Products

3D Systems VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-NT)

    • Product Name: 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-NT)
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 209391
    Product Name 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200 + VisiJet CE-NT)
    Material Type Multi-material photopolymer composite
    Base Materials VisiJet CR-CL 200 and VisiJet CE-NT
    Compatible Printer 3D Systems ProJet 5500X
    Printing Technology MultiJet Printing (MJP)
    Color Clear
    Shore D Hardness 55
    Tensile Strength 23.6 MPa
    Tensile Modulus 1,090 MPa
    Elongation At Break 29%
    Flexural Strength 34.5 MPa
    Flexural Modulus 1,020 MPa
    Heat Deflection Temperature 45 °C at 0.45 MPa
    Water Absorption 0.35%
    Density 1.12 g/cm³

    As an accredited 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-NT) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing
    Shipping
    Storage
    Application of 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-NT)

    The VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 composite is processed as a two-phase jetted solid rather than as a homogeneous resin blend. VisiJet CR-CL 200 supplies the hard transparent phase and VisiJet CE-NT supplies the low-durometer elastomeric phase. The downstream value of this combination is not in the average properties of the two materials but in the shape and continuity of the voxel-resolved boundary between them. Each application below is therefore described by the geometric function of the hard phase, the sealing or dampening function of the soft phase, and the failure mode at the transition. Published product-specific data for the composite is limited in several of these applications; where a numerical threshold is not available from the supplier, the text identifies the appropriate test standard instead.

    What happens when a low-durometer seal bead is jetted directly onto a rigid transparent retainer?

    The most frequently tested configuration in low-pressure fluid handling uses a flat CR-CL 200 flange as the compression limiter and a raised CE-NT bead as the sealing lip. The hard phase prevents over-compression of the soft bead and carries the tightening torque of the closure screws. Compression set is the controlling property and it must be measured on a coupon that includes the same bead height and hard-floor thickness as the production part, not on a bulk CE-NT slab. ASTM D395 Method B is the appropriate reference; the standard specimen is compressed to a fixed deflection for a specified time and temperature. Production-scale multi-material jetting shows that a hard floor reduced to the final voxel layer at the edge of the build can flex under clamp load and change the compressed cross-section. A screw boss placed too close to the bead can split the soft phase during thread-forming insertion; a hard-phase ring around every threaded insert is therefore an operational requirement. If the assembly is exposed to hot water or water-glycol, the elastomeric phase should be assessed for hydrolysis and compression set because published data for this composite under continuous high-humidity service is limited. ASTM D471 immersion testing is the accepted reference for that exposure. The solvent cleaning step after printing must remove uncured low-viscosity species from the bead root. Residual uncured resin left in the sharp corner between the hard floor and the soft bead can migrate during storage and reduce interfacial adhesion. The phase boundary in this application is not a cosmetic line; it is the primary leak path.

    Rigid transparent inspection windows framed by CE-NT seal lands

    In flow-cell development, CR-CL 200 serves as a clear sight glass and CE-NT forms the surrounding gasket. This removes a separately die-cut gasket and allows the seal land to sit flush with the window. The main process conflict is optical haze at the mixed-phase boundary. Soft-phase oligomers can diffuse into the uncured hard-phase voxel before UV cure, producing a scattering zone that is not always captured by an average transmittance test. ASTM D1003 measures total light transmittance and haze; the boundary region must be sampled separately because the clear centre can dominate the integrating-sphere reading. Hot alkaline or strongly polar cleaning solutions attack the interface by swelling the elastomer more than the hard phase. The result is a fine wedge-shaped crack that propagates under fluid pressure. To limit this mode, the hard-phase wall adjacent to the elastomeric land should maintain a constant cross-section and the land should be placed away from the flow edge. Planing direction also changes the striae pattern in the transparent hard phase. Horizontal and vertical builds should be compared as witness samples after the same cleaning and drying cycle used for the production part. If the flow cell is autoclaved, dimensional change at 134 °C for 3 min should be recorded and the seal force checked. Published data for optical transmission of the composite interface is limited, so build-orientation-specific inspection is required before the window is used in a critical leak-tight test.

    Consumer wearable housings make a different use of the same phases: the clear phase carries the display rim and snap bosses while the CE-NT phase forms the strap loop and cushion. This moves bending stress into the low-modulus phase, but the highest structural risk is at the hard-soft boundary. Repeated loop flexing does not reproduce the delamination mode seen in two-shot overmoulding because the phases are interleaved over a finite transition rather than joined at a sharp melt line. The failure mode is more often a crack in the thin hard shell at the root of the loop or an elastomer tear around a discrete boss. Strap retention testing should therefore include cyclic flexure at the service angle rather than a single proof load. Tear resistance of the soft phase is measured by ASTM D624 die C using a 2.0 mm specimen thickness. Batch-to-batch variation in loop rebound may exceed the nominal Shore durometer range because the surface layer is sensitive to part spacing and build orientation. First-article inspection with micro-CT is advisable when the hard boss is reduced to only a few voxel widths, because the interfacial boundary can become continuous with the outer surface. A continuous hard rim is stiffer but can concentrate stress at the snap feature; a discrete boss layout isolates the snap but lowers the margin against elastomer tearing. Both layouts should be tested under low-temperature flexure because the low-durometer phase hardens and the interface can become brittle at sub-zero service temperatures.

    When the composite substitutes for two-shot TPU in appliance connector strain relief

    Appliance connector strain reliefs are sometimes prototyped from this composite when the production design is a two-shot thermoplastic polyurethane overmould. The CE-NT phase is used as the cable grommet and the CR-CL 200 phase is the cable stop and housing. Tear strength becomes a design constraint because the cable groove can split along the interface if the groove root is too close to the hard phase. ASTM D624 die C is preferred over tensile elongation for this comparison. The hard phase should form a continuous shoulder behind the CE-NT grommet. If the shoulder is perforated to reduce build volume, the elastomer can bulge through the openings under cable side-load. Torque-on-torque off response is another process interaction: the surrounding elastomer damps the seating torque, so the screw may reach its friction torque before the clamp bottoms on the hard stop. A hard-phase collar that creates a solid clamp bottom eliminates this ambiguity. Chemical exposure is dominated by household cleaners, grease, and plasticiser migration from adjacent PVC cables. The low-durometer phase may swell from low-polarity ester plasticisers; published compatibility data for this specific pairing is limited. Accelerated testing under IEC 60335-1 is required before functional boiling-water or baking tests. Continuous-load creep should be measured by residual clamping force over time rather than by short-term Shore hardness. The replacement of a TPU grommet with a jetted elastomer is therefore not a simple Shore matching exercise; the failure mode is controlled by the interface, the post-processing schedule, and the holding geometry.

    The standards matrix below separates the test requirements by phase and failure mode. It is not a substitute for supplier data.

    Application areaPrimary phase concernReferenced methodInterface effect to evaluate
    Low-pressure fluid sealCompression setASTM D395 Method BHard floor flexure changes bead compression
    Flow-cell windowHazeASTM D1003Soft-phase migration into hard voxel
    Wearable loopTear initiationASTM D624 die CThin hard shell cracks at root
    Appliance connectorTorque ambiguityIEC 60335-1Elastomer damping masks seating torque
    Medical modelSteam dimensional changeISO 17665Warpage at thin hard shell
    Equipment footInterfacial peelASTM D638-14 for bulk errorDovetail boss changes load mode

    Anatomical models and surgical rehearsal fixtures use the soft phase for compressible tissue regions and the hard phase for transparent osseous or vascular landmarks. These are not implant applications. The material combination has not been qualified as a permanent implant; ISO 10993-5 cytotoxicity screening alone is not sufficient for tissue-contact clearance. The main downstream tests are puncture resistance, suture retention, and reusability after high-level disinfection. The elastomer phase can absorb quaternary ammonium compounds and swell slightly after repeated soak cycles, changing the haptic response of the tissue-like regions. For fluid-filled models, the interface between the transparent hard vessel wall and the soft tissue analogue is the most likely failure position once internal pressure exceeds the peel resistance of the mixed voxel layer. No product-specific peel-strength value is published for this configuration; representative witness patches should be tested with the same orientation and cleaning protocol. Autoclave exposure at 134 °C for 3 min can relieve process stresses and cause warpage in thin hard-phase shells. Ethylene oxide may be less thermally damaging but requires longer aeration because the soft phase can retain residual sterilant. Radiation sterilisation may shift the transparent phase colour; if colour stability is relevant, samples should be exposed to the intended dose and evaluated by ASTM D2244. Because the composite is intended for visual and tactile reproduction rather than mechanical certification, bulk mechanical values should not be interpreted as implant-grade material data.

    Floating rigid bosses inside an elastomeric pad shift the failure locus from shear tearing to interfacial peel.

    Equipment feet and handheld tool grips sometimes use isolated CR-CL 200 bosses embedded in a CE-NT pad. The bosses carry threaded fasteners or magnetic inserts, and the soft phase supplies damping and surface friction. The transition from bulk elastomer shear to interfacial peel appears when the boss diameter is reduced and the circumferential contact line becomes the dominant load path. In a cast or injection-moulded pad, the hard boss is held by a moulded undercut. In a jetted composite, the boss must be held by the drop-placement interface itself. Pull-out force is therefore a function of total interfacial area and local cure state at the transition. A straight cylindrical boss will exhibit lower pull-out than a boss with a dovetailed or flanged root, because the dovetail transfers load into compression rather than pure peel. Tensile testing of the bulk hard phase under ASTM D638-14 Type IV specimens does not capture this boundary. For dynamic loading, dynamic mechanical analysis at 1 Hz under ASTM D4065 is a more sensitive method for interfacial energy differences than quasi-static pull-out alone. The low-durometer phase should not be bonded permanently with aggressive cyanoacrylate adhesives because the boundary may whiten and plasticise. If the pad is loaded at high frequency, hysteresis in the elastomer can raise local temperature; published data for this composite under cyclic compressive loads is limited. The practical design rule is to extend the rigid boss through the full pad thickness to the mounting face, isolating the fastener from the elastomer and changing the failure mode from peel to bearing.

    Underhood retainer clips and sensor mounts are another application where the rigid phase holds a locating feature and the elastomer provides vibration damping. The primary process constraint is high-temperature dimensional stability. The hard phase may creep if the clip is installed near a heat source; the soft phase can undergo thermal ageing and lose its clamping force. ISO 75-2 defines heat deflection for the hard phase; the elastomeric phase should be evaluated by compressive stress relaxation rather than hardness retention because Shore hardness may recover after cooling. Engine-bay exposure includes hot air, coolant spray, and oil mist. The interface can wick fuel or oil if it opens at the edge; this is a stronger reason to encapsulate the entire boundary than the pure pull-out force. Published multi-material jetting data for continuous automotive underhood exposure is limited, so prototype clips should be tested with thermal cycling between sub-zero and elevated temperatures in the intended mounting position. The best-performing geometry in limited published service studies is a full-depth hard boss capped by the elastomer only on the outside face, rather than a soft pad with embedded hard islands. That configuration avoids exposing the phase boundary to the hot mounting surface and reduces edge wicking. Electrical connector clips should be tested for dimensional recovery after repeated insertion and withdrawal and after each thermal cycle; the low-durometer phase may retain a temporary set that increases clip insertion or removal effort.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-NT) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618136850665 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618136850665

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    The VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 Multi-Material Composites system is a two-phase photopolymer build configuration composed of VisiJet CR-CL 200 clear rigid resin and VisiJet CE-NT elastomeric natural resin. The system is intended for MultiJet Printing platforms that maintain independent delivery channels for two build resins and a sacrificial support wax. The RCL designation identifies the co-jetting of a rigid clear phase with an elastomeric natural phase, and the ENT code corresponds to ear, nose, and throat anatomical modeling workflows in which rigid osseous structures and low-durometer soft-tissue-like regions are required in a single print. The D55 suffix denotes a targeted intermediate hardness of 55 Shore D for the printed multi-material composite; the local hardness of a given feature is governed by the voxel-level ratio of the two phases, the print order, and the part orientation with respect to the build plane.

    The two resins are stored and jetted separately; they are not premixed before entering the delivery system. Material isolation is maintained to prevent viscosity drift and premature cure. On a qualified MultiJet Printing system, the printer material profile maintains independent jetting temperatures, piezoelectric waveforms, and meniscus vacuum settings for the clear rigid and elastomeric natural resins. Running either resin outside the qualified profile can produce interfacial microvoids, incomplete elastomer bead coalescence, and support wax entrapment.

    Table 1. Constituent phase specification framework for VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55
    Property Test reference VisiJet CR-CL 200 VisiJet CE-NT RCL-ENT-D55 composite
    Tensile strength ASTM D638-14 46 MPa representative Manufacturer TDS value; elastomeric method may differ Not published as a single value
    Tensile modulus ASTM D638-14 1700 MPa representative Manufacturer TDS value Region-dependent
    Elongation at break ASTM D638-14 8% representative High-elongation elastomer; verify current TDS Spatially variable
    Hardness ASTM D2240-15 83 Shore D representative 27 Shore A representative 55 Shore D target
    Heat deflection temperature ASTM D648-16 at 0.455 MPa 53 °C representative Not routinely specified Governed by the elastomer phase

    These representative values are taken from manufacturer technical documentation for the individual resin phases and should be verified against the current 3D Systems technical datasheet for the specific lot before process qualification. The RCL-ENT-D55 composite does not have an independent full mechanical datasheet in the same format; published data for this specific configuration is limited, and the final stiffness and elongation of the multi-material part are determined by the geometric arrangement of the two phases rather than by a single homogeneous resin.

    What Distinguishes a Co-Jetted D55 Interface from a Bonded Assembly?

    When a clear rigid outer shell and an elastomeric inner region are produced as separate parts, the assembly process introduces a discrete bondline, often a cyanoacrylate or condensation-cure silicone. Under repeated flexure, that bondline becomes the primary failure site; observed failure modes include cohesive rupture of the adhesive, interfacial peeling, and moisture ingress at the exposed edge. The RCL-ENT-D55 configuration avoids this discrete layer by interleaving jetted voxels of CR-CL 200 and CE-NT in the same layer of the build. Load transfer across the rigid-elastic boundary is therefore governed by the polymer network formed at the jetted interface rather than by an adhesive cure profile. This distinction is material to anatomical models that undergo repeated palpation or surgical instrument interaction; published quantitative peel adhesion data for this specific configuration is limited, but the elimination of the adhesive bondline removes the need for bond strength verification under ASTM D6862-11.

    In contrast to a cast silicone over a printed rigid shell, the co-jetted process does not require mold design, release agents, or secondary casting. The spatial transition can be graded by varying the voxel pattern, so a sharp step from 83 Shore D to 27 Shore A is not inevitable. The practical resolution of this gradient is constrained by the drop volume, layer pitch, and printhead health on the selected MultiJet Printing platform. Thin-shell regions composed primarily of CR-CL 200 can be produced adjacent to high-displacement CE-NT regions, but design features such as enclosed cavities and blind elastomer channels require additional drain geometry because support wax cannot vent through the elastomer phase as readily as through the rigid phase.

    Build orientation has a direct effect on the interphase boundary. A boundary oriented parallel to the build plane is formed by successive layers of jetting and can exhibit a smoother macroscopic transition, while a boundary oriented vertically can expose the layer-to-layer coalescence edge. Field inspections on production trays have shown that vertical transition zones are more likely to display a visible translucent interface line after support wax removal. For load-bearing anatomical structures, this condition is evaluated by sectioning a representative printed coupon across the interface and recording the appearance under D65 illumination prior to any mechanical testing.

    Rheological and Thermal Boundaries Across the Two-Resin Build Envelope

    The two phases exhibit different rheological windows. VisiJet CR-CL 200 is a low-viscosity rigid acrylate system that is jetted at a controlled printhead temperature, while VisiJet CE-NT is a higher-molecular-weight elastomeric system requiring a separate thermal and waveform profile. Multi-material MJP hardware uses active recirculation and meniscus vacuum control to keep both resins at stable jetting conditions. Material profile mismatches can produce nozzle-out, satellite droplet, or poor coalescence defects if the materials are run outside the qualified firmware parameters. On production equipment, these failures present as banding in the clear phase, incomplete elastomer bead merging on the part surface, and support wax entrapment along the material boundary.

    The heat deflection behavior of CR-CL 200 reported under ASTM D648-16 at 0.455 MPa is approximately 53 °C. The CE-NT phase, due to its elastomeric character, is not routinely specified by HDT; its thermal stability during support removal is instead assessed by dimensional recovery and hardness retention. Support wax removal is therefore run at the lowest oven setpoint that still allows complete wax outflow, with part orientation selected so that wax drainage channels do not pass through thin elastomeric membranes. On a production line, tray-level defects frequently originate at the transition between the clear rigid phase and the natural elastomer phase. If the jetting waveforms are not optimized, the clear phase can exhibit microvoids at the interface, while the elastomer phase can show lip-to-lip merging defects along the z-axis. These defects are not always visible in the green part; they become apparent after support wax removal when a translucent interface line or ragged elastomer boundary is observed under D65 illumination. Dimensional checks of thin elastomer membranes are therefore performed after support removal with a calibrated vision system rather than on the as-jetted part.

    Resin storage before loading is specified by the manufacturer within a controlled temperature band, and the resins must be recirculated or agitated after idle periods. In field use, failure to redisperse CE-NT after prolonged idle can result in lower Shore A readings in the first build of a shift and visible surface mottling. The manufacturer handling guide defines the maximum idle period before recirculation; exceeding this period is a known source of batch-to-batch variation. For the clear phase, moisture contamination is controlled by keeping the reservoir closed and avoiding operation in ambient relative humidity above the limit stated in the process bulletin.

    Application of VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 includes patient-specific anatomical replicas for surgical planning, education, and instrumentation trials in otolaryngology, where the combination of high-rigidity osseous structures and low-durometer soft-tissue-like regions reduces reliance on painted or cast silicone artifacts. The printed part is not a replacement for a validated anatomical model if diagnostic measurements must be traceable to patient imaging; verification against CT or MR spatial calibration remains necessary. No statement in this paragraph establishes the material as an implantable, mucosal-contact, or sterilizable in-vivo device; biological evaluation of the finished printed device must be completed according to ISO 10993-1:2018 and testing such as ISO 10993-5:2009.

    When Solvent Exposure and Sterilization Are Considered for Anatomical Models

    Solvent exposure can alter phase adhesion and clarity. Alcohols may be used for surface rinsing after support removal, but immersion in strong solvents or repeated exposure to quaternary ammonium disinfectants may produce microcrazing in the rigid clear phase and swelling of the elastomeric natural phase. The model should not be autoclaved unless the specific resin and build geometry have been validated for steam sterilization; published data for this specific configuration is limited. If disinfection is required, the selected method should be evaluated for dimensional stability and Shore D retention on the printed geometry. Chemical compatibility screening may be performed under ASTM D543-20, but screening data do not substitute for end-use device validation.

    Disinfectant compatibility is geometry-dependent and cannot be reduced to a single material rating. A thin elastomeric membrane will respond to a given chemical exposure with a larger relative change in dimension than a thick rigid wall. For this reason, repeat compatibility trials are required for the thinnest and stiffest features in the build. If dimensional drift exceeds the tolerance established for the anatomical model, the cleaning protocol must be revised or the part orientation modified to increase feature thickness.

    Compared with single-material VisiJet CR-CL 200 prints, RCL-ENT-D55 sacrifices maximum clarity and rigidity in regions where elastomer is present but provides regional compliance in the same part. Compared with single-material VisiJet CE-NT prints, the RCL-ENT-D55 build adds a rigid framework that reduces gross deformation during handling. Unlike clear silicone casting into a printed mold, the multi-material jetting process does not require mold design, release agents, or secondary casting; however, the resolution and surface gloss are those of the jetting process and are subject to layer pitch, printhead condition, and downstream finishing. The cost per build is also distinct from single-resin MJP because two build resins and their delivery channels must be maintained.

    Table 2. Standards and regulatory references relevant to process qualification
    Standard or regulation Scope Application to RCL-ENT-D55
    ASTM D638-14 Tensile properties of plastics Constituent clear rigid phase; multi-material coupon testing if build orientation is reported
    ASTM D2240-15 Durometer hardness Verification of 55 Shore D target regions and 27 Shore A elastomer regions
    ASTM D648-16 Heat deflection temperature Support-removal thermal limit for the rigid clear phase
    ASTM D543-20 Chemical resistance of plastics Compatibility screening of disinfectants and solvents
    ISO 10993-1:2018 Biological evaluation of medical devices Required for finished-device risk assessment, not raw resin certification
    ISO 10993-5:2009 Cytotoxicity testing In vitro screening of printed material if biological use is intended
    REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 Chemical safety and SVHC communication Lot-specific SDS and import documentation

    For production runs, the current 3D Systems lot-specific safety datasheet and the VisiJet RCL-ENT-D55 process guide define the controlling storage, jetting, and support-removal windows. Process qualification on each MultiJet Printing unit remains necessary because differences in printhead age, recirculation pump performance, and ambient humidity can shift the practical operating window even when the firmware material profile is unchanged.

    Top