| HS Code | 409507 |
| Chemical Name | Propylene Glycol |
| Cas Number | 57-55-6 |
| Molecular Formula | C3H8O2 |
| Molecular Weight | 76.09 g/mol |
| Grade | Electronic/EL Grade |
| Purity | >= 99.9% |
| Water Content | <= 0.1% |
| Appearance | Clear, colorless, viscous liquid |
| Odor | Practically odorless |
| Specific Gravity 20 20 C | 1.035 - 1.040 |
| Boiling Point | 187.6 °C |
| Flash Point | 99 °C |
| Refractive Index 20 C | 1.431 - 1.433 |
| Viscosity 20 C | 52 mPa·s |
As an accredited Propylene Glycol Electronic/EL Grade factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Packaged in 20L sealed HDPE drum, nitrogen-blanketed for purity, with tamper-evident cap and electronic-grade labeling. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL loaded with Propylene Glycol Electronic/EL Grade in sealed drums on pallets, safely blocked, braced, and secured for transit. |
| Shipping | Propylene Glycol Electronic/EL Grade ships in clean, sealed drums or IBCs to prevent moisture absorption and contamination. It is non-hazardous for transport, but store away from strong oxidizers. Protect from extreme heat or cold, and handle with dry equipment to preserve high purity. |
| Storage | Store Propylene Glycol Electronic/EL Grade in tightly sealed, clean HDPE or stainless-steel containers under a dry, inert gas blanket. Keep in a cool, well-ventilated area away from moisture, heat, and direct sunlight. Prevent contact with contaminants and incompatible materials. Avoid storing in aluminum. Ensure containers are clearly labeled and use first-in, first-out rotation. |
| Shelf Life | Propylene Glycol Electronic/EL Grade typically has a 24-month shelf life when stored sealed, cool, dry, and away from sunlight. |
In semiconductor lithography, propylene glycol electronic/EL grade is metered as a co-solvent and film-formation regulator in aqueous photoresist edge bead removal and backside rinse formulations. The material is selected on the basis of its 1.036 g/cm³ density at 20°C, its 188°C boiling point, and its reduced vapour pressure relative to methyl ethyl ketone or acetone. On a coater-developer track fitted with spin bowls operating between 2,000 rpm and 3,500 rpm, the addition of PG at 5 wt% to 15 wt% alters the evaporation profile of the water/solvent film and prevents drying at the wafer edge during the transition from dispense to high-speed spin-off. The residual solvent film dissolves the exposed photoresist bead while the low-volatility PG maintains a liquid interface over the backside rinsing nozzle window. Because PG is hygroscopic, EL grade material is specified with water content below 0.10 wt% by ASTM E203-16 and with monohydric alcohol impurities controlled by ASTM D1078-16 distillation range; this limits the conductivity contribution in the wafer environment. Metal ion contamination is controlled at the supplier level by ICP-MS to keep sodium, potassium, iron, and zinc below 50 µg/kg each in typical EL grade certificates; published SEMI standard documentation for this specific co-solvent in edge bead removal is limited. Transfer lines and day tanks are usually nitrogen-blanketed where cleanroom relative humidity exceeds 60%, and storage tanks are fitted with 0.2 µm hydrophobic vent filters to prevent moisture ingress. Concentrations above 15 wt% are generally avoided because the 188°C boiling point shifts the drying front after spin-off and can redeposit non-volatile residue at the wafer edge; this redeposition is quantified by post-coat defect scanners using brightfield and darkfield channels.
| Parameter | Test method | Typical electronic-grade control |
| Density at 20°C | ASTM D4052-18a | 1.035–1.038 g/cm³ |
| Water content | ASTM E203-16 | ≤0.10 wt% |
| Distillation range | ASTM D1078-16 | initial ≥185°C, dry point ≤189°C |
| Color | ASTM D1209-05(2019) | ≤10 APHA |
| Chloride | ASTM D4327-19 | ≤1 mg/kg |
| Sulfate | ASTM D4327-19 | ≤1 mg/kg |
| Sodium | ICP-MS | ≤50 µg/kg |
| Potassium | ICP-MS | ≤50 µg/kg |
| Iron | ICP-MS | ≤50 µg/kg |
| Zinc | ICP-MS | ≤50 µg/kg |
Water-washable solder paste flux vehicles use electronic-grade propylene glycol as a humectant and viscosity modifier to extend the printable open time on stencil printers. In a typical flux formulation, 5 wt% to 15 wt% PG slows the evaporation of water and alcohol co-solvents and maintains a stable viscosity during print pauses of 10 min to 20 min; the viscosity target for type 4 solder paste is commonly 800 P to 1,200 P at 25°C as measured by spiral viscometer, but exact ranges vary with alloy and powder loading. The compiled flux must meet IPC J-STD-004B classification and pass IPC TM-650 method 2.6.3.3 surface insulation resistance testing after reflow. PG additions above 20 wt% create a measurable residue that does not fully volatilize in the reflow profile; the remaining polyol film absorbs moisture and can reduce time-to-failure in electrochemical migration tests below acceptable limits. Batch-to-batch variation in PG water content directly shifts flux viscosity; a 0.10 wt% water difference is sufficient to alter printing deposit volume on 100 µm stencil apertures, so incoming EL grade is routinely verified by ASTM E203-16. Process engineers adjust squeegee pressure from 0.15 N/mm² to 0.25 N/mm² and print speed from 25 mm/s to 60 mm/s to compensate for viscosity drift. The use of technical-grade PG is incompatible with water-washable flux because chloride and sulfate impurities above 1 mg/kg, measured by ion chromatography after aqueous extraction, contribute to post-soldering ionic contamination and white residue. Manufacturers also specify low ultraviolet-absorbing impurities for fluxes that will be inspected by automated optical inspection; this is checked by UV spectrophotometry at 254 nm and 365 nm against a water blank.
Aluminum electrolytic capacitor electrolytes based on ethylene glycol can be modified with 10 wt% to 30 wt% propylene glycol electronic/EL grade to adjust boiling point, water retention, and low-temperature equivalent series resistance. In a mixed-solvent system, PG raises the boiling point of the electrolyte and reduces evaporative loss during capacitor aging at 105°C or 125°C; however, the higher viscosity of PG relative to ethylene glycol means that fractions above 30 wt% usually increase ESR at -40°C and slow the impregnation of wound elements under vacuum. The capacitor element is impregnated at 60°C to 85°C under a vacuum of 0.5 kPa to 5 kPa, and the electrolyte fill weight is controlled to ±5% of target. Electrical acceptance testing follows IEC 60384-1 and IEC 60384-4, with ESR measured at 100 kHz and dissipation factor measured at 120 Hz. EL grade PG is specified because chloride and sulfate ions in the solvent accelerate aluminum oxide dissolution and degrade working electrolyte stability; chloride is typically controlled below 1 mg/kg and sulfate below 1 mg/kg. The quantitative formulation ratio of ethylene glycol to propylene glycol in commercial capacitors is proprietary, and published data for exact low-temperature ESR response in PG/EG/water ternary systems is limited; producers therefore qualify each PG lot by comparing full cell ESR and leakage current at rated voltage over 500 h at 105°C. Water content in the incoming solvent is critical because free water shifts pH and changes the oxide formation reactions during aging; Karl Fischer titration by ASTM E203-16 is used for lot release, with limits generally at or below 0.10 wt%. Incompatible ionic impurities include sodium, calcium, and magnesium, which can participate in leakage current paths; EL grade material is specified with each of these metals below 50 µg/kg by ICP-MS.
For closed-loop liquid cooling of power electronic modules, electronic-grade propylene glycol is diluted with deionized water to 30 vol% to 50 vol% to produce a low-electrical-conductivity heat-transfer fluid with freeze protection. The diluted fluid in a press-pack IGBT cooling loop should initially exhibit conductivity below 2 µS/cm at 25°C, determined by ASTM D1125-14 after 24 h of circulation through a mixed-bed ion-exchange filter; the loop resistivity is monitored continuously with an in-line resistivity cell. Above 50 vol% PG, the kinematic viscosity of the blend rises rapidly, reducing the turbulent heat-transfer coefficient in cold plates and increasing pumping work; below 30 vol%, freeze protection becomes insufficient for equipment stored at -20°C. In operation above 85°C, dissolved oxygen attacks the glycol, forming glycolic, formic, and acetic acid; this degradation raises conductivity and lowers pH. A coolant distribution unit with a 10 µm to 20 µm particulate filter and a cation/anion resin bed is therefore required, and the resin bed is replaced when the pressure drop increases by 50% or when conductivity exceeds 5 µS/cm. The materials in contact with the fluid include copper cold plates with nickel plating, ethylene propylene diene monomer gaskets, and polysulfone manifolds; PG-water blends are compatible with these surfaces under operating temperatures below 90°C, but the system should be protected from continuous air ingress. Test coupons of cold plate alloys are immersed in the blended fluid and evaluated by mass loss and visual pitting according to a modified ASTM D1384-05 corrosion test; published data for electronic cooling loops is limited but the test is adapted from automotive coolant practice. EL grade rather than technical grade is essential because sulfate and chloride ions from lower-purity glycol accumulate in the loop after water evaporation and can initiate under-deposit corrosion on heater traces.
Underprinter stencil wipe systems use a solvent blend applied to lint-free fabric, and propylene glycol electronic/EL grade is substituted for ethylene glycol in concentrates where lower worker-exposure volatility and controlled residue are required. A typical wipe concentrate contains 10 wt% to 25 wt% PG, 5 wt% to 10 wt% ethoxylated alcohol surfactant, and the balance deionized water; the blended solution is prepared by high-shear mixing at 500 rpm to 1,500 rpm for 15 min and filtered through a 1 µm absolute polypropylene cartridge. The cleaning mechanism relies on the high surface energy of the aqueous glycol solution to wet solder paste residues on stencil apertures; the wetted fabric is moved at 20 mm/s to 50 mm/s across the stencil underside. The PG fraction must be held below 25 wt% because higher concentrations leave a thin hygroscopic film on the stencil underside, which transfers to the PCB pad surface during the next print stroke and reduces solder paste tack. Manufacturers control the evaporation residue by gravimetric analysis after 2 h at 105°C; typical residue limits are below 0.5 mg/cm² for the diluted wipe fluid. The printed circuit board assembly environment is maintained at 22°C ± 2°C and 45% RH to 55% RH, and stencil wipe frequency is adjusted based on paste dry-out; PG-containing wipes increase the interval between manual underscreen cleaning. Incompatible materials include natural rubber wiper blades and some acrylic stencil cleaning equipment components, which swell upon prolonged contact with glycol; perfluoroelastomer or EPDM wiper seals are preferred, as confirmed by immersion testing for 168 h and hardness change measurement according to ASTM D471-16a.
Aqueous cleaning solutions for water-soluble flux residues after reflow often contain 10 wt% to 30 wt% propylene glycol electronic/EL grade to dissolve organic acid activators and maintain wetting of low-clearance component standoffs. In an inline spray-in-air cleaner, the solution is sprayed at 45°C to 60°C and 2 bar to 5 bar through flat-jet nozzles, followed by deionized water rinses at a resistivity above 18 MΩ·cm. The cleaning outcome is verified by IPC TM-650 method 2.3.25 resistivity of solvent extracts; a clean board should produce an extract resistivity above 50 MΩ·cm or a sodium chloride equivalent below 1.56 µg/cm², depending on the acceptance class. PG concentrations above 30 wt% in the cleaning bath reduce the soil load capacity and create a viscous film on the board after drying, which can falsely lower ionic contamination readings by encapsulating salts. The bath is monitored by refractometry or gas chromatography each shift, and the PG content is replenished when the concentration drops more than 2 wt% from the set point. The presence of glycol in the rinse water must be controlled because discharge regulations and wastewater treatment fouling limit glycol load; closed-loop rinse systems with activated carbon and reverse osmosis are used where local limits apply. This cleaning step is incompatible with unprotected bare-copper boards and with certain no-clean residues that are designed to be left in place; aggressive PG-water blends can soften solvent-sensitive solder mask and remove markings if contact time exceeds 10 min. Process validation uses a standardized test board with 0805 capacitors and 0.4 mm pitch quad flat no-lead parts, and the wash recipe is adjusted until no visible white residues and no SIR failures are recorded after 168 h at 85°C and 85% RH per IPC TM-650 method 2.6.3.3.
Competitive Propylene Glycol Electronic/EL Grade prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Propylene Glycol Electronic/EL Grade is a high-purity propane-1,2-diol stream refined for closed-loop electronics manufacturing, photoresist ancillary formulations, and controlled-humidity cleanroom operations. The substance is identified by CAS 57-55-6, empirical formula C3H8O2, and molar mass 76.09 g/mol. The “Electronic/EL” designation is a purity class, not a proprietary model; supplier certificates of analysis for this grade typically report assay values of not less than 99.9% by gas chromatography using ASTM E202, water content not exceeding 0.05% by Karl Fischer titration using ASTM E203, and color of 5 Pt-Co or less by ASTM D1209. The material functions as a polar solvent, freeze-point suppressant, and moisture-conditioning agent where residual ionic species must remain below defect thresholds for metal interconnects and dielectric layers. It is selected over technical-grade propylene glycol because ordinary industrial streams can contain chloride, sulfate, sodium, and oxidation byproducts at concentrations that elevate leakage current and accelerate electrochemical migration. In semiconductor wet-bench operations, the product is used for formulated cleaning solutions, flux residue removal, and as a component in thermal management fluids; in each case the electronic grade is not defined by a single compound property but by the aggregate of low moisture, low ionic contamination, low UV-active impurities, and controlled particle counts.
The principal separation is not the propylene glycol molecule itself, but the frequency and depth of purification. USP/EP monograph material satisfies pharmacopeial assay and water limits, while industrial streams may carry glycol ethers, color bodies, chloride, sulfate, and oxidative acids from conventional distillation. Electronic/EL grade is subjected to additional dehydration, ion-polishing, and submicrometer filtration so that mobile ions such as sodium, potassium, chloride, and sulfate do not migrate to wafer surfaces or copper interconnects during subsequent processing. The following values are representative supplier specifications and are not universal; individual lot certificates of analysis define exact limits.
| Parameter | Electronic/EL Grade | USP/EP Monograph | Technical/Industrial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assay by GC, ASTM E202 | ≥ 99.9% | ≥ 99.5% | 98.0–99.5% |
| Water by ASTM E203 | ≤ 0.05% | ≤ 0.2% | 0.1–0.5% |
| Chloride by ion chromatography | ≤ 1 ppm | not routinely specified | ≤ 10 ppm |
| Sulfate by ion chromatography | ≤ 1 ppm | not routinely specified | ≤ 10 ppm |
| Iron by ICP-MS | ≤ 0.1 ppm | ≤ 0.5 ppm | ≤ 1 ppm |
| UV absorbance at 220 nm, 1 cm path length | ≤ 0.10 AU | not typically reported | not typically reported |
The USP/EP column reflects general monograph expectations for propylene glycol, but residue limits for inorganic anions are often absent because pharmaceutical use does not require the same wafer-level ionic cleanliness. Technical/industrial propylene glycol is frequently produced for antifreeze, deicing, or polymer intermediate applications where chloride and sulfate limits above 1 ppm are acceptable. Electronic/EL grade therefore differs by specification, not by chemical identity; the grade is selected only when downstream analytical release, ionic cleanliness, and UV transmittance are part of the manufacturing control plan.
In wafer-level interconnect reliability testing, mobile ion contamination is assessed because sodium and chloride ions can drift under bias and shift threshold voltages in metal-oxide-semiconductor devices. Residual chloride can promote pitting of aluminum bond pads, while sulfate can form acidic residues that attack flux-laden copper traces. Electronic/EL grade propylene glycol is therefore specified with chloride and sulfate ceilings of 1 ppm or lower by ion chromatography. The grade is not inherently non-ionic; propylene glycol is a neutral molecule, but trace amounts of ionic impurities from feedstock or stainless-steel transfer lines can remain unless removed by final polishing. Quality control laboratories typically report chloride, nitrate, phosphate, and sulfate by ion chromatography and report sodium, potassium, calcium, iron, copper, nickel, and zinc by ICP-MS. In closed-loop cooling and cleaning applications, the conductivity of the final formulated fluid remains a system-level parameter; dissolved carbon dioxide, inhibitor salts, and make-up water can contribute conductivity even when the raw propylene glycol meets electronic-grade ionic limits. Published data for specific semiconductor tool configurations is limited, but the practice is to monitor conductivity, pH, chloride, sulfate, and total organic carbon at defined maintenance intervals rather than relying on raw material ionic values alone.
In edge bead remover and photoresist thinner formulations that contact 248 nm and 193 nm lithography tracks, UV-active impurities in propylene glycol can interfere with spectral monitoring of dispense volume and film thickness. Electronic/EL grade is specified with UV absorbance limits at 220 nm, 250 nm, and 275 nm because aromatic and conjugated carbonyl byproducts from incomplete purification absorb in this range. Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection alone does not detect non-volatile UV-absorbing species; simultaneous UV spectrophotometry and total organic carbon analysis are required. A typical electronic/EL certificate of analysis reports UV absorbance not greater than 0.10 AU at 220 nm, not greater than 0.05 AU at 250 nm, and not greater than 0.02 AU at 275 nm using a 1 cm path length. These values are not established by a single global standard; they are supplier-defined specifications aligned with the metrology limits of ArF and KrF photoresist processing. Published data for direct photoresist formulation effects can be limited, but the trend is documented that low-molecular-weight aldehydes and ketones can act as chain transfer agents in certain negative-tone resists, altering development rate and sidewall profile.
Closed-loop cooling skids for excimer lasers and plasma etch chillers blend propylene glycol Electronic/EL Grade at 25–50 vol% with deionized water to suppress freezing while maintaining pumpable viscosity. The concentration is not chosen for heat transfer alone; above 50 vol%, the viscosity of the mixture at -10°C increases enough to require pump derating, and the heat capacity per unit volume declines relative to water. Published coolant studies using ASTM D1384 corrosion test methodology show that glycol-water mixtures are not inherently corrosive when formulated with appropriate inhibitors; however, inhibitor packages must be validated for semiconductor-facing materials such as copper, nickel-plated aluminum, and fluoroelastomer seals. Electronic/EL grade reduces the initial ionic burden, but added inhibitors can contribute borate, phosphate, or molybdate species that raise conductivity; therefore the final fluid, not the raw propylene glycol, must be qualified against wafer-level defect criteria.
Pure electronic/EL grade propylene glycol has a viscosity of approximately 56 mPa·s at 20°C, compared with 1 mPa·s for water and 21 mPa·s for ethylene glycol at the same temperature. This higher viscosity reduces heat transfer coefficient and raises pump energy consumption in low-temperature chiller loops. Ethylene glycol provides lower viscosity and slightly better heat capacity per unit volume, but propylene glycol is frequently selected where acute mammalian toxicity and wastewater ecotoxicity are process constraints. Table 2 lists representative physical property values for pure electronic/EL grade propylene glycol at standard pressure.
| Property | Value | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Boiling point | 188.2°C | ASTM D1078 |
| Density at 20°C | 1.035–1.037 g/cm³ | ASTM D4052 |
| Viscosity at 20°C | 56 mPa·s | ASTM D445 |
| Flash point, closed cup | 103°C | ASTM D92 |
| Autoignition temperature | 371°C | ASTM E659 |
| Refractive index at 25°C | 1.4310–1.4325 | ASTM D1218 |
At low operating temperatures, propylene glycol-water mixtures can become more viscous than ethylene glycol-water mixtures at the same concentration. This distinction is critical for immersion cooling and heat exchanger sizing. When replacing ethylene glycol with propylene glycol in an existing chiller loop, pressure drop across brazed plate heat exchangers may increase because viscosity at -20°C is higher for propylene glycol-water mixtures; pump impeller sizing and bypass valve settings require recalculation. The freeze protection limit also differs by concentration and is not linear; published freeze point curves from coolant suppliers should be used rather than estimating from pure component melting point.
Particle levels in Electronic/EL grade are controlled by submicrometer cartridge filtration at the packaging point. For semiconductor-grade solvent distribution, liquid particle counters often report counts for particles larger than 0.5 µm, but published numerical limits vary by supplier and cleanroom classification. The product should be dispensed through point-of-use 0.1 µm or 0.2 µm filters to protect immersion lithography nozzles and fine-pitch dispense tips. Filtration does not remove dissolved ionic species; therefore particle control is a separate quality parameter from chloride, sulfate, and metal limits.
High-density polyethylene drums and 316L stainless steel totes fitted with dry nitrogen padding are standard primary containers for Electronic/EL grade propylene glycol. In semiconductor chemical distribution systems, line materials are limited to PFA, PTFE, or 316L stainless steel; unlined carbon steel is not used because trace iron dissolution raises the ICP-MS metal background and compromises UV transmittance. Storage should remain in sealed containers at 15–30°C. The material is hygroscopic; repeated partial-drum withdrawals in uncontrolled cleanroom humidity above 60% RH can increase water content by 0.05–0.1% over multiple days, shifting the Karl Fischer result outside electronic-grade limits. Nitrogen blanketing or small-container transfer is required for moisture-sensitive applications. Incompatibilities include strong oxidizers such as concentrated nitric acid, permanganates, and dichromates; exothermic oxidation can generate organic acids that raise conductivity. Compatibility with amine-based corrosion inhibitors and alkaline cleaning concentrates should be verified at process temperature because pH shifts above 9 in oxygenated solutions can accelerate oxidative degradation and aldehyde formation, which affects downstream UV absorbance and residue behavior.