Products

Butorphanol Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions

    • Product Name: Butorphanol Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 195827
    Api Name Butorphanol Tartrate (Veterinary Grade Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient)
    Chemical Name Butorphanol tartrate: (-)-17-(cyclobutylmethyl)morphinan-3,14-diol tartrate
    Cas Number Base: 42408-82-2; Tartrate salt: 58786-99-3
    Molecular Formula Base: C21H29NO2; Tartrate salt: C25H35NO8
    Molecular Weight Base: 327.46 g/mol; Tartrate salt: 477.55 g/mol
    Appearance White to off-white crystalline powder
    Solubility Freely soluble in water; sparingly soluble in alcohol; practically insoluble in ether and chloroform
    Mechanism Of Action Synthetic opioid agonist-antagonist producing central analgesia, sedation, and cough suppression through kappa-opioid receptor agonism and mu-opioid receptor partial agonism/antagonism
    Pharmacological Category Opioid analgesic (mixed agonist-antagonist); antitussive and sedative
    Veterinary Indications Relief of moderate to severe pain, sedation, anesthetic adjunct, and antitussive in target animal species such as dogs, cats, horses, and other non-food animals as approved
    Route Of Administration As formulated: oral (tablets, capsules, powders, granules, premix, solutions) or injectable (solutions for IV/IM/SC administration)
    Available Dosage Forms Tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premix, and solutions
    Controlled Substance Status Schedule IV controlled substance in the United States and similarly regulated in several other countries; veterinary use requires prescription/regulatory authorization
    Storage Conditions Store in tightly sealed light-resistant containers under controlled room temperature (15-30°C); protect from moisture, heat, and direct sunlight
    Shelf Life Typically 24-36 months when stored under recommended conditions in unbroken original packaging
    Quality Specifications Veterinary-grade API complies with applicable pharmacopoeial standards; assay generally 98.0%-101.0% on dried basis; meets limits for related substances, residual solvents, and heavy metals

    As an accredited Butorphanol Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Packaging: 1 kg sealed double-lined aluminum foil bag inside a fiber drum, labeled for safe handling, ideal for veterinary-grade Butorphanol API formulations.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) One 20′ FCL container holds palletized, drummed Butorphanol Veterinary Grade API, safely secured for tablet, injection, capsule, and powder production.
    Shipping Butorphanol Veterinary Grade API is shipped in sealed, light-resistant, moisture-proof containers. Shipments are temperature-controlled at 15–30°C, with tamper-evident packaging and clear labeling. All transport complies with pharmaceutical and veterinary regulatory requirements, ensuring secure chain-of-custody and safe, traceable delivery for formulation use.
    Storage Store Butorphanol Veterinary Grade API in a tightly sealed, light-resistant container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Maintain controlled room temperature (20–25°C) with excursions permitted between 15–30°C. Protect from moisture, direct sunlight, and incompatible materials. For finished tablets, injections, capsules, powders, granules, premixes, or solutions, follow manufacturer-specific labeling and avoid freezing unless directed.
    Shelf Life Shelf life is typically 2-3 years when stored in original sealed containers under controlled room temperature and protected from light.
    Application of Butorphanol Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions

    What Limits Content Uniformity in 0.2% Butorphanol Tartrate Tablet Blends?

    Direct compression of a veterinary-grade butorphanol tartrate API at a dose of 1.0–5.0 mg per core generates an API mass fraction below 2.0% w/w when the core weight is 300 mg. Under these conditions, random sampling error and low drug loading combine to produce assay RSD values outside the USP <905> acceptance value unless the API is pre-blended. The preferred method is a two-stage geometric dilution: a 1:10 pre-blend with lactose monohydrate Ph. Eur 1064, passed through a 0.850 mm screen, followed by a second 1:10 dilution with microcrystalline cellulose PH-102 and pregelatinized starch. The dilution sequence is not interchangeable; adding the API directly to the final blender load frequently leaves local API aggregates that are not detected by a single thief sample. Blending is run in a 100 L bin blender at 8–10 rpm for 15–20 min, with an intensifier bar at 1440 rpm for the final 3 min. The resulting powder RSD should be ≤ 3.0% by stability-indicating HPLC before the blend is discharged to the tablet press hopper.

    If the supplier certificate of analysis reports a D90 exceeding 75 µm, the API is passed through a quadro comil with a 0.457 mm rasp screen before dilution. Failure to mill is observed directly on tablet content uniformity: the USP <905> Stage 1 acceptance value may rise above 15.0 for the first 10 units. Compression is performed on a rotary press with 10.5 mm round concave tooling. Compression force is held at 8–12 kN to target hardness of 5–7 kp and disintegration below 15 min in 0.1 N hydrochloric acid. Magnesium stearate is limited to 0.5% w/w; exceeding 1.0% w/w delays disintegration by more than 2 min and reduces tablet tensile strength. Blend hold time at RH >60% beyond 24 h causes agglomeration and weight variation on the force feeder. The granulation-free route is therefore viable only when the API is milled, excipients are dried to loss on drying ≤ 2.0%, and the compression suite is humidity-controlled. Published data for a singly approved veterinary oral tablet are limited; a development batch must generate canine bioavailability data rather than assume proportionality to the injectable dose.

    Production-scale sterile injectable lines handling butorphanol tartrate at 10 mg/mL as butorphanol base require a closed processing train from API dispensing to vial sealing because the API is a Schedule IV opioid under 21 CFR 1301.72. The bulk solution is compounded in Water for Injection meeting USP <1231>, adjusted with 1 N hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide to a pH of 3.5–5.5, and brought to isotonicity with sodium chloride at 9.0 g/L. A nitrogen overlay is maintained when the oxygen headspace exceeds 2.0% v/v; amber Type I glass vials conforming to USP <660> reduce light-induced degradation during terminal storage. Sterile filtration through a 0.22 µm PVDF membrane is used either as the sole sterilisation step or as a bioburden-reduction step before moist heat sterilisation at 121°C for 15 min to an F0 ≥12 min. Filter integrity is confirmed by bubble point at not less than 3.2 bar, with a bacterial retention claim under ASTM F838-20. If thermal degradation products exceed ICH Q3B thresholds after 121°C, the fill-finish route is switched to aseptic filtration in an ISO 5 unidirectional airflow zone with an ISO 7 background, as required by 21 CFR 211.42. Vials are depyrogenated by dry heat at 250°C for at least 30 min; elastomeric closures are selected for low extractables under USP <381> and USP <1663>.

    Particulate matter is controlled by light obscuration under USP <788>. Small-volume parenterals must contain no more than 6000 particles at ≥10 µm and 600 particles at ≥25 µm per container. A pH drift greater than 0.3 units during terminal sterilisation signals salt disproportionation or packaging interaction and requires reformulation. Multi-dose vials require an antimicrobial effectiveness test meeting USP <51>; single-dose vials omit the preservative but then cannot support repeated entry without microbial risk. On automated aseptic filling lines, batch-to-batch variance is commonly introduced by peristaltic tubing fatigue and by stopper feed interruptions; fill volume RSD should be held below 1.5% for a 2 mL presentation to ensure label compliance.

    Capsule Filling and Powder Segregation Boundaries

    Automated capsule filling of butorphanol tartrate low-dose blends on a dosator-equipped machine at 50,000 capsules/hour is sensitive to powder bed collapse and electrostatic charging. For a size 3 hard gelatin capsule containing 1.0–2.0 mg API in a 150 mg net fill, the final API fraction is 0.7–1.3% w/w. A pre-blend of API with microcrystalline cellulose PH-102 at 1:10 is prepared, followed by dilution with lactose monohydrate and 0.25% w/w fumed silica. The glidant is added last because its high surface area displaces API on excipient active sites and can slow dissolution if incorporated before the API is fully distributed. Powder flow is characterised by bulk density 0.40–0.50 g/mL and a Carr index below 20%. If the Carr index exceeds 25%, dosator pin fill weight variability increases beyond 3.0% RSD. Loss on drying of the final blend should be ≤ 2.0%; moisture above 4.0% causes sticking to the dosator pins and capsule shells.

    Content uniformity is evaluated by USP <905> on 10 capsules with an acceptance value ≤ 15.0. If the first stage fails, the second stage requires testing of 20 additional units, which is costly for a controlled substance API. Capsule shell selection matters. Gelatin capsules at RH <40% become brittle, while HPMC capsules at RH >60% can cross-link and delay release. For formulations with fumed silica above 0.5% w/w, dissolution in 0.1 N hydrochloric acid is checked because hydrophobic silica can retard wetting. A desiccant and HDPE bottle with an induction-sealed liner are used for bulk packaging to hold moisture below the capsule specification. Batch reconciliation under 21 CFR 1304.22 is required at every transfer stage because discarded powder retains recoverable controlled substance.

    When Albumin-Free Aqueous Vehicles Replace Isotonic Saline in Oral Solutions

    When a butorphanol tartrate API powder is transferred from a sterile injectable workstream into an oral liquid dosage form, the isotonic saline vehicle is replaced by a buffered aqueous vehicle that retains the tartrate salt in solution but does not create a precipitation risk through free base loss. The pH is maintained between 4.0 and 5.0 using a citrate buffer; above 5.5, precipitation of the lipophilic free base can occur at high concentration. The vehicle is prepared with 0.1% w/w sodium benzoate and 0.1% w/w potassium sorbate as a preservative system when room-temperature storage is required. A non-preserved formulation is possible only if the beyond-use date is shortened to the limit specified in USP <795>. Compounding from bulk API requires a controlled non-sterile environment; the work surface is cleaned with a high-alcohol swab before and after handling because butorphanol tartrate is a Schedule IV controlled substance and must be reconciled under 21 CFR 1304.22.

    ParameterPreserved Aqueous Oral SolutionNon-Preserved Aqueous Oral SolutionReference Standard
    Storage temperature20–25°C2–8°CUSP <795>
    Beyond-use date35 days14 daysUSP <795>
    pH4.0–5.04.0–5.0USP <791>
    Antimicrobial effectivenessRequiredNot presentUSP <51>
    Light exposureAmber PET or glassAmber PET or glassICH Q1B

    Geometric dilution in a glass mortar is used for batch sizes below 100 mL; larger batches use a propeller mixer at 500–1000 rpm for 20 min. The final solution is filtered through a 100 µm screen to remove agglomerates. Palatability agents are added only after the pH measurement is recorded; some flavor systems containing citric acid can lower the pH below 3.5 and alter preservative ionisation. At pH values near 3.0, sodium benzoate shifts toward benzoic acid and can reduce antimicrobial activity. The oral solution is packaged in amber glass or polyethylene terephthalate with a child-resistant closure because butorphanol tartrate retains opioid activity by ingestion.

    Wet granulation of butorphanol tartrate API in an aqueous binder system introduces a migration risk because the tartrate salt dissolves in the granulating fluid and is carried to the granule surface during drying. This surface enrichment is typically invisible to a single blend sample but appears as an elevated USP <905> acceptance value after tableting. For a 65 L high-shear mixer, the granulation sequence uses an impeller speed of 300 rpm and a chopper speed of 1500 rpm. Water addition is held at 12–15% w/w with 3.0% w/w PVP K30 binder dissolved in the granulating fluid. Wet massing lasts 4 min, after which the granules are transferred to a fluid-bed dryer at 45°C inlet air until loss on drying is 1.5–2.5%. An alternative approach replaces the aqueous granulating fluid with 95% ethanol or isopropanol, which lowers API solubility in the binder and reduces migration. However, organic granulation requires explosion-proof equipment and an ICH Q3C residual solvent monograph.

    ParameterTarget RangeMethod or Standard
    Loss on drying1.5–2.5% w/wUSP <731>
    Granule D50150–300 µmSieve analysis
    Bulk density0.45–0.55 g/mLUSP <616> Method I
    Tapped density0.55–0.70 g/mLUSP <616> Method II
    Carr index15–25%USP <1174>

    The dried granules are milled through a 1.0 mm screen. Granules with a Carr index above 25% require 0.2% w/w colloidal silicon dioxide before compression. Fumed silica above 1.0% w/w can retard dissolution and is not used. A high-shear wet granulation route is preferable to direct compression only when the final tablet dose falls below 0.5 mg, because the additional excipient surface area reduces the relative influence of API particle size on blend uniformity. In that dose range, granule porosity must still be controlled; over-drying below 1.0% moisture produces brittle granules that segregate on the press force feeder.

    Premix Carrier Homogeneity Is Not a Regulatory Default for Schedule IV Opioid APIs

    Butorphanol tartrate is not approved in the United States as a medicated feed premix for food-producing species, and 21 CFR 530.11(b) prohibits extralabel use in animal feed. A manufacturer attempting a premix-bound delivery for a non-food animal would still need to address the same homogeneity and stability issues as any low-dose carrier blend. If a lactose monohydrate or soybean meal carrier is selected, the API is incorporated by stepwise dilution to 0.10–0.50% w/w. Ten thief samples are taken after blending for 20 min in a twin-ribbon mixer; the RSD should remain ≤ 5.0%. Published data for this specific configuration are limited.

    Moisture in the carrier above 8.0% promotes caking and microbial growth; desiccants are required for bulk fiber drums. Dust containment is handled in an isolator with HEPA H14 filtration and a downflow booth because butorphanol tartrate is a controlled substance. In all cases, the premix route is considered only after a parenteral or oral solid dosage form has been rejected for the target species and the regulatory status has been verified with the competent authority.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Butorphanol Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Butorphanol Veterinary Grade API for Tablets / Injections / Capsules / Powders / Granules / Premix / Solutions is supplied as butorphanol tartrate, CAS 58786-99-5, molecular formula C21H29NO2·C4H6O6, molecular weight 477.55 g/mol. The material is a white to off-white crystalline powder. Model identification follows the manufacturer’s lot-specific code and certificate-of-analysis number; no universal model designation applies to a pharmacopoeial substance. The API is differentiated from morphine sulfate and buprenorphine hydrochloride by receptor activity: it is a kappa opioid receptor agonist and a mu opioid receptor antagonist or partial agonist. This profile supports analgesic, antitussive, and preanesthetic veterinary protocols. The tartrate salt is selected for the listed dosage-route grades because of water solubility and crystalline stability, but the API as supplied is neither a finished dosage form nor sterile. Identity, assay, related substances, residual solvents, water content, residue on ignition, elemental impurities, and particle size are controlled before tableting, encapsulation, granulation, premix dilution, or solution formulation.

    Powder and granule grades are intermediate materials rather than finished products. The powder grade is the compendial API without added binder; the granule grade is a formulated intermediate containing binder and filler and is released under a separate specification. The premix grade is a diluted mixture intended for feed incorporation, with carrier flow and segregation control determined by the target animal feed. Solutions include aqueous oral or injectable finished presentations; aqueous solution clarity and pH are controlled during manufacture. In all cases, the quality of the finished veterinary product depends on particle size distribution, flowability, chemical purity, and route-specific safety limits.

    The specification framework for multi-route use separates physical, chemical, and safety parameters. Pharmacopoeial monographs are the controlling references; where regional monographs differ, the tighter residual solvent and elemental impurity limits prevail. Table 1 lists representative method anchors and acceptance values. Values shown as manufacturer-specific are not pharmacopoeial absolute limits but are common control ranges used in pharmaceutical development. Published data for this specific API in direct compression and premix segregation are limited; therefore, particle-size and flow limits are established during development rather than taken from a universal standard.

    ParameterMethod/StandardRepresentative acceptance
    AppearanceVisualWhite to off-white crystalline powder
    IdentificationInfrared absorption per USP 197, HPLC retention timeMatches reference standard
    Assay, dried basisHPLC98.0–102.0%
    Related substancesHPLCIndividual unspecified impurity ≤0.2%; total ≤1.0% or as per monograph
    Residual solventsUSP 467 / ICH Q3CClass 1, Class 2, Class 3 limits per monograph
    Water contentKarl Fischer per USP 9211.0%
    Residue on ignitionUSP 2810.1%
    Elemental impuritiesUSP 232/233 / ICH Q3D / VICH GL19Category limits by intended route
    Particle size, tablet/capsule gradeLaser diffractionD90 ≤150 µm (manufacturer-specific)
    Particle size, premix gradeLaser diffractionD90 ≤300 µm (manufacturer-specific)
    Bulk/tapped densityUSP 616Bulk 0.30–0.50 g/mL; tapped 0.45–0.70 g/mL; Hausner ratio 1.20–1.50 (manufacturer-specific)

    Differentiation from other veterinary opioid APIs is defined by receptor activity, duration, and formulated route use. Table 2 provides the comparison. Butorphanol is shorter acting than buprenorphine and is more commonly used as an antitussive in small-animal medicine. Morphine is a full mu agonist; butorphanol’s mu antagonism can blunt or reverse some mu-mediated effects, which has clinical consequences when products are changed. Nalbuphine shares kappa agonist and mu antagonist behavior but has a different species-specific use distribution. These differences do not alter API purity requirements, but they influence finished-product strength, pH, and preservative selection.

    AttributeButorphanol tartrateMorphine sulfateBuprenorphine hydrochlorideNalbuphine hydrochloride
    Receptor actionKappa agonist; mu antagonist/partial agonistFull mu agonistPartial mu agonist; kappa antagonistKappa agonist; mu antagonist
    Duration of actionShort to intermediate; species-dependentIntermediateLonger due to slow receptor dissociationIntermediate
    Typical veterinary routesIV, IM, SC, oral tabletsIV, IM, SC, epiduralIV, IM, SC, oral transmucosalIV, IM, SC
    Key clinical differentiationAntitussive and preanesthetic use; less mu-type respiratory depressionStrong analgesia; emesis and histamine release possibleLong duration; slower onsetSimilar mixed profile; less antitussive use

    What Limits Direct Compression of Low-Dose Butorphanol Tartrate Blends?

    Solid-dosage products containing butorphanol tartrate often use low active loads, frequently ≤10 mg per tablet or capsule. At these loadings the active fraction may be below 5 wt%, and blend uniformity becomes the critical processing risk. Direct compression requires API with D90 ≤150 µm and a Hausner ratio below 1.50. If the API has bulk density below 0.30 g/mL, the blend may fluidize in bin blenders and show segregation. Geometric dilution with lactose monohydrate or microcrystalline cellulose is used before main blending. A pre-screening step through 500 µm mesh removes soft agglomerates. Blending time is limited because overblending can induce fines migration; near-infrared blend monitoring is recommended when active load is below 2 wt%. Published data for butorphanol tartrate direct compression is limited; the above thresholds are common pharmaceutical development controls and are verified with USP 905 content uniformity testing.

    Capsule filling adds another constraint. Dosator machines and tamping-pin machines respond differently to powder flow. A Hausner ratio above 1.50 can produce fill weight variability greater than ±5% at production speed. If direct compression powder does not meet flow limits, slugging or roller compaction is used to produce densified granules. Wet granulation is possible but the water solubility of butorphanol tartrate narrows the process window. In high-shear granulation, aqueous binder addition above 20% w/w can produce hard agglomerates and particle growth; drying endpoint is controlled at 1.0–2.0% loss on drying. Fluid-bed granulation with low spray rate is preferred when aqueous granulation is required. These are practical constraints for multi-route processing rather than monographed API requirements.

    Residual Solvent and Elemental Impurity Control Across Multi-Route Veterinary API

    Because the same API lot may be used for tablets, injectables, and premixes, residual solvent and elemental impurity specifications must satisfy the strictest route. Residual solvent testing follows USP 467 and ICH Q3C; the veterinary-specific guidance VICH GL18 applies in the European Union. Class 1 solvents are not used or are controlled below pharmacopoeial limits. Class 2 solvents such as methanol, dichloromethane, and toluene are limited to the ICH Q3C concentration thresholds; if synthesis uses a Class 2 solvent, its identity and level are reported on the certificate of analysis. Class 3 solvents are limited by quality risk assessment and process capability.

    Elemental impurity control is harmonized with ICH Q3D and VICH GL19. Because injectable solutions have a daily parenteral exposure limit, the API release is typically evaluated against parenteral elemental impurity limits. Testing or risk assessment may be performed using USP 232/233 methods. Palladium, platinum, and nickel are relevant if catalytic hydrogenation steps are used; lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury are assessed regardless of route. The API supplier provides an elemental impurity risk assessment rather than relying on older heavy metals methods such as USP 231, which lacks selectivity for route-specific limits. Nitrosamine risk assessment is conducted under ICH M7 and regional veterinary guidance for secondary or tertiary amine-containing APIs where nitrite contact is possible; butorphanol tartrate is evaluated in this framework as a tertiary amine.

    When Injectable Solution Manufacture Uses Non-Sterile API

    Injectable-grade butorphanol tartrate API is not sterile. Finished injectable solutions are sterilized downstream, usually by aseptic filtration through a 0.22 µm filter or, where possible, by terminal sterilization. The API must have low bioburden and a defined endotoxin limit. Bioburden is typically controlled to ≤100 CFU/g, and the endotoxin limit is calculated from the maximum finished-dose route using the pharmacopoeial K/M relationship. A 10 mg/mL injection with a maximum single dose of 10 mg would have an API endotoxin limit derived from the finished-product limit; no universal API endotoxin value applies. Filter validation, extractables/leachables assessment, and particulate matter control follow USP 788 for finished injections, not API release.

    Butorphanol tartrate is freely soluble in water. Solution manufacturing uses buffered aqueous systems with pH control. The API is not a self-preserving molecule; multi-dose injectable formulations require preservative effectiveness testing per USP 51 when preservatives are used. Single-dose presentations without preservatives must meet sterility and endotoxin limits after aseptic filling. Visible and subvisible particulate formation can occur if the solution pH is outside the formulated range or if the solution is exposed to oxygen; nitrogen sparging is used where necessary. Photostability testing under ICH Q1B is recommended for solution formulations because the product may be exposed to light in clinical use. The API is stored in airtight, light-resistant containers at controlled room temperature; moisture uptake is controlled by storage conditions and by the water content specification.

    Compared with morphine, butorphanol tartrate has a ceiling for mu-mediated respiratory depression and is less likely to produce vomiting in dogs; compared with buprenorphine, the shorter duration supports use in short procedures but may require more frequent dosing. Compared with nalbuphine, butorphanol has a broader veterinary antitussive history. Concurrent administration with full mu agonists can reduce mu-mediated analgesia because of the mu antagonist component. In veterinary protocols this is sometimes used deliberately for partial reversal of morphine-like effects, but it is an operational limitation when full mu opioid analgesia is intended. No API-level incompatibility with common tablet excipients has been established; formulation incompatibilities are assessed through forced degradation studies under ICH Q1A(R2).

    Top