Products

CRP Technology Windform FR2 Glass Filled Flame Retardant Composite Polyamide for Additive Manufacturing

    • Product Name: CRP Technology Windform FR2 Glass Filled Flame Retardant Composite Polyamide for Additive Manufacturing
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 465506
    Color Black
    Density 1.30 g/cm³
    Tensile Strength 50 MPa
    Tensile Modulus 4,500 MPa
    Elongation At Break 2.5%
    Flexural Strength 80 MPa
    Flexural Modulus 4,000 MPa
    Izod Impact Strength Notched 35 J/m
    Hardness 80 Shore D
    Heat Deflection Temperature At 0 45 Mpa 140 °C
    Heat Deflection Temperature At 1 82 Mpa 95 °C
    Flame Retardancy UL94 V-0
    Thermal Conductivity 0.35 W/m·K
    Dielectric Strength 15 kV/mm
    Water Absorption 0.4%
    Coefficient Of Thermal Expansion 5.0 × 10^-5 /°C

    As an accredited CRP Technology Windform FR2 Glass Filled Flame Retardant Composite Polyamide for Additive Manufacturing factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing
    Shipping
    Storage
    Free Quote

    Competitive CRP Technology Windform FR2 Glass Filled Flame Retardant Composite Polyamide for Additive Manufacturing prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618136850665 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618136850665

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    CRP Technology Windform FR2 is a glass-filled flame-retardant polyamide composite formulated for selective laser sintering and related powder-bed fusion processes. The material is based on a polyamide matrix with dispersed glass-fibre reinforcement and a halogen-free flame-retardant package. Manufacturer documentation positions the grade at UL 94 V-0 at 0.8 mm thickness under vertical burn testing. The glass phase shifts mechanical response toward higher tensile modulus and heat deflection temperature relative to unfilled flame-retardant polyamide powders, while reducing elongation and impact compliance. Because the flame-retardant system is halogen-free, the material is specified for enclosed electrical housings, aircraft cabin interior brackets, rail interior enclosures, air ducting, and small structural covers where ignition resistance and constrained acidic gas release during combustion are procurement requirements.

    In a selective laser sintering build, the glass-fibre phase increases melt viscosity and slows interparticle coalescence compared with unfilled polyamide 12. This narrows the energy-density window between incomplete consolidation and over-sintering, particularly at wall thicknesses below 1.0 mm. The material is run on standard polymer laser-sintering platforms operating with CO₂ laser wavelengths near 10.6 µm, but machine-specific parameter sets for this exact grade are limited in public literature. Users commonly begin from glass-filled polyamide profiles and re-optimise contour exposure, hatching distance, and powder-bed temperature to avoid curl, steam porosity, and edge overgrowth. The recoating behaviour of a glass-filled flame-retardant powder differs from unfilled PA12 because the denser, more angular particles produce higher bulk density and require stable recoater motion to maintain uniform layer thickness.

    Why does glass-fibre loading reduce the strain-to-failure window in flame-retardant laser-sintered polyamides?

    The low elongation at break of Windform FR2 is controlled by stress concentrations at glass-fibre ends and by the dispersed flame-retardant phase, both of which act as crack initiation sites when the sintered matrix begins to yield. The matrix itself is a semicrystalline polyamide, but the fibre network constrains plastic flow and produces a more brittle tensile response than unfilled PA12. This is not a defect; it is the physical basis for the higher modulus and improved dimensional stability of the grade. The trade-off is that thin living hinges, snap-fits, and highly strained clips designed for unfilled PA12 are generally unsuitable. Component design must redistribute strain into larger radii and wall sections.

    Representative physical, mechanical, and flammability data for Windform FR2
    PropertyTest standardTypical reported value
    DensityISO 1183-11.10 g/cm3
    Tensile strengthISO 527-243 MPa
    Tensile modulusISO 527-23500 MPa
    Elongation at breakISO 527-23.0%
    Flexural strengthISO 17868 MPa
    Flexural modulusISO 1783000 MPa
    Notched Izod impactISO 1804.0 kJ/m2
    Heat deflection temperature at 1.82 MPaISO 75-2145 °C
    Flammability ratingUL 94 / IEC 60695-11-10V-0 at 0.8 mm

    The table indicates the principal difference from unfilled flame-retardant PA12. An unfilled variant may provide notched Izod values above 10 kJ/m² and elongation in double-digit percentages, but its tensile modulus and heat deflection temperature are lower. Windform FR2 is therefore selected when a part must be stiff, thermally stable, and ignition-resistant, but not when the part must absorb repeated impact or undergo large elastic deflection. The flame-retardant additive package may also reduce the already limited ductility of the sintered polyamide matrix; thus, datasheet elongation should be treated as a dry-as-built screening value rather than a service-life guarantee after moisture conditioning or prolonged thermal ageing.

    In powder form, the glass fibre is dispersed within polyamide particles rather than being added as a surface coating. The particle size distribution for laser-sintering grades is typically centred near 50–60 µm, with an upper limit constrained by recoater clearance and layer thickness. Fibre length and fibre aspect ratio influence both melt viscosity and mechanical coupling. Batch-to-batch variation in fibre length distribution can shift tensile modulus by several percent even when the powder passes the same D50 specification. On production lines, this is controlled by blending virgin and reclaimed powder in ratios commonly between 30:70 and 50:50. Thermally aged glass-filled powder held at elevated build-chamber temperatures for extended runs can exhibit increased melt viscosity from polyamide post-condensation and fibre attrition, requiring upward adjustment of laser energy density or a reduction in refresh ratio.

    Processing limits imposed by powder-bed temperature, refresh rate, and moisture uptake

    The build window for this material is bounded by two failures. If the powder-bed temperature is too low, the sintered layers curl and delaminate from the build platform while the part is still forming. If the temperature is too high, the surrounding powder cake pre-sinters and becomes difficult to break out. The polyamide matrix therefore requires bed temperatures near the onset of recrystallisation, commonly in the 165–175 °C range for production machines, though the actual set point depends on machine calibration, part cross-section, and the thermal ageing state of the recycled powder. Glass-filled powders conduct heat slightly differently from unfilled powders, and the flame-retardant additives modify recrystallisation kinetics. Published machine-specific data for this exact configuration is limited, so process verification on the intended laser-sintering platform is critical.

    Moisture is a separate processing boundary. The glass phase is non-hygroscopic, but the polyamide matrix and flame-retardant additives can equilibrate with ambient humidity. Moisture content above about 0.3 wt% can produce steam-induced porosity at the sintered surface and reduce part density. Pre-drying at 80 °C for 4–6 h is used when powder has been stored in ambient conditions, with dry hopper storage recommended when relative humidity exceeds 60%. During long builds, the feed and overflow hoppers should be held below 50% RH to avoid flow variability and electrostatic accumulation. These limits are common to many glass-filled polyamide powders, but the flame-retardant package makes surface porosity a fire-performance risk as well as a mechanical defect. In UL 94 vertical burn testing, local porosity can increase the effective surface area and oxygen access, potentially degrading the flame rating of thin walls even when the base resin chemistry is unchanged.

    Build orientation also modifies mechanical response. The recoating process tends to align glass fibres in the build plane, so XY-direction tensile and flexural values are usually higher than Z-direction values. The interlayer boundary remains the weakest region because the sinter necks between layers are smaller and less continuous than intralayer fused regions. In glass-filled laser-sintered polyamides, Z-direction tensile strength may be 20–40% lower than XY values. Designs should orient critical load paths in the XY plane where practical, or apply higher safety factors to Z-direction features. The datasheet values in the table above are not simultaneous isotropic properties; they represent typical XY-oriented test specimens.

    Post-processing of Windform FR2 components includes machining, drilling, tapping, and adhesive bonding. The glass reinforcement increases tool wear relative to unfilled PA12, and carbide tooling with reduced cutting speeds is recommended for repeated operations. Flame-retardant additives can affect surface energy, so solvent wiping and light sanding are standard before bonding. Vapour smoothing, dyeing, and coating compatibility must be verified separately because the flame-retardant package may exude slightly at the surface after thermal post-processing or chemical exposure. Published peel and lap-shear data for this specific grade are limited; application-specific adhesive testing is required when bonded assemblies are used in load-bearing aerospace or rail interiors.

    When brominated flame-retardant PA12 or unfilled polyamide 12 is replaced in enclosed electrical systems

    The substitution decision is driven by the governing fire standard. Windform FR2 is rated UL 94 V-0 at 0.8 mm, which allows thin-wall electrical enclosures to be built without increasing wall thickness to the 1.5 mm or 3.0 mm levels sometimes required by unfilled flame-retardant grades. The glass fibre raises stiffness and heat deflection, but it reduces impact and strain capacity. Unfilled flame-retardant PA12 may be preferable for snap features or cable clips, while Windform FR2 is preferable for enclosures, brackets, and ducting that must hold dimensional form under moderate load and elevated temperature.

    Compared with a general-purpose glass-filled PA12 without flame retardant, Windform FR2 adds a flame-retardant package that can reduce tensile strength by roughly 5–15% and may increase ash residue after combustion. The halogen-free chemistry is selected to avoid the evolution of corrosive hydrogen halide gas that can occur with brominated systems, but halogen-free systems may require higher additive loading to achieve the same ignition resistance. That higher loading can further reduce melt flow and notched impact. The product therefore occupies a deliberately conservative position: it is not the most ductile polyamide in the Windform family, and it is not the stiffest carbon-filled grade, but it combines thin-wall flame retardance with glass-filled stiffness in a single laser-sintering powder.

    For railway applications, material-level UL 94 V-0 testing is not sufficient by itself. EN 45545-2 requires component-level assessment of fire, smoke, and toxicity according to hazard level and part location. A halogen-free material is often evaluated because brominated additives can contribute to acidic gas release under radiative heat. The material may be used in interior enclosures, gangway components, or ducting if the completed assembly meets the required hazard level. For aerospace cabin interior parts, FAR 25.853 Appendix F Part I vertical burn screening is commonly applied, but the final qualification is always part-specific. Thickness gradients, internal cavities, and porosity can change ignition behaviour relative to a flat 0.8 mm test plaque.

    Compliance references relevant to application qualification
    Regulation or standardApplication context
    UL 94 / IEC 60695-11-10Vertical burn classification for thin plastic enclosures; material rating tested at 0.8 mm.
    EN 45545-2Railway interior fire, smoke, and toxicity; material data must be used in component-level hazard-level assessment.
    FAR 25.853 Appendix F Part IAircraft cabin interior vertical burn screening; part-level testing is required for certification.
    RoHS 2011/65/EURestriction of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment; supplier declaration is required.
    REACH 1907/2006SVHC content and safe-use information managed through supplier documentation.

    The material should not be conflated with carbon-fibre-filled polyamides or mineral-filled flame-retardant grades. Carbon-fibre reinforcement can provide higher modulus and possibly higher heat deflection, but it may introduce unintended electrical conductivity and is not inherently flame-retardant. Mineral-filled flame-retardant grades may offer lower anisotropy but often increase density more than glass fibre. Windform FR2 sits between these categories: moderate density, glass-dominated stiffening, thin-wall flame retardance, and no deliberate electrical conductivity. This combination is specific to applications where the part must be structurally rigid, nonconductive, and compliant with ignition-resistance requirements in its final installed thickness.

    Published data for long-term retention of mechanical properties after UV exposure, hydrolysis, or repeated thermal cycling in this specific grade is limited. Qualification programs should include application-specific conditioning according to ISO 1110 or ISO 62, and should verify the flammability rating on actual part geometries rather than relying solely on raw material classifications.

    Top