| HS Code | 856788 |
| Product Name | Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API |
| Chinese Name | 地锦草粉 |
| Latin Name | Herba Euphorbiae Humifusae |
| Source | Dried whole herb of Euphorbia humifusa Willd. |
| Appearance | Brownish-green to yellowish-brown fine powder |
| Odor | Slight characteristic odor |
| Taste | Bland or slightly bitter |
| Active Ingredients | Flavonoids, tannins, triterpenoids, sterols, organic acids |
| Purity | ≥ 98% |
| Grade | Veterinary grade |
| Api Type | Herbal veterinary API |
| Dosage Forms | Tablets, Injections, Capsules, Powders, Granules, Premix, Solutions |
| Solubility | Sparingly soluble in water; soluble in ethanol |
| Storage | Cool, dry, ventilated place, protected from moisture and light |
| Shelf Life | 24 months |
| Packaging | 25 kg fiber drum with double polyethylene bags |
| Standard | In-house / veterinary herbal medicine standard |
| Moq | 25 kg |
As an accredited Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API is supplied in 25 kg net fiber drums, double polyethylene lined, sealed for transport. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL loading: Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API for tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premix, solutions; securely palletized and drummed. |
| Shipping | Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API is shipped in sealed, moisture-resistant drums or foil-lined bags, clearly labeled with batch, expiry, and safety data. International air/sea freight uses temperature-controlled, compliant logistics with MSDS, COA, and customs documents. Avoid moisture, heat, and contamination; handle per veterinary API regulations. Store cool, dry. |
| Storage | Store Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API at controlled room temperature in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, protected from direct sunlight, moisture, and heat. Keep containers tightly closed, clearly labeled, and in original packaging. Maintain away from incompatible materials, strong oxidizers, feed, and foodstuffs. Observe shelf life; avoid freezing unless specified. Follow local veterinary API storage regulations. Use clean, dry handling equipment. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life: usually 24 months in unopened, sealed containers stored cool, dry, protected from light and moisture; confirm labeled expiry. |
In pilot-scale oral solid dosage production, direct compression of the dried Dijin Hecao powder is constrained less by the mechanical compression force applied on a rotary press than by the residual moisture equilibrium of the botanical matrix under uncontrolled room relative humidity. Batches conditioned at RH ≥60% for more than 4 h have shown picking on 10 mm round concave tooling, with average ejection force rising from below 0.4 kN to above 0.9 kN during consecutive compression cycles. The root cause is the hygroscopicity of the powder's tannin fraction, which lowers the softening point of the compressed material and increases adhesion to steel tooling surfaces. A production-scale remedy is to pre-dry the API in a fluid-bed dryer at 45–50°C until loss on drying by USP <921> Karl Fischer or infrared balance is ≤5.0%, then compress within an environment maintained at 35–40% RH.
For a direct-compressed tablet core, a starting addition ratio for the API is 10–25% w/w, with the remainder composed of microcrystalline cellulose at 30–50% w/w, spray-dried lactose monohydrate at 20–40% w/w, croscarmellose sodium at 2.0–5.0% w/w, and magnesium stearate at 0.5–1.0% w/w. The exact API fraction is corrected against the supplier certificate of analysis for total tannin or flavonoid marker content so that the finished tablet does not drift outside the intended label claim. Blend uniformity is assessed by stratified sampling with acceptance criteria derived from USP <905> Uniformity of Dosage Units; tablet friability is controlled at ≤1.0% after 100 revolutions in the apparatus described in USP <1216>, and disintegration is verified in 0.1 N hydrochloric acid at 37±2°C per USP <701> with complete disintegration within 30 min.
The downstream process for the tablet route comprises screening the pre-dried API and excipients through a 1.0 mm sieve, blending in a bin blender at 15 rpm for 15 min, and compressing on a 16-station rotary tablet press at average hardness 8–14 kN. If the tablet is film-coated, a hydroxypropyl methylcellulose coating at 3.0–4.0% weight gain is applied after core compression. The terminal product is a nonsterile oral tablet for companion-animal veterinary pharmacies, distributed in bulk for repackaging or in final blister formats where the market authorization permits it.
Injectable-grade processing of this powder begins with a depyrogenation and clarification step that is not required for oral forms; the as-supplied oral-grade API is not injected directly. For an injectable solution, the powder is normally re-extracted or redissolved, filtered through a depth-media filter, and spray-dried or freeze-dried before sterile formulation to reduce endotoxin, water-insoluble fiber, and high-molecular-weight polyphenol aggregates. The final sterile solution typically contains 1.0–5.0% w/v of the processed extract, a co-solvent such as propylene glycol or PEG 300 at 20–40% v/v, and a citrate or phosphate buffer to maintain pH 4.5–6.5. The addition ratio is set on a mass-per-volume basis: a 2.0% w/v batch requires 20 g of processed API per liter of final solution, subject to adjustment by marker assay.
The principal downstream process risk is not terminal sterilization chemistry but membrane fouling during aseptic filtration. Tannins and residual polysaccharides in the extract can occlude 0.22 µm PVDF final membranes when the transmembrane pressure exceeds 0.8 bar; a staged filtration train with a 0.45 µm polyethersulfone prefilter and a 0.22 µm final membrane is therefore used, with maximum transmembrane pressure held below 0.8 bar. Terminal steam sterilization at 121°C for 15 min can cause color increase, polymerization, and precipitant formation in some batches; aseptic filtration followed by filling under ISO 14644-1:2015 Class 5 conditions is therefore used. Published data for extract-specific membrane fouling under commercial batch sizes is limited; filter capacity should be confirmed by a Vmax test on each batch before scale-up.
The injectable finished product is tested for sterility per USP <71>, bacterial endotoxins per USP <85> with an acceptance criterion of not more than 0.5 EU/mg of extract, and particulate matter per USP <788>. Residual solvents from any extraction step are controlled under USP <467> or VICH GL18, and elemental impurities are controlled under USP <233>. The terminal product is a sterile injectable solution for cattle, sheep, or swine, typically presented in 50 mL or 100 mL vials; a multidose presentation may include benzyl alcohol at 1.5% v/v if approved in the target market, but the preservative must be excluded from intrathecal or intra-articular routes.
Broiler and layer production systems that still maintain withdrawal-period constraints frequently evaluate water-soluble botanical powders as adjunctive products for periods of intestinal challenge, but the downstream formulation is not simply a dilution of the raw milled herb. The API is incorporated into a concentrated water-soluble powder at 20–40% w/w, with the balance composed of glucose monohydrate or lactose monohydrate carrier, sodium citrate dihydrate at 5.0–10.0% w/w, and anhydrous citric acid sufficient to bring a 1 g/L solution to pH 4.5–5.5. At farm level, the concentrated powder is typically metered at 0.5–1.0 kg per 1000 L of drinking water, although the actual intake varies with water consumption rate, ambient temperature, and age of the flock.
In manufacture, the raw API and carrier are de-agglomerated through a 0.8 mm conical mill, blended in a ribbon blender for 20 min, and filled into laminated foil sachets under a nitrogen flush if the residual moisture exceeds 5.0%. The finished powder is checked for reconstitution behavior: a 1 g sample in 1 L of hard water at 25°C should disperse without visible sediment within 3 min. If the source water contains iron or calcium above 200 mg/L total hardness, the formula may require an additional chelating acidifier because tannin fractions can complex with divalent cations and form insoluble precipitates.
Microbial limits follow USP <61> and USP <62>, with absence of Salmonella in 25 g and yeast/mold count below 100 CFU/g. Homogeneity is tested on 10 stratified samples by UV-Vis marker content with RSD ≤5.0%. The terminal product is a water-soluble powder for in-line drinking water proportioner systems in broiler and layer houses, intended for short-duration administration under veterinary oversight.
Feed mill trials with this API consistently identify the conditioner temperature as the parameter with the most pronounced effect on post-pellet marker recovery. Steam conditioning at 75–85°C for 20–40 s is normally required to gelatinize starch and achieve pellet durability above 90% on a Holmen durability tester, but temperatures above 85°C can reduce extractable marker compound recovery by 12–18% compared with the unprocessed mix. The reduction is attributed to binding of tannin fractions to denatured feed proteins and, in some batches, to Maillard-type reactions with reducing sugars. The process control window for feeds containing this API is therefore narrowed: conditioning at 70–75°C with 16–17% moisture, pellet die diameter 2.5–3.5 mm, and post-pellet cooling to within 5°C of ambient.
In a medicated premix, the API is typically incorporated at 2.0–5.0% w/w of the premix, with a carrier such as calcium carbonate or wheat middlings. When diluted at 10–20 kg premix per tonne of finished feed, the resulting final feed contains 500–1500 g of Dijin Hecao powder per tonne; exact inclusion is adjusted to the approved representative species and batch-specific marker assay. The desired coefficient of variation for the active marker across 10 sampled points is ≤10%.
Manufacturing compliance in relevant EU markets falls under Regulation (EU) 2019/4 on medicated feed, with homogeneity and carry-over control demonstrated in manufacture; sampling may follow ISO 6497:2005 for animal feeding stuffs. The terminal product is a pelleted medicated feed for weaned piglets during post-weaning enteric challenge periods, shipped in 25 kg or bulk bags with moisture controlled to ≤13.0% in finished pellets.
| Downstream route | API addition ratio | Critical control parameter | Designated standard or regulation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tablet core | 10–25% w/w | LOD ≤5.0%; compression force 8–14 kN | USP <905>, USP <1216>, USP <701> |
| Injectable solution | 1.0–5.0% w/v | Endotoxin <0.5 EU/mg; filter pressure ≤0.8 bar | USP <71>, USP <85>, USP <788> |
| Water-soluble powder | 20–40% w/w | Reconstitution <3 min; solution pH 4.5–5.5 | USP <61>, USP <62> |
| Feed premix pellets | 2.0–5.0% w/w premix | Conditioner temperature ≤85°C; final feed 500–1500 g/t | Regulation (EU) 2019/4; ISO 6497:2005 |
| Hard gelatin capsule | 40–70% w/w | Tapped density 0.45–0.65 g/mL; water activity <0.60 | USP <61>, USP <62>, USP <905> |
| Oral granules | 30–50% w/w | Wet-mass LOD 12–14%; final LOD ≤6.0% | USP <921> |
Because capsule fill precision in small-batch veterinary compounding is governed by powder flow and density rather than compression behavior, the API requires a different particle-size specification than tablet manufacturing. The raw powder is often milled to a d50 of 80–120 µm and blended into size 1 or size 0 hard gelatin capsules at 40–70% w/w API, corresponding to a total fill weight of 200–500 mg. The remaining excipients are microcrystalline cellulose at 20–50% w/w, colloidal silicon dioxide at 0.5–1.5% w/w, and sodium starch glycolate at 2.0–4.0% w/w if rapid disintegration is required. The capsule fill is calculated from the supplier COA marker assay rather than from raw powder weight alone.
The compounding process consists of a pre-mix of the API with colloidal silicon dioxide for 5 min, screening through a 0.5 mm sieve, blending with microcrystalline cellulose in a V-blender at 25 rpm for 15 min, and filling on a semi-automatic capsule machine with tamping pins adjusted to give a tapped density of 0.45–0.65 g/mL. Fill weight is checked every 15 min, with rejection limits set at ±5.0% of target; capsules are polished and visually inspected before packaging.
Nonsterile capsules must meet microbial limits per USP <61> and USP <62>; water activity measured with a dew-point instrument is controlled below 0.60 to prevent mold growth and gelatin cross-linking. The terminal product is a compounded capsule used in veterinary pharmacies or contract manufacturing for companion animals and exotic species, where dose flexibility and small batch size override the higher production cost.
Under high ambient moisture in open-barn environments, the free-flowing API powder tends to cake within 24–48 h if packaged in polyethylene-lined kraft bags without desiccant. Granulation is therefore the preferred downstream route when the product is intended for on-farm top-dressing of feed. The powder is wet-granulated in a high-shear mixer with an aqueous binder solution of povidone K30 at 2.0–5.0% w/w dry basis; the wet-mass target moisture is 12–14% loss on drying before drying. Drying is performed in a fluid-bed dryer with inlet air temperature 55–60°C and product temperature not exceeding 40°C to preserve the tannin fraction. The dried granules are sized through a 1.5 mm oscillating sieve, and the 0.5–1.5 mm fraction is retained for packaging; fines below 0.5 mm are recycled into the next wet granulation batch at no more than 20% of the total mass.
The granule formula contains 30–50% w/w Dijin Hecao powder, corn starch at 20–40% w/w, microcrystalline cellulose at 10–20% w/w, povidone K30 at 2.0–5.0% w/w, and colloidal silicon dioxide at 0.5–1.0% w/w. At use, the granules are top-dressed at a rate of 20–50 g per animal per day depending on body weight and prescriber instruction; exact dosing must be established under veterinary supervision and is influenced by marker content and target species.
Water content in the finished granules is controlled by USP <921> to ≤6.0%; granule friability is monitored by a sieving test after 10 min in a Retsch AS 200 at 1.5 mm amplitude. The povidone K30 supplier specification for residual peroxide should be reviewed because peroxide can oxidize polyphenol markers and reduce batch potency. The terminal product is an oral granule for top-dressing on feed for ruminants, horses, or swine in large-animal practice, packaged in sealed polyethylene terephthalate jars with desiccant.
Competitive Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618963613625 or mail to sales10@sinochem-nanjing.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8618963613625
Email: sales10@sinochem-nanjing.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
The material designated as Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions is supplied as a dry botanical extract powder intended for integration into multiple veterinary dosage forms. The product model is not represented by a unique numeric catalogue code in public regulatory listings; the full designation itself functions as the model identifier. Purchase documentation should carry this complete phrase, the batch number, and the analytical release profile version. As a veterinary-grade active pharmaceutical ingredient, the material is distinct from feed-grade or technical-grade botanical powders: batch release is expected to be traceable to veterinary good manufacturing practice and to analytical methods suitable for an API rather than a feed additive. The powder is not a finished dosage form and requires further processing such as milling, granulation, blending, clarification, filtration, or sterilization depending on the intended route.
Particle-size distribution is the controlling specification for solid oral dosage forms. A laser-diffraction method following ISO 13320:2020 is appropriate for reporting D10, D50, and D90 values. If the D90 exceeds 250 µm, low-dose tablet content uniformity can be impaired on rotary presses; the powder is commonly passed through a conical mill fitted with a 0.5 mm screen before final blending. On a production rotary press operated at 30 rpm, powders with D90 above 250 µm can display die fill variation exceeding 3% relative standard deviation in weight sorting, a common failure mode in low-dose botanical tablets. Loss on drying or Karl Fischer moisture determination should be reported, because residual moisture affects both powder flow and the chemical stability of hygroscopic botanical constituents. Bulk density and tapped density measurements following USP <616> are used to compute Carr index and Hausner ratio; these values guide capsule filling and tablet die fill consistency. Microbial limits for non-sterile routes are assessed under USP <2021> and USP <2022>, residual solvents under VICH GL18 by headspace gas chromatography, and elemental impurities under USP <232> with quantification by USP <233>. The certificate of analysis should also report appearance, identification by thin-layer chromatography or HPLC, total ash, and assay of one or more marker constituents. Because published data for this specific formulation are limited, the receiver must set release limits from process capability data rather than from compendial default values.
| Attribute | Standard method or equipment | Dosage-form relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Particle size D10/D50/D90 | ISO 13320:2020 laser diffraction | Content uniformity, segregation, dissolution |
| Bulk/tapped density | USP <616> | Capsule fill, tablet die fill |
| Loss on drying | Karl Fischer or halogen dryer | Stability, caking, flow |
| Microbial limits | USP <2021>/USP <2022> | Non-sterile routes |
| Residual solvents | VICH GL18 GC-HS | API purity |
| Elemental impurities | USP <232>/USP <233> ICP-MS | Safety |
In direct compression, the powder is typically pre-blended with microcrystalline cellulose and lactose monohydrate in a bin blender; magnesium stearate is added at 0.25–1.0 wt% as a lubricant. Wet granulation is required when the powder exhibits poor flow or when a high-dose tablet is specified. A high-shear granulator with a 25 L bowl and a 4–6% water or hydroalcoholic binder solution is a standard configuration, but the liquid addition rate must be titrated against torque monitoring to avoid overwetting. Drying is typically conducted in a fluid-bed dryer with inlet air temperature limited to 60 °C for heat-sensitive botanical constituents. For capsules, the milled powder is either filled directly into hard gelatin capsules using a dosator or tamping pin, or granulated to improve bulk density. Blend uniformity is assessed according to USP <905> for solid dosage forms; the calculated acceptance value must be reported with the results.
Oral solutions and drenches are prepared by dissolving or suspending the powder in purified water or a co-solvent system. pH adjustment is required because botanical constituents have pH-dependent solubility. A 0.45 µm clarification filter is used for non-sterile solutions; preservative compatibility is tested by antimicrobial effectiveness testing under USP <51>.
Use of the powder in solutions intended for injection requires a sterile manufacturing stream. The powder is not suitable for direct injection; it must be reconstituted, clarified, and filtered through a 0.22 µm sterilizing-grade membrane. Botanical extracts often contain polysaccharides and colloids that reduce membrane throughput, so a prefilter with a 0.45 µm nominal rating is placed upstream. Final product sterility is tested by membrane filtration under USP <71>. Bacterial endotoxins are measured by limulus amebocyte lysate assay under USP <85>. Subvisible particles in parenterals are controlled using light obscuration or microscopic procedures described in USP <787> and USP <788>, with acceptance thresholds dependent on fill volume and route. Aseptic operations require a Grade A environment under ISO 14644-1, with Grade B supporting areas; environmental monitoring is performed according to ISO 14698-1. Because the material is a multi-component botanical powder, filter validation should include the actual formulated solution rather than a surrogate, and filter adsorptive losses of marker compounds should be quantified before batch release.
For powders and granules used as oral solids or in-feed administration, the powder is typically diluted with a direct compression or feed-compatible carrier. Dry granulation by roller compaction is used when the powder is sensitive to moisture or heat. For premix, the particle size of the active powder should be matched to the carrier to reduce segregation; a standard ribbon blender or paddle mixer with a coefficient of variation below 5% in blend uniformity is generally expected. The presence of moisture above the release limit in molasses-containing premixes can initiate caking; therefore, dry carriers such as ground corn, rice hulls, or mineral carriers are preferred when the active powder has high hygroscopicity.
Premix manufacturing lines that use molasses or vegetable oil as a binding aid require explicit moisture and particle-size controls. Molasses can add 2–5% moisture to the mix, which may exceed the API’s stability boundary if the powder is hygroscopic. Under those conditions, the line is typically operated with a dry carrier first, followed by spraying of liquid binder after the active powder has been dispersed. Loss-in-weight feeders with 0.5–1.0% feed rate accuracy are used to prevent localized high-potency pockets. Batch homogeneity is monitored by sampling multiple points and quantifying the marker constituent by HPLC-DAD or UPLC/MS; the acceptance criterion is often set at a coefficient of variation not exceeding 5%. If the powder is to be incorporated into an oil-based solution, water content must be below the limit specified by the manufacturer, as free water can promote hydrolysis of esters and glycosides present in botanical extracts.
Since the product is a botanical multi-component powder, release testing by a single titration or UV absorbance is inadequate for batch-to-batch equivalence. A chromatographic fingerprint using HPLC-DAD or UPLC/MS should be generated against a reference standard, and at least one marker constituent should be quantitated. The fingerprint should include relative retention time and peak area limits for characteristic peaks. Quantification is performed by external standard or standard addition; system suitability requirements follow general chromatographic monographs such as USP <621>. Batch-to-batch variation is then expressed as percentage relative standard deviation across the marker concentration; a typical acceptance range for botanical extract consistency is 90–110% of the label claim or manufacturer’s range, but the exact limit must be process-specific. Without such a fingerprint, substitution of material from a different extraction or drying process can alter the dissolution rate and the safety margin in target species.
Differences from feed-grade and technical-grade botanical powders are material to regulatory acceptance. A feed-grade material is not released under API GMP and may not be tested for residual solvents, elemental impurities, or specified microbial limits, making it unsuitable as a direct replacement. Technical-grade powder may have no chromatographic fingerprint; batch-to-batch marker variation can be large. A single-entity veterinary API is generally controlled with a defined assay and related-substance procedure, whereas this botanical powder requires a fingerprint method and quantification of one or more marker components. Human-grade botanical extracts may meet some pharmacopoeial tests but do not automatically carry veterinary target animal safety data or withdrawal period information. The table below summarizes these distinctions.
| Product category | Key control differences | Regulatory/technical anchor |
|---|---|---|
| Feed-grade botanical powder | No API GMP release; limited residual solvent and elemental impurity testing | VICH GL18; USP <232>/USP <233> |
| Technical-grade powder | No microbial or fingerprint consistency; unsuitable for sterile routes | USP <2021>/USP <2022>; HPLC-DAD fingerprint |
| Single-entity veterinary API | Defined assay and impurity profile; no multi-marker fingerprint needed | VICH GL10/GL11; USP monographs |
| Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API | Multi-component botanical powder requiring dosage-form-specific particle size, moisture, bioburden, residual solvent, elemental impurity, and marker assay | ISO 13320:2020; USP <616>/USP <71>/USP <85>/USP <787>/USP <788>/USP <905>; VICH GL18 |
Published data for Dijin Hecao Powder Veterinary Grade API specifically are limited; therefore, exact release limits, marker content, and stability boundaries must be obtained from the manufacturer’s API master file or a validated pharmacopoeial monograph. The material should be stored in sealed, dry containers below the maximum specified relative humidity, and opened containers should be retested for moisture before use. Sterile injectable manufacture should not proceed without filter validation and extractables data on the actual formulation. Feed-grade material is not a suitable substitute without full testing under the API release methods described above.