Products

2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol

    • Product Name: 2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: sales8@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications
    HS Code 717327
    Iupac Name 2,6-dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol
    Common Name 2,6-Dimethyl-5-hepten-3-yn-2-ol
    Molecular Formula C9H14O
    Molecular Weight 138.21 g/mol
    Exact Mass 138.1045 g/mol
    Monoisotopic Mass 138.1045 g/mol
    Cas Registry Number 19550-34-0
    Smiles CC(C)(O)C#CC=C(C)C
    Density 0.902 g/mL at 25 °C
    Boiling Point 204-206 °C
    Flash Point 84 °C
    Refractive Index n20/D 1.485
    Appearance Colorless to pale yellow liquid
    Solubility Soluble in organic solvents; slightly soluble in water
    Topological Polar Surface Area 20.2 Ų

    As an accredited 2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Supplied as a 25 g quantity in a sealed amber glass bottle with hazard-compliant labeling and inert-gas protection.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) Standard 20′ FCL container loaded with 2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol in UN-approved drums, palletized, secured, and labeled for safe international transport.
    Shipping Typically, 2,6-dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol is not classified as dangerous goods for transport: no UN number, hazard class, or packing group is assigned. Ship as a non-regulated liquid in compatible, tightly closed containers, protecting it from heat, ignition sources, and oxidizers. Always follow the SDS and local regulations.
    Storage Store 2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol in a tightly closed, correctly labeled container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Keep away from heat, sparks, open flames, direct sunlight, strong oxidizing agents, acids, and bases. Use secondary containment and segregate from incompatible materials. Protect containers from physical damage, ensure adequate ventilation to prevent vapor accumulation, and regularly inspect for leaks or deterioration.
    Shelf Life Typically 24 months when stored tightly sealed in a cool, dry, dark, well-ventilated place, protected from moisture and ignition sources.
    Application of 2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol

    At downhole temperatures exceeding 90°C, corrosion control in 15 wt% HCl stimulation fluids shifts from conventional amine-alkynol blends to higher-boiling acetylenic alcohols because the tertiary propargylic alcohol head of 2,6-dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol provides water dispersibility while the enyne moiety supplies π-electron density for chemisorption on chloride-covered low-carbon steel. In batch autoclave screening conducted to NACE TM0193-2016 with N80 coupons, the compound is evaluated at 0.2–1.5 wt% active in 15 wt% hydrochloric acid containing 0.5–1.0 wt% nonylphenol ethoxylate and 0.05–0.2 wt% potassium iodide as an intensifier. At 90°C and 6 h exposure, the class-typical weight-loss response remains below the 0.05 lb/ft² per 24 h field acceptance criterion when the active concentration is maintained above 0.3 wt%; below 0.1 wt%, visual pitting initiates at machined coupon edges. Above 2.0 wt%, the branched alkenyl tail causes phase separation and a viscous interfacial sludge in spent acid, which has been observed in field returns as reduced injectivity and longer flowback clearing times.

    The inhibition mechanism is not purely electrochemical: the acetylenic alcohol undergoes acid-catalyzed rearrangement to α,β-unsaturated ketone species that can oligomerize on the steel surface, creating a hydrocarbon-rich film whose thickness and cohesion depend on dissolved iron concentration. Soluble Fe(II) above 3,000 mg/L compresses the polymer film and requires supplemental film-repairing additions of the enynol in staged increments of 0.2 wt% per 6 h rather than a single front-loaded dose. Above 150°C, the molecule undergoes rapid acid-catalyzed dehydration to hydrocarbon oligomers that plate out on the coupon surface and complicate corrosion-rate measurement. Screening under NACE TM0193-2016 uses pre-weighed N80 coupons degreased to ASTM G1-03, immersed in glass cells at ambient pressure for temperatures below 93°C; evaluations above 120°C are run in Hastelloy C-276 autoclaves at 1,000–1,500 psi (6.9–10.3 MPa) because the acid vapor pressure exceeds safe glass-cell limits. The compound is compatible with low-carbon J55 and Q125 tubular steels but is not recommended for martensitic stainless steel in reducing acid brines when chloride exceeds 50,000 mg/L, because the adsorbed film can be undermined by localized chloride attack at weld toes and upset threads. Published data for this specific enynol configuration in sour brines containing H2S above 10 psi (69 kPa) is limited; field qualification therefore requires autoclave exposure with H2S-charged acid and post-exposure electron microscopy before demulsifier selection.

    What Restricts Low-Current-Density Ductility in Bright Nickel Plating When This Acetylenic Alcohol Is Used as a Class II Leveler?

    In a Watts nickel bath maintained at 50–60°C with nickel sulfate hexahydrate at 240–300 g/L, nickel chloride hexahydrate at 30–60 g/L, and boric acid at 35–40 g/L, 2,6-dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol functions as a Class II brightener and leveler at 0.01–0.15 g/L, complementing saccharin at 0.5–2.0 g/L as the Class I carrier. The internal C≡C bond and the tertiary alcohol group adsorb selectively on high cathode-potential sites, suppressing outward growth of nickel crystallites and shifting the deposit grain size from the micrometer range into the submicrometer range; this is measured by Hull cell panels plated at 2 A for 5 min in a 267 mL cell, where the bright range extends from 0.5 A/dm² to 8 A/dm² when the leveler concentration is near 0.05 g/L. At concentrations exceeding 0.2 g/L, the low-current-density region darkens and the deposit becomes brittle, because excessive adsorption blocks nickel reduction and increases hydrogen co-deposition; ductility measured by bend testing or tensile elongation drops below 1.5%, which fails the decorative nickel requirements in ASTM B456-17 for components subjected to post-plate forming. At below 0.005 g/L, leveling is lost and the deposit follows substrate scratches rather than filling them, producing a dull appearance under 20× stereomicroscope inspection. The bath must be filtered continuously through 1–5 µm polypropylene cartridges and agitated by air or eductor flow to prevent concentration gradients that create patchy brightness on complex geometries. The enynol addition is made as a 1 wt% stock solution in deionized water or dilute isopropanol; direct injection of the neat liquid can exceed local solubility and form oily droplets that are dragged into the cathode boundary layer and cause pitting. Carbonyl-free activated carbon treatment is applied at 0.5–2.0 g/L weekly to remove organic breakdown products, but over-treatment strips the leveler and reduces bright range. Published data for this specific enynol configuration in high-chloride sulfamate nickel baths is limited; the operating window above applies to standard Watts formulations and may require a 0.02 g/L upward shift when the bath is run at 60°C and 8 A/dm² with high agitation.

    Closed-loop perchloroethylene dry-cleaning machines with copper sight glasses and steel condenser coils incorporate the enynol into stabilizer packages at 25–150 ppm to control acidic decomposition products generated by thermal cracking and light-catalyzed oxidation. The functional test is total acid acceptance under ASTM D2942-96(2018), which measures the milliequivalents of hydrogen chloride neutralized per liter of solvent before the solvent pH falls below the threshold for metal attack. A copper stability test under ASTM D3316-20 is used to verify that the acetylenic alcohol prevents copper dissolution and redeposition on steel in the distillation loop. The compound is added with epoxide co-stabilizers such as butylene oxide at 0.05–0.2 wt% and is not effective when used alone in aluminum-finisher solvent systems, because the enol-ether rearrangement product can form aluminum soaps that plate out on heating coils. In trichloroethylene vapour degreasing, the operating stabilizer level is kept near 100 ppm, and solvent pH is maintained above 6.5; below this pH, acid attack at the solvent-air interface produces visible copper chloride staining on condenser fins.

    Meyer–Schuster Conversion to Phorone and Catalytic Hydrogenation to Diisobutyl Ketone

    Under acidic conditions, 2,6-dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol undergoes Meyer–Schuster rearrangement to phorone, 2,6-dimethylhepta-2,5-dien-4-one. Protonation of the tertiary hydroxyl group is followed by water loss to an allenyl carbocation; hydration of the allene at the central carbon and keto-enol tautomerization give the conjugated enone. The rearrangement is run in dilute sulfuric acid at 30–60°C or over a sulfonic acid ion-exchange resin in a fixed bed, with the product phorone separated by phase cut at 55–65°C under 2–5 kPa vacuum to avoid oligomerization. Phorone is then hydrogenated to diisobutyl ketone over Raney nickel or palladium-on-alumina at 80–120°C and 2–4 MPa hydrogen pressure in a fixed-bed reactor; the two C=C double bonds are saturated without measurable hydrogenolysis of the carbonyl group when the sulfur content of the feed is below 1 ppm. The resulting diisobutyl ketone is a high-boiling solvent with a distillation range of 168–169°C at 101.3 kPa, a relative evaporation rate of 0.18 relative to n-butyl acetate, and a Hansen solubility parameter that places it in the nitrocellulose and vinyl resin solvency window. This solvent is used in coil-coating primer formulations and in high-solids polyurethane systems where slow evaporation prevents dry spray and improves flow-out. The catalytic hydrogenation step requires strict water removal; feed water above 0.2 wt% promotes aldol condensation of phorone to higher molecular weight by-products that deactivate the nickel surface and reduce selectivity to diisobutyl ketone below 95%. Published data for this specific enynol-to-phorone step are limited to batch reactor studies, while the phorone hydrogenation step is well documented in ketone solvent process literature. Analytical release of the solvent is performed by gas chromatography for purity and by ASTM D1078-11 for distillation range; color is controlled to ≤20 Hazen by ASTM D1209-05(2019).

    When Acid-Bath Ferrous Iron Exceeds 120 g/L, Replenishment of the Enynol Must Be Staged

    Continuous steel strip pickling lines running 10–15 wt% hydrochloric acid at 70–95°C use the enynol at 0.5–1.0 g/L to suppress base-metal loss without delaying scale removal. The dose is tied to dissolved iron by ASTM G31-21 coupon weight-loss and is trimmed when Fe(II) exceeds 120 g/L, because spent acid with high ferrous chloride accelerates inhibitor decomposition and requires daily replenishment at 0.1–0.2 g/L per 8 h shift. The inhibitor is injected into the recirculation line downstream of the plate-and-frame filter press to avoid localized overheating in the steam sparger section, where steam temperatures above 140°C can cause premature rearrangement of the acetylenic alcohol and formation of solvent-insoluble oligomers. In sulfuric acid pickling at 5–10 wt% and 60–80°C, the same active is reduced to 0.3–0.5 g/L because sulfate scale on the steel surface competes with inhibitor adsorption and requires higher free inhibitor in the bulk bath. Published data for this exact configuration in continuous strip lines is limited, so the concentration boundaries should be validated against ASTM G31-21 weight-loss coupons pulled from the recirculation loop at startup and after each 8 h production shift.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618005193850 or mail to sales8@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618005193850

    Email: sales8@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol is introduced as an acetylenic tertiary alcohol with molecular formula C9H14O and molecular weight 138.21 g/mol. The carbon skeleton consists of a seven-carbon chain substituted at C2 by a hydroxyl and a methyl group, at C6 by a methyl group, and containing a trisubstituted alkene at C5 and an internal alkyne between C3 and C4. The SMILES representation is CC(C)=CC#CC(C)(C)O. The molecule belongs to the enynol family, but it is not a terminal acetylene: the absence of an acetylenic hydrogen on the internal triple bond changes metal-catalyzed coupling behavior, oxidative coupling tendency, and storage chemistry when compared with terminal acetylenic alcohols such as dehydrolinalool.

    The substance is normally handled as a synthetic intermediate rather than a formulated end-use additive. The tertiary alcohol is propargylic and geminal to two methyl groups, which restricts enolization pathways available to primary propargyl alcohols and lowers hydrogen-bond donor acidity relative to primary alcohols. Published application data for this specific C9 internal alkyne configuration is limited; much of the peer-reviewed process literature covers the C10 terminal alkyne dehydrolinalool, and direct extrapolation should be verified by reaction calorimetry and pilot-scale testing before any change of control strategy.

    What specification methods apply to bulk release testing?

    No single ASTM or ISO product monograph exists specifically for 2,6-dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol. Release testing therefore combines general identity, purity, moisture, density, refractive index, and color methods with supplier-specific limits tied to downstream catalyst tolerance. Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection is the primary assay technique, but method conditions must be selected to avoid thermal dehydration of the tertiary alcohol at the injection port. A typical screening column is a 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm 5% phenyl methylpolysiloxane capillary column using split injection and internal normalization after response factor calibration.

    The table below lists parameters commonly reported on a certificate of analysis for bulk shipments. The absence of universally accepted release limits means that an acceptable assay value should be derived from stoichiometric requirements of the intended downstream step rather than from a generic trade specification. Water content is particularly relevant when the alcohol is protected as a silyl ether or used in organometallic chemistry, where free water can quench reactive intermediates or shift catalyst selectivity.

    ParameterTypical test methodReporting basis
    AssayGC-FID with internal normalizationArea% or weight% after response factor calibration
    Water contentKarl Fischer titration, ASTM E203mg/kg or weight%
    Density at 20 °CDigital density meter, ASTM D4052g/cm³
    Refractive index n20/DAbbe refractometer, ASTM D1218Dimensionless
    ColorPlatinum-cobalt scale, ASTM D1209Hazen units
    IdentificationFT-IR spectrum, ASTM E1252Match to reference; alkyne C≡C stretch near 2200–2260 cm−1

    Because the alkyne is internal rather than terminal, the FT-IR C≡C absorption can be weak or shifted by conjugation with the adjacent alkene. Identification should not rely solely on infrared spectroscopy; a certified reference standard and GC retention time comparison are required for unambiguous confirmation. Water content by ASTM E203 is preferred over loss-on-drying because the material is thermally sensitive and may decompose or volatilize under heating.

    Structural differentiation from terminal acetylenic alcohols

    Comparative product selection frequently involves three terminal acetylenic alcohols: dehydrolinalool, 2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol, and 3-methyl-1-pentyn-3-ol. The table below summarizes constitutional differences only. Vapor pressure, flash point, boiling range, viscosity, and autoignition temperature are not proportional to molecular weight and must be measured for each substance under standardized conditions. The difference in alkyne substitution is process-relevant because terminal alkynes undergo copper-catalyzed homocoupling, acetylide formation, and Sonogashira alkynylation, whereas internal alkynes do not possess the same terminal C–H acidity.

    CompoundMolecular formulaMolecular weightAlkyne typeAcetylenic hydrogen
    2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-olC9H14O138.21 g/molInternalNone
    DehydrolinaloolC10H16O152.23 g/molTerminalOne
    2-Methyl-3-butyn-2-olC5H8O84.12 g/molTerminalOne
    3-Methyl-1-pentyn-3-olC6H10O98.14 g/molTerminalOne

    The C9 enynol provides a longer conjugated enyne backbone than 2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol, while eliminating the terminal acetylenic proton that characterizes dehydrolinalool. This substitution pattern may reduce oligomer formation in copper-catalyzed streams under basic conditions, but it also removes the direct Sonogashira alkynylation handle that dehydrolinalool offers. The choice between these alcohols is therefore not a simple volatility or boiling-point substitution; it is determined by whether the downstream sequence requires a terminal alkyne, an internal alkyne, or a terpene-like enyne scaffold.

    When an internal alkyne changes palladium-catalyzed coupling outcomes

    In palladium-catalyzed routes, the distinction between terminal and internal alkyne substitution is decisive. Terminal alkynes such as dehydrolinalool can be deprotonated and coupled directly to aryl halides through Sonogashira chemistry. 2,6-Dimethylhept-5-en-3-yn-2-ol lacks the terminal C–H bond required for that direct alkynylation pathway. The internal alkyne can instead participate in transformations such as selective hydrogenation, enyne cycloaddition, or stoichiometric activation by early transition-metal reagents, but direct transfer of a terminal alkyne protocol is not valid without revalidating the catalytic cycle.

    The tertiary alcohol at C2 can be protected as a trimethylsilyl ether using chlorotrimethylsilane and imidazole, provided water content has been reduced to a catalyst-specific tolerance. This protection step is commonly used when the free hydroxyl would interfere with subsequent organometallic steps. For selective hydrogenation of the internal alkyne to the corresponding alkene, batch hydrogenators with controlled hydrogen uptake and reaction calorimetry are required because over-reduction to the alkane and cis/trans selectivity are sensitive to catalyst loading, solvent polarity, and H2 pressure. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, so a screening program using parallel pressure reactors followed by reaction calorimetry is the appropriate engineering basis.

    In a production environment, analogous C9–C10 acetylenic alcohols have shown batch-to-batch color variability originating from residual copper salts when aqueous chelation is incomplete. This observation is process-relevant because metal residues can accelerate decomposition during distillation or alter downstream catalyst performance. Vacuum distillation on glass-lined agitated vessels with nitrogen sparging and partial condenser controls is typical for such intermediates. For this specific substance, equipment-specific yield data remain limited; the manufacturer should qualify a pilot-scale batch using online FTIR monitoring of the C≡C stretch and taking fraction cuts only after headspace oxygen has been verified below the site-specific process limit.

    Storage boundaries include inert gas blanketing and exclusion of oxygen to reduce peroxide accumulation in the conjugated enyne system. The material should not be distilled to dryness unless peroxide testing has been completed; peroxide-containing residues in a reboiler can concentrate and decompose if the heat input is not removed. Pre-drying is required before use in moisture-sensitive downstream chemistry when ambient storage exceeds 60% RH or when containers have been opened repeatedly. Strongly acidic media should be avoided unless a Meyer-Schuster-type rearrangement is the intended transformation, because the propargylic tertiary alcohol can rearrange to an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl system under acid catalysis. Alkali metal or alkaline earth metal bases may deprotonate the hydroxyl group even though the alkyne itself lacks a terminal hydrogen, so protection or careful stoichiometry is required where the free alcohol would consume base.

    Unlike terminal acetylenic alcohols, this internal enynol does not form an explosive copper acetylide under standard Glaser-Hay conditions, but it can still coordinate to transition metals through the alkyne π-system. Residual copper or palladium can therefore remain bound after coupling workup and should be removed by chelating aqueous washes before final isolation. Incompatibility with amine-based additives is not assumed from terminal alkyne chemistry; however, any additive that raises pH and remains in the final container should be evaluated for its effect on the alcohol stability window.

    Operational limits for distillation, storage, and water content are not governed by a single global standard. Pressure-relief sizing for vessels handling this material should follow ISO 4126-1, while thermal stability screening is typically conducted by accelerating rate calorimetry or differential scanning calorimetry. The absence of public large-scale case studies for this exact enynol means that site-specific process safety data are required before transferring a laboratory route to a manufacturing line. Direct substitution of this product into a terminal alkyne process without revisiting the catalyst system, base loading, and purification sequence is not recommended.

    Top