Products

3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal

    • Product Name: 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: sales8@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications
    HS Code 147156
    Product Name 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal
    Synonyms Bourgeonal; 4-tert-Butylbenzenepropanal; 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propionaldehyde; 4-tert-Butylhydrocinnamaldehyde
    Cas Number 18127-01-0
    Ec Number 242-016-2
    Iupac Name 3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)propanal
    Molecular Formula C13H18O
    Molecular Weight 190.28 g/mol
    Appearance Colorless to pale yellow liquid
    Odor Floral, lily-of-the-valley, green
    Density 0.956-0.966 g/cm3 at 25 °C
    Boiling Point 265 °C at 760 mmHg
    Flash Point >100 °C
    Refractive Index 1.515-1.520 at 20 °C
    Solubility Insoluble in water; soluble in alcohol and oils
    Logp 4.2 (estimated)
    Purity Typically ≥98% (GC)
    Storage Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated place away from light and ignition sources
    Hazard May cause skin, eye, and respiratory irritation
    Smiles CC(C)(C)c1ccc(CCC=O)cc1
    Inchi InChI=1S/C13H18O/c1-13(2,3)12-8-6-11(7-9-12)5-4-10-14/h6-10H,4-5H2,1-3H3

    As an accredited 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Packaged in a 25 kg tamper-evident HDPE drum with inner liner for safe storage and transport, labeled 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) 20′ FCL: Load palletized, labeled drums upright in a clean, dry container; brace securely and protect from heat, moisture, and sunlight.
    Shipping Shipping description: 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal (Bourgeonal) is generally not regulated as dangerous goods for transport; however, if it meets aquatic-hazard criteria, ship as UN 3082, Environmentally hazardous liquid, n.o.s., Class 9, PG III. Use closed containers, cool dry storage, and avoid heat/ignition.
    Storage Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from heat, ignition sources, and direct sunlight. Protect from moisture. Keep containers tightly closed, preferably under inert gas, to limit oxidation. Segregate from strong oxidizers, acids, bases, and amines. Use secondary containment, clear labeling, and inventory control. Follow local regulations and the SDS; restrict access to trained personnel.
    Shelf Life Shelf life is generally 24 months when stored tightly sealed in a cool, dry, well-ventilated place away from light and ignition sources.
    Application of 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal

    Schiff Base Equilibrium and Maceration Kinetics in Ethanolic Fine Fragrance Concentrates

    3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal (CAS 18127-01-0, molecular weight 190.28 g/mol, molecular formula C13H18O) enters fine fragrance manufacturing as a liquid aryl alkyl aldehyde imparting a muguet/lily-of-the-valley odor character in alcoholic Eau de Toilette and Eau de Parfum formulations. The para-tert-butyl substitution on the phenyl ring suppresses ring hydroxylation and confers a substantivity profile that differentiates the compound from unsubstituted hydrocinnamaldehydes; published data for precise vapor pressure and odor threshold of this specific configuration is limited, and industrial formulators rely on headspace gas chromatography profiling rather than isolated physical-chemistry constants. In commercial parfum concentrate development, the aldehyde is typically dosed at 0.05–1.20 wt% of the concentrate, corresponding to 0.0075–0.18 wt% in a finished Eau de Toilette at 15 wt% fragrance loading, or 0.01–0.24 wt% in an Eau de Parfum at 20 wt% loading. Regulatory compliance for this application boundary requires a Cosmetic Product Safety Report under EC 1223/2009 Annex I with margin-of-safety exposure data generated according to the current SCCS Notes of Guidance. Fragrance compound certification against the IFRA Standards is a mandatory precondition; since the compound belongs to the aryl alkyl aldehyde class, the supplier must provide a certificate confirming compliance with the current IFRA Safety Assessment for the specific finished product category and use level. REACH registration under EC 1907/2006 is required at the ≥1 t/a tonnage band, with CLP notification under EC 1272/2008 for self-classified or harmonized hazard endpoints.

    Downstream manufacturing of ethanolic fine fragrances proceeds in 316L stainless steel or glass-lined maturation vessels of 250–2,000 L capacity. The concentrate is diluted with perfumer's alcohol, commonly denatured as SDA 39-C or SDA 40-B, and the diluted batch is subjected to maturation at 10–15°C for 14–28 days. During this period, reversible acetal formation occurs between the aldehyde carbonyl and ethanol; the equilibrium is strongly shifted toward the free aldehyde at pH 5.5–7.0, but residual acetic acid generated by alcohol oxidation can transiently catalyze acetalization, reducing the olfactory contribution of the compound. Quality control samples are pulled at 48 h intervals and analyzed by capillary GC-FID on a polar polyethylene glycol stationary phase column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm film thickness). A process-specific incompatibility emerges when methyl anthranilate or ethyl anthranilate is present in the formula: the primary aromatic amine condenses with the aldehyde carbonyl to form an azomethine Schiff base. If deliberate slow-release pro-fragrance behavior is not intended, the anthranilate component is segregated during initial blending, or water activity is held below aw 0.2. Published data for the equilibrium conversion rate of this specific aldehyde-anthranilate pair is limited; industrial perfumery practice monitors color development spectrophotometrically at 420–450 nm as a surrogate for Schiff base concentration. Before bottling, the diluted fragrance is chill-filtered at 0–2°C through depth filter sheets with a nominal retention rating of 0.5–1.0 µm to remove high-molecular-weight residues and Schiff base aggregates. Bottling lines operate at 15–20°C with inert blanketing to preserve aldehyde content. Terminal finished product types include Eau de Toilette, Eau de Parfum, extrait de parfum, and alcohol-free oil-based perfume concentrates.

    In leave-on oil-in-water emulsion systems for skin contact, 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal partitions preferentially into the internal lipid phase during manufacture, with an apparent log P of approximately 3.7 governing its distribution between oil droplets and the continuous aqueous phase. The emulsified matrix consists of glyceryl stearate, cetearyl alcohol, and a non-ionic emulsifier blend with typical HLB 10–12; the aldehyde is introduced as part of a pre-blended fragrance oil at 0.3–0.8 wt% of the total emulsion. Within this fragrance oil, the compound is formulated at 0.1–0.5 wt%, yielding a final product concentration in the range of 0.0003–0.004 wt% (3–40 ppm). The European cosmetic safety framework requires a Cosmetic Product Safety Report per EC 1223/2009 Annex I with a margin of safety calculation; manufacturing hygiene is governed by ISO 22716:2007, and the fragrance blend must be certified according to current IFRA Standards for leave-on skin contact products. Batch documentation must include raw material traceability to REACH EC 1907/2006 registration dossiers and supplier SDS compliance with CLP EC 1272/2008.

    Production of the emulsion proceeds in a vacuum homogenizer equipped with a side-sweep anchor (10–30 rpm) and an internal rotor-stator homogenizer (3,000–5,000 rpm). The aqueous and lipid phases are heated separately to 70–75°C, combined under vacuum at −0.4 to −0.6 bar, and homogenized for 10–15 min. Fragrance oil containing the aldehyde is added during the cooldown phase once the batch temperature falls below 40°C, using only the side-sweep agitator at 30–50 rpm to avoid droplet shear and minimize volatilization loss. A chelating agent such as tetrasodium EDTA at 0.05–0.1 wt% is incorporated before fragrance addition to complex trace transition metals leached from equipment surfaces, which otherwise accelerate aldehyde oxidation to 3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)propanoic acid. Final batch pH is adjusted to 5.0–6.0 with citric acid solution because alkaline pH promotes aldol condensation of the aldehyde with other carbonyl species in the fragrance oil. The cooled bulk is discharged into HDPE or glass packaging with low oxygen transmission to limit oxidative degradation during shelf life. Terminal finished products include body lotions, face creams, hand creams, and cold creams.

    Compliance verification matrix for 3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)propanal application pathways
    Application pathwayPrimary regulatory instrumentReferenced clause or test methodVerification point
    Ethanolic fine fragranceEC 1223/2009Annex I, Cosmetic Product Safety ReportPIF/CPSR document
    Leave-on emulsionISO 22716:2007Cosmetic GMP, material traceabilityBatch manufacturing record
    Rinse-off surfactantEC 648/2004/ECAnnex VII allergen labeling, OECD 301FFinished product label
    Powder detergentEC 648/2004/ECAnnex III surfactant biodegradabilitySurfactant raw material dossier
    CandleASTM F2417-17Fire safety specificationThird-party test report
    Research reagentISO 9001:2015Quality management systemSupplier quality agreement

    To What Extent Do Micellar Surfactant Phases Alter Aldehyde Deposition Efficiency?

    When the finished formulation contains anionic surfactant micelles, the deposition efficiency of 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal on skin or hair is governed by its partitioning between bulk water and the hydrophobic micelle interior formed by sodium laureth sulfate, cocamidopropyl betaine, and cocamide monoethanolamine. The aldehyde's log P of approximately 3.7 drives preferential enthalpic association with the micelle core; upon dilution during rinsing, the micellar structure relaxes and releases the fragrance oil as a coarse oil-in-water emulsion with droplet size distribution in the 5–25 µm range. This release behavior directly influences post-rinse odor substantivity. Formulation constraints require the aldehyde concentration in the fragrance oil to be held between 0.2–1.0 wt% to prevent micellar swelling and viscosity collapse in the finished product. The fragrance oil itself is added at 0.5–1.0 wt% of the final formula, placing the aldehyde at 0.001–0.01 wt% in the packaged product. Compliance for rinse-off products under EU law includes the Cosmetic Product Safety Report mandated by EC 1223/2009 Annex I and good manufacturing practice per ISO 22716:2007. Ready biodegradability of the surfactant chassis is assessed by OECD 301F or OECD 301B according to the EU Detergent Regulation EC 648/2004/EC Annex III; the IFRA certificate for the fragrance must specify the rinse-off exposure category.

    Manufacturing is performed at ambient pressure in 316L mixing tanks with counter-rotating central anchor and disperser blades. The surfactant blend is diluted with demineralized water at 40–50°C, then the pH is corrected to 5.5–6.0 with a 50 wt% citric acid solution before viscosity adjustment with sodium chloride at 1.0–1.5 wt%. The fragrance containing the aldehyde is introduced only after thickener addition, at a batch temperature below 30°C, under low-shear mixing at 20–40 rpm to avoid entrapped air and reduce aldehyde evaporation. Laboratory-scale stability monitoring includes centrifugation at 3,000×g for 30 min and storage at 45°C for 90 days to detect phase separation or odor drift. Terminal finished product types include clear shampoo, pearlescent shower bath, and liquid hand soap.

    The high-temperature environment of co-current spray drying towers in powder detergent manufacturing precludes direct incorporation of 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal into the slurry phase. Tower inlet air temperatures reach 300–350°C, and the atomized slurry experiences outlet temperatures of 80–100°C; the aldehyde would undergo unacceptable volatilization loss during atomization, and its carbonyl group is susceptible to base-catalyzed aldol condensation on contact with alkaline builders such as zeolite 4A and sodium carbonate. Consequently, the compound is introduced exclusively in post-tower perfuming operations, where the cooled base powder (20–30°C) is conveyed to a perfuming drum or twin-shaft paddle mixer. The fragrance oil, in which the aldehyde is formulated at 0.5–1.5 wt%, is dosed onto the moving powder bed at 0.1–0.5 wt% of the finished detergent; this yields a final aldehyde concentration of 0.0005–0.0075 wt% (5–75 ppm). Compliance obligations include the EU Detergent Regulation EC 648/2004/EC Annex VII labeling provisions for fragrance allergens, an IFRA certificate for household product categories, and REACH registration under EC 1907/2006.

    To prevent localized high concentration gradients that accelerate aldehyde oxidation and cause base-powder clumping, the fragrance oil is pre-adsorbed onto porous carrier granules such as precipitated silica with oil absorption capacity 200–400 mL/100 g or cross-linked starch microspheres before metering into the mixer. The perfuming drum operates at a rotational speed of 10–20 rpm with a fill level of 30–40% and a residence time of 2–5 min; droplet size from the twin-fluid spray nozzle is controlled to 50–150 µm for uniform distribution. For liquid fabric conditioner processes, the aldehyde is introduced into the molten esterquat dispersion (60–70°C) only after the batch has been cooled to 30–35°C and the pH adjusted to 2.5–3.5 with hydrochloric or lactic acid, since the acidic environment suppresses base-catalyzed aldehyde self-condensation while the low temperature limits hydrolysis. The finished conditioner is cooled and packaged without further heat exposure. Terminal finished product types include high-efficiency powder laundry detergent, enzyme-containing powder detergent, and esterquat-based fabric conditioner.

    Comparative formulation addition rates and processing windows for 3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)propanal across finished product matrices
    Finished product matrixAldehyde in fragrance concentrate (wt%)Fragrance loading in finished product (wt%)Final aldehyde concentration (wt%)Critical processing window
    Eau de Toilette/Eau de Parfum0.05–1.2015–200.0075–0.24Maturation 10–15°C, chill filtration 0–2°C
    Body lotion/cream0.1–0.50.3–0.80.0003–0.004Fragrance addition below 40°C
    Shampoo/shower gel0.2–1.00.5–1.00.001–0.01Post-thickening addition below 30°C
    Powder laundry detergent0.5–1.50.1–0.50.0005–0.0075Post-tower perfuming at 20–30°C
    Candle0.5–2.06–100.03–0.2Fragrance blended at 70–90°C, poured 60–75°C
    Reed diffuser0.5–1.515–250.075–0.375Ambient fill, no heat exposure

    Candle Wax Polarity, Wick Capillary Flow, and Aldehyde Retained Volatility

    The performance of 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal in candle and reed diffuser matrices depends on wax polarity and the capillary transport characteristics of the wick. In container candles, the aldehyde is blended into the fragrance oil at 0.5–2.0 wt%, and the fragrance oil is incorporated at 6–10 wt% of the total wax fill; the resulting aldehyde concentration in the finished candle is 0.03–0.2 wt%. Soy wax (hydrogenated soybean oil) exhibits higher polarity than fully refined paraffin (primarily C20–C40 straight-chain alkanes) and therefore retains the moderately polar aldehyde function more readily; however, fragrance loads above 8 wt% in soy wax can induce syneresis and surface sweating, especially if the aldehyde is over-dosed relative to the fragrance oil's solubility capacity. The wick must be selected to counterbalance the viscosity and surface tension changes induced by the aldehyde; cotton wicks with a paper core or zinc core are used to maintain a steady molten wax pool temperature of 60–75°C and prevent flame instability. Production compliance for candles requires conformity to ASTM F2417-17 fire safety specifications and, in the EU, EN 15493:2019 candle fire safety requirements; labeling of the finished candle for the US market is further governed by ASTM F2058. If the candle is marketed as a scented consumer article within the EU, the finished product falls under the General Product Safety Directive 2001/95/EC and REACH EC 1907/2006, while IFRA standards for non-skin-contact air care categories guide fragrance dosage.

    Manufacturing proceeds by melting the wax to 80–90°C, adding the fragrance oil at 10–15°C above the wax melt point under paddle stirring at 60–120 rpm for 3–5 min, and pouring into containers at 60–75°C to minimize surface defects and air entrapment. The candles are cured at 20–25°C for 24–72 h before wick trimming and lid placement; the curing period allows the crystalline wax structure to stabilize and partially immobilizes the fragrance within the solid lipid matrix. In reed diffusers, the aldehyde-containing fragrance oil is dissolved at 15–25 wt% in a volatile carrier blend such as dipropylene glycol methyl ether or Augeo Clean Multi, yielding an aldehyde concentration of 0.075–0.375 wt%; the reeds are natural rattan with capillary channels that transport the low-viscosity solution to the evaporation surface at ambient temperature. Terminal finished products include soy container candles, paraffin pillar candles, reed diffusers, and electric warmers.

    When Bourgeonal Functions as an OR1D2 Ligand in Pharmacological and Reproductive Biology Studies

    Beyond fragrance manufacturing, 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal is employed as a pharmacological tool compound for investigating the human olfactory receptor OR1D2 (also designated hOR17-4), which is expressed in both olfactory sensory neurons and mammalian spermatozoa. Calcium imaging experiments using human spermatozoa have demonstrated transient intracellular calcium responses at bourgeonal concentrations of approximately 100 µM; the effect is attenuated by the selective antagonist undecanal. Published dose-response data for this specific configuration is limited, and the exact EC50 varies across donor cell populations, buffer composition, and receptor expression system. Researchers must establish concentration-response relationships for each cell batch rather than relying on fixed reference values. Supply-chain compliance operates under a Research Use Only designation defined in the supplier quality agreement, with analytical certification according to ISO 9001:2015 for laboratory reagent distribution rather than ISO 22716:2007 cosmetic GMP. REACH registration for laboratory quantities below 1 t/a is supported by the supplier's pre-registration or full registration dossier under EC 1907/2006, and the SDS is classified per CLP EC 1272/2008 with appropriate dermal sensitization hazard statements. Experimental preparation involves dissolving the liquid aldehyde in anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide to obtain stock solutions at 10–100 mM, stored under argon in amber glass vials with PTFE-lined caps at −20°C for up to 24 months. Working dilutions are prepared fresh on the day of the assay in Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution supplemented with 10 mM HEPES and 0.1 wt% bovine serum albumin, with final DMSO concentration kept at or below 0.1 vol% to prevent solvent-induced artifacts in cell motility or calcium fluorimetry. Since the terminal aldehyde undergoes autoxidation in aqueous solution, dilutions older than 6 h are discarded, and all plastic consumables are pre-rinsed with assay buffer to reduce aldehyde loss to hydrophobic surfaces. Terminal finished product types include investigational pharmacological tool compounds, odorant receptor screening panel components, and reference standards for reproductive cell biology studies.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618005193850 or mail to sales8@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618005193850

    Email: sales8@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal is identified in bulk chemical commerce primarily by CAS registry number 18127-01-0 and EINECS 242-016-2; the molecular formula is C13H18O and the relative molecular mass is 190.28 g/mol. The compound consists of a benzene ring substituted at the para position with a tert-butyl group and at C1 with a 3-oxopropyl chain. Supplier literature also uses the systematic name 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)benzenepropanal and the perfumery trade name Bourgeonal. No unified industry model number exists for the substance itself; individual producers assign article codes that must be cross-referenced to the CAS number in quality agreements, safety data sheets, and incoming inspection records.

    The product is supplied as a mobile liquid, not as a solid flake or aqueous emulsion. Representative technical descriptions report a colourless to pale yellow appearance and a floral, lily-of-the-valley, cyclamen odour profile. Because the molecule contains a terminal aldehyde group attached to an aryl alkanal skeleton, it is analytically classified as a carbonyl-functional fine chemical. The primary specification criteria therefore include assay by gas chromatography, refractive index, density, water content, and related aromatic isomer control.

    The following table consolidates representative batch-release values drawn from supplier technical data sheets. Individual certificates of analysis and site-specific incoming quality plans take precedence over generic ranges.

    Parameter Representative range or acceptance limit Test basis
    Appearance Clear liquid, colourless to pale yellow Visual inspection
    Odour profile Floral, lily-of-the-valley, cyclamen Odour panel evaluation
    Purity by GC-FID ≥ 97.0% area, typical 98.0–99.5% Internal calibrated GC-FID
    Refractive index n/D at 20 °C 1.509–1.513 ASTM D1218-21 or supplier equivalent
    Density at 20 °C 0.938–0.943 g/cm³ ASTM D4052-22
    Flash point closed cup > 100 °C ASTM D7094-20
    Water content ≤ 0.1% mass fraction ASTM E203-21
    Related aromatic isomers total ≤ 1.0% area Internal calibrated GC-FID

    The flash point places the undiluted liquid in the combustible rather than readily flammable category under common GHS criteria; local storage classification remains dependent on the safety data sheet and national fire codes. Because no single ISO standard is specific to this compound, suppliers typically operate validated internal GC-FID or GC-MS methods with external standard calibration. It is appropriate for receiving laboratories to verify the method is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 where the certificate of analysis is used for product release.

    Assay by area percent does not distinguish water, residual solvents, or non-volatile oligomers unless the method includes a volatility or internal standard correction. A weight-percent assay using an internal standard such as dodecane or tridecane is preferable for stoichiometric calculations in fragrance compound design. Area percent is acceptable for batch-to-batch comparison when impurity response factors are demonstrated to be near unity. The related isomer control row reflects the commercial need to limit ortho- and meta-tert-butylphenylpropanal analogues that may accompany Friedel-Crafts alkylation routes. Ortho or meta isomers can shift the odour profile from lily-of-the-valley toward more chemical or cresylic side characters; GC-FID should be capable of resolving the para isomer from the ortho and meta structures. A nonpolar dimethylpolysiloxane column with a film thickness of 0.25 µm and length of 30 m is a common starting condition, but resolution must be confirmed with spiked isomer standards.

    What Limits Storage Stability of the Undiluted Aldehyde?

    Autoxidation of the terminal aldehyde is the dominant degradation mode under aerobic storage. The electron-rich aromatic ring and the unprotected carbonyl group are both susceptible to molecular oxygen attack, forming the corresponding carboxylic acid and oligomeric by-products. Bulk vessels should be kept under nitrogen blanketing at a slight positive pressure; repeated opening of drums should be minimised because headspace oxygen and humidity accelerate acid formation and may reduce assay below the 97.0% release criterion. Temperature excursions above 25 °C are not recommended for long-term storage, although brief transport excursions up to 40 °C are commonly accepted by suppliers if the container remains sealed.

    Contact with copper, brass, or unlined carbon steel should be avoided because trace transition metal ions catalyse free-radical oxidation and can add colour. Phenolic-lined or 316L stainless steel containers are appropriate. Primary and secondary amines are incompatible because Schiff base or enamine formation removes the free aldehyde and may occur at ambient temperature without added catalyst. Strong alkaline cleaning agents should not remain in process lines, since residual caustic promotes aldol condensation of the alpha-methylene carbon adjacent to the carbonyl group. If storage extends beyond the supplier-stated shelf life, peroxide content should be checked by iodometric titration and the material should be re-qualified by GC-FID before use.

    Water uptake above 0.1% may not immediately hydrolyse the aldehyde, but it can support phase separation in nonpolar fragrance bases and increase the dielectric environment for acid-catalysed aldol reactions. Karl Fischer titration using ASTM E203-21 should be performed on drum samples after opening, not only on sealed manufacture lots, because humidity ingress during sampling is the more frequent cause of out-of-specification water content.

    On production lines, the liquid is transferred through positive-displacement or diaphragm pumps with elastomers selected from the supplier chemical compatibility list. Ethylene-propylene diene monomer and polytetrafluoroethylene are commonly used; natural rubber and nitrile elastomers are unsuitable for prolonged exposure because swelling and extractive contamination can occur. Bulk tanks should be fitted with desiccant-filtered vents after nitrogen blanketing, and transfer lines should be flushed with a low-boiling oxygenated solvent or the base formula solvent before and after high-volume batches to prevent heel degradation.

    In fragrance-concentrate manufacture, the product is added as a liquid to the high-concentration compounding vessel; no pre-melting is required. Use levels are formula-specific and depend on odour-value contribution, base strength, and regulatory status. Published use levels in fine fragrance concentrate range from 0.1% to 5.0%; in finished leave-on cosmetic emulsions the nominal concentration is lower by dilution ratio. These values are not per se safe-use limits; the IFRA certificate for the specific fragrance compound and the EU Cosmetic Regulation govern the final legal maximum.

    The material is used in muguet, cyclamen, lilac, and green-floral accords. It is commonly blended with hydroxycitronellal, benzyl acetate, phenylethyl alcohol, methyl dihydrojasmonate, and selected indole or galbanum modifiers to adjust the aldehyde-related headspace. No stoichiometric reaction with ordinary alcohol or ester solvents is expected during normal compounding, but residual acidic clay filtration media can promote aldol dimerisation. Primary amine-functional solvents and chelating agents must be excluded from direct contact; in fabric-care formulations, urea-based or amino-functional additives may cause Schiff base loss of free aldehyde and off-colour development.

    In hydroalcoholic fine fragrance, the partition between ethanol-water and headspace determines the perceived aldehyde lift. The product has a relatively low odour threshold and should be handled in closed dosing systems to prevent worker exposure and cross-contamination. Final product headspace should be instrumentally verified if the product is used as a replacement for regulated lily-of-the-valley aldehydes; static odour panel data alone are not sufficient to confirm kinetic release from complex bases.

    Vapour-Liquid Partition, Skin Substantivity, and Mucosal Irritation Thresholds

    Headspace performance of this aldehyde in personal-care bases is governed by air-water and oil-water partition coefficients, droplet size, emulsifier structure, and package headspace volume. Published headspace data for this single molecule in fully formulated consumer goods are limited; the receiving laboratory should therefore measure free aldehyde by headspace solid-phase microextraction with GC-MS after the emulsion has reached equilibrium at the intended storage temperature. In rinse-off systems, substantivity is transport-limited rather than covalent-bond controlled. The terminal aldehyde does not form covalent bonds with keratin under normal use conditions; retention on skin or cotton arises mainly from hydrophobic interaction and lipid partitioning. The lack of an alpha-methyl branch reduces molecular hydrophobicity relative to 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propanal, and this can shorten dry-down perception in some applications.

    Undiluted contact with mucosa should be prevented. The substance is classified in the supplier safety data sheet as a dermal sensitiser or irritant depending on regional GHS implementation; occupational exposure limits and local exhaust ventilation requirements must be taken from the current SDS, not from fragrance use levels. Aerosolised or heated-vapour operations require exposure monitoring because low odour threshold does not imply low toxicological exposure limit.

    When a Replacement for 2-(4-tert-Butylbenzyl)propanal Is Evaluated in a Floral Accord

    3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal differs from the branched analogue 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propanal in three regulatory and physical parameters. First, the latter is listed as butylphenyl methylpropional and is subject to harmonised reproductive toxicity classification and Annex II prohibition under EU cosmetic legislation; the former is not currently covered by that Annex II entry. Second, the linear side chain in 3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)propanal lacks the alpha-methyl group, so the molecule has no stereogenic centre and no enantiomeric excess specification is relevant. Third, the molecular mass is lower by 14.03 g/mol relative to the tert-butylbenzyl branched analogue, which affects vapour pressure and unit-dose calculations. Equal-mass substitution in a fragrance base is therefore not valid as a formulation rule; headspace concentration, substantivity, and regulatory status must be re-established for the new composition.

    The following comparison is limited to structural and regulatory features documented in public databases and regulatory lists. Olfactory performance comparisons are formulation-specific and panel-dependent.

    Parameter 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal 2-(4-tert-Butylbenzyl)propanal 3-(4-Isopropylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal
    CAS registry number 18127-01-0 80-54-6 103-95-7
    Molecular formula C13H18O C14H20O C13H18O
    Relative molecular mass 190.28 g/mol 204.31 g/mol 190.28 g/mol
    Side-chain aldehyde type Linear propanal Alpha-methylpropanal Alpha-methylpropanal
    Para substituent tert-Butyl tert-Butyl Isopropyl
    Stereogenic centre at alpha carbon Absent Present Present
    EU cosmetic regulatory note Not included in the Annex II entry for butylphenyl methylpropional Included in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as butylphenyl methylpropional Not included in the same Annex II entry

    In comparison with 3-(4-isopropylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal, the para-tert-butyl compound lacks an alpha-methyl branch and carries a bulkier para-alkyl group. The quaternary carbon of the para-tert-butyl group has no benzylic hydrogen attached to the substituent alpha carbon, whereas the para-isopropyl substituent has a benzylic methine. This structural difference can influence radical oxidation at the para substituent during high-temperature storage; however, published accelerated-oxidation data for direct comparison are limited.

    For formulators replacing BMHCA, a blind olfactory panel should be conducted after 24 h dry-down on wool and skin, because the terminal aldehyde may deliver more immediate headspace but less persistent residual character than the branched analogue. The final formula should be checked for Schiff base consumption in amino-functional product bases by measuring free aldehyde at 0, 1, 4, and 12 weeks at 40 °C and by comparing batch-to-batch headspace variation. No direct mass-substitution factor can be taken from structural similarity alone.

    REACH registration numbers are not universal; the legal entity placing the substance in the EU must provide its registration number in the safety data sheet. The product should not be blended with amine-functional molecules unless Schiff base formation is deliberately intended. When returning unused material to storage, containers should be re-inerted under nitrogen and resealed; partially emptied small containers are a greater oxidation risk than sealed bulk storage because of increased headspace-to-liquid volume ratio.

    Top