheronizer or a high-shear granulator with an impeller speed of 300–500 rpm and chopper speed of 1,500–2,000 rpm. Drying is carried out in a fluid-bed dryer at inlet air temperature not exceeding 50 °C until loss on drying is below 3.0%. The dried granules are sieved to retain a particle-size fraction between 150 µm and 850 µm, and fines below 150 µm are limited to 10.0% to prevent segregation during filling. Release testing includes USP <786> for particle-size distribution, USP <1216> for friability, and Ph. Eur. 2.9.5 for single-dose mass uniformity. Terminal finished product types are granules in laminated sachets of 100 g and 500 g for top-dress administration on feed, or bulk drums of 25 kg for veterinary pharmacies that repackage into smaller units.

    Multidose Oral Solution Preservative Load and Extraction Stability

    For oral solution dosing in neonatal and small companion animals, the primary development constraint is microbiological integrity after first opening of multidose bottles because preservative efficacy testing under Ph. Eur. 5.1.3 requires log reduction of bacteria within 7 days and fungi within 14 days. The oral solution is prepared at 10 mg/mL or 20 mg/mL Dimeopurcal, with the active dissolved in purified water containing a co-solvent system of 10.0%–15.0% propylene glycol or glycerol and buffered to pH 4.0–5.5. Sodium benzoate at 0.1%–0.2% w/v and potassium sorbate at 0.1%–0.2% w/v are added as preservative, but only after compatibility testing because some buffer systems reduce preservative activity. The manufacturing process uses a jacketed stainless-steel vessel at 20–25 °C with continuous stirring for 30 min, followed by filtration through a 10 µm clarifying filter and filling into amber PET or glass bottles with child-resistant closures. Release testing under Ph. Eur. 2.9.5 and USP <905> is supplemented by preservative-efficacy challenge testing and extraction stability at 25 °C and 60% relative humidity for the proposed storage period. Terminal finished product types are multidose oral solutions in 50 mL, 100 mL, and 250 mL bottles, with graduated droppers or oral syringes supplied separately.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618963613625 or mail to sales10@sinochem-nanjing.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618963613625

    Email: sales10@sinochem-nanjing.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Dimeopurcal Veterinary Grade API is supplied as three physical grade models: an unmicronized oral grade for capsules, powders, granules and premixes; a micronized oral grade for low-dose tablet and dry suspension homogeneity; and an injectable-grade powder manufactured under enhanced bioburden and endotoxin control for reconstitution into solutions or suspensions. Each batch is released against a pharmacopoeial-style specification covering identity by infrared spectrophotometry, assay and related substances by liquid chromatography, water content by coulometric titration, residual solvents by headspace gas chromatography, and particle size distribution by laser diffraction. Oral-grade packaging uses food-contact polyethylene liners in fibre drums, while the injectable grade is double-bagged in low-particulate polyethylene and sealed in an aluminium foil laminate to restrict moisture ingress. The current certificate of analysis states the batch-specific values; the approved marketing-authorisation specification remains the binding acceptance record. Published comparative data between this specific product and other veterinary active substances in the same therapeutic class are limited; therefore the differentiation described here is limited to grade design, release-control methodology, and formulation-process fit.

    What Limits the Use of Non-Micronized API in High-Speed Tablet Compression?

    High-speed tablet compression exposes the API to segregation, die-fill variation, and particle-size-dependent flow. For direct compression, the unmicronized grade is suitable only when the formulation contains sufficient flow aids such as colloidal silicon dioxide at 0.5–1.5% w/w and the press is a rotary machine with forced feeder speed adjusted to powder rheology rather than fixed setpoint. Content uniformity is verified by the pharmacopoeial acceptance value test in Ph. Eur. 2.9.40 or USP <905>; low-dose tablets below 2 mg label claim typically require the micronized grade to keep blend segregation below detection. In wet granulation, the API is pre-blended in a high-shear mixer with an impeller tip speed in the range 2–6 m/s and a chopper speed of 1500–3000 rpm; the endpoint is controlled by impeller power draw rather than fixed time. The resulting granules are dried in a fluid-bed dryer to a loss-on-drying value set in the batch master record, then milled through a 1.0 mm or 0.8 mm screen. For capsule filling, the powder grade is matched to either dosator or dosing-disc equipment by bulk density and compressibility measured according to Ph. Eur. 2.9.34. These equipment settings are not product-specific acceptance criteria; they are operating ranges used to stabilise the process when the active substance is incorporated into solid oral dosage forms.

    Release attributeReference method or equipmentControl purpose
    IdentityPh. Eur. 2.2.24, USP <197>Confirms molecular structure against a working standard
    AssayPh. Eur. 2.2.29, USP <1225>Quantifies active content on the dried basis
    Related substancesGradient HPLC, VICH GL10Controls impurity profile and degradation products
    Water contentPh. Eur. 2.5.12, USP <921>Prevents hydrolytic degradation and powder caking
    Residual solventsPh. Eur. 2.4.24, USP <467>Confirms removal of process solvents
    Particle size distributionLaser diffraction, dry dispersionMatches grade to blend uniformity and dissolution needs
    Bulk and tapped densityPh. Eur. 2.9.34, USP <616>Supports capsule filling and powder flow control
    Microbial enumerationPh. Eur. 2.6.12, USP <61>Confirms non-sterile oral acceptance limits

    Injectable dosage formation imposes the tightest endotoxin and insoluble particulate limits.

    For injectable solutions, the API is not released solely on chemical purity. Endotoxin control is obligatory because the reconstituted solution may be administered parenterally. The limit is calculated from the maximum intended dose and the route, using Ph. Eur. 5.1.10 and USP <85>. Routine testing uses kinetic chromogenic LAL; batch release is not accepted without a valid endotoxin analysis. Sub-visible particulates are assessed after reconstitution by light obscuration as described in Ph. Eur. 2.9.19 and USP <788>. Production of the injectable grade therefore operates in an ISO 14644-1:2015 Class 8 environment at minimum, with packaging into washed and depyrogenated containers. When the formulation is intended for aseptic processing, terminal sterilisation is preferred; if terminal sterilisation is not feasible because of thermal sensitivity, sterile filtration through a 0.22 µm membrane is used in a closed system. Filter compatibility testing according to ASTM F838-20 is required to demonstrate that the membrane does not remove the active substance or contribute leachables.

    In premix, granule and powder applications, the process-limiting variable is blend homogeneity in high-volume feed matrices. Ribbon blenders and double-cone tumble blenders are used at working volumes of 50–70% of nominal capacity; sampling for content uniformity is performed at 10 discrete points, including the discharge port, and the coefficient of variation is calculated. A common in-process acceptance value is CV ≤ 5.0%, but the registered product specification remains the binding value. If the active substance is later diluted in feed, the premix must demonstrate batch-to-batch consistency in bulk density and sieve profile; laser diffraction data per ISO 13320:2020 are included in the batch record to detect lot-to-lot shifts before they affect dosing accuracy. Moisture ingress above 3.0% w/w is a known transfer hazard because it can create caking in vacuum conveying and bridging in auger filling. The oral grade is therefore dried to a target water content below 2.0% w/w before packaging, unless otherwise specified in the formulation dossier.

    When the API Is Dispersed in Aqueous Solutions, pH Control and Light Exposure Govern Chemical Stability

    Aqueous solution manufacture requires buffering and photostability data that are specific to the formulation and not assumed from the dry API. Buffer salts are selected after forced degradation studies performed under ICH Q1A(R2) and VICH GL3; if no formulation-specific stability data exist, the default screening condition is 1.2 million lux·h visible light and 200 W·h·m⁻² UV radiation as described in ICH Q1B. Solutions are prepared in 316L stainless-steel vessels with bottom-mounted magnetic stirring or recirculating pumps; headspace nitrogen sparging is applied when oxygen-sensitive degradation products exceed the identification threshold. The API is added slowly through a mesh screen to avoid the formation of intensely concentrated regions that can generate localised pH excursions. Filtration is used to reduce bioburden before storage; the filter rating selected for oral solutions is 0.45 µm, while injectable solutions require 0.22 µm. The final pH range is established by the marketing authorisation; buffering systems such as citrate or phosphate are chosen to stay within the range of maximum chemical stability identified in the dossier.

    Grade-to-grade differentiation rests on release-control and process-fit parameters rather than a different chemical entity. The oral grade and injectable grade contain the same active substance; however, the injectable grade is controlled for endotoxin, bioburden, sub-visible particulates, and packaging. The table below summarises the operational differences.

    Control parameterOral / premix gradeInjectable gradeReference method or standard
    Bacterial endotoxinsNot routinely required for non-sterile oral forms; tested if the dossier requiresRelease limit calculated from the maximum parenteral dosePh. Eur. 2.6.14, USP <85>
    Microbial enumerationNon-sterile acceptance limits for oral veterinary powdersBioburden controlled before sterile filtrationPh. Eur. 2.6.12, USP <61>
    Sub-visible particulatesNot requiredRequired after reconstitutionPh. Eur. 2.9.19, USP <788>
    Particle sizeFree-flowing or micronized; laser diffraction lot reportMicronized or solubilised; laser diffraction lot reportISO 13320:2020
    Packaging environmentGeneral warehouse; fibre drum with polyethylene linerCleanroom ISO 14644-1:2015 Class 8; double polyethylene bag and aluminium foil laminateEU GMP Annex 15

    Compared with generic veterinary APIs that offer a single powder grade, the route-specific separation described above reduces the probability of a non-sterile oral-grade lot entering an injectable manufacturing line. This is a supply-chain control difference, not a pharmacodynamic superiority claim. For formulators, the operational difference appears as a narrower residual solvent and impurity profile for the injectable grade, with batch records that demonstrate compliance to VICH GL10 impurity threshold controls. Published data comparing this product directly with other suppliers’ veterinary active ingredients are limited; comparative qualification should therefore be performed at the formulation level using forced degradation and stability studies.

    Stability packaging decisions follow the intended market climate zone. Long-term storage for Zone IVb is evaluated at 30 °C/75% RH, while Zone I/II temperate conditions are evaluated at 25 °C/60% RH, according to VICH GL3. Packaging materials are selected by moisture vapour transmission rate; the aluminium foil laminate used for the injectable grade provides a moisture barrier below 0.1 g·m⁻²·day⁻¹ when measured by ISO 15106-2 at 38 °C/90% RH. The oral-grade polyethylene liner is acceptable for lower-barrier requirements, but shipment into humid regions above 60% RH ambient may require additional desiccant or resealed outer containers. Stability batches are placed in storage and sampled at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36 months, with assay and related substances tested at each pull point. Compatibility with amine-based additives cannot be assumed without forced degradation screening; because published interaction data for this specific API are limited, such combinations are outside the validated manufacturing space unless supported by a site-specific compatibility study.

    Top