| HS Code | 973575 |
| Product Name | 3D Systems VisiJet RBK-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-BK + VisiJet CE-BK) |
| Brand | 3D Systems |
| Material Type | Multi-material composite |
| Composition | VisiJet CR-BK + VisiJet CE-BK |
| Color | Black |
| Hardness | Shore A 60 |
| Tensile Strength | 5.0 MPa |
| Tensile Modulus | 12 MPa |
| Elongation At Break | 70% |
| Flexural Strength | 5.5 MPa |
| Flexural Modulus | 14 MPa |
| Izod Impact Notched | 60 J/m |
| Heat Deflection Temperature | 40 °C at 0.45 MPa |
| Density | 1.12 g/cm³ |
| Compatible Printer | ProJet 5500X |
| Printing Technology | MultiJet Printing (MJP) |
As an accredited 3D Systems VisiJet RBK-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-BK + VisiJet CE-BK) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
Overmolded hand tool grips in production-scale material jetting require a rigid core that retains dimensional stability under axial torque and an elastomeric outer surface that limits slippage in oily glove conditions. The VisiJet RBK-EBK-A60 multi-material system addresses this by pairing VisiJet CR-BK rigid black in the grip frame, trigger boss, and threaded insert zone with VisiJet CE-BK elastomeric black overmolding regions specified at a nominal Shore A 60 under ASTM D2240-15. The digital composite is not a pre-blended pellet; the MJP recipe assigns voxel-level material states across the interface, producing a continuum from 100% CR-BK through intermediate rigid-elastomer ratios to 100% CE-BK. This graded transition prevents the discrete adhesive bond line that fails in insert-molded thermoplastic elastomer assemblies under repeated torque cycling. Tensile properties of the rigid phase are evaluated by ASTM D638-14, elastomer extension by ASTM D412-16, and comparative tear behaviour across the transition zone is screened using a peel method adapted from ASTM D6862-11. For compliance documentation, the individual components are covered under the supplier’s REACH EC 1907/2006 and RoHS 2011/65/EU as amended by (EU) 2015/863 declarations. Processing on a ProJet MJP 2500 Plus with a build volume of 294 × 211 × 144 mm and native layer thickness of 32 μm places the interface in the same build as the core, eliminating downstream assembly and adhesive curing. After printing, wax support is removed in a 65–70 °C oven followed by ultrasonic cleaning; operator time for support removal on textured grip surfaces is higher than on flat housings because wax entrainment in knurled or coarse topographies requires extended bath residence. Terminal parts are typically assembled into power tool handles, pneumatic tool grips, and industrial safety lever handles where the rigid core maintains clamping load and the elastomer dampens hand-arm vibration.
On production-scale MJP lines, the dominant failure mode at the CR-BK/CE-BK transition is not adhesive loss but elastomer phase softening after repeated exposure to hydraulic oils. If a power tool grip is wiped with ester-based solvents or heavy-duty hand cleaners, the CE-BK surface can soften and the textured grip can lose mechanical interlock. Chemical resistance screening under ASTM D543-20 with the customer’s cutting fluid or hydraulic oil is therefore specified before production release. The digital composite also shows orientation-dependent tear strength at the transition: when the transition plane lies parallel to the XY build plane, tear propagation along the layer boundary is more likely than when the transition is angled at 20–30° from the build platform. This is a process-specific boundary condition; published data for this specific configuration is limited, and first-article validation should include a peel or tear test across the interface. In addition, transition zones thinner than the printer’s minimum feature resolution may exhibit elastomer discontinuity at the interface, so validation builds at the intended production voxel pitch are required before scaling to full build volumes.
A wearable diagnostic enclosure demands two contradicting mechanical functions: the battery compartment must protect cylindrical cells from crush loading, while the skin-contact perimeter must follow body curvature without edge pressure. The CR-BK phase in VisiJet RBK-EBK-A60 provides a snap-fit battery retainer and PCB standoffs; the CE-BK phase forms the dorsal cushion and strap lug. Hardness of the elastomer phase is controlled to nominal Shore A 60 under ASTM D2240-15, while adhesion at the rigid-elastomer interface is verified by peel testing adapted from ASTM D6862-11 if a bonded-interface comparison is required. For skin-contact medical enclosures, cytotoxicity screening follows ISO 10993-5:2009 and sensitization assessment follows ISO 10993-10:2010; the material supplier’s biological evaluation data for the specific multi-material print condition, including post-processed wax residue levels, must be reviewed before design freeze. The MJP process builds both phases in a single print run, but orientation of the elastomer cushion toward the platen can alter surface finish and Shore hardness. Build layouts that put skin-contact surfaces on the support side require additional rinse and inspection for residual wax because incompletely removed wax can transfer to skin or textile. The terminal devices are episodic-wear diagnostic patches, Holter monitor housings, and continuous glucose recorder enclosures where the rigid shell protects electronics and the elastomer cushion reduces device-related pressure marks between the sensor array and the dorsal housing.
Automotive interior fastener systems require snap-fit retention that survives module installation impact but does not creak under panel flexure. In wiring harness grommets and HVAC blend door isolators, the VisiJet RBK-EBK-A60 system is printed with the snap-beam portion in VisiJet CR-BK and the sealing collar in VisiJet CE-BK. The snap beam’s flexural modulus and yield strain are evaluated under ASTM D790-17 and ASTM D638-14, while the collar’s compression set after 22 h at 70 °C is measured under ASTM D395-18 Method B. Flammability documentation for passenger cabin use typically references ISO 3795:1989 or FMVSS 302; engineering teams must confirm the printed composite thickness and surface condition against those test protocols because thin walls below 2.0 mm can alter burn rate classification. The process eliminates the need to overmold a PA6 or PA66 clip with a TPE, but the printed elastomer does not replicate the high-temperature resistance of an injection-molded EPDM or silicone grommet. Engine bay applications require validation beyond typical interior material profiles; published data for this specific configuration under sustained high-temperature exposure is limited. Production-scale pitfalls observed on MJP lines include snap-beam warpage when long, unsupported CR-BK features are oriented parallel to the build plate; rotating the part so the snap beam is angled at 30–45° from the Z-axis reduces anisotropic curl. Terminal components include door wiring grommets, seat sensor isolators, and HVAC mode-door edge seals.
Benchtop analytical instruments that move microliter reagent volumes between reservoirs, pumps, and detection cells require sealing interfaces that do not cold-flow under repeated compression. The RBK-EBK-A60 multi-material system permits a manifold body in VisiJet CR-BK with integrated sealing lands in the elastomeric CE-BK phase. The sealing lands are printed at nominal Shore A 60 and compressed against mating PMMA or glass microfluidic chips at 10–20% compressive strain, with compression-deflection measured by ASTM D575-91(2018). Because the rigid manifold and elastomer seal are chemically integrated, there is no discrete adhesive interface that can leach into the reagent stream or delaminate under repeated chip insertion. Chemical resistance is evaluated for each process fluid by ASTM D543-20 immersion testing; published data for this specific configuration is limited for aggressive solvents such as tetrahydrofuran, dichloromethane, and concentrated nitric acid, so a 72 h immersion trial under actual operating concentration is required. Compliance for the instrument housing may reference IEC 61010-1:2010 for electrical safety, while the wetted path must be assessed according to the instrument manufacturer’s analyte carryover protocol. The process uses the same ProJet MJP 2500 Plus build, but the internal channels require drainage of molten wax during support removal; channels with diameters below 1.0 mm increase the risk of residual support occlusion and extend ultrasonic cleaning time. Terminal products are reagent selector manifolds, waste routing blocks, and cartridge docking stations for clinical analyzers.
| Application zone | Standard or code | Evaluated property or condition |
|---|---|---|
| Rigid-phase tensile behaviour | ASTM D638-14 / ISO 527-2:2012 | Tensile strength, elongation at break, modulus |
| Elastomer hardness | ASTM D2240-15 | Nominal Shore A 60 durometer |
| Elastomer tensile behaviour | ASTM D412-16 | Tensile strength, elongation, tear initiation |
| Compression set | ASTM D395-18 Method B | 22 h at 70 °C |
| Compression-deflection | ASTM D575-91(2018) | Elastomer load-bearing behaviour |
| Chemical resistance | ASTM D543-20 | Immersion resistance to process fluids |
| Skin-contact safety evaluation | ISO 10993-5:2009 / ISO 10993-10:2010 | Cytotoxicity, sensitization |
| Interior flammability | ISO 3795:1989 / FMVSS 302 | Burn rate classification |
| Enclosure drop performance | IEC 60068-2-31:2008 | Free-fall impact assessment |
Handheld field electronics with total mass below 1.0 kg use multi-material printing to replace screw-mounted rubber bumpers and rigid clamshells with a single chassis. The RBK-EBK-A60 digital composite is positioned so that the rear shell and battery door are CR-BK, while corner impact zones and lens bezels are CE-BK at Shore A 60. Drop performance is evaluated under IEC 60068-2-31:2008 free-fall testing; the elastomer corner must retain its energy-absorbing cross-section after support removal and must not exhibit tear propagation from the vent holes. The rigid phase is assessed for notched impact using ASTM D256-10 as comparative crack-initiation data for material selection, not as a direct drop test. The integrated design removes four to six elastomer overmold assembly steps and reduces foreign object debris risk in field service, but the electronic enclosure must be tested for electromagnetic compatibility because carbon-black pigmentation can reduce surface resistivity and alter shielding behaviour. The process limitation appears in wall-thickness transitions: extreme changes from a 2.5 mm rigid shell to a 1.5 mm elastomer bumper can create layer-height discontinuities at the voxel boundary if the transition length is shorter than 1.0 mm. Terminal products include barcode scanner housings, portable data loggers, and field tool displays.
End-of-arm tooling jaws for microplate and vial handling use the multi-material build to eliminate adhesive-bonded silicone pads that peel after repeated disinfectant wipe cycles. The RBK-EBK-A60 part is designed with a rigid CR-BK jaw body, spring flexure, and robot mounting flange, and a CE-BK contact pad at Shore A 60. Grip force is influenced by the elastomer’s friction coefficient; coefficient of friction is measured under ASTM D1894-14 against glass, polypropylene, and anodized aluminium coupons. The pad must survive 1,000+ bottle-gripping cycles without chunking; cyclic compression fatigue is screened by ASTM D395-18 or a custom servo-pneumatic gripper test at 0.5–1.0 Hz. The MJP process prints the jaws in batches of 12–24 per build, but support removal from the elastomer pad’s surface micro-texture can increase post-processing time by 30–50% compared with a rigid-only jaw. Design rules specify that the elastomer pad thickness should not be below 1.0 mm or the pad may tear at the CR-BK interface during aggressive robot acceleration. Chemical compatibility with hydrogen peroxide vapour and quaternary ammonium disinfectants is verified under ASTM D543-20; autoclave compatibility is not established for this specific multi-material configuration. Terminal uses are collaborative robot grippers, vial transfer jaws, and tube de-capping collets in laboratory automation cells.
Custom foot orthotics for offloading high plantar pressure zones involve a rigid shell that controls midfoot motion and an elastomeric top layer that redistributes load under the calcaneus and metatarsal heads. In this configuration, the VisiJet CR-BK phase forms the shell and heel counter, while the VisiJet CE-BK phase forms the Shore A 60 cushioning layer. Compressive modulus and energy return are screened using ASTM D575-91(2018) compression-deflection and ASTM D395-18 compression set after 22 h at 70 °C. The multi-material MJP workflow accepts direct digital foot scans, but the printed shell must be reinforced at the posterior heel radius to avoid Z-axis layer separation when the orthotic is ground or micro-finished. Support wax removal from deep heel cups requires extended oven residence at 65 °C and low-frequency ultrasonic agitation; residual wax in textured top coats is a documented visual and skin-contact defect. Biological evaluation for skin contact should follow ISO 10993-5:2009 and ISO 10993-10:2010; this material system is not indicated as a permanent implant and autoclave compatibility is not established. Clinical validation of offloading efficacy requires plantar pressure mapping under a qualified biomechanical protocol, not solely material hardness data. Terminal outputs are diabetic foot offloading orthoses, post-surgical interim foot supports, and sports insole prototypes for podiatry clinics.
Competitive 3D Systems VisiJet RBK-EBK-A60 Multi-Material Composites (VisiJet CR-BK + VisiJet CE-BK) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618136850665 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8618136850665
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
VisiJet RBK-EBK-A60 is a multi-material composite for the 3D Systems ProJet 5500X MultiJet Printing platform, produced by co-jetting VisiJet CR-BK rigid black and VisiJet CE-BK elastomeric black in a machine-controlled ratio that yields a nominal hardness of 60 Shore A when tested according to ASTM D2240. The product code encodes the two feedstock resins and the durometer target; it is not a pre-mixed resin, a filled photopolymer, or a dual-durometer overmold. During the build, the two acrylate photopolymers are kept separate in the delivery system, heated to jetting viscosity, and deposited as discrete droplets that are UV-cured in situ. The resulting composite has a black, matte appearance and an engineered blend of rigid and elastomeric domains at the voxel scale. The composite fills an intermediate mechanical position between the rigid VisiJet CR-BK feedstock and the soft VisiJet CE-BK elastomer feedstock, and is intended for functional prototypes and short-run production of parts requiring a soft-touch interface with higher indentation resistance than the neat elastomer.
Material architecture differs from homogeneous thermoplastic elastomers. The rigid and elastomeric phases remain distinguishable after curing, with the CR-BK domains acting to restrict the low-durometer CE-BK matrix. This microstructural arrangement controls the bulk Shore A value, but it also introduces directional properties. Build orientation, wall thickness, and the printer voxel-placement pattern all affect tensile recovery, tear resistance, and compression set. Consequently, mechanical data obtained on flat XY coupons should not be extrapolated to Z-oriented walls without correction factors. The A60 designation is therefore a nominal bulk hardness, not a chemical identity.
The ProJet 5500X prints the composite at a native resolution of 600 × 600 dpi and a layer interval of 32 µm in the high-definition mode. The build envelope is 518 mm × 381 mm × 300 mm, which allows large multi-material prototypes to be produced in a single cycle. Because the two feedstock resins have different cure kinetics, shrinkage coefficients, and surface tensions, the printhead management system applies separate waveforms and temperatures to the CR-BK and CE-BK channels. A deviation in ambient temperature or a partially degraded jet nozzle can shift the deposited ratio of the two materials and move the as-built hardness away from the 60 Shore A target. The melt-away support material is deposited alongside the two part materials; therefore the printing window is defined by simultaneous jetting stability of three fluids. When the ambient relative humidity exceeds the upper limit specified by the manufacturer, moisture uptake at the feed path can alter droplet formation and cause surface defects in the rigid domains. The most reproducible builds are obtained when the system is operated under climate-controlled conditions and the daily calibration coupon is verified.
Production experience on the ProJet 5500X identifies three main sources of as-built hardness variation: incomplete support removal, printhead calibration drift between the two material channels, and feed cartridge age. Because the A60 composite depends on the local ratio of rigid to elastomer droplets, visual inspection alone cannot confirm the durometer. A printhead with a partially blocked nozzle may under-deposit the CR-BK phase, shifting the final part toward the elastomer end of the scale and reducing the measured Shore A value. Operators therefore run the manufacturer calibration coupon at the start of a build day and after any cartridge change. Cartridge age is a second factor. The low-viscosity monomers are inhibited for storage; once the inhibitor package is partially consumed, viscosity can increase enough to alter droplet volume. Logging cartridge lot number, open time, and ambient conditions is standard practice in multi-material cleanrooms. If hardness falls outside the intended window, the corrective sequence is to replace the CR-BK cartridge, re-run the printhead calibration, and verify the support-removal oven temperature with a calibrated thermocouple.
Post-processing begins with support removal in a convection oven, where the S-series wax support is melted from the part. Residual wax is then removed in an enclosed cleaning station using heated water and a manufacturer-approved detergent. The use of acetone, chlorinated solvents, or unapproved hydrocarbons must be avoided because these chemicals can swell the elastomer phase, reduce the apparent Shore A hardness, and create dimensional instability. Since the composite is UV-cured during the jetting process, no additional polymerization step is required after support removal, but parts are conditioned at room temperature before hardness verification. Thick sections may require extended oven dwell times to remove wax from enclosed volumes; drain holes and open channels should follow the design guide supplied for the ProJet 5500X.
Documentation for the feedstock resins and composite follows the ASTM D638, ASTM D412, ASTM D624, and ASTM D2240 test families. Hardness is measured on a stacked slab of at least 6 mm thickness with a Shore A durometer and a 15 s dwell time. Tensile and tear specimens are printed in the XY orientation and tested after support removal. Because the A60 composite is a heterogeneous digital material, property values vary with specimen printing orientation, local rigid-to-elastomer ratio, and section thickness. The manufacturer published data for the neat feedstocks place VisiJet CE-BK at 27 Shore A; the A60 composite raises the hardness by incorporating rigid CR-BK domains. Full engineering datasets for the A60 designation should be requested from the current VisiJet Industrial datasheet package.
| Characteristic | Standard method | Specimen condition |
|---|---|---|
| Hardness | ASTM D2240 | Stacked coupon, 6 mm minimum, 15 s dwell |
| Tensile properties | ASTM D638 / ASTM D412 | As printed, support removed |
| Tear resistance | ASTM D624 | Die C, as printed |
Rheological data for the two feedstock resins are available in the material datasheets. During printing, the piezo-electric heads require viscosities in the low-shear range specified by the manufacturer. The elastomeric CE-BK feedstock is formulated to resist chain extension during jetting, while the CR-BK feedstock contains a higher crosslink density. The A60 composite therefore contains a continuous or semi-continuous elastomer matrix with dispersed rigid domains. This is why the composite retains elastomeric recovery at room temperature but may exhibit higher compression set than a homogeneous cast polyurethane of equivalent Shore A hardness. Published data for this specific composite configuration is limited, so compression set values must be generated on application-specific test coupons.
Compared with machined or injection-molded thermoplastic elastomer components, the RBK-EBK-A60 composite differs in its microstructure, its failure modes, and its production economics. The MultiJet part is free of flow-induced orientation and weld lines, but it possesses a layered anisotropy in the Z direction. The composite is also a crosslinked acrylate network rather than a reprocessable thermoplastic; it cannot be remelted or recycled through thermoplastic regrind streams. Relative to the neat VisiJet CE-BK elastomer, the A60 grade increases indentation resistance because the rigid CR-BK domains restrict elastomer chain movement. Relative to the rigid CR-BK, the composite sacrifices tensile modulus and heat deflection temperature for flexibility and energy absorption. Compared with the other digital designations in the RBK-EBK series, the A60 represents a specific calibrated point in the machine material space, not a separate chemical compound. Designers should therefore treat the Shore A value as a selection criterion, not as a complete mechanical specification.
Incompatibility notes for RBK-EBK-A60 include direct contact with strong polar solvents, ketones, and aromatic hydrocarbons; the elastomer phase can absorb these liquids and soften. The composite should not be combined with amine-based coatings or adhesives unless tested, because residual reactive sites on the acrylate surface may catalyze unwanted reactions. When bonding to rigid substrates, cyanoacrylate adhesives may induce stress cracking at thin rigid-elastomer interfaces; polyurethane or epoxy adhesives are generally preferred after adhesion testing.
In functional assemblies, the A60 composite is used for snap-fit isolators, soft-touch housing gaskets, vibration-damping pads, and ergonomic prototypes where a specification of 60 Shore A is required. Both input resins are black, so painted mockups are unnecessary, although build layers may remain visible on shallow slopes. For applications involving repeated flexure, the design should include sufficient section thickness and generous radii because the rigid-elastomer interfaces can act as crack-initiation sites under cyclic loading. For medical, skin-contact, or food-contact uses, the current regulatory status of the feedstocks must be verified against the intended regional requirements; the Safety Data Sheet and biocompatibility statements supplied by 3D Systems, not the Shore A value alone, define the permissible application envelope.
End-use testing for seals and gaskets made from RBK-EBK-A60 is normally performed under the relevant application standard rather than a generic material sheet. Compression set may be evaluated under ASTM D395, fluid resistance under ASTM D471, and accelerated aging under ISO 188. These standards supply the environmental resistance data that basic tensile and hardness tests cannot provide.
Regulatory documentation for the two input resins is available from the manufacturer. Typical MultiJet photopolymers are supplied with REACH SVHC statements and RoHS certificates; however, the composite is generated on-machine from separately classified feedstocks, so the certification set must cover both CR-BK and CE-BK, plus the S-series support material if residue is present. Manufacturers of end-use devices must perform any required biocompatibility or flammability testing on the printed composite itself, because the digital material may have different extractables or burning characteristics than the individual resins.