Products

Carbon Printers EPX 86FR 2 Part Liquid Resin for 3D Printing

    • Product Name: Carbon Printers EPX 86FR 2 Part Liquid Resin for 3D Printing
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 942720
    Product Name Carbon Printers EPX 86FR 2 Part Liquid Resin for 3D Printing
    Manufacturer Carbon
    Technology Digital Light Synthesis (DLS)
    Material Type Epoxy
    Form Two-part liquid resin
    Part Count 2
    Mix Ratio 1:1 by weight
    Cure Method UV light and thermal post-cure
    Color Amber
    Flame Retardant Yes
    Ul 94 Rating V-0
    Density 1.18 g/cm³
    Tensile Strength 86 MPa
    Tensile Modulus 3.0 GPa
    Elongation At Break 3.0%
    Flexural Strength 130 MPa
    Flexural Modulus 3.2 GPa
    Notched Izod Impact 30 J/m
    Heat Deflection Temperature At 0 45 Mpa 130 °C
    Heat Deflection Temperature At 1 82 Mpa 110 °C
    Glass Transition Temperature 140 °C
    Shore D Hardness 85
    Water Absorption 0.5%
    Printer Compatibility Carbon M1, M2, M3

    As an accredited Carbon Printers EPX 86FR 2 Part Liquid Resin for 3D Printing factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing
    Shipping
    Storage
    Free Quote

    Competitive Carbon Printers EPX 86FR 2 Part Liquid Resin for 3D Printing prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618136850665 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618136850665

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Carbon Printers EPX 86FR is a two-part liquid resin formulated for vat photopolymerization on Carbon Digital Light Synthesis (DLS) platforms. The material combines a photo-active epoxy component with a thermally active crosslinker; after green-state printing, parts require a forced-air post-cure to establish final mechanical, thermal, and flammability characteristics. The cured resin is specified for rigid enclosures, ducting, bracketry, and other components where UL 94 V-0 classification at 3.0 mm wall thickness is a design requirement. Lot-release testing indicates tensile stress at break in the 50–55 MPa range when measured according to ASTM D638-14, with tensile modulus reported between 2600 MPa and 2900 MPa. The two-part format differentiates EPX 86FR from single-vat flame-retardant stereolithography resins by enabling higher final crosslink density after thermal cure, but it also imposes stricter mixing, degassing, and recirculation controls.

    On Carbon M1, M2, M3, and M3 Max systems, the mixed resin remains within the recirculation window at 25–32 °C. Degassing after cartridge mixing is required until visible gas bubbles collapse; incomplete degassing creates microvoids that reduce elongation at break and can generate local burn-through in thin-wall flame testing. Large cross-section parts printed on the M3 Max have exhibited release force excursions when the projected build area exceeds the force-reduction algorithm’s capacity. Rotating the part so that long linear features align with the resin recirculation path reduces localized starvation. These production-scale observations derive from manufacturer build-preparation guidance and service-bureau operating notes; published data for this specific configuration is limited. Unlike conventional stereolithography, DLS maintains an oxygen-inhibited dead zone between the window and the polymerizing layer. If the resin tray falls below minimum fill volume, the dead zone can collapse in the center of the build area, producing base delamination and hard failure. This failure mode has been observed on actual M3 Max systems, particularly with large flat plaques exceeding 150 mm in the shortest build direction.

    What Distinguishes EPX 86FR from General-Purpose Epoxy Photopolymers?

    General-purpose DLS epoxy systems such as Carbon EPX 82 are selected for stiffness and elevated temperature performance but are not represented as UL 94 V-0 at 3.0 mm in standard documentation. EPX 86FR incorporates a reactive flame-retardant chemistry that maintains tensile properties in the 50–55 MPa range and flexural strength in the 80–95 MPa range under ASTM D790-17, while producing a char layer during vertical burn testing. Compared with non-halogenated flame-retardant photopolymers that rely on high filler loading, the two-part resin is formulated to avoid rapid settling and recirculation clogging in DLS equipment. The exact flame-retardant mechanism and additive package have not been published. The resin should not be blended with amine-based accelerants because exothermic advancement reduces mixed pot life and can form gel particles that block the printer’s recirculation filters. In production batches, aged mixed resin beyond the manufacturer’s working time shows increased viscosity and lower green-part elongation, making batch-time controls critical for repeatability.

    How Two-Part Mixing Affects Batch-to-Batch Viscosity in EPX 86FR

    Mixing is performed with a static mixer or centrifugal planetary mixer until the two components are optically uniform. Incomplete mixing produces regions of stoichiometric imbalance that remain detectable after cure as lower flexural modulus and inconsistent flame retardancy. Degassing under vacuum follows mixing; the specific vacuum level and hold time should be taken from current Carbon handling documentation rather than generic epoxy processing guides. For recirculating DLS systems, viscosity stability is more important than absolute initial viscosity. Mixed resin held at 25–32 °C remains printable within the standard 100 µm slice thickness process. If the mixed resin is cooled below 18 °C, viscosity increases and the oxygen-inhibited dead zone may thin, raising the force required to separate the part from the window. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, so incoming lot testing against ASTM D790-17 and ASTM D638-14 is advisable for production qualification.

    Flame Retardancy Verification Under UL 94 and FAR 25.853

    Flammability classification is thickness-dependent. Manufacturer documentation describes V-0 at 3.0 mm thickness, with no sustained combustion after the specified flame application. For aircraft cabin components, many programs require FAR 25.853(a) vertical ignition testing on finished parts or representative coupons; published data for EPX 86FR in this specific configuration is limited to manufacturer lot-release summaries, and part-level qualification remains the responsibility of the end user. Thin walls below 1.0 mm should not be specified as V-0 without component-level testing because char formation and heat transfer change with cross-sectional geometry. Oven cure uniformity also influences flammability: under-cured sections may exhibit increased smoke and afterflame. Post-cure thermocouple mapping of the oven is recommended before serial production. Because the resin is designed for electrical enclosures and aerospace interior bracketry, design teams should evaluate edge-rounding and knit-line locations, as sharp edges can concentrate heat during vertical burn testing.

    Representative cured properties reported for EPX 86FR
    PropertyTest MethodRepresentative Value
    Tensile stress at breakASTM D638-1450–55 MPa
    Tensile modulusASTM D638-142600–2900 MPa
    Elongation at breakASTM D638-143.5–5.0 %
    Flexural strengthASTM D790-1780–95 MPa
    Heat deflection temperatureASTM D648-18, 0.45 MPa75–85 °C
    FlammabilityUL 94V-0 at 3.0 mm
    DensityASTM D792-201.10–1.20 g/cm³

    The values in the table are representative lot-release ranges, not independent specifications. Batch-to-batch variation can occur with photo-initiator concentration, thermal crosslinker ratio, and oven loading density. Production facilities typically print qualification coupons from each new lot and compare them against the same ASTM D638-14 and ASTM D790-17 coupon database. Published data for this specific configuration is limited outside the manufacturer’s technical data sheet and handling guide.

    When Post-Cure Temperature Excursion Exceeds 120 °C

    Thermal post-cure drives conversion of the epoxy component and determines final glass-transition temperature, flexural modulus, and flame-retardant char formation. Manufacturer processing guidance specifies a final oven temperature near 120 °C; excursions above 130 °C accelerate crosslinking but may thermally embrittle thin sections. Oven temperature uniformity should be mapped before production batches because gradients exceeding ±5 °C create variable crosslink density within a single build. In production-scale forced-air ovens, loading density influences ramp-rate and recovery time; densely packed parts can remain below cure temperature for extended periods, yielding low heat deflection and incomplete flame retardancy. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, but under-cure is detectable through reduced ASTM D648-18 deflection temperatures and higher visible smoke in UL 94 vertical burn tests. For tall thin-wall ducts, a staged ramp of 1–5 °C/min reduces residual stress and distortion; the exact ramp depends on part mass and oven airflow. Oven thermocouple placement should include part core locations, not only air temperature, to verify that internal mass has reached the specified cure soak temperature.

    Green-state part washing is required before post-cure to remove uncured resin from microchannels, snap-fit windows, and blind holes. Incomplete washing leaves residual two-part resin that cures during thermal post-cure and can alter dimensional tolerances on latching surfaces. Production lines generally use fresh solvent baths with two-stage immersion or ultrasonication; the specific solvent and cycle must follow current Carbon handling documentation. Solvent-laden resin waste streams require hazardous waste management under local regulations. Cross-contamination with EPX 82, RPU 70, or other Carbon resins in wash baths or build platforms should be prevented because mixed resins shift stoichiometry and may lose flame-retardant classification.

    When Geometrically Complex Ducting Requires V-0 Resin with Thin-Wall Capability

    Thin-wall ducting with integrated snap-fit closures, wire-routing bosses, and mounting flanges is a representative production use case. DLS does not require the same support structures as stereolithography, but tall thin sections can deflect if the green-state modulus is insufficient. For EPX 86FR, vertical ribs below 1.5 mm thickness should be supported by gussets or patterned thickening to prevent distortion during the 120 °C post-cure. Because the resin has a moderate heat deflection temperature, service temperatures above 70–80 °C require load-path analysis; published data for this specific configuration is limited. Batch-to-batch variation in flexural modulus should be controlled by incoming resin testing against ASTM D790-17, and printed qualification coupons are recommended for each new lot to detect shifts in photo-initiator concentration and thermal crosslinker ratio. In aerospace cabin interior bracketry, the material has been used to consolidate multiple machined or molded components into a single printed part, but part-level flammability and smoke density testing remains mandatory because geometry and cure state affect fire performance.

    Operating boundaries include storage of unmixed components at 18–30 °C and avoidance of open-container humidity above 60% relative humidity. Water uptake before cure can inhibit crosslinking and reduce glass-transition temperature. The cured resin is not intended for continuous immersion in strong alkaline solutions; chemical compatibility should be evaluated per ASTM D543-20 before specifying the material for fluid-handling components. Dedicated resin trays, build platforms, and wash solvents are required to prevent contamination with other Carbon materials. Mixing EPX 86FR with EPX 82 or RPU 70 in any proportion will shift stoichiometry and may result in incomplete cure or loss of flame retardancy. The resin is not formulated for desktop MSLA or top-down SLA printers; it is intended only for Carbon DLS equipment with active resin recirculation and oxygen-controlled dead-zone management.

    Compliance and verification status for EPX 86FR
    Standard / RegulationTest ConditionReported Status
    UL 943.0 mm thickness vertical burnV-0
    FAR 25.853(a)12 s vertical ignition, 3.0 mm couponManufacturer-reported pass; part-level validation required
    ASTM D638-14Tensile coupon, printed and post-cured50–55 MPa tensile stress at break
    ASTM D790-17Flexural coupon, printed and post-cured80–95 MPa flexural strength
    ASTM D648-180.45 MPa fiber stress75–85 °C heat deflection temperature
    Top