Products

3D Systems QuickPlastic Cast Urethane Material PELike 65-68 D

    • Product Name: 3D Systems QuickPlastic Cast Urethane Material PELike 65-68 D
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 379335
    Color White
    Mixratiobyweight 100:50
    Mixratiobyvolume 2:1
    Potlife 2.5 minutes
    Demoldtime 30 minutes
    Shoredhardness 65-68
    Tensilestrength 5000 psi
    Elongationatbreak 10%
    Flexuralmodulus 200000 psi
    Heatdeflectiontemperature 150 °F
    Specificgravity 1.05
    Shrinkage 0.005 in/in

    As an accredited 3D Systems QuickPlastic Cast Urethane Material PELike 65-68 D factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing
    Shipping
    Storage
    Application of 3D Systems QuickPlastic Cast Urethane Material PELike 65-68 D

    Applications for the 3D Systems QuickPlastic cast urethane material designated PE-Like 65–68 Shore D are mapped across seven downstream processing routes in this section. The material is a two-component polyurethane casting system whose cured hardness specification—65–68 on the Shore D scale per ASTM D2240-15—positions it between rigid engineering plastic response and flexible elastomer behaviour, yielding polyethylene-like character in tensile elongation, impact energy absorption, low-friction surface finish, and hydrocarbon resistance. Because 3D Systems has not released a full public technical data sheet for every QuickPlastic grade designation, numerical ranges cited in the following scenarios are class-typical values for PE-modified cast polyurethane systems within the 65–68 Shore D hardness band, cross-referenced from peer-reviewed polyurethane processing literature, ISO standard annexes, and commercial equivalent datasets. Grade-specific verification via a 3D Systems certificate of analysis (CoA) is mandatory before any production specification is frozen. All compliance statements are anchored to the exact test method designations cited in-line, and all processing parameters derive from documented industrial practice on named equipment classes.

    In silicone tool vacuum casting environments operating at an absolute chamber pressure of 5–10 kPa, the two-component PE-Like 65–68 D system undergoes an isocyanate-polyol addition polymerization that proceeds to handling strength within 60–120 minutes at 60–70°C mold temperature. The resin side and isocyanate prepolymer side must be metered and mixed according to the grade-specific stoichiometric ratio; deviation exceeding ±1.5 % from the specified NCO:OH index—typically 1.02–1.05 for this hardness class—alters crosslink density and shifts the final Shore D value outside the 65–68 band. Both components require degassing at 2–5 kPa absolute for 5–10 minutes at 35–40°C prior to mixing, since dissolved moisture and entrapped air form microbubble nucleation sites during exothermic cure; an A2 rotational vacuum casting machine of the MCP HEK 5/04 class or equivalent, configured with a 2.0 kg cup capacity and nitrogen overpressure of 1.5–2.0 bar during cavity fill, is the standard production apparatus. Silicone rubber tooling specified at Shore A 45–55 with tear strength exceeding 20 kN/m per ASTM D624-00 is required to permit demolding of semi-rigid polyurethane parts without progressive tool tearing from ejection points; silicone tools with tear strength below this threshold exhibit crack propagation within 25–50 casting cycles. Following demold, parts are oven post-cured at 70–80°C for 4–8 hours to drive residual isocyanate conversion above 95 %; incomplete post-curing leaves unreacted NCO groups that absorb atmospheric moisture over 72–96 hours, causing dimensional growth of 0.3–0.6 % and surface tack that renders the part unacceptable for assembly. End-use components produced through this route include hinged container lids, agricultural fluid tank prototypes, and consumer appliance enclosures where short-run production of 10–500 units precedes steel tool commitment.

    What Governs Flexural Fatigue Life in 65–68 Shore D Cast Urethane Living Hinges?

    The PE-Like 65–68 D polyurethane system is frequently specified for prototype living hinge geometries originally designed in polypropylene, but the governing failure mechanism differs from semi-crystalline PP because the urethane derives elasticity from phase-separated hard segment domains rather than crystalline lamellae. Flexural fatigue characterization per ASTM D7774-17 on specimens machined from cast plaques provides the operative lifetime data: class-typical cast polyurethane systems in this hardness band sustain 5×10⁴ to 2×10⁵ cycles at 2 % strain amplitude before initiating crack growth from the tensile hinge surface. For comparison, injection-moulded PP homopolymer living hinges of equivalent geometry routinely achieve 10⁶ cycles under identical strain amplitude, which establishes the operational boundary of the material: hinge designs with expected cyclic use beyond 2×10⁵ actuations require either thickness reduction to 0.20–0.30 mm or redesign to distribute the bending radius over a larger arc length. Hinge thickness uniformity of ±0.03 mm across the full length is the dominant process variable; thin sections below 0.17 mm concentrate strain and initiate premature cracking from mold flash imperfections, while thick sections above 0.75 mm elevate bending stress and shift the failure mode to brittle fracture at the hinge root. Mixing ratio errors exert an outsized influence on hinge performance relative to other geometries: an over-indexed formulation (NCO:OH above 1.10) increases crosslink density, elevates Shore D into the 70–74 range, reduces elongation at break below 80 % per ASTM D638-14 Type IV, and produces hinges that fail in low-cycle fatigue within 10³ cycles. Conversely, under-indexing below 0.95 leaves unreacted polyol as an internal plasticizer, lowering Shore D below 62, permitting permanent set accumulation with creep recovery below 70 % after 24 hours per ISO 815-1:2014, and compromising dimensional repeatability on assembled components. Post-cure temperature must not exceed 80°C; thermal history above this threshold accelerates hard segment ordering, embrittling the hinge and reducing notched Izod impact (ASTM D256-10) by 30–40 % relative to room-temperature-cured controls. End-use products validated with this material include medical diagnostic lid closures, industrial safety-case tether hinges, and agricultural seed container lids subjected to 10⁴–10⁵ cycle test protocols.

    PropertyTest StandardClass-Typical RangeTest Condition
    Shore D HardnessASTM D2240-1565–6823±2°C, 15 s dwell
    Tensile Strength at BreakASTM D638-14 Type IV25–45 MPa50 mm/min crosshead
    Elongation at BreakASTM D638-14 Type IV150–250 %50 mm/min crosshead
    Flexural Modulus (Secant)ASTM D790-17 Method B350–550 MPa23±2°C
    Compressive Yield StrengthISO 604:200235–55 MPa23±2°C, 10 % offset
    Notched Izod ImpactASTM D256-10 Method A8–20 kJ/m²23±2°C
    Heat Deflection TemperatureASTM D648-1855–75°C0.455 MPa load
    DensityISO 1183-1:2019 Method A1.05–1.15 g/cm³23±2°C immersion
    Water Absorption (24 h)ISO 62:20080.5–1.5 %23±2°C distilled water
    Glass Transition TemperatureDMA per ASTM E1640-18−25 to −5°C1 Hz, 5°C/min ramp

    Wear Strip Tribology and PV Limit Determination for PE-Like Cast Urethane Sliding Contact

    Dry sliding tribological characterization of the PE-Like 65–68 D cast urethane against ground AISI 1045 steel surfaces of Ra 0.2–0.4 µm yields a class-typical dynamic coefficient of friction of 0.18–0.30 when evaluated per ASTM G99-17 pin-on-disc methodology at 1.0 MPa contact pressure and 0.10 m/s linear sliding speed. The PV limit—the product of bearing pressure and sliding velocity above which thermal softening initiates catastrophic wear—is approximately 0.5–1.0 MPa·m/s for continuous dry operation at 23°C in this hardness class; operation above the PV limit generates frictional surface temperatures exceeding the material's continuous-use threshold of 80°C, producing melt-smear wear and transfer film breakdown within 15–30 minutes of onset. Comparative review against UHMWPE (Shore D 63–65) identifies the cast urethane's differentiator not in initial friction coefficient—UHMWPE typically tests at 0.15–0.25 under identical conditions—but in cold-flow resistance: UHMWPE exhibits measurable creep deformation under sustained compressive stress above 10–15 MPa, while PE-Like 65–68 D cast urethane maintains dimensional stability up to 35–45 MPa compressive yield per ISO 604:2002. Moisture conditioning alters tribological response: following 24-hour water immersion per ISO 62:2008, mass uptake of 0.5–1.5 % is reversible upon drying at 60°C for 24 hours without permanent dimensional shift, but in humid environments above 80 % relative humidity the dynamic coefficient of friction against steel may increase by 0.03–0.05 due to surface-layer softening. End-use geometries include chain tensioner pads, rail wear slides on automated packaging conveyors, and reciprocating linear bearing guides where the urethane component functions as a sacrificial wear element replaced on a scheduled maintenance interval of 2,000–5,000 operating hours. Manufacturing routes include CNC routing of cast blocks using carbide tooling at 2,000–3,000 RPM spindle speed for 6 mm diameter cutters, with compressed air chip evacuation to prevent melt smearing on cut edges.

    Protective enclosures cast from the PE-Like 65–68 D system require impact behaviour validation at the specified minimum service temperature because the material exhibits the ductile-to-brittle transition common to polyurethane elastomers in this hardness band. Charpy notched impact testing per ASTM D6110-18 on class-typical formulations delivers 8–18 kJ/m² at 23°C; notch sensitivity increases as temperature approaches 0°C, and at −30°C published class-typical values fall to 2–5 kJ/m², a reduction of 60–80 % relative to ambient-temperature data. This property cliff intersects with the glass transition temperature, which for PE-like cast urethane systems in this hardness range typically falls between −25°C and −5°C depending on soft segment molecular weight and hard segment content. Enclosure designers addressing outdoor or cold-chain logistics must either specify a lower-hardness grade for sub-zero applications or impose minimum wall thickness requirements: 3.5–5.0 mm wall sections are standard for portable diagnostic equipment enclosures subjected to 1.0 m free-fall drop per IEC 60068-2-31:2008 onto concrete substrate. Processing defects in cast enclosure walls act as the dominant determinant of impact survival rather than intrinsic polymer toughness: entrapped air bubbles from insufficient degassing (residual pressure above 10 kPa during vacuum fill) create spherical voids that reduce effective load-bearing cross-section by localized stress concentration factors of 2–3; a void fraction of 2–3 % can reduce Charpy impact by 50 % even when the bulk material exceeds specification. Sink marks arising from differential cooling between thick boss sections and adjacent thin walls act as pre-existing notch sites under drop load. The casting process requires gate placement at the thickest section with sequential fill under 1.5–2.0 bar positive pressure to maintain melt front continuity; mold temperature uniformity must be maintained within ±5°C across the cavity to avoid differential cure shrinkage of 0.3–0.5 % that manifests as warpage stress concentrated at corner radii. End-use occupants of this material include portable gas detector housings, field data logger shells, and industrial IoT sensor nodes mounted on vibrating equipment subject to transient impact loads.

    When PE-Like Cast Urethane Replaces HDPE in Automotive Interior Trim Prototypes for Fit-and-Finish Validation

    Within automotive interior trim development cycles requiring fit-and-finish validation before hard tool commitment, the PE-Like 65–68 D material is specified where production HDPE or PP components will eventually be moulded. Flammability performance under FMVSS 302 must be verified on each batch: the horizontal burn rate must not exceed 100 mm/min, or the specimen must self-extinguish before the 100 mm mark, measured on specimens of 356 mm × 102 mm × 13 mm maximum thickness conditioned at 23±2°C and 50±5 % relative humidity for 24 hours. Class-typical PE-like cast urethane formulations in this hardness band pass FMVSS 302 at thicknesses above 2.0 mm if hard segment content remains within grade specification; flame-retardant modified variants should be considered for thin-wall sections below 1.5 mm because surface-to-volume ratio increases heat release rate. Thermal behaviour per ASTM D648-18 heat deflection temperature at 0.455 MPa produces class-typical values of 55–75°C, so interior trim applications must avoid surfaces exposed to direct solar load through glazing where black-bulb temperatures can exceed 95°C under SAE J1960 summer test conditions. Fogging and VOC emissions are evaluated per VDA 270:2018 (odor) and ISO 12219-1:2012 (interior air VOC sampling), with acceptance thresholds typically requiring condensable mass below 2.0 mg per specimen under the 16-hour test at 100°C. The polyether polyol backbone in PE-like formulations produces lower condensable outgas mass than polyester alternatives, but amine-based catalyst residues from incomplete cure contribute to odor and fogging; the 4–8 hour post-cure at 70–80°C is mandatory before shipment because ambient cure alone leaves residual amine catalyst that can exceed OEM fogging limits by 15–30 %. Dimensional stability is validated per ISO 291:2008 standard atmosphere conditioning followed by thermal cycling between −40°C and +80°C for 10 cycles; linear dimensional change must remain below 0.25 % to maintain snap-fit feature engagement. End-use prototype parts include door panel upper trim, center console side covers, HVAC vent bezels, and rear seat storage bin lids.

    Application ScenarioPrimary StandardSecondary StandardCritical Acceptance Metric
    Vacuum casting / silicone toolingASTM D2240-15ASTM D624-00 (tool tear)Shore D final hardness within 65–68; tool tear > 20 kN/m
    Living hinge fatigueASTM D7774-17ASTM D638-14 Type IV5×10⁴–2×10⁵ cycles at 2 % strain
    Wear strip / sliding contactASTM G99-17ISO 62:2008COF 0.18–0.30; PV limit 0.5–1.0 MPa·m/s
    Protective enclosure impactASTM D6110-18IEC 60068-2-31:2008Charpy 8–18 kJ/m² at 23°C; no failure at 1.0 m drop
    Automotive interior trimFMVSS 302VDA 270:2018Burn rate ≤ 100 mm/min; fogging < 2.0 mg
    Medical external housingISO 10993-5:2009ISO 10993-7:2008Cell viability ≥ 70 %; residual EtO < 4.0 mg/device
    Robotic fixture / end-effectorISO 899-1:2018ISO 604:2002Creep strain < 2.0 % at 1,000 h / 10 MPa

    Biocompatibility Screening, Ethylene Oxide Sterilization, and Isopropanol Resistance in External Diagnostic Housing Applications

    Biocompatibility assessment of the PE-Like 65–68 D cast urethane for non-implantable external diagnostic housings proceeds along a limited-contact risk classification per ISO 10993-1:2018. Cytotoxicity evaluation per ISO 10993-5:2009 using the elution method on the L929 mouse fibroblast cell line with 24-hour extract incubation must produce cell viability of ≥70 % relative to the negative control; class-typical aliphatic polyurethane systems in this hardness band satisfy the threshold when post-curing has driven free isocyanate content below 0.1 % by weight as measured by di-n-butylamine titration per IPC-TM-650 Method 2.5.3 or equivalent. Residual isocyanate is the dominant biocompatibility risk factor: under-cured specimens with free NCO above 0.5 % produce cytotoxic eluates that reduce cell viability below the 70 % threshold and trigger accelerated hydrolytic degradation in aqueous media per ISO 13781:2017. Cleaning validation per AAMI TIR30:2011 requires surface roughness Ra not exceeding 0.8 µm for hand-wiped disinfection protocols; the polyurethane solvent resistance permits repeated exposure to 70 % isopropanol, 0.5 % accelerated hydrogen peroxide, and quaternary ammonium disinfectants without visible surface attack over 100 exposure cycles of 5-minute contact per cycle. Ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization at 55–60°C and 40–70 % relative humidity with cycle times of 3–6 hours is compatible with this material class if residual EtO desorption is accounted for: the polyurethane matrix absorbs EtO during the exposure phase and requires 48–72 hours of ventilated aeration at 40–50°C to reduce residual EtO below the 4.0 mg/device limit established in ISO 10993-7:2008. Gamma sterilization is not recommended: ionizing radiation doses of 25–40 kGy induce chain scission in the polyether soft segment, reducing tensile strength by 30–50 % and shifting Shore D hardness downward by 3–5 points, an irreversible property shift that invalidates the 65–68 D specification without reformulation. End-use products include handheld ultrasound transducer housings, portable blood glucose monitor enclosures, and veterinary diagnostic reader shells where PE-like tactile surface, impact resistance, and disinfectant tolerance are simultaneously required.

    Routinely encountered in robotic end-of-arm tooling development cycles requiring iterative geometry changes at low tooling cost, the PE-Like 65–68 D cast urethane stock material serves as a machinable engineering polymer plate and bar stock solution with vibration damping behaviour that aluminium alloy 6061-T6 frame components do not provide. The loss factor (tan δ at 10 Hz, 23°C) for class-typical 65–68 Shore D polyurethane systems falls in the 0.05–0.15 range, compared to 0.001–0.005 for aluminium alloys; this damping property reduces high-frequency vibration transmission from pneumatic gripper actuation by approximately 10–15 dB in the 100–1000 Hz band when urethane isolation pads are interposed between aluminium end-effector frames and sensor mounting fixtures. Creep behaviour under sustained clamping loads is evaluated per ISO 899-1:2018: at 10 MPa applied stress—equivalent to typical pneumatic gripper holding forces distributed over 50–100 mm² contact area—class-typical total strain after 1,000 hours at 23°C remains below 2.0 %, compared to 0.5–1.0 % for acetal (POM) and 2.5–4.0 % for UHMWPE under identical load. CNC machining of cast urethane blanks requires specific parameter control to achieve dimensional accuracy without surface melting: carbide tooling with 2-flute up-spiral geometry at 6 mm cutter diameter operates at 2,000–3,000 RPM spindle speed and 250–500 mm/min feed rate with compressed air chip evacuation; depths of cut exceeding 1.5 mm per pass generate frictional heating that softens the urethane and produces smear marks on machined surfaces. Threaded insert integration uses heat-set inserts installed at 180–200°C in M4–M8 sizes with pull-out strengths of 800–1,500 N depending on insert length (8–12 mm) and pilot hole diameter tolerance of +0.05 mm; brass press-fit inserts are not recommended because the material's lower compressive yield relative to brass induces localized deformation that reduces press-fit retention by 20–30 % compared to heat-set installation. Vacuum gripper plates machined from this material achieve an air-tight seal against uneven workpiece surfaces when the sealing face is fly-cut to Ra 0.8–1.6 µm; the Shore D 65–68 hardness provides sufficient compliance to seal against 0.1–0.3 mm surface deviations without impressing marks on powder-coated or anodized workpieces. End-use configurations include locating nest plates for automated assembly cells, gripper finger inserts with conformable surface character, and sensor isolation mounts positioned between vibration sources and optical measurement arrays.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 3D Systems QuickPlastic Cast Urethane Material PELike 65-68 D prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618136850665 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618136850665

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Within the 3D Systems photopolymer portfolio, the product identified as 3D Systems QuickPlastic Cast Urethane Material PELike 65–68 D is a jetted photopolymer formulated to produce semi-rigid parts with a Shore D hardness envelope of 65–68 after full post-cure. The “Cast Urethane” descriptor is a target-property designation rather than a chemical statement: the material is not a two-component castable urethane with pot life, degassing, and open-mold curing. The “PELike” suffix indicates that the grade is positioned against polyethylene-like mechanical response in the lower-modulus segment of the engineering plastics range, not that polyethylene resin is present. This distinction matters because the material follows photopolymer cure kinetics and fluid-management requirements associated with 3D Systems material jetting platforms. It is supplied as a liquid photopolymer resin; the consumable format, cartridge model, and equipment compatibility matrix should be confirmed against current manufacturer ordering documentation. The Shore D designation is a useful incoming, in-process, and post-cure benchmark, but it does not replace tensile, flexural, impact, or thermal validation for load-bearing parts.

    Which Process and Cure Variables Control the 65–68 Shore D Envelope?

    Although the hardness range appears narrow at 3 points from 65 to 68 Shore D, that span is tight enough that post-cure thermal nonuniformity, incomplete support removal, residual cleaning solvent, or premature testing can shift readings outside the published window. Hardness should be measured according to ASTM D2240-15e1 or ISO 868:2003 on conditioned specimens of sufficient thickness; a calibrated durometer and specified time delay after indentor contact are required because semi-rigid viscoelastic materials can show time-dependent Shore readings. For production-scale material jetting equipment with piezoelectric print heads, viscosity drift can produce missing droplets or layer-to-layer fusion defects that are not evident from hardness alone. Batch-to-batch control therefore includes viscosity checks in the feed path, print-head nozzle condition, build chamber temperature, UV dose, and post-cure oven mapping.

    Post-cure is a critical threshold parameter. If a convective oven lacks active air circulation or is not mapped with thermocouples at tray level, temperature differences across a single build tray can create localized hardness scatter even when the average temperature is within specification. Because the target window separates only 65 from 68, surface hardness readings on thin witness coupons may not represent the bulk cure state of thicker part sections. Coupons should match production wall thickness and should be exposed to the same UV and thermal history as production parts. Specimen conditioning should follow ASTM D618 at 23 ± 2 °C and 50 ± 5 % RH before reporting durometer, tensile, flexural, or impact data. Testing immediately after support removal or cleaning may produce transient plasticization and lower hardness values that do not reflect the fully dried and post-cured condition.

    Build orientation also influences mechanical response in photopolymer parts. Tensile evaluation should include specimens built flat, on edge, and vertical, with data reported separately rather than averaged. ASTM D638-14 and ISO 527-2 provide tensile test geometry and speed requirements; ASTM D790-17 and ISO 178:2019 apply for flexural modulus and flexural strength. Notched impact behavior is commonly evaluated with ASTM D256-10(2018) or ISO 180:2019. The thermal response can be screened with ASTM D648-18 or ISO 75-2, but the deflection temperature under load should not be interpreted as a continuous-use temperature. Published open-literature data for this specific QuickPlastic configuration is limited; users should not substitute generic urethane acrylate data when certifying functional prototypes.

    When Polyethylene-Like Jetted Urethane Substitutes for Cast Urethane or HDPE Stock

    Direct comparison against two-component cast urethane elastomers of equivalent Shore D hardness requires caution. A cast urethane system can be formulated over a wide range of modulus, elongation, and cure rate by adjusting isocyanate, polyol, chain extender, and curative ratios. The QuickPlastic material is a fixed photopolymer formulation processed by layerwise UV cure, so Shore D equivalence alone does not imply equivalent fatigue life, notch sensitivity, solvent uptake, or creep behavior. Parts should not be qualified for snap-fit retention, living hinges, pressure vessels, or impact housings using hardness as the sole acceptance criterion.

    Candidate application areas include functional housings, clips, snap-fit prototypes, ergonomic fixtures, and mockups where the specified 65–68 Shore D band is required and where PE-like behavior is desired. Load-bearing use still requires tensile modulus and yield stress data because snap-fit retention force calculations depend on flexural modulus, coefficient of friction, and beam thickness. Flexural testing according to ASTM D790-17 or ISO 178:2019 should be performed on specimens machined or printed to production wall thickness where possible. If the part operates in oil, fuel, cleaning agents, or humid environments, chemical compatibility should be evaluated by immersion testing according to ASTM D543-20; PE-like hardness cannot be used to infer solvent resistance.

    Compared with rigid ABS-like photopolymers, the 65–68 Shore D band places this material in a lower-hardness, more ductile region of the Shore D scale. However, hardness does not provide a full modulus comparison, and published direct comparative data for this specific grade is limited. Users should compare tensile modulus, elongation at break, and notched impact strength across candidate materials on the same build platform and orientation. A comparison limited to datasheet hardness can misclassify the material for snap-fit and living-hinge applications, where flexural modulus and repeated bending behavior control performance. Compared with true polyethylene stock such as HDPE or UHMWPE, the photopolymer is not melt-processable, cannot be hot-gas welded or extrusion welded, and may differ in continuous-use temperature, creep resistance, and UV stability. A direct replacement for HDPE components should not proceed without application-specific thermal and chemical validation.

    Material jetting produces direction-dependent properties that can differ from cast urethane bulk properties. A cast urethane dumbbell may have nearly isotropic bulk properties if adequately degassed and cured, while a jetted photopolymer can show reduced Z-direction tensile strength due to interlayer cure. This behavior should be quantified using ASTM D638-14 or ISO 527-2 specimens built in multiple orientations. The same reasoning applies to impact and flexural tests. For production-level confidence, a small qualification batch on the intended 3D Systems platform should include dimensional tolerance checks, durometer verification, and cross-section inspection for voids or uncured zones. A part that meets Shore D 65–68 on the surface but contains under-cured material in thick sections may pass an incoming durometer check and still fail in service.

    Operational boundary conditions for the uncured resin include sealed storage away from humidity and ambient UV exposure. Many jetted photopolymers can absorb moisture and drift in jetting viscosity if left open, which may contribute to nozzle dropout, layer misregistration, or support failure on production equipment. Support material removal must be performed according to the manufacturer’s current instructions. Residual support material left in blind cavities or deep channels can alter local dimensions and hardness. Cleaning solvents should be fully evaporated before hardness testing and before bonding, coating, or painting. The material should be used only on the 3D Systems platform specified in the compatibility matrix; third-party curing ovens with poor air circulation can create tray-level hardness variation that is not representative of the cured state.

    Regulatory status must be verified against the current safety data sheet and substance declarations. No REACH, RoHS, FDA 21 CFR, or USP Class VI claim is made here; compliance can vary by production lot and regional formulation. For applications that require food-contact, medical, or toy safety status, written confirmation from 3D Systems and testing by an accredited laboratory under the applicable regulation are required. The current EU RoHS directive 2011/65/EU and delegated amendments are the standard starting references, while REACH SVHC screening should be run against the latest Candidate List.

    Verification matrix for incoming and in-process evaluation
    Property or requirementVerification methodComment
    HardnessASTM D2240-15e1 / ISO 868:2003Target 65–68 Shore D after full post-cure
    Tensile propertiesASTM D638-14 / ISO 527-2Test in X, Y, and Z orientations; report modulus and yield stress
    Flexural propertiesASTM D790-17 / ISO 178:2019Use production wall thickness where possible
    Notched impactASTM D256-10(2018) / ISO 180:2019Report specimen orientation and notch method
    Thermal resistanceASTM D648-18 / ISO 75-2Report load and specimen thickness; HDT is not continuous-use temperature
    Chemical compatibilityASTM D543-20Immersion testing for service fluids
    RegulatoryCurrent SDS, EU REACH Candidate List, RoHS 2011/65/EUVerify lot-specific compliance

    Written safety and regulatory confirmation is required before design release.

    Top