Products

3D Systems VisiJet RCL-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-BK)

    • Product Name: 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-BK)
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 986308
    Manufacturer 3D Systems
    Product Name VisiJet RCL-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200 + VisiJet CE-BK)
    Base Materials VisiJet CR-CL 200 + VisiJet CE-BK
    Material Type Multi-Material Composite
    Color Black
    Shore Hardness 60 Shore A
    Tensile Strength 3.1 MPa
    Tensile Modulus 5.5 MPa
    Elongation At Break 110%
    Flexural Modulus 6.0 MPa
    Tear Strength 14 kN/m
    Heat Deflection Temperature 35°C
    Density 1.10 g/cm³
    Water Absorption 0.4%

    As an accredited 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-BK) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing
    Shipping
    Storage
    Application of 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-BK)

    In medical anatomical modelling workflows where the rigid phase must demonstrate fluid-tract transparency and the soft phase must recover after repeated compression, the A60 digital material from the VisiJet RCL-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites range is typically assigned to clear rigid structures from VisiJet CR-CL 200 and black elastomeric structures from VisiJet CE-BK. The 60 Shore A designation is associated with durometer measurements on the elastomer-dominant phase under ASTM D2240-15, while the clear phase retains sufficient light transmittance for vessel and sinus boundary visualization after support removal. The A60 setting does not correspond to a bulk mixing ratio; instead, the relative voxel population of CE-BK and CR-CL 200 is fixed in printer software and triggered by the digital-material selection. For clinical skills centres and teaching hospitals, documentation of cytotoxicity under ISO 10993-5:2009 and skin sensitization under ISO 10993-10:2021 is requested before models are introduced into wet-training spaces; this composite is not intended for permanent implantation, so release is often limited to surface-contact or short-term skin-contact assessment. The build is executed on MultiJet Printing platforms with a 32 µm layer height in high-resolution mode, with wax support jetted in the same pass to preserve hollow vessel lumens and thin cortical shells. Support wax is removed in a dedicated oven or mineral-oil bath maintained below 65 °C to reduce compressive set in the CE-BK regions and avoid thermal haze in the CR-CL 200 windows. Terminal models include renal collecting-system replicas in which the calyceal walls are printed in rigid clear and the ureteral segments are patterned as black elastomer, allowing trainees to practise guidewire advancement through a compliant, visually distinct duct. A known limitation is repeated disinfection: common aldehyde-based hospital sterilants can attack the crosslinked acrylic network, and no published compatibility dataset exists for more than intermittent exposure, so each clinical disinfection protocol must be tested before implementation.

    When a Shore A 60 Digital Material Replaces Two-Shot Injection Tooling for Keypad Seals

    Prototyping of consumer keypad seals with multi-material jetting uses CR-CL 200 and CE-BK to produce one-piece shells that carry both a rigid transparent display window and an integral black elastomeric keypad diaphragm, eliminating the need for a two-shot mold during beta-iteration builds. The A60 composition ratio is not a simple mass percentage; it is a digital voxel proportion selected in printer software to reach the Shore A 60 durometer target on the elastomer phase. The rigid phase is designed to withstand snap-fit assembly loads, and the elastomeric phase is assigned to the button perimeter where the material must flex repeatedly between 0.05 mm and 0.2 mm travel. Because the A60 composite is graded by printer software at the voxel level, designers can create a transition band rather than a discrete bond line, which reduces the risk of local delamination at the rigid-elastomer interface. For compliance, the manufacturer’s safety documentation is reviewed against RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Annex II restricted substances, and electrical enclosure prototypes are separately checked for creepage and clearance against IEC 62368-1:2018 because the clear phase does not carry a published comparative tracking index for production use. The build is oriented with the elastomeric diaphragm facing the printhead side to minimize trapped support wax and to keep the critical sealing face free of witness marks. After the build, the part is cooled to below 25 °C before wax removal; isopropyl alcohol is then used to clear residual support from the keypad channels, and a final UV flood post-cure follows manufacturer settings to avoid yellowing the clear regions. Terminal prototypes include mobile-phone enclosure mules with integrated volume rocker seals, industrial keypads with transparent switch covers, and handheld instrument cases where the black elastomer provides dust sealing around the display perimeter. Compression set and button-return force should be verified with ASTM D395-18 Method B and a force-displacement fixture; published material-specific values for CE-BK after repeated actuation are limited, so acceptance criteria must be generated from first-article prototypes.

    Compliance verification matrix for VisiJet RCL-EBK-A60 multi-material prototypes
    Application trackStandard or directiveTest condition / documentation
    Medical anatomical modelsISO 10993-5:2009In vitro cytotoxicity elution on printed coupons
    Medical anatomical modelsISO 10993-10:2021Skin sensitization patch data
    Consumer electronicsRoHS 2011/65/EU Annex IIDeclaration for restricted metals and phthalates
    Consumer electronicsIEC 62368-1:2018Creepage/clearance on prototype enclosure
    Automotive fluid contactASTM D471-16aImmersion in designated reference fluid at 70 °C for 72 h
    Elastomer hardnessASTM D2240-15Shore A on 6 mm plaque, reading at 1 s
    Tear screeningISO 34-1:2015 die CCrescent tear specimen at 500 mm/min

    Directly after the build plate is cleared of residual wax, wearable-device prototypes combining CR-CL 200 sensor housings with CE-BK strap anchors are conditioned at 23±2 °C and 50±10 % RH for 24 h in accordance with ASTM D618-21 before tensile or flexural testing. This conditioning step stabilizes the absorbed moisture gradient between the two material phases and prevents premature interfacial failure when the strap is cycled. The transparent sensor window is printed in the rigid phase to allow optical interrogation during fit trials, while the black elastomeric anchor loops and skin-facing pads are digitally composed at the Shore A 60 target. In a typical wearable optical heart-rate monitor mock-up, the CR-CL 200 window is kept at a thickness of 1.2 mm to 1.5 mm to reduce flexural cracking at the charge dock, and the CE-BK strap attachment is graded into the rigid frame over a 3 mm transition instead of a butt joint. For skin-contact documentation, short-term irritation testing follows ISO 10993-23:2021 where required by the receiving laboratory; the largest uncertainty is the absence of long-wear sweat-exposure data for CE-BK, and this must be addressed with in-house cycling in pH-adjusted artificial sweat before user trials. Print orientation places the rigid window flat to the build tray with the strap loop vertical, because this reduces visible layer lines across the optical path and aligns the elastomer recovery axis with the expected loading direction. Terminal outputs include wrist-worn clinical trial enclosures, ECG chest-strip electrode carriers with clear fibre-optic inspection windows, and ear-wear hearing-device bodies that require a compliant black canal seal. Build-to-build variability in the elastomer phase is monitored by durometer measurement on a printed 6 mm plaque in every batch; deviations greater than ±3 Shore A units trigger recalibration of the printhead before production of trial units.

    Fluid-Contact Prototype Performance Under ASTM D471 and ISO 34-1 Tear Screening

    Automotive quick-connector and grommet development uses the A60 digital material to replicate the geometric interplay between a rigid transparent connector body and a black elastomeric sealing lip without cutting steel tooling for each port revision. The CR-CL 200 phase is assigned to the clear housing so flow visualization remains possible during bench rig tests, while the CE-BK phase is assigned to the sealing collar and anti-vibration grommet where compression recovery is critical. Before any fuel-vapour or oil-contact evaluation, elastomer-only prints are immersed in the relevant reference fluids under ASTM D471-16a for 72 h at 70 °C to measure volume swell and hardness shift; published data for CE-BK in aggressive automotive fuels is limited, so pre-testing on the actual fluid is mandatory rather than inferred from generic elastomer families. The sealing lip is also screened for tear resistance under ISO 34-1:2015 die C after fluid exposure, because stiffness loss may mask degradation of cut-growth resistance at the grommet groove. For under-hood air-management systems, a separate endurance check is performed with dry heat aging at 100 °C for 168 h using ASTM D573-04, after which the seal is compressed to 25 % deflection and inspected for surface tack or permanent set. The build strategy places the sealing lip on the top-facing surface and leaves 0.3 mm of sacrificial support clearance around the grommet groove so wax can drain without tearing thin sections. The elastomer-to-rigid interface is staggered through the wall thickness by modifying the bitmap mask over three to five layers; this creates an interlocking transition that resists peel when the connector is pulled from a mating port. Terminal prototypes include fuel rail test adapters, EV cooling-line quick connectors with transparent sight windows, and brake-booster vacuum grommets used only for fit and flow trials, not for on-vehicle durability release. For production-level validation under the automotive quality system, PPAP documentation of the photopolymer material is not directly transportable to injection-molded EPDM or FKM parts, and measured values are used solely as design inputs for tooling specification.

    Because the CR-CL 200 phase supplies a transparent rigid frame and the CE-BK phase supplies a Shore A 60 frictional contact surface, multi-material prints are used in assembly robotics for end-effector fingers that must locate small parts and grip them without marring polished surfaces. The black elastomer is deposited as a cap over the rigid finger core, with the digital transition extended 2 mm rearward from the contact face to avoid a sharp material boundary under shear loading. Compressive load capacity is not published for this exact digital-material configuration; therefore, first-article grippers are tested on a universal testing machine in compression at 1 mm/min until 20 % strain or visible interfacial cracking, whichever occurs first. For abrasive service, Taber wear screening under ASTM D4060-19 using CS-17 wheels at 500 g load provides a comparative ranking against production polyurethane pads, but the test is not intended to establish field life. The build is oriented with the grip face pointing downward to reduce the amount of support wax locked into the elastomer surface, which otherwise becomes tacky after cleaning. Low-temperature performance is checked in a cold chamber at -10 °C for 4 h before repeating the compression cycle, because the CE-BK phase loses compliance at lower temperatures and the rigid CR-CL 200 fingers become more brittle. Terminal assemblies include pick-and-place fixtures for optical lenses, battery-cell handling jaws with transparent inspection windows, and clamping nests for PCB edge connectors where the black elastomer prevents short circuits and distributes contact pressure. Because the printed interface is a photopolymer network rather than a molded chemical bond, sustained shear stress above 0.5 MPa should be avoided unless fatigue testing demonstrates adequate retention in the target environment.

    Does Multi-Material Jet Printing Preserve Clear Phase Transmission After CE-BK Co-Patterning?

    For optical and camera-module prototyping, the A60 composite is used to produce rigid clear lens barrels or light-pipe windows with black elastomeric light-shielding gaskets and bezel seals in a single print operation. The primary yield concern is not mechanical delamination but optical contamination: waxy support material or black oligomer migration can deposit a haze layer on the CR-CL 200 window, especially when the window is built adjacent to a large CE-BK volume. Transmission is measured according to ASTM D1003-13 and total haze is checked with a hazemeter after the specified post-surface polishing procedure; a clear CR-CL 200 control plaque processed through the same support-removal oven is required to separate material haze from process haze. If the support wax is removed above 65 °C, or if oil-bath removal is followed by insufficient solvent clearing, the elastomer surface can retain a waxy film that migrates onto the clear phase over the following 48 h. Build strategy places the clear optical face on the downward side of the tray and locates the black elastomer gasket at least 1 mm outside the clear aperture to limit the contact zone. A final surface treatment with a manufacturer-approved sealant may be applied to the gasket interface, but the effect on transmission and adhesion must be qualified under ISO 2409:2013 cross-cut adhesion testing before deployment. Terminal prototypes include automotive camera gaskets where the rigid barrel is clear for lens-positioning checks, AR/VR headset frames with black elastomer light seals, and scientific instrument cuvette holders that combine transparent fluid cells with compliant black retainer lips. This configuration is not suitable for high-energy blue-violet laser beam paths because the CR-CL 200 matrix absorbs and scatters at high fluence; designers should use fused silica or glass optics for any path exceeding indirect illumination levels.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-CL 200** + VisiJet CE-BK) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618136850665 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618136850665

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    The product designation 3D Systems VisiJet RCL-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites identifies a paired photopolymer system composed of VisiJet CR-CL 200** and VisiJet CE-BK. The composite is intended for MultiJet Printing platforms in which separate piezoelectric inkjet printhead channels deposit rigid clear and black elastomeric materials in a single build sequence. The CR-CL 200** phase supplies the rigid clear component, while the CE-BK phase supplies the black elastomeric component. The A60 portion of the product code corresponds to a Shore A60 durometer designation for the elastomer phase, identifying the formulation as a soft, rubber-like material rather than a rigid thermoplastic. The RCL-EBK string encodes the rigid-clear and elastomeric-black material pairing, and the composite is supplied as a coordinated cartridge set rather than as a single mixed resin.

    For printed parts that combine hard load-bearing regions with flexible sealing or retention features, the two-component construction removes the need to assemble separately molded elastomer inserts into rigid housings. The material transition occurs during layer formation, not through post-print adhesive bonding or mechanical overmolding. This distinction changes tolerance management because the interface location is defined by the CAD model and the printer’s voxel-level material assignment. Dimensional control is therefore governed by jetting accuracy, build orientation, and support material interaction rather than by molding shrinkage or adhesive bond-line thickness.

    What Limits the Practical Deposition Layer Thickness in the CE-BK Elastomer Phase?

    Layer thickness selection in the elastomer phase is constrained by the photocuring response of the black pigmented resin and the jetting reliability of the material in production printheads. Black pigmentation absorbs a larger fraction of the incident UV curing energy than clear or lightly pigmented resins, which reduces the depth of cure at equivalent irradiance. If layer thickness is increased without compensating exposure or reducing jetting speed, underpolymerization can occur at the lower surface of the elastomer layer. The result is poor interlayer coalescence, reduced tear resistance, and visible delamination at the interface between adjacent elastomer layers.

    Relevant characterization of elastomer hardness is performed under ASTM D2240 or ISO 7619-1, while tensile properties are typically reported under ASTM D638 or ISO 527-1. Tear resistance for the elastomer phase is commonly characterized under ASTM D624 or ISO 34-1. These standards do not define interlayer adhesion limits for multi-material deposition, so layer-specific mechanical data must be obtained from the material supplier’s application documentation. Published data for this specific composite configuration is limited to the manufacturer’s controlled datasheets and compatibility matrices.

    Because the CE-BK elastomer is formulated with a Shore A60 hardness target, its cured network has higher chain mobility and lower crosslink density than the rigid CR-CL 200** phase. This difference creates a sharp elastic modulus discontinuity at the material boundary. Under bending or torsion, stress concentrates at the boundary and can initiate interfacial separation if the layer-to-layer cohesion is insufficient. Build orientation therefore becomes a primary process variable. Orientation that places the material boundary perpendicular to the primary tensile stress vector is generally less favorable than orientation that places the boundary parallel to the applied load. No universal orientation rule applies because the optimum is geometry-specific.

    When Multi-Material Composite Replaces Rigid Overmolding and Adhesive Bonding

    Compared with a rigid photopolymer part that secondarily receives an elastomeric overmold, the composite eliminates the overmolding tool and the associated mold registration step. It also removes adhesive bond-line variability because the two material phases are fused during the printing process. However, the composite introduces a different process risk: the rigid and elastomer phases may exhibit different shrinkage rates during photopolymerization and subsequent thermal equilibration. If the build platform is removed from the printer while the part is still warm, differential contraction can produce curl at the interface, particularly in long, thin parts with a high aspect ratio.

    Unlike a homogeneous elastomer cartridge, the multi-material set requires the printer to maintain both materials at their individual jetting viscosity ranges. The rigid clear phase and the black elastomer phase may require different reservoir temperatures and different printhead heater setpoints. MultiJet Printing equipment with separate heated reservoirs and recirculating ink paths can manage these conditions, but material changeover and purge routines take longer than single-material operation. The presence of two photopolymers also increases the importance of nozzle health because missing jets in one material channel produce localized voids that are not filled by the other material.

    Attribute VisiJet CR-CL 200** VisiJet CE-BK
    Phase type Rigid clear photopolymer Black elastomeric photopolymer
    Hardness designation Rigid; Shore D range not encoded in product code Shore A60 from product nomenclature
    Test standard for hardness ASTM D2240 or ISO 7619-1 ASTM D2240 or ISO 7619-1
    Tensile property standard ASTM D638 or ISO 527-1 ASTM D638 or ISO 527-1
    Primary role in composite Rigid structural regions, optical clarity Elastomeric regions, flexures, sealing surfaces

    For assemblies that currently use a rigid clear housing with a separately die-cut black elastomer gasket, the composite permits the gasket feature to be printed as an integral part of the housing. This consolidation reduces part count and assembly labor but changes serviceability because a damaged seal cannot be replaced independently of the rigid housing. The decision to adopt the composite therefore depends on whether the assembly is designed as a disposable subcomponent or as a serviceable unit.

    Interface Integrity Between CR-CL 200 and CE-BK Deposits

    The interface between VisiJet CR-CL 200** and VisiJet CE-BK is produced by sequential jetting of the two resins onto the same layer surface. In regions where both materials are present, the printer deposits discrete voxels of each material according to the bitmap generated from the sliced CAD data. The interface is therefore not a continuous planar boundary but a voxelated transition zone whose width depends on the printhead resolution and the pattern density assigned in the build file.

    Interfacial adhesion is influenced by the degree of conversion of the first jetted material before the second material contacts it. If the first material is partially cured but retains unreacted acrylate or methacrylate groups, the second material can crosslink across the boundary during the subsequent UV exposure. If the first material is fully cured before the second material is jetted, interfacial bonding depends on mechanical interlock and surface interaction rather than copolymerization. This condition is more likely when the build sequence exposes the first material to multiple flash-curing pulses before the neighboring material is deposited.

    Because the black elastomer absorbs UV more strongly than the clear rigid phase, the same flash intensity does not produce identical cure depths in both materials. In voxelated interface regions, the clear phase may cure more deeply than the black phase, creating an asymmetric cure front. This asymmetry can generate localized shrinkage stress at the transition. At higher layer counts, repeated stress accumulation may produce microcracks that are not visible on the part surface but reduce tensile elongation through the interface.

    Mechanical testing of printed multi-material tensile bars is the most direct method for evaluating interface performance. Tensile specimens should be built with the interface located at the center of the gauge length and oriented both parallel and perpendicular to the build axis. These tests are performed under ASTM D638 or ISO 527-1 protocols, but the resulting values are configuration-specific and cannot be transferred to parts with different wall thicknesses or boundary patterns. No published interlayer toughness value is reproduced here because a single numerical value would be misleading without the exact print parameter set.

    Material Handling Constraints for the Cartridge Set

    The two components are supplied in sealed cartridges and must be stored according to the manufacturer’s photopolymer storage recommendations. Exposure to direct sunlight, high room temperature, or open-air moisture can alter the jetting viscosity and the free-radical photopolymerization behavior. Cartridges should not be agitated immediately before loading because air bubbles introduced into the ink path can interrupt jetting and create voids in the elastomer phase. If the printer is idle between builds, the materials must remain sealed in the machine’s material management system to prevent surface skinning and nozzle crust formation.

    During build starts, the elastomeric black phase may require a longer warm-up period than the rigid clear phase to reach its target jetting viscosity. Operators on multi-material MJP equipment frequently observe that the black elastomer is more sensitive to nozzle drooling and color-to-color mixing if the printhead purge routine is shortened. A full purge and recirculation sequence is required after any material cartridge replacement because residual cured particles in the delivery system can lodge in the piezo jetting channels and reduce droplet velocity.

    Support material removal introduces additional constraints because the A60 elastomer can tear or deform under mechanical pressure applied during wax or melt-away support removal. High-pressure water jetting that is acceptable for rigid clear parts may be too aggressive for thin elastomer sections. Manual support removal in the soft regions should proceed only after the part has fully cooled to room temperature, because warm elastomer has lower tear strength and greater tendency to deform plastically. The exact support removal temperature and time must be obtained from the material supplier, as these values are dependent on the support material code and the printer model.

    In application terms, the composite is suitable for functional prototypes that require black elastomer gaskets, soft-touch bumpers, flexures, or living-hinge regions integrated with clear rigid structure. The clear phase permits visual inspection of internal features in transparent housing areas, while the black elastomer phase provides contrast for wear or deformation marks. Because the elastomer hardness is fixed by the A60 material designation, applications requiring significantly softer or harder elastomer behavior must use a different material set rather than adjusting the mixing ratio of this composite.

    Compared with a single-material clear build, the composite increases the complexity of the printer setup and support removal process. Compared with a separate black elastomer overmold, it eliminates tooling and assembly but requires that the entire part be printed on a compatible MJP platform with multi-material capability. The materials are not supplied as a pre-mixed resin and cannot be used interchangeably in single-material printheads without a complete material changeover procedure.

    Dimensional verification of composite parts follows standard metrology practices for photopolymer parts, but the soft phase introduces a measurement constraint. Contact probes compress the elastomer and produce lower apparent thickness or depth readings unless low-force probing is used. Non-contact optical scanning avoids compression but can fail on deep black surfaces if the scanner does not have adequate exposure range for low-reflectance regions. Measurements should therefore be planned to include both rigid datum features and elastomer zones, with the understanding that contact and non-contact instruments may report different values for the same elastomer geometry.

    Top