| HS Code | 206969 |
| Productname | Wet Electronic Propylene Glycol Methyl Ether (G3-G5) |
| Chemicalname | Propylene glycol methyl ether |
| Synonyms | 1-Methoxy-2-propanol; PGME; PM |
| Casnumber | 107-98-2 |
| Einecsnumber | 203-539-1 |
| Molecularformula | C4H10O2 |
| Molecularweight | 90.12 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless, clear liquid |
| Odor | Mild ether-like odor |
| Boilingpoint | Approximately 120 °C at 101.3 kPa |
| Flashpoint | Approximately 32 °C closed cup |
| Density | Approximately 0.92 g/cm³ at 20 °C |
| Refractiveindex | Approximately 1.403 at 20 °C |
| Viscosity | Approximately 1.8 mPa·s at 20 °C |
| Solubility | Miscible with water and many organic solvents |
| Grade | G3-G5 wet electronic grade |
As an accredited Wet Electronic Propylene Glycol Methyl Ether (G3-G5) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Wet Electronic Propylene Glycol Methyl Ether (G3–G5), 200 L HDPE drum, sealed, labeled, and palletized for safe transport. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL loading for wet electronic propylene glycol methyl ether (G3–G5): clean container, compatible sealed drums, secure stowage, documented handling. |
| Shipping | Ship Wet Electronic Propylene Glycol Methyl Ether (G3–G5) as UN 3092, 1-Methoxy-2-propanol, Class 3 flammable liquid, Packing Group III, in sealed drums, IBCs, or ISO tanks. Keep closed, grounded, away from ignition sources, and transport in cool, ventilated areas under applicable dangerous-goods regulations. |
| Storage | Store Wet Electronic Propylene Glycol Methyl Ether (G3-G5) in a cool, dry, well-ventilated, fire-resistant area away from ignition sources, oxidizers, acids, and direct sunlight. Keep containers tightly closed, labeled, and grounded/bonded during transfer. Use compatible materials, secondary containment, and explosion-proof equipment; prevent moisture and contamination. Maintain supplier-recommended temperature and comply with local flammable-liquid storage regulations. |
| Shelf Life | Typically 12–24 months when stored sealed in original containers under dry, inert conditions, away from heat, light, and moisture. |
In a 300 mm coater/developer track running 248 nm or 193 nm photoresists, electronic-grade propylene glycol methyl ether (PGME, CAS 107-98-2) with G3–G5 metal control is dispensed through edge-bead removal nozzles at 0.3–1.5 mL per wafer edge. The solvent is applied to the backside and edge exclusion zone while the wafer rotates at 800–2,500 rpm; the resulting edge profile is controlled by evaporation rate and surface tension rather than by bulk solvency alone. On production tracks such as TEL Lithius ProV or SCREEN SK-E, EBR cup exhaust is maintained between −50 Pa and −150 Pa relative to cleanroom ambient to prevent solvent vapor back-diffusion onto the device area. PGME is selected over ethylene glycol monomethyl ether in this step because the methoxypropanol structure avoids the teratogenicity classification associated with the restricted glycol ether acetate series under EU CLP (EC) No 1272/2008. In EBR formulations, PGME is blended with ethyl lactate and cyclohexanone at mass ratios that adjust the drying-front velocity; a higher PGME fraction slows the drying front at 23 °C because its vapor pressure is lower than that of ethyl lactate, reducing resist whisker formation at the edge bead boundary. Qualification wafers are inspected with automated optical macro inspection; the pass/fail limit is a remaining resist tail below 50 µm from the edge exclusion boundary. Point-of-use filtration is executed with 0.05 µm UPE membrane filters, and dispense-line pressure drop is held below 0.2 MPa to avoid cavitation in diaphragm pumps. The primary process output is edge exclusion width after development; a drift beyond ±0.1 mm from the target edge-bead removal ring is associated with nozzle orbit deviation, filter outgassing, or an uncontrolled temperature shift in the solvent cabinet. Incoming PGME is qualified by density per ASTM D4052-22, distillation range per ASTM D1078-11(2019), and water content per ASTM D1364-21 before connection to the distribution loop.
| Property | Method | Process Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Density at 20 °C | ASTM D4052-22 | Verification of mass-flow dosing from day-tank pressure change |
| Distillation range | ASTM D1078-11(2019) | Control of dry-front evaporation and reclaim distillation cut points |
| Water content | ASTM D1364-21 | Resist phase stability and polyamic acid hydrolysis risk |
| APHA color | ASTM D1209-05(2019) | Post-rinse residue and optical cleanliness control |
| Acidity as acetic acid | ASTM D1613-17 | Corrosion control for aluminum and molybdenum films |
| Chloride | ASTM D512-12 | Pitting control in metal-interconnect processing |
Thinner blending for novolak/diazonaphthoquinone positive-tone resists uses PGME as a high-purity co-solvent to shift spin-coating viscosity without altering the dissolution inhibition ratio of the photoactive compound. The target dynamic viscosity for 300 mm resist films is typically 1.5–4.0 mPa·s at 25 °C; PGME with a neat viscosity near 1.7 mPa·s reduces blend viscosity more efficiently than cyclohexanone at the same mass loading. In point-of-use blending, PGME content between 30 wt% and 80 wt% is standard for wafer-surface tension adjustment, but the exact ratio is corrected for the solids content of the parent resist and the coater track exhaust conditions. A higher PGME fraction lowers the drying rate at the wafer edge; below 20 wt%, the drying front moves inward fast enough to produce radial striations in 193 nm resist films. Conversely, above 80 wt%, residual PGME after soft bake can remain in the film at levels above 2 wt%, shifting dose to clear by 5–10% on some novolak systems depending on soft-bake temperature and wafer proximity gap. This sensitivity is measured on wafer-level CD SEM after a focus-exposure matrix; qualification lots are compared against a reference thinner using a 25-point across-wafer uniformity map. Incoming thinner is filtered at 0.05 µm and checked for water content below 500 ppm to avoid resist phase separation. Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection is used to verify PGME assay and the absence of the acetate analogue. The G5 cation control is meaningful here because sodium and potassium present at parts-per-trillion grade reduce dark erosion variability in the exposed resist.
During array-process cleaning of Gen 5 metal-oxide TFT backplanes on 1,100 × 1,300 mm glass substrates, PGME-containing solvent blends are applied as intermediate rinse agents after aqueous alkaline develop and before hot-air knife drying. The function is not bulk cleaning but surface tension reduction in the final rinse; a 60–80 wt% PGME/water mixture at 25 °C lowers the dynamic surface tension into the 27–31 mN/m range, allowing the rinse to penetrate 3–8 µm pixel-pitch gaps without leaving topographic water marks. Dilute PGME is supplied to the cleaning tool through a point-of-use blender with conductivity and refractive index feedback; blend ratio drift is kept below ±0.5 wt% because the drying frontier on molybdenum and indium gallium zinc oxide surfaces is sensitive to PGME concentration. The use of pure PGME at this stage is avoided because a pure organic film remaining under the next plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition layer can increase particulate adhesion. On production cleaners with air-knife pressures between 0.3 MPa and 0.6 MPa, PGME-containing rinses reduce post-dry residues compared with isopropyl alcohol/water rinses, but the benefit is lost if the bath temperature exceeds 30 °C due to rapid vapor accumulation in the process chamber. Exhaust flow is increased to 0.5–1.0 m/s face velocity at the cleaner opening. Waste streams containing PGME are segregated from aqueous acid drains because the solvent has a closed-cup flash point near 31 °C, requiring explosion-proof transfer pumps. For Gen 5 fabs, the cleaning bath is replaced based on particle counts measured by an in-line optical particle counter, with the control limit set at 100 particles/mL at 0.2 µm. Tool-specific residue counts remain supplier-qualified; published data for this specific configuration is limited.
Photoresist stripper blends containing monoethanolamine, dimethyl sulfoxide, water, and PGME are prepared with the ether as a coupling solvent to maintain single-phase behavior between the high-polarity amine phase and the non-polar resist dissolution products. In aluminum-interconnect process flows, the PGME fraction is typically held between 10 wt% and 25 wt%; below 10 wt%, the stripper separates into two phases after loading with novolak resist at 60–70 °C, leaving amine-rich droplets on the wafer that create post-rinse defects. Above 25 wt%, the flash point of the stripper bath drops toward the closed-cup flash point of 31 °C, requiring temperature interlock at 65 °C and forced vapor extraction. The strip rate is evaluated in a spray processor with wafer rotation at 300–600 rpm and chemical temperature at 70 °C; complete removal of a 1.8 µm novolak resist after deep-UV hardening is confirmed by optical film thickness measurement below 5 nm. PGME is preferred over ethylene glycol monomethyl ether in this service because the methoxypropanol backbone shows lower acute dermal toxicity under EU CLP classification, but industrial hygiene monitoring still requires a vapor exposure limit below 100 ppm 8-hour TWA. Metal contamination from the stripper is controlled by incoming lot release with ICP-MS; G4-grade PGME is specified for aluminum lines because iron and copper residues above 5 µg/kg in the solvent can catalyze localized pitting during the subsequent deionized water rinse. The bath lifetime is terminated by refractive index drift and particle increase rather than by color alone.
In fan-out wafer-level packaging, polyimide passivation varnishes are diluted with PGME before low-temperature soft-bake on reconstituted 300 mm wafers. The polyamic acid varnish is received with a dynamic viscosity near 5,000 mPa·s at 25 °C; PGME addition of 15–30 wt% reduces the coating viscosity to 1,500–2,500 mPa·s for spin coating on warped reconstituted substrates. Unlike N-methylpyrrolidone, PGME does not require an amide-specific vapor abatement train, but the coater bowl is still purged with nitrogen at 0.10–0.20 MPa during dispense because the flash point is 31 °C. Soft-bake is conducted at 120 °C for 180 s on a hotplate with exhaust at 0.3 m/s face velocity; residual PGME after this step is measured by thermal desorption GC-MS and held below 1 wt% to prevent bubble formation during subsequent imidization cure at 350 °C. The varnish filtration system uses 0.10 µm nylon membrane filters; a batch is rejected if the initial differential pressure exceeds 0.15 MPa or if the post-solvent viscosity recovery deviates more than ±3% from the pre-solvent baseline. Because fan-out wafers are sensitive to edge bead build-up, the EBR nozzle uses a PGME/ethyl lactate mixture at 0.5–1.0 mL per edge after the main coat. Pre-drying of the PGME source is required if the water content exceeds 500 ppm; water in the varnish can hydrolyze the polyamic acid backbone and reduce the cured film elongation at break by an amount that must be verified by ASTM D882 tensile testing of free-standing cured films.
When a sacrificial resist layer on a MEMS release structure is patterned for lift-off, PGME-based solvent delivery is used to dissolve the exposed resist without swelling the underlying polyimide or SU-8 anchor layers. The process is run as a puddle dispense on a single-wafer tool with spindle rotation below 100 rpm to avoid mechanical stress on released cantilevers. PGME is blended with cyclopentanone or ethyl lactate at 20–50 wt%; the blend is selected because the Hansen solubility parameter distance to cured polyimide is larger than that of N-methylpyrrolidone, reducing thickness increase of the anchor layer below 0.5% after 60 s of exposure. The dispense volume is 3–5 mL per wafer, and temperature is held at 23 °C to control evaporation. A two-stage rinse with isopropyl alcohol is applied immediately, as PGME left on the released structure can re-deposit dissolved resist solids after drying. Incoming PGME for MEMS use is required to have sub-0.1 µm particle counts below 10 particles/mL because particles trapped between the resist and the anchor layer create lift-off ears. The metal layer is then deposited by electron-beam evaporation; if PGME residue remains, adhesion of the deposited film drops in tape pull tests performed according to ASTM D3359. Tool temperature interlocks are set at 40 °C because the solvent’s vapor pressure at that temperature is high enough to exceed the lower explosion limit in the coater bowl if exhaust is interrupted.
In organic light-emitting diode frontplane fabrication, PGME is one of the solvents used to dilute polyimide-based bank layer formulations before inkjet printing on Gen 6 mother glass. The viscosity at jetting temperature, typically 8–12 mPa·s at 30–40 °C, is adjusted by blending PGME with glycol ether esters; if the PGME mass fraction exceeds 20 wt%, the drying profile inside the bank opening becomes concave and reduces pixel well uniformity. The printed film is vacuum-dried at 10–50 Pa and pre-baked at 120 °C; PGME residue after pre-bake is measured by thermal desorption GC-MS and held below 1 wt% because residual solvent in the bank layer can cause outgassing during organic layer evaporation. The solvent supply for the inkjet line is degassed under vacuum at 25 kPa absolute to prevent bubble formation in the nozzle array; dissolved gas levels below 5 ppm oxygen are required for consistent droplet volume. PGME-based dilution is limited to bank layer materials whose polyimide precursor is soluble in methoxypropanol; formulations based only on N-methylpyrrolidone may precipitate when PGME is added above 10 wt%. Point-of-use filters at 0.02 µm are installed directly before the inkjet printhead to remove particles that can block nozzles. Cleaning cycles between print runs use pure PGME to dissolve dried bank layer residues in the nozzle plate; the solvent is then purged with nitrogen at 0.15 MPa to leave no liquid in the meniscus region.
Competitive Wet Electronic Propylene Glycol Methyl Ether (G3-G5) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618005193850 or mail to sales8@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8618005193850
Email: sales8@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Wet Electronic Propylene Glycol Methyl Ether (G3–G5) is a controlled-purity 1-methoxy-2-propanol solvent supplied for liquid-phase semiconductor, advanced packaging, and flat-panel display processing. The material is identified by CAS 107-98-2 and is delivered as a model family comprising three cleanliness tiers, G3, G4, and G5, which differ primarily in trace metal, anion, particle, and water control rather than in molecular structure or organic purity. The product is filled into nitrogen-blanketed stainless-steel containers or PFA-lined drums after submicrometre filtration and is released with lot-specific ICP-MS and particle-count documentation. The solvent is fully miscible with water and with common photoresist solvents; its closed-cup flash point is 32 °C, its boiling point is 120 °C at 101.325 kPa, and its density is approximately 0.921 g/cm³ at 20 °C.
The designation “wet electronic” indicates that the solvent is intended for liquid-phase process chemicals rather than vapour-deposition or gas-phase cleaning. In bulk chemical distribution systems, the product is typically run through dedicated stainless-steel or polymer-lined lines with point-of-use filtration. Selection among G3, G4, and G5 is not based on assay value alone; it is linked to the allowable critical metal concentration per wafer, the particle specification at 0.1 µm or 0.2 µm, and the tolerance for fast-diffusing species such as sodium, potassium, and iron in the target device node. Published data for this exact product configuration is limited; the parameters given here are drawn from physical-property data for PGME and from typical electronic-grade solvent release documentation. Users should verify supplier-grade limits for each lot.
Industrial-grade PGME may be sold with a gas-chromatographic assay below 99.5% and may contain ppm-level metals, unspecified particulate loads, and water contents up to 0.2% or higher depending on the production route and container history. The wet electronic product differs in trace-metal control: G3, G4, and G5 releases are typically tested by ICP-MS after preconcentration, and critical metals are reported per element rather than as a single total metal sum. The exact ceilings are supplier-specific, but the commercial nomenclature generally places G3 in the single-digit ppb range for the most critical elements, G4 in the sub-ppb range, and G5 at or near instrument detection limits. This tiering is not a single ISO or SEMI specification; it is a supplier–fab quality agreement framework, often mapped to the metal budget of the technology node.
Compared with propylene glycol methyl ether acetate, PGME has a lower boiling point (120 °C versus 146 °C) and a lower closed-cup flash point (32 °C versus 45 °C). It also lacks the acetate ester functionality, which can hydrolyze to acetic acid under acidic or aqueous conditions. This difference is relevant in edge bead removal, clean-tool residue control, and any process where trace acid formation can affect metal pad corrosion or resist footing. Compared with N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, PGME is not subject to the same REACH Annex XVII restriction entry in the European market. Compared with ethyl lactate, PGME has higher water miscibility and a different hazard profile under CLP; substitution is not drop-in and requires reformulation or process revalidation.
| Parameter | Typical value | Reference method |
|---|---|---|
| CAS registry number | 107-98-2 | — |
| Boiling point at 101.325 kPa | 120 °C | ASTM D1078 |
| Flash point, closed cup | 32 °C | ASTM D3278 |
| Density at 20 °C | 0.921 g/cm³ | ASTM D4052 / ISO 12185 |
| Dynamic viscosity at 20 °C | 1.8 mPa·s | ASTM D7042 / ISO 3219 |
| Vapour pressure at 20 °C | 12 hPa | ASTM D2879 |
| Water solubility | miscible | — |
Bulk specification values commonly reported for electronic-grade PGME include assay ≥99.5% by gas chromatography, water ≤0.10% by Karl Fischer titration, colour ≤10 APHA, and acidity ≤0.01% as acetic acid. Non-volatile residue, chloride, sulfate, sodium, potassium, iron, and other transition metals are included in grade-specific release certificates; the exact limits are not universal and must be extracted from the supplier’s certificate of analysis. For the G3–G5 series, the most significant changes are usually not the bulk assay but the trace element and particle blocks. A G5 lot and a G3 lot can share similar organic purity and still differ by two orders of magnitude in critical metal content. Therefore a wafer fab cannot confirm grade compliance by density or assay alone; it must review ICP-MS and particle-count data.
From a handling perspective, the vapour pressure of 12 hPa at 20 °C and the 32 °C closed-cup flash point require explosion-proof dispense equipment, grounding and bonding under NFPA 30, and hazardous area classification under EN 60079-10-1 or equivalent. Local exhaust ventilation should be verified by industrial hygiene monitoring. Cleanroom storage cabinets must be rated for flammable liquids and should be segregated from oxidizers.
In coater/developer tracks, PGME is dispensed to the wafer backside or edge from pressurized canisters or point-of-use reservoirs. Wetted surfaces in the dispense path are typically stainless steel, PTFE, PFA, or high-density polyethylene; elastomer seals are minimized because plasticizer and metal extraction from seals can raise on-wafer metal counts. Point-of-use filtration is commonly rated at 0.05 µm or 0.1 µm for solvent service, with filter replacement based on pressure drop. Track models vary in nozzle geometry and dispense volume, and there is no single universal spin-speed curve for a given dilution. Process engineers typically generate film-thickness and edge-bead removal curves on the specific track, using the production resist and bottom anti-reflective coating stack.
Photoresist thinning with PGME changes viscosity and solids content in a nonlinear fashion. Addition of 10–20% w/w PGME may reduce viscosity by more than the linear dilution ratio for some novolac resists, but for chemically amplified resists the response depends on polymer molecular weight, solvent retention, and casting-solvent interaction. Because the boiling point is 120 °C, the soft-bake temperature can be lower than with PGMEA, but evaporative cooling at the wafer surface increases in humid cleanrooms. Track temperature and exhaust balance should be kept stable to avoid variation in edge bead width and film thickness.
Edge bead removal uses PGME because the solvent dissolves uncured photoresist at the wafer edge and can be rinsed with ultrapure water. The water miscibility of PGME prevents solvent droplets or phase separation at the edge exclusion boundary. In mixed formulations, the dilution water must be of the same cleanliness tier as the solvent; otherwise particles and trace metals are introduced at the edge, where they can be transported inward during subsequent spin dry. Production-scale tracks have shown that a rise in particle defects after an EBR solvent change is frequently caused by water quality or by dead legs in dispense lines, not by the solvent lot itself. Dedicated loops and point-of-use filters reduce this failure mode.
Wet cleaning applications include post-etch residue removal, pre-diffusion clean, and advanced packaging organic residue removal where a water-miscible polar solvent is required. PGME is not a stripper for highly cross-linked photoresist; it is used as a co-solvent or rinse companion to amine- or fluoride-based formulated strippers. Direct combination with aggressive acidic oxidizers is not recommended without compatibility testing, and the product should not be blended with concentrated hydrogen peroxide or strong mineral acids in storage tanks because exothermic decomposition and peroxide formation can occur. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; blending with oxidizer-bearing chemistries must be evaluated with reaction calorimetry before production use.
PGME is hygroscopic. In open reservoirs or wet benches with relative humidity above 60% RH, water content can rise above the 0.10% release limit within a production shift. Point-of-use nitrogen overlay or dry-air purge is required where water-sensitive photoresist performance is a concern. After opening, the material should not be returned to the original container if trace-metal or particle limits must be preserved. Shelf life is governed by the supplier’s certificate of analysis and storage conditions; unopened, blanketed containers often carry 12 to 24 months from fill date, but point-of-use re-testing for water, particles, and critical metals is recommended after transfer through portable day tanks or repackaging.
Elastomer compatibility should be verified before changing dispense components. Natural rubber and some nitrile elastomers may swell or extract into PGME, while EPDM, PTFE, PFA, and perfluoroelastomer materials generally provide better resistance. Compatibility data should come from immersion tests using the actual lot and component material, because elastomer additive packages vary between vendors. Because the G3–G5 nomenclature is not fixed by a single public standard, the product’s acceptance limits should be recorded in the fab’s incoming-material specification. The certificate of analysis should include lot-specific trace metal by ICP-MS, particle count, water, and assay, linked to the wafer defect density and metal contamination budget of the target technology node.