Products

Hydrochloric Acid Electronic/EL Grade

    • Product Name: Hydrochloric Acid Electronic/EL Grade
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 240454
    Product Name Hydrochloric Acid Electronic/EL Grade
    Iupac Name Hydrogen chloride (aqueous solution)
    Chemical Formula HCl
    Cas Number 7647-01-0
    Molecular Weight 36.46 g/mol
    Grade Electronic/EL
    Appearance Clear liquid
    Color Colorless
    Odor Pungent
    Concentration 36.5–38.0% w/w HCl
    Assay As Hcl 36.5–38.0% w/w
    Density 1.19 g/cm³ at 20 °C
    Specific Gravity 1.19
    Molarity Approximately 12.1 mol/L
    Solubility In Water Fully miscible; exothermic dissolution
    Acidity Strong monoprotic mineral acid
    Pka Approximately -7
    Metal Impurity Level ppb-level for EL/electronic grade

    As an accredited Hydrochloric Acid Electronic/EL Grade factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Packaged in 1 L HDPE bottles with secure seals, labeled for ultrapure EL-grade hydrochloric acid, ensuring contamination-free handling and storage.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) 20′ FCL loading of Electronic/EL Grade Hydrochloric Acid: secure UN-approved containers on pallets, protect from damage, ensure ventilation, and segregate from incompatible chemicals.
    Shipping Hydrochloric Acid Electronic/EL Grade ships as a corrosive hazardous material. Use DOT-approved polyethylene drums or specialized totes, securely sealed to prevent leaks. Label with Class 8 corrosion signage and complete proper documentation. Transport via ground freight only, following all federal regulations, ensuring compatibility, ventilation, and spill containment.
    Storage Store Electronic/EL Grade hydrochloric acid in tightly sealed, high-purity fluoropolymer or glass-lined containers, away from direct sunlight and heat. Keep in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, segregated from strong oxidizers, metals, alkalis, and cyanides. Use corrosion-resistant secondary containment, clearly label, and inspect regularly to prevent contamination and vapor release.
    Shelf Life Shelf life is typically 24 months when stored sealed in original container, away from heat, moisture, and contaminants.
    Application of Hydrochloric Acid Electronic/EL Grade

    Front-end wafer preparation for gate oxidation begins with a two-stage wet-bench sequence in which electronic-grade hydrochloric acid is combined with hydrogen peroxide and ultrapure water at a volumetric ratio of 6:1:1 H2O:HCl:H2O2. The HCl component is supplied at 35–37% assay and must conform to SEMI C27 metallic impurity specifications; the peroxide component conforms to SEMI C28. The mixture is heated to 75–80 °C in a quartz overflow bath with PTFE or PVDF plumbing and 0.1 µm fluoropolymer cartridge filtration. Under these conditions hydrochloric acid converts aluminium, iron, copper, zinc and alkali contaminants into soluble chloride species, while hydrogen peroxide raises the redox potential so that dissolved metals do not redeposit on the silicon surface. Immersion time is typically 10 min, but integration engineers adjust the duration according to incoming contamination load and device thermal budget. Metallic surface concentration is measured by vapour phase decomposition inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and is routinely held below 1×10¹⁰ atoms/cm² for iron, copper, zinc and aluminium. Bath life is governed not by acid depletion but by peroxide decomposition at 75 °C; unstabilised hydrogen peroxide in this acidic matrix can lose sufficient oxidative activity within 2–4 h to require metered replenishment or fresh makeup. The finished wafer exits the wet bench with a thin chemical oxide of 0.8–1.5 nm thickness, which is subsequently stripped in dilute HF prior to furnace loading. The limiting operational boundary is moisture and metallic impurity accumulation in the exhaust duct; acid-laden vapours from the hot bath are extracted through a polypropylene exhaust with a 0.3 µm demister to prevent chloride aerosol condensation in the cleanroom airflow.

    What Limits Chloride Addition in Acid-Copper Through-Silicon Via Plating Baths?

    Chloride addition in acid-copper through-silicon via plating is governed by a narrow adsorption window that separates void-free bottom-up fill from sidewall nodulation and via-lip overhang. Electronic-grade hydrochloric acid is used not as the primary electrolyte but as a chloride ion source; typical acid-copper sulphate via-fill baths contain 180–240 g/L CuSO4·5H2O, 40–80 g/L H2SO4, organic suppressor and polymer additives, and 30–70 mg/L chloride ion. The chloride target is trimmed by dosing a dilute solution of electronic-grade HCl, typically 0.1–1.0 vol% in ultrapure water, through a peristaltic pump into the recirculating bath return line. Chloride concentration is verified off-line by potentiometric titration with silver nitrate per ASTM D512-23, with calibration standards matched to the organic additive matrix. The plating tool is a vertical continuous electroplating cell with insoluble Ir/Ta anodes, a cation exchange membrane, and pulse-reverse rectification; via fill is performed at 1–2 A/dm² with wafer rotation between 30–60 rpm and bath temperature of 20–25 °C. Chloride adsorbs on the copper surface, destabilises the suppressor layer at the via bottom under forced convection, and prevents spontaneous passivation that would otherwise freeze deposition in the middle of the via. The lower limit of 30 mg/L is set by incomplete suppression release and centre voids; the upper limit beyond 70–80 mg/L shifts deposition to the field and via lip, producing overhang, seam defects and rough sidewalls. Electronic-grade HCl avoids iron, lead, tin and silver backgrounds that occur in technical acid; these impurities can co-deposit in the via or alter suppressor adsorption. End-point metrology consists of cross-section scanning electron microscopy after fill, with void area in fully processed test vehicles kept below 1% of via cross-sectional area, and four-point probe sheet resistance mapping detects non-uniform plating. Incoming HCl purity is referenced to SEMI C27, while packaged-device qualification is governed by the manufacturer’s own thermal cycling and copper protrusion test methods for three-dimensional interconnect.

    At polycrystalline silicon production sites, electronic-grade hydrochloric acid is metered into a trichlorosilane synthesis reactor as a high-purity chlorine source for converting metallurgical-grade silicon into a rectifiable chlorosilane intermediate. The reaction Si + 3 HCl → SiHCl3 + H2 is operated at 300–400 °C and 2–5 bar in a fluidized-bed or stirred-bed reactor loaded with silicon particles sized to 100–200 µm; unreacted HCl and fine silicon dust are separated in a hot cyclone and returned to the bed. Acid purity is critical because metallic impurities present in technical HCl—aluminium, iron, calcium, boron, phosphorus and arsenic—become volatile chlorides or entrained aerosols that enter the crude trichlorosilane and persist through simple condensation. Electronic-grade HCl supplied under SEMI C27 is drawn from a dedicated low-particulate vaporizer with PFA/PTFE wetted surfaces; steam pressure is limited to avoid carryover of liquid droplets. Crude trichlorosilane is purified through a train of distillation columns, rejecting low-boiling chlorosilanes and high-boiling metal chlorides to meet silicon feedstock specifications for Siemens deposition. Polysilicon rods are grown in a Siemens bell jar at 1,050–1,100 °C from hydrogen and purified trichlorosilane on thin silicon filaments; deposition rate is limited by silicon surface temperature and trichlorosilane partial pressure, with parasitic powder formation controlled by gas distribution. Final polysilicon is sampled by secondary ion mass spectrometry for boron and phosphorus, with high-efficiency monocrystalline ingot pulling typically requiring boron and phosphorus below 0.1 ppbw each. The operational boundary for HCl feed is moisture ingress; water reacts with chlorosilanes to form siloxane oligomers that foul distillation reboilers, so transfer lines are dried to a dew point below -60 °C before introduction of HCl vapour.

    Directional Etching of Indium Phosphide at Elevated H3PO4:HCl Ratios

    Indium phosphide mesa patterning on optoelectronic wafers depends on controlled reagent ratio and low metallic impurity background in the etching mixture. A typical formulation for mesa isolation uses volumetric H3PO4:HCl = 3:1 at 20–25 °C, prepared with electronic-grade phosphoric acid and SEMI C27 hydrochloric acid. The HCl component provides chloride complexation of indium while the phosphoric acid moderates dissolution rate and reduces undercut. Reported etch rates for undoped or n-type InP in this mixture are typically in the 0.1–0.5 µm/min range depending on temperature, crystal orientation and doping level; published data for this specific configuration is limited to line width and sidewall angle measurements on patterned wafers rather than exhaustive kinetic rate laws. The etch is performed in a laminar-flow wet deck with immersion tanks recirculating the mixture through 0.2 µm PTFE filters, with process temperature held to ±1 °C to prevent lateral etch variability. Photoresist adhesion is maintained with a post-bake at 110–120 °C; undercut is measured by top-down scanning electron microscopy after resist stripping. The finished product is an InP mesa structure with smooth sidewalls used in buried heterostructure laser diodes, edge-emitting lasers and photodiodes. Metallic contamination is controlled by HCl purity, because residual copper or iron in the etchant can deposit on exposed InP and alter subsequent organometallic regrowth or Schottky contact formation. Process effluent is segregated for phosphorus recovery or dedicated waste treatment because phosphoric acid and indium chloride streams require separate pH neutralisation.

    Quartzware Reconditioning in Diffusion Furnace Wet Benches

    Quartz tubes, boats and liners from diffusion and LPCVD furnaces are immersed in a 10% electronic-grade HCl solution at 60 °C for 20–40 min after an initial HF-based oxide removal step. The acid bath is prepared with ultrapure water meeting ASTM D1193-06(2018) Type E-I and is contained in a polypropylene tank with 40 kHz ultrasonic agitation. Hydrochloric acid in this application dissolves residual metal contaminants—particularly iron, copper and sodium—that remain adsorbed on quartz surfaces after previous process cycles. The HCl must meet SEMI C27 because reconditioned quartzware contacts production wafers in thermal processing; use of technical acid would reintroduce sub-surface metals that out-diffuse during furnace operation. The post-immersion rinse is continued until effluent resistivity reaches 18 MΩ·cm, after which the quartzware is dried in HEPA-filtered nitrogen and returned to the diffusion service area in sealed polypropylene carriers. A quartz surface particle check under high-intensity light provides a qualitative release criterion prior to furnace installation.

    Regeneration of strong acid cation resin in semiconductor-grade ultrapure water plants draws electronic-grade hydrochloric acid as a 5–10% regenerant at a low service flow of 2–4 bed volumes/h. The dosing skid dilutes 35–37% electronic-grade HCl with Type E-I ultrapure water in a fiberglass-reinforced polypropylene mixing tank; the diluted regenerant is introduced counter-current to the exhausted resin bed to displace calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium from sulfonic acid exchange sites. Selection of electronic-grade rather than technical-grade acid is a contamination-transfer control: iron and aluminium present in technical acid would load the resin during regeneration and subsequently desorb slowly during service, producing cation excursions in the final polishing loop. Effluent pH, conductivity and sodium ion concentration are monitored continuously; slow rinse begins when effluent pH drops to 2.0–2.5 and ends when rinse water conductivity approaches the feed value. Finished UPW from the polishing loop is controlled to 18.2 MΩ·cm resistivity at 25 °C, total organic carbon below 1 µg/L, and particle counts below 10 counts/L at 0.05 µm. Operational limitations include acid fume extraction at the regeneration skid and elastomer compatibility; EPDM gaskets in the dilution line are replaced on a preventive maintenance schedule because hydrolytic degradation in warm acid causes particulate shedding into the regenerant stream.

    When Copper Seed Layer Removal After Bump Electroplating Requires Sub-ppb Metallic Backgrounds

    After solder bump electroplating, the copper seed layer is removed with a hydrochloric acid/hydrogen peroxide microetch that must not contribute metallic contamination to the bump interface. The etching mixture is prepared from electronic-grade HCl, electronic-grade H2O2 and ultrapure water; a representative volumetric ratio is 1:1:8 HCl:H2O2:H2O, applied by spray or immersion at 30–40 °C for 30–90 s depending on seed thickness and line spacing. Hydrogen peroxide oxidises Cu(0) to Cu²+, while chloride shifts the redox potential and forms soluble copper chloro complexes; the SEMI C27 HCl background prevents silver, tin, lead, iron and zinc from adsorbing onto the exposed copper or titanium adhesion layer. End-point detection uses optical emission spectroscopy on the etch chamber to stop the process when copper emission intensity falls below a preset baseline. Undercut of the seed layer edge is measured by focused ion beam cross-section and is maintained below 1.0 µm per side to avoid loss of solder bump shear strength. After rinsing and drying, the wafer proceeds to reflow at 240–260 °C under nitrogen; subsequent ball shear and intermetallic compound thickness are tested according to the packaging qualification plan. Compliance with RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Annex III is verified by X-ray fluorescence screening for lead and cadmium on the finished bump wafer, because lead residues from lower-purity acid can appear as interface contamination even when bulk solder composition meets the directive.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Hydrochloric Acid Electronic/EL Grade prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Hydrochloric Acid Electronic/EL Grade is supplied as an aqueous hydrogen chloride solution intended for semiconductor, photovoltaic, and flat-panel wet-processing operations. Supplier product identifiers include HCl 36% EL, HCl 31% EL, and HCl 35% EL, with the principal electronic-grade concentration band being 36.5–38.0% w/w HCl. Chemical identity is defined by CAS 7647-01-0, EC number 231-595-7, molar mass 36.46 g/mol, and transport classification UN 1789, Class 8, PG II. The material is produced by direct synthesis of hydrogen and chlorine, absorption into high-purity water, and subsequent submicron filtration; by-product hydrochloric acid from chlorinated-organic manufacturing is not considered suitable for EL-grade release without additional purification because residual chlorinated hydrocarbons can contribute to organic residues.

    The product differs from commodity muriatic acid in trace-cation, anion, and particle burden rather than in total acid concentration. It is filled in cleanroom environments and packaged in fluoropolymer-lined drums, high-density polyethylene containers, or stainless-steel bulk systems with appropriate liners. Density of the 36% solution at 20°C is approximately 1.18 g/cm³. The supplier certificate of analysis typically reports lot number, HCl assay, color, residue after ignition, free chlorine, sulfate, sulfite, phosphate, ammonium, specific trace metals, and particle count. The product is not interchangeable with food-grade hydrochloric acid merely because CAS number and concentration may match; food-grade material under 21 CFR 182.1057 is controlled for arsenic and heavy metals, whereas electronic/EL grade is controlled for the broader transition-metal and particle panel required by semiconductor wet-processing standards such as SEMI C29.

    What Impurity Profile Separates EL-Grade from ACS Reagent and Technical Muriatic Acid?

    The most significant performance difference is not total acidity but the concentration of non-volatile residue, redox-active transition metals, and particles that can shift etch rates or degrade device yields. In electronic-grade material, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, nickel, and zinc are specified in low ppb to sub-ppb ranges, whereas technical acid may contain 1–10 ppm of iron alone and no routine particle specification. ACS reagent grade HCl may satisfy many laboratory wet-chemistry requirements, but it is not supplied with a cleanroom particle certificate or SEMI C29 cation limits, so it is not a direct substitute in front-end cleaning and etch baths.

    Table 1. Typical aqueous hydrochloric acid grade comparison
    ParameterElectronic/EL GradeACS Reagent GradeTechnical/Muriatic Acid
    HCl assay (w/w)36.5–38.0%36.5–38.0%28–33%
    Color≤10 APHA≤10 APHA≤30–50 APHA supplier-dependent
    Residue after ignition≤1 ppm≤5 ppmnot routinely controlled
    Sulfate (SO₄²⁻)≤0.5 ppm≤5 ppm> 50 ppm typical
    Iron (Fe)≤0.02 ppm≤0.2 ppm1–10 ppm typical
    Particle count ≥0.2 μmsupplier-certifiednot specifiednot controlled

    The absence of corrosion inhibitors and organic surfactants is a further distinction. Technical acid used for steel pickling may contain additives that are unacceptable in semiconductor etch or ultrapure-water regeneration. Electronic/EL grade is not necessarily interchangeable with pharmaceutical-grade material, because compendial limits focus on residue on ignition, arsenic, and heavy metals rather than the full cation panel, submicron particulate burden, and lot-to-lot process-control limits required for wafer fabrication.

    Release testing for electronic-grade HCl typically includes inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry per ISO 17294-2:2016 for trace-metal distribution, ion chromatography per ASTM D4327 for sulfate, sulfite, phosphate, and bromide, and acidimetric assay per ISO 904:2008. Particle counts are verified with an optical particle counter at point of fill in an ISO 14644-1:2015 Class 5 cleanroom, where maximum airborne particle concentration is 3,520 particles/m³ at ≥0.5 μm. The combination of low trace metals and controlled particles is intended to reduce electrical defect formation in gate oxide, interconnect, and thin-film transistor layers. Exact particle limits are supplier-defined and must be stated on the certificate of analysis because published data for a universal SEMI C29 particle specification covering all sub-0.5 μm channels is limited.

    Semiconductor Wet Etch and Mixed-Bed Regeneration Conditions

    In front-end wet processing, electronic-grade HCl is used in SC-2 cleaning baths, typically blended as 1 part HCl, 1 part H₂O₂, and 5 parts deionized water at 70–80°C to convert residual metals into soluble chloride complexes. The low cation content avoids recontamination of the wafer after the oxidant step. In metal etch operations, HCl/HNO₃ mixtures are applied to chromium, aluminum, or indium tin oxide at process-specific concentrations; the HCl component supplies chloride anions that modify oxide dissolution and undercut profiles. Aluminum etching proceeds by the exothermic reaction 2Al + 6HCl → 2AlCl₃ + 3H₂, and bath temperature must be controlled to prevent excessive hydrogen evolution and resist lifting.

    In ultrapure-water systems, EL-grade HCl is diluted to 4–6% w/w for cation resin regeneration in mixed-bed polishers. Regeneration is followed by a deionized-water rinse until resistivity measured at 25°C returns to ≥18.2 MΩ·cm per ASTM D1125-14. The use of electronic-grade rather than technical acid reduces the introduction of iron and calcium into the resin bed, which otherwise extends rinse-down time and lowers final water resistivity. Equipment for dilute acid regeneration includes CPVC or PVDF piping, PFA-lined metering pumps, and downstream neutralization tanks with pH controllers set to 6–9 before discharge.

    In ion-exchange regeneration, the acid front displaces Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Na⁺, and K⁺ according to resin selectivity, but incomplete regeneration occurs when regenerant contact time is shortened below the resin manufacturer’s recommended minimum. Ferric iron fouling is a known field failure mode: technical-grade HCl with 1–10 ppm iron can precipitate Fe(OH)₃ within the resin matrix during rinse, causing pressure-drop increase and channeling. Electronic-grade HCl specified at ≤0.02 ppm Fe reduces this failure mechanism. Regenerant concentration above 6% can also increase osmotic shock and bead fracture in gel-type cation resins.

    Bulk storage tanks for 31% and 36% EL-grade acid are constructed from unplasticized PVC, CPVC, PVDF, or fiberglass-reinforced plastic with a thermoplastic liner. Low-pressure transfer is conducted with PFA dip tubes, PTFE bellows, and CPVC piping conforming to ASTM D1784 cell class 23447 for rated temperature service. Vent lines are connected to wet scrubbers or dry acid scrubbers because the solution emits HCl vapor; occupational exposure is controlled below the ACGIH ceiling limit of 2 ppm and the OSHA ceiling limit of 5 ppm. The acid must not be stored adjacent to sodium hypochlorite, ammonia, or alkaline hydroxide systems because rapid gas-generating reactions release chlorine, ammonium chloride mist, or heat. If dilution is required, acid is added to water, never water to concentrated acid, and the heat of dilution is managed by jacketed mixing vessels or controlled static-mixer pump rates. Carbon steel, 304 stainless steel, and unlined concrete are incompatible as wetted materials.

    When Sub-ppb Cation Control Is Required in FEOL Post-Litho Cleaning

    After dry etch or ash steps, wafers processed at advanced nodes require cleaning sequences in which sodium, potassium, lithium, and transition-metal deposition from process liquids must be below device-specific threshold limits. In this application, the selection of HCl grade is determined by cation sum rather than by total acidity. Electronic-grade material with release limits in the single-digit ppb range for sodium, potassium, calcium, and iron is matched to front-end cleaning tools equipped with point-of-use filtration and blanketing. In contrast, ACS reagent HCl may contain measurable calcium and magnesium at levels that are acceptable for laboratory wet chemistry but not for gate stack or contact cleaning. The operational boundary is the point at which a specific trace metal exceeds its device-specific split-lot threshold; published data for this specific configuration is limited at sub-10 nm process nodes, so device qualification requires wafer-level testing rather than reliance on supplier certificates alone.

    The compliance and analytical method checklist for the electronic/EL grade material is summarized in Table 2. This checklist is used during incoming inspection and supplier qualification to confirm that the delivered material matches the grade claimed on the certificate of analysis.

    Table 2. Compliance and analytical method checklist
    Control pointMethod or standardLimit or condition
    Total acidityISO 904:200836.5–38.0% as HCl
    Trace metalsISO 17294-2:20160.02 ppm Fe, single-digit ppb critical ions
    AnionsASTM D43270.5 ppm sulfate, ≤0.5 ppm sulfite, ≤0.2 ppm phosphate
    Cleanroom fillISO 14644-1:20153,520 particles/m³ at ≥0.5 μm
    Transport classificationUN 1789, Class 8, PG IIcorrosion hazard
    Top