Products

BASF 3D Ultrafuse HiPS Fused Fillament

    • Product Name: BASF 3D Ultrafuse HiPS Fused Fillament
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 478871
    Product Name BASF 3D Ultrafuse HiPS Fused Filament
    Material High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS)
    Primary Function Soluble support material for ABS and ABS-compatible filaments
    Filament Diameter 1.75 mm (also available in 2.85 mm)
    Diameter Tolerance ±0.05 mm
    Net Filament Weight 750 g
    Density 1.05 g/cm³
    Print Temperature 230–250 °C
    Bed Temperature 80–100 °C
    Print Speed 30–60 mm/s
    Tensile Strength 25 MPa
    Tensile Modulus 1800 MPa
    Elongation At Break 40%
    Flexural Strength 40 MPa
    Flexural Modulus 1900 MPa
    Hardness 75 Shore D
    Heat Deflection Temperature 75 °C
    Vicat Softening Temperature 90 °C
    Solubility Soluble in d-limonene
    Color Natural
    Drying Conditions 60 °C for 4 hours
    Compatibility ABS

    As an accredited BASF 3D Ultrafuse HiPS Fused Fillament factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing
    Shipping
    Storage
    Free Quote

    Competitive BASF 3D Ultrafuse HiPS Fused Fillament prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618136850665 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618136850665

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    BASF 3D Ultrafuse HiPS Fused Fillament (commercially listed as Ultrafuse HiPS Fused Filament) is an unfilled high-impact polystyrene extrusion feedstock for fused filament fabrication. The product model is supplied in 1.75 mm and 2.85 mm nominal diameters with a diameter tolerance of ±0.05 mm. Published processing guidance defines a nozzle set-point range of 230–250 °C, a heated-bed range of 90–110 °C, and a print-speed envelope of 30–80 mm/s for a 0.4 mm nozzle. Although the butadiene-modified styrene backbone absorbs moisture more slowly than PLA, spools held at relative humidity above 60% for more than 48 h should be dried at 80 °C for 4 h before extrusion. The unfilled material has a density of 1.04 g/cm³ when tested in accordance with ISO 1183-1, a tensile modulus near 2100 MPa under ISO 527-2, and a Vicat softening temperature of 96 °C under ISO 306/B50. Because the grade is amorphous, it lacks a crystalline melting peak; the processing window is therefore defined by melt viscosity and thermal stability rather than by a melting transition. The standard safety data sheet classifies the solid filament as non-hazardous in supplied form, but local exhaust ventilation is required during extrusion because styrenic decomposition products are released at the upper end of the processing window.

    Why Does Ultrafuse HiPS Occupy a Separate Processing Niche from PLA and ABS?

    Unlike PLA, which loses dimensional stability above its glass-transition range of 55–60 °C and bubbles during extrusion after modest moisture exposure, HiPS maintains a Vicat softening point near 96 °C and does not require vacuum-sealed desiccant storage for routine printing. The styrene-rich matrix also forms a stronger interfacial bond with styrenic part materials such as ABS and ASA than with polyolefin or PETG counterparts, because interlayer chain entanglement occurs across the melt boundary. Compared with ABS, HiPS displays lower warpage on open-frame build plates because the dispersed rubber phase reduces shrinkage stress, but the trade-off is a lower heat deflection temperature: commercial ABS grades often exceed 100 °C under ISO 75-2/A, whereas HiPS is specified in the 84–96 °C range depending on test method. The most operationally significant difference is solubility. HiPS dissolves in d-limonene under mild heating, enabling support-removal protocols that are impractical with water-soluble PVA unless the operator maintains PVA storage below 30% RH to avoid spool blocking. This makes HiPS a rigid, moisture-tolerant support choice for complex styrenic builds, whereas PLA and PETG support structures typically require mechanical separation or alkaline hydrolysis.

    Published datasheet values for specimens printed at 250 °C, bed temperature 100 °C, and 40 mm/s in a 0.4 mm direct-drive FFF system are summarized in the following matrix. Specimens were conditioned at 23 °C and 50% RH for 24 h before mechanical testing; the values are typical lot averages and not batch-release limits.

    PropertyTest methodTypical value
    DensityISO 1183-11.04 g/cm³
    Tensile modulusISO 527-2/1A/12100 MPa
    Tensile stress at yieldISO 527-2/1A/5021 MPa
    Tensile strain at breakISO 527-2/1A/5040%
    Flexural modulusISO 1781900 MPa
    Flexural strengthISO 17835 MPa
    Charpy notched impact strengthISO 179-1/1eA10 kJ/m²
    Vicat softening temperatureISO 306/B5096 °C
    Heat deflection temperature at 0.45 MPaISO 75-2/B85 °C

    Tensile values obtained under ASTM D638-14 are not directly interchangeable with ISO 527-2 results because of differences in specimen gauge geometry and extensometer practice. The reported modulus and yield values reflect the butadiene-toughened styrene architecture: the material yields before extensive cold flow, and the break strain remains high enough for snap-fit geometries that would fracture brittle standard PS homopolymer at similar thickness.

    Nozzle Wear, Feed Tension, and Open-Frame Bed Adhesion in Production-Scale HiPS Runs

    On production FFF equipment with Bowden feed paths longer than 400 mm, HiPS can show feed inconsistency because the rubber-modified matrix has lower column stiffness in the melt-transition zone than ABS. Feed-roller idler pressure should be reduced to avoid shaving the filament surface; visible surface deformation from the feed roller is an early failure indicator. Direct-drive toolheads or constrained filament paths provide the most stable output. Brass nozzles are acceptable because the unfilled grade is non-abrasive; hardened steel is necessary only when the same toolhead is shared with abrasive carbon-fiber or glass-fiber materials. For open-frame systems, first-layer adhesion is more reproducible at 105–110 °C on glass with PVP-based adhesive or polyimide tape. Corner lift on parts with z-height above 120 mm is a known failure mode when the build surface is below 95 °C; reducing first-layer speed to 10–20 mm/s and increasing first-layer extrusion width to 120% of nozzle diameter reduce peel initiation. Because HiPS solidifies with less volumetric shrinkage than ABS, enclosed chamber temperatures of 35–50 °C are sufficient for most parts; polycarbonate requires substantially higher chamber temperatures. A heated chamber is not mandatory for small parts below 50 mm in z-height, but temperature fluctuations above 5 °C during a build can create visible layer banding because the amorphous polymer expands and contracts uniformly with the build plate.

    Under ISO 1133-1:2022, the melt volume rate of the standard HiPS grade is typically evaluated in the range 5–8 cm³/10 min at 200 °C/5 kg. This moderate viscosity supports extrusion at 230–250 °C, but prolonged residence above 270 °C is not recommended because the butadiene impact modifier begins to oxidize and deposits a tacky film on the nozzle exterior. The amorphous nature of HiPS removes crystallization-related layer fusion limitations; interlayer strength is controlled by melt temperature, contact pressure, and cooling rate. At cooling rates above 30 K/min, frozen-in orientation increases tensile modulus but reduces notched impact strength. Annealing printed parts at 70–80 °C for 2 h reduces residual stress in thick sections and improves dimensional stability before machining.

    Free-shrinkage values measured on printed bars are typically 0.4–0.6% in the X and Y directions, lower than the 0.7–1.0% range commonly reported for ABS under similar open-frame conditions. The lower shrinkage is a direct consequence of the rubber-toughened morphology: the dispersed polybutadiene particles act as stress concentrators that initiate multiple microvoids rather than permitting large-scale orientation relaxation. This behaviour reduces visible warp on large flat parts but also lowers the modulus relative to glass-filled styrenic materials. For applications requiring higher stiffness, the unfilled HiPS grade should be substituted with a glass-filled or carbon-fiber-filled material in the Ultrafuse range rather than by increasing shell count alone, because additional perimeters do not change the matrix modulus.

    When D-Limonene Support Removal Is Required but Solvent Exposure Limits Build Envelope

    In multi-material builds where HiPS is printed as sacrificial support beneath ABS or ASA, the support is removed by immersion in d-limonene heated to 40–60 °C. Dissolution time is governed by solvent access and support density. Open lattice support with 2 mm channels typically clears within 2–6 h, whereas closed cavities and internal ducts may require 12–24 h or forced solvent circulation. Dissolution rate is not linear with temperature; raising the bath temperature from 40 °C to 60 °C can reduce clearing time by approximately half, but heat accelerates solvent evaporation and increases the volatile organic compound load on the workspace. The solvent does not attack ABS or ASA at the same immersion time, but it can swell polycarbonate sight windows, silicone seals, and some elastomeric gaskets; processing equipment should therefore be dedicated or inspected before multi-material use. d-Limonene has a flash point near 48 °C and requires local exhaust ventilation, spark-resistant heating, and grounded ultrasonic bath controls. Because the solvent is a terpene, waste removal must follow local volatile organic compound disposal rules. Solvent-soluble support stacks are not compatible with PLA part materials because PLA softens in hot d-limonene and the differential extraction rate can distort thin part walls. The use of HiPS support therefore imposes a material compatibility boundary: it is best paired with styrene-rich part materials, and it is not a universal support solution for polyolefin or polyester build platforms.

    Operational incompatibilities centre on solvent exposure and service temperature. Parts should not be cleaned with acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, or chlorinated solvents because these agents induce environmental stress crazing in the polystyrene matrix. Continuous service above 85 °C under load is not recommended for load-bearing geometries because the heat deflection temperature is below that of ABS and ASA. The standard processing datasheet does not include an FDA 21 CFR food-contact statement or an EU 10/2011 migration listing; food-contact, medical, and toy uses require explicit supplier documentation under the applicable regulation. Under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the safety data sheet lists the standard grade as non-hazardous in supplied solid form, but processing emissions from styrenic polymer at 230–250 °C require local ventilation. For UV-exposed outdoor components, HiPS is not a direct substitute for ASA because the butadiene-rich impact-modifier phase undergoes photo-oxidation unless a UV-stable coating or black pigment is applied.

    Top