| HS Code | 366995 |
| Appearance | Amber, translucent liquid |
| Viscosity | 1,200 cP at 25°C |
| Density | 1.08 g/cm³ |
| Shore A Hardness | 90 |
| Tensile Strength | 10 MPa |
| Elongation At Break | 250% |
| Tear Strength | 50 kN/m |
| Compression Set | 25% |
| Rebound Resilience | 60% |
| Uv Cure Wavelength | 385-405 nm |
| Layer Thickness | 50-100 µm |
| Post Cure Schedule | 60 minutes at 60°C |
As an accredited Adaptive3D Elastic ToughRubber™ 90 (ETR 90) Elastomer for DLP factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Adaptive3D Elastic ToughRubber™ 90 (ETR 90) Elastomer for DLP is supplied in a 1 kg light-blocking plastic bottle with a screw cap. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL container loading: palletized, ambient, dry, secure, labeled packaging for Adaptive3D Elastic ToughRubber™ 90 (ETR 90) DLP elastomer. |
| Shipping | Adaptive3D Elastic ToughRubber™ 90 (ETR 90) Elastomer for DLP is shipped as UN3082, Environmentally hazardous substance, liquid, n.o.s. (contains isobornyl acrylate), Class 9, Packing Group III. It requires UN-approved packaging, Class 9 labels, proper shipping papers, and compliance with DOT/IATA/IMDG regulations. Small-quantity exceptions may apply. |
| Storage | Store Adaptive3D Elastic ToughRubber™ 90 (ETR 90) Elastomer for DLP in its original, tightly closed container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Protect from direct sunlight, UV light, heat, sparks, and flames. Recommended storage temperature is 15–25°C (59–77°F); do not freeze. Keep away from strong oxidizers and radical initiators. Use appropriate PPE and follow local regulations. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life is 12 months from date of manufacture when stored sealed in original container, away from light, at 15–25°C. |
In iterative footwear midsole development on a bottom-up DLP system operating at 385 nm or 405 nm, Adaptive3D Elastic ToughRubber™ 90 (ETR 90) is processed as a single-component photopolymer without solvent dilution, reactive diluent addition, or two-part crosslinker mixing. Slice thickness is set between 50 µm and 100 µm; the lower value is used when lattice cell walls below 1.2 mm nominal thickness must retain smooth curvature in the z-axis, while the higher value is accepted only for solid heel wedges or thick-walled pads where interlayer staircase does not concentrate strain. Build orientation is fixed before tensile testing because printed elastomer anisotropy is measurable: xy-plane coupons tested according to ASTM D638-14 may report higher elongation than z-axis coupons cut through layer interfaces, and finite-element material cards that ignore this difference overpredict lattice bending loads. The material’s nominal hardness of 90 Shore A under ASTM D2240-15 places it above soft midsoles in compliance, so cushioning is tuned by lattice strut diameter, node spacing, and shell thickness rather than by changing resin grade. Cushioning prototypes are evaluated under ASTM F1976-20 for impact attenuation and under ASTM D395-18 Method B for compression set after repeated load cycling; no published universal coefficient of restitution is assigned because energy return varies with lattice topology and post-cure dose. On production-derived bottom-up DLP cells with 200 mm-class build diagonals, first-layer adhesion failure at solid raft edges is observed when the initial exposure band is too narrow for the platform’s mask uniformity; adding a 0.8 mm to 1.0 mm removable raft and increasing the first-layer exposure stabilizes the build at the cost of secondary raft removal. Uncured resin retention inside closed lattice compartments is avoided by specifying a minimum drain aperture of 1.5 mm and by using two sequential solvent washes before a controlled 405 nm flood post-cure. The terminal components in this sector are prototype midsoles, heel wedge test inserts, and conformal lattice parameter study sets used to reduce injection-compression tooling iterations.
Protective lattice pads for sports and industrial impact applications are evaluated for edge tear and cell-wall fracture rather than bulk tensile elongation, because impact loads propagate along the shortest path between adjacent cell nodes. Tear resistance is measured on printed plaques using ASTM D624-00(2020) Die C; specimens are extracted in both the xy and z directions because the interlayer interface creates a measurable anisotropy. When cell walls are printed thinner than 1.0 mm, oxygen inhibition at the free surface can reduce double-bond conversion, leaving a softer skin layer that initiates tearing at lower strain than the interior photopolymer. Process adjustments for this segment include increasing exposure per layer or using a post-cure chamber with 405 nm LED flood arrays; however, overexposure in the z-axis can produce hardness drift and reduce energy absorption by embrittling the lattice nodes. The build arrangement must orient the primary impact direction parallel to the xy-plane where interlayer cleavage is not directly loaded in peel. Pads printed with the primary compressive axis aligned along the z-axis show different load redistribution and often fail by buckling of cell walls before the bulk resin tear limit is reached. The terminal components include lacrosse rib pads, knee-pad lattice cores, and industrial collision buffers for automated guided vehicle bumpers. Compliance for these applications is usually driven by REACH and EU 2016/425 for personal protective equipment only where the printed part is placed on the market as PPE; the raw photopolymer itself is not sufficient to establish conformity without completed device testing.
| Standard or regulation | Measured property or scope | Representative downstream linkage |
|---|---|---|
| ASTM D638-14 | Tensile stress–strain of printed coupons in xy and z orientation | Footwear lattice beams; soft robotic bellows |
| ASTM D624-00(2020) Die C | Tear resistance of cell walls and sealing lips | Protective lattice pads; gasket prototypes |
| ASTM D2240-15 | Durometer hardness after post-cure | Incoming resin lot release; hardness drift checks |
| ASTM D395-18 Method B | Compression set after thermal or cyclic loading | Gaskets; orthotic pads; vibration mounts |
| ASTM D471-16a | Fluid resistance in reference fluids | Automotive grommets; sealing components |
| ASTM F1976-20 | Impact attenuation of cushioning systems | Footwear midsoles; protective pad cores |
| ISO 10993-5 | Cytotoxicity of washed and post-cured articles | Prosthetic interface pads; orthotic liners |
| REACH | Substance registration and restriction status | All industrial and consumer downstream segments |
| RoHS 2011/65/EU | Restricted substance compliance for electrical assemblies | Electrical enclosure gaskets |
Printed as a continuous cross-section, ETR 90 is UV post-cured instead of being cast into room-temperature vulcanizing (RTV) silicone molds. The gasket is designed for closure compression between 15% and 25% of free height; compression set is tested according to ASTM D395-18 Method B after 22 h at 70 °C, because enclosure tests frequently expose seals to warm electronics. Printed gaskets are not assumed to have inherently low compression set; the post-cure dose must be sufficient to consume residual acrylate unsaturation. If the gasket is intended for an electrical enclosure, the final assembly may need to satisfy RoHS 2011/65/EU restricted substance limits and a flammability classification such as UL 94 HB or V-class, but the raw resin datasheet alone does not provide final component classification. No amine catalyst or amine-functional silane is added, because such additives can interfere with free-radical photopolymerization and produce uncured zones or surface tack. If pigmenting is required for part identification, the pigment loading must remain below the threshold that shifts the resin working curve by more than one layer thickness; the exposure set must then be revalidated using a test matrix of solid and thin-wall specimens.
Process failures observed in gasket runs include mottled durometer when the post-cure chamber has poor light distribution across concave groove profiles, and localized swelling near the gasket groove when solvent washing is not followed by complete drying before post-cure. The terminal components are gaskets for enclosures undergoing IP54 or IP65 ingress testing, lid seals for industrial controllers, and short-run replacement gaskets for low-pressure pneumatic manifolds. For food-contact sealing applications, migration testing under FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 or an equivalent food-contact regulation is not inherent to the resin and must be completed on the printed and post-cured article.
Prosthetic socket interface liners and orthotic cushioning pads printed from ETR 90 are treated as skin-contacting device components subject to cleaning validation and biological safety review, not as general elastomer prototypes. The printed part is washed in two solvent baths to reduce residual acrylate monomer, then post-cured in a UV chamber and vacuum-dried to remove solvent and low-molecular-weight species. Cytotoxicity and sensitization are tested according to ISO 10993-5 and ISO 10993-10 on the cleaned final article; raw resin supplier data may be used as supporting evidence, but does not by itself establish device-level conformity. Mechanical cushioning is characterized by compression-deflection under ASTM D575-91(2018) and compression set under ASTM D395-18 after 70 °C ageing. Thin orthotic pads below 2.0 mm total thickness are built as solid profiles or with shallow relief channels rather than tall unsupported lattice structures, because bottom-up DLP peeling can detach closely spaced columns during recoating. A common production fault on multi-printer cells is patchy Shore A hardness on concave socket inner surfaces when the post-cure light cannot reach the undercut; rotating the part around two axes and using a dual-sided 405 nm flood array reduces this failure. The terminal parts include check-socket interface pads, heel cushion inserts for ankle-foot orthoses, and custom toe-off wedge prototypes that are fitted only under clinical supervision.
In soft robotic pneumatic systems, ETR 90 bellows are built with thin convolution walls in the 1.5 mm to 2.0 mm range and a 50 µm z-slice where smooth inner radius transitions are required. Static tensile and tear data from ASTM D638-14 and ASTM D624-00(2020) Die C establish lot-acceptance baselines but do not directly predict cyclic inflation life. Printed elastomer bellows fail primarily by crack initiation at the inner convolution root where layer interfaces align with local tensile strain; this failure mode is not captured by bulk tensile coupons cut from flat plaques. The build orientation is set so the bellows axis is parallel to the build platform or tilted at a shallow angle, allowing uncured resin to drain during peeling and reducing liquid pooling in lower convolutions. A minimum internal fillet radius of 0.8 mm is used at the convolution root because smaller radii create a stress concentration that reduces cycle life under repeated pneumatic loading. Pressure cycling is conducted at a proof pressure scaled to wall thickness, with leakage monitored by pressure decay; printed parts are not inflation devices and require overpressure relief in the test circuit. The one-component resin is used as supplied; no reactive diluent is added, and any surface treatment after post-cure must be tested for effect on tear resistance. Terminal components in this segment are low-cycle R&D gripper bellows, soft actuator sleeves, and pneumatic fixture bladders used for pick-and-place feasibility trials.
The limiting operational boundary in soft robotics is not static hardness but cyclic crack growth along interlayer planes. Designs that orient the primary bending axis along the xy build plane survive longer than z-axis bending in laboratory comparisons, but published data for ETR 90 under specific cyclic pressure regimes is limited and must be generated using the final wall thickness and post-cure dose.
Wire harness grommet prototypes and connector blank seals are printed in low volumes where injection mold tooling is unavailable or not yet justified. The relevant material evaluations are fluid resistance under ASTM D471-16a in reference fluids such as IRM 901 and IRM 903, and heat ageing under ASTM D573-04(2019) at temperatures representative of the target vehicle zone. Published data for ETR 90 in continuous underhood heat and oil exposure is limited; short-term laboratory immersion does not establish service life in an engine bay. The material is processed as a one-component resin, but batch-to-batch consistency in green hardness should be verified by ASTM D2240-15 after a fixed post-cure dose because resin storage below 30 °C and rehomogenization before each build reduce drift. Prototype grommets are printed with solid sealing lips rather than thin unsupported flanges below 1.0 mm, and the part is oriented so the lip edges are not parallel to the peel plane of the DLP system. A known failure mode in this segment is axial split at the wire entry when the post-cured grommet is stretched repeatedly during harness threading; this is reduced by increasing fillet radii at the root of the sealing lip and by testing the installation force on the actual wire bundle diameter. Terminal components are instrument panel pass-through grommets, connector blank seals, and low-volume underhood cable transition prototypes. Any application requiring electrical insulation, flame retardancy, or long-term coolant resistance requires OEM-specific validation beyond the raw resin compliance documentation.
Competitive Adaptive3D Elastic ToughRubber™ 90 (ETR 90) Elastomer for DLP prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618136850665 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8618136850665
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Photopolymerization of high-durometer elastomers on digital light processing (DLP) platforms introduces a set of vat-depth, oxygen-inhibition, and green-strength constraints that are not present with rigid acrylate or epoxy resins. Adaptive3D Elastic ToughRubber™ 90 (ETR 90) is formulated for this processing window as a single-component, UV-A-curable elastomer with a nominal hardness of 90 Shore A. The resin is intended for DLP systems operating in the 385–405 nm UV-A band; print resolution is controlled by pigment dispersion, inhibitor package, and measured cure depth rather than by nozzle pressure or extrusion flow. Manufacturer processing guidance recommends equilibration of the uncured resin to 20–25 °C before printing and slow recirculation to prevent sedimentation without entraining air bubbles.
The product designation places ETR 90 at the upper end of the Adaptive3D elastic photopolymer hardness range. As a comparison point, ETR 70 is a softer grade with lower crosslink density; ETR 90 typically exhibits higher tensile strength and tear propagation resistance and a lower elongation at break. Direct numerical comparisons from supplier datasheets are not uniform across production lots, and published data for this specific configuration is limited to manufacturer-controlled test reports. Users responsible for material substitution in serial production should requalify the resin on the target DLP machine because exposure irradiance, build-platform separation speed, and vat film aging alter green-part mechanical properties.
The uncured resin exhibits shear-thinning behaviour under recirculation, but DLP recoating occurs under low-shear conditions after the build platform displaces the vat film. Excessive fill depth above 2 mm can prolong recoating time and trap air bubbles at the build surface. The resin should be allowed to rest after stirring until visible bubbles clear before a build starts. Viscosity measurements are normally conducted at 25 °C with a Brookfield RVT rotational viscometer using a small-sample adapter; variations in spindle geometry and shear rate make direct comparisons between users difficult.
ETR 90 occupies a higher-durometer class than ETR 70. The increased crosslink density required to achieve a nominal 90 Shore A hardness produces a steeper stress-strain curve and generally lower elongation at break than ETR 70, but the specific tensile-strength delta depends on cure state and test piece orientation. Compared with rigid DLP resins such as filled acrylates or cyanate-ester materials, ETR 90 provides large-strain elastic recovery, higher tear resistance, and lower Young’s modulus. However, those properties impose tighter control over layer exposure, post-cure dose, and ambient humidity. Rigid resins can tolerate a broader exposure band because slight overcure increases modulus rather than causing surface tack; ETR 90 can remain tacky if the top surface is oxygen-inhibited during post-cure.
Rigid DLP resins used for injection-mold inserts do not require the same layerwise elastomer interdiffusion that ETR 90 needs to achieve high z-strength. A rigid resin can be considered cured when conversion reaches a threshold that prevents distortion; an elastomer must develop a sufficiently high molecular weight between crosslinks to achieve strain recovery and tear resistance. This distinction explains why ETR 90 post-cure routines are longer than those for many rigid prototyping resins.
Protective bellows, vibration isolators, industrial seals, and soft robotic end effectors are representative production geometries where the combination of 90 Shore A hardness and cyclic flex fatigue resistance justifies the use of ETR 90. In these components, build orientation is not cosmetic. High-aspect-ratio bellow convolutions are frequently oriented at 30–45° to the build axis to reduce interlayer stress concentrations during repeated flexing. Post-cure routines reported on production lines include 20–40 min exposure under 405 nm UV lamps at 30–60 °C, followed by cooling to room temperature before support removal. Removing supports before full post-cure can distort thin walls and seal lips.
Green parts are typically cleaned with isopropanol or a supplier-approved solvent in an ultrasonic bath for 5–10 min at 20–30 °C. Over-cleaning in high-purity alcohol can extract low-molecular-weight species and reduce final elongation; under-cleaning leaves residual uncured monomer that becomes tacky after post-cure. The cleaning solvent should be changed when dissolved resin content exceeds 5% by mass, because solvent saturated with monomer redeposits contaminants on the part surface.
Elastomer components printed from ETR 90 are evaluated by tear and compression-set methods because seals and gaskets can initiate failure at layer lines if z-axis conversion is incomplete. ASTM D624-00 Die C tear specimens machined or printed in the XY orientation provide a more relevant measure for film and gasket service than tensile-only datasets. Compression set testing under ASTM D395-18 Method B with 25% deflection at 70 °C for 22 h is used to screen creep-prone sealing applications. Supplier-controlled averages for ETR 90 are commonly reported in the range of 15–35% compression set, but user-generated results vary with build orientation, post-cure dose, and part thickness. Sections thicker than 6 mm require extended post-cure cycles because atmospheric oxygen limits top-surface conversion in these systems.
Cyclic loading of ETR 90 specimens can show a Mullins effect during the first few strain cycles, with stiffness softening until the material reaches a stable hysteresis loop. This behaviour is consistent with filled elastomer networks and should be accounted for in dynamic mechanical testing. The magnitude of stress softening is lower in fully post-cured XY specimens than in z-axis specimens, reinforcing the requirement to report orientation in all data.
In low-exposure processing intended to preserve fine positive features, ETR 90 green parts may delaminate during build-platform separation. DLP exposure for 50 µm slices in this resin class frequently falls between 10 and 20 mJ/cm²; if lamp irradiance decays below 8 mW/cm², the required dose may no longer be reached at standard exposure times. Operators should monitor irradiance with a calibrated radiometer at the vat surface weekly. Underexposure produces not only dimensional loss but also cohesive failure at the interlayer interface, particularly when separation forces increase after large cross-sectional layers.
Overexposure above 25 mJ/cm² for 50 µm layers may generate excessive polymerized depth per slice, closing channels and reducing feature resolution. The practical processing window is therefore bracketed by minimum green strength and maximum apparent cure depth. This window narrows on aging DLP light engines with spatial non-uniformity; replacing a degraded LED array can shift optimal exposure by more than 10%.
The uncured ETR 90 resin is subject to standard industrial photopolymer handling controls: local exhaust ventilation, nitrile gloves tested to EN 374, and eye protection. It should not be mixed with amine-catalyzed condensation systems or tin-catalyzed silicones unless compatibility has been confirmed, because residual active species may accelerate premature gelation. Storage stability is typically 12 months from the date of manufacture when kept in sealed opaque containers at 20–25 °C; frozen storage is not recommended. At relative humidity above 60%, a condensation film can form on the vat surface during long builds and produce tacky top layers; a dry-air shroud or pre-conditioned build chamber is required in these conditions.
Regulatory documentation for ETR 90 may include REACH and RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU compliance statements from the supplier. A UL 94 flammability classification should not be assumed without a controlled test report. The material is not automatically medical-grade under ISO 10993-5 unless the supplier provides formal certification for the specific grade and post-cure protocol.
| Parameter | Test method | Typical boundary | Operational note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness | ASTM D2240-15 | 88–92 Shore A | Measure on solid or stacked 6 mm specimens after full post-cure |
| Tensile strength | ASTM D412-16 | 8–12 MPa | Orientation-dependent; verify lot-specific data |
| Elongation at break | ASTM D412-16 | 150–260% | Z-axis elongation may be lower |
| Tear strength | ASTM D624-00 Die C | 30–50 kN/m | XY orientation recommended |
| Compression set | ASTM D395-18 Method B | 15–35% | 25% deflection, 70 °C/22 h |
| Viscosity | ASTM D2196-15 | 4,000–8,000 cP at 25 °C | Spindle and shear-rate dependent |
Batch-to-batch variation in pigment dispersion can shift optimal exposure dose by approximately ±10%. A printability test coupon with 0.5 mm slots and 1.0 mm walls is recommended for each new production lot. This check provides a quick detection of viscosity drift, inhibitor imbalance, or light-source decay before committing to full build volumes.
ETR 90 is not a direct drop-in replacement for 90 Shore A cast polyurethane elastomers. DLP-printed parts have anisotropic mechanical behaviour tied to build orientation, with z-axis elongation frequently lower than XY-axis values. Unlike injection-molded TPU, ETR 90 does not exhibit the same melt history or shear-induced phase separation; however, it can reproduce complex undercuts and internal lattices without tooling. When tensile specimens are extracted from XY and Z orientations according to ASTM D412-16, users often observe a 10–30% reduction in tensile strength along the z-axis depending on layer thickness and post-cure. This anisotropy must be included in finite-element material cards rather than assuming isotropic behaviour.
Performance comparisons against cast urethanes should also account for surface finish and environmental exposure. DLP layer lines can act as fatigue initiation sites unless surfaces are post-processed by tumbling, coating, or media blasting. The cure profile of ETR 90 is designed for UV-A sources; exposure to sunlight or high-intensity UV-B can cause continued crosslinking and embrittlement over time unless the part is coated or pigmented to block UV radiation.
On production DLP lines with 4K or 8K LED engines and build envelopes exceeding 200 mm in z-height, lot-to-lot viscosity and pigment dispersion variance are common causes of failed builds rather than chemical instability of the resin itself. A closed-loop resin handling system with jacketed feed at 20–25 °C and 0.2 µm filtration removes partially gelled particles that otherwise damage polydimethylsiloxane vat films. That equipment configuration is described in supplier technical bulletins; however, published data for this specific configuration is limited, and process parameters require confirmation on the target machine.