|
HS Code |
351380 |
| Chemical Name | Triclosan |
| Molecular Formula | C12H7Cl3O2 |
| Molar Mass | 289.54 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Odor | Slight aromatic odor |
| Melting Point | 56-60°C |
| Solubility In Water | Low (10 mg/L at 20°C) |
| Logp | 4.8 |
| Cas Number | 3380-34-5 |
| Boiling Point | 280°C (decomposes) |
| Pka | 7.9 |
| Common Uses | Antibacterial agent in soaps and toothpastes |
| Stability | Stable under recommended storage conditions |
As an accredited Triclosan factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Triclosan is packaged in a sealed, amber glass bottle containing 500 grams, with hazard labels and chemical information clearly displayed. |
| Shipping | Triclosan should be shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from sunlight, moisture, and incompatible substances. It must be clearly labeled and handled according to local, national, and international regulations. Use appropriate protective packaging, and ensure compliance with UN transport regulations, as Triclosan is classified as an environmentally hazardous substance. |
| Storage | Triclosan should be stored in a tightly closed container in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area away from direct sunlight and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers and acids. It should be kept away from heat sources and ignition points. Proper labeling is essential, and access should be limited to authorized personnel to ensure safety and prevent environmental contamination. |
Competitive Triclosan prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: sales3@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
In our years at the plant, working through the technical and regulatory complexities of manufacturing Triclosan, we have seen how customer demands and public scrutiny reshape even a well-established compound. Triclosan has long stood out among antimicrobial agents. We produce our material at a consistent assay of 99% or higher, crystalline powder with a faint aromatic scent, standardized for both stability and clarity. Every kilo passes through hands and eyes, not just analytical machines. We’ve learned the habits of the material, how slow drying in a controlled environment brings out the brilliant white, how fluctuations in pH during crystallization cause yellowing or clumping, and what it means for downstream formulating. Many companies look to outsource or speculatively order intermediates—here, each batch is built from start to finish under one roof. This focus on integrated production gives us the control to deal with variable feedstocks or regulatory changes without letting surprises reach our customers.
Chemically, Triclosan is known as 5-chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol. It’s not just a mouthful for compliance paperwork; it’s a structure that brings specific benefits. We have always differentiated our Triclosan from generic phenolic preservatives and from alternative antibacterial agents like chlorhexidine or quaternary ammonium salts. The molecule dissolves poorly in water but handles lipids and soaps smoothly, which unlocks its wide compatibility for our customers working in personal care, hand soaps, and toothpaste. Unlike broad-spectrum quats—many of which retain charge and stick to surfaces—Triclosan operates through bacterial enzyme inhibition without causing surface residue. Over the years, our clients report fewer formulation complaints related to grit or separation. We’ve designed micronized and standard grades: the former for transparent gels and dispersions, the latter favored in solid soaps or intermediate blending.
Specification reaches deeper than the purity number. We study melamine content, volatile organic compound residues, and unreacted chlorinated phenols—there are targets we aim for even if international standards only address a narrow range of contaminants. Recent regulatory audits pushed us to develop new analysis runs tailored to catch halosubstituted byproducts, after supply chain disruptions in East Asia increased impurity loads in feedstocks. We didn’t wait for problems to become headlines; the process team adjusted reaction conditions, adjusted distillation points, and re-qualified the synthetic route to tighten control of low-level impurities. These rarely show up in the final product, but operators and quality managers know the tell-tale signs—color shifts, off odors, or powder with a crusty feel. As a manufacturer, we keep historical trend logs stretching back decades, a habit rooted in years of anticipating rather than reacting to regulatory and customer pressure.
When the legacy soaps and detergents team debates raw material choices, we start with user performance data and long-term compatibility, not just regulatory status or price. Triclosan offers a unique blend of broad-spectrum antibacterial performance and ingredient stability across multiple bases: from liquid detergents to toothpaste, to medical washcloths and textile treatments. Through experience, we’ve learned to spot which formulations take best advantage of Triclosan’s performance window. In toothpastes, for instance, stability through multiple freeze/thaw cycles and low interaction with fluoride salts separate real, field-tested formulations from theoretical lab trials. Technicians report the difference after accelerated aging tests. Consumers rarely see this, but as a back-end partner with labs and manufacturers, we always stress that careful selection of antimicrobial agents is what preserves the sensory feel and safety profile that’s become expected in today’s market.
We don’t see Triclosan as a one-size-fits-all answer in preservation. In hygiene applications, it outperforms many basic alcohols, especially where persistent bioactivity is wanted beyond a “quick kill.” It shows slower onset of bacterial resistance compared to some older agents. Chlorhexidine, for example, excels in clinical and dental rinses but brings staining and taste concerns. Quaternary ammoniums work well on hard surfaces but face issues with skin irritation, wash-off durability, and bioaccumulation in wastewater. Silver ions target different bug spectrums and carry persistent cost and supply issues. For soap bars, trail studies have shown that well-incorporated Triclosan keeps microbial counts down without softening the bar excessively or introducing strong odors. We have worked with research partners who wanted to swap in newer “green” antimicrobials—most drop out after scaled manufacturing trials show instability, phase separation, or regulatory gray zones. Nothing yet matches the shelf-stability and versatility of high-purity Triclosan for high-throughput production lines where our job is to predict headaches before they happen.
Legislation over the past decade has changed how everyone works with Triclosan. The FDA’s 2016 decision to remove certain antimicrobial agents, including Triclosan, from consumer hand soaps forced many of our customers into reformulation. Our chemists spent years reviewing archival toxicology, environmental impact data, and global safety assessments. For specific uses, such as toothpaste and hospital grade disinfectants, safety profiles and robust risk data supported continued use. We took the time to brief clients in regulated markets, showing them the latest material safety findings and manufacturing changes we made to comply with more restrictive impurity thresholds. European authorities placed tighter waste restrictions, so we built larger effluent treatment expansions and logged process changes that dramatically reduced discharge. Environmental impact from trace run-off remains a constant concern—so we run additional post-reaction filtration and solvent recovery efforts on site, cutting down released residues well below the most conservative regulatory guidelines.
One recurring challenge for both small batch and industrial users comes down to integration: how best to introduce Triclosan to a process without drift, caking, or uneven distribution. We’ve refined the particle size and moisture content, offering fine mesh grades to meet technical needs in gels or transparent liquids. Our R&D teams remember years when poor flowability created clumping and headaches in rapid dosing machines. Those lessons drove investments in fluid-bed drying and anti-clumping agents safe for finished formulation. The benefit of running our own manufacturing means quick support for customers trying tough new blends—when a personal wash line faced unexpected solubility issues, our team ran pilot-scale tests, tweaked the drying cycle, and delivered a batch matching tighter microscopic distribution within a month. This level of collaboration would be impossible for bulk traders or brokers.
Worker safety and environmental integrity remain our top operational priorities. We learned early that dust inhalation from powdered Triclosan or solvent vapors from synthesis require solid controls, so we use closed transfer and automated ventilation at every sensitive point. Years on the floor taught us that engineering controls, not just paperwork, prevent exposure incidents. Waste stream monitoring is not outsourced; in-house specialists sample and log every discharge. Meeting international safety norms means staying nimble: hazard labs validate any raw material change, and production lines requalify output whenever parameters shift. We are aware of the legacy reputation Triclosan faces—media reports about antimicrobial agent pollution and health risks come out regularly. We treat toxicological research as real, not hypothetical; our policy is to stay ahead of regulations, documenting biodegradation rates and environmental fate through accredited third-party labs before customers start asking.
Industry conversation often circles around bacterial resistance. From research collaborations and our own in-house monitoring, results consistently show Triclosan’s targeted mode of action limits emergence of high-level resistance in most usage scenarios. Resistance-linked gene activity occurs in high, sustained dosing scenarios not typical for real-world product use. We track environmental isolates and have not found field evidence of large-scale resistance propagation even after decades of use. The resistance issue demands ongoing vigilance—complacency would leave gaps for regulators or public opinion to exploit—but so far, the controlled use patterns maintained in most developed economies have kept the risk surface manageable. Our technical staff are available to support customers with literature reviews, pattern analysis, or reformulation advice if resistance concerns shift globally, supporting an evidence-driven approach instead of panic.
Manufacturing Triclosan at scale gives a hard look at energy, resource consumption, and environmental trade-offs. Over a decade ago, we upgraded from batch to semi-continuous synthesis, using heat recovery from exothermic reactions to lower factory fuel use year on year. We reduced solvent requirements by switching extraction strategies and refining our raw material supply chain to better track source location and handling. These process changes stemmed not from outside pressure, but from an on-site culture of efficiency: plant managers from our team regularly audit the process for waste heat, solvent leaks, and reagent spending, not just to pass an ISO audit, but to ensure we control costs and conserve resources.
In waste remediation, our integrated solvent recovery plant reclaims chlorinated solvents to a purity that feeds back into our main process; what might have left as hazardous waste now cycles until genuine exhaustion. We introduced real-time sensor arrays in our wastewater treatment to catch any anomaly before it exits site. Phasing out older energy-hungry dryers and switching to low fuel ovens saved emissions and brought local acceptance, which matters more than top-down compliance. Today’s buyers ask for carbon footprint data, so we track embodied energy and run regular process LCA updates, sharing the results with partners who need to meet their own climate pledges further downstream. None of these operational controls would function as well if we imported intermediates or acted only as brokers; sustained investment on home ground drives quality, safety, and environmental value for every customer relying on us for Triclosan.
Clients often come to us after testing other preservatives or antibacterial agents, looking to troubleshoot texture loss in cosmetic creams, stability issues in medical disposables, or sudden regulatory concerns over new biocides. Years ago, hand sanitizer market leaders swapped to alternative chemistries under regulatory heat, only to confront new performance, shelf-stability, and procurement risks. Our R&D worked closely with select partners, conducting double-blind storage experiments, challenge tests, and user field trials, comparing our high-purity Triclosan to other actives. In every step, we offered not only base material but also the technical knowledge built from handling, blending, storing, and validating the compound over decades.
We understand the project lifecycles inherent to end-use product innovation. Often, the need for traceable, repeatable performance means experimental formulations run at small scale first; our warehouse and logistics flexibility lets us provide custom lot sizes for these pilots. As those projects scale, they return for bulk orders, secure in the knowledge that product sourced from us keeps the same physical and chemical properties regardless of delivery date. We see end-use innovators as long-term partners; our technical team supports them through regulatory comment periods, audits, label reviews, and sudden specification changes. Companies trying completely new categories—such as antimicrobial textiles for hospitals, water filtration media, or odor-resistant coatings—get direct assistance from engineers and lab techs on our side. We learn from every new challenge, adding feedback to our manufacturing and QA protocols, ensuring the next lot is better aligned to what the market really needs.
Some buyers start by comparing price points or shipment volumes from different names in the market. Our approach focuses less on transactional wins and more on building a cycle of credible supply, rapid response, and improvement. We invest in direct dialogue rather than anonymous supply agreements. Clients get answers from experienced chemists and production managers, not scripted front-end sales. This has paid off during supply chain shocks or regulatory changes—when a European client needed documentation traced down to the raw chlorine source, or when a US manufacturer faced an urgent recall question, there was always someone on the line who knew the batch history, impurity profile, and documentation flow. Our experience tells us that only a manufacturer controlling their own process can deliver this responsiveness; others too often pass the problem up the chain, losing both time and accountability.
Triclosan has drawn its share of controversy, often echoing broader debates about chemical exposure, ingredient transparency, and “clean label” product movements. As someone who has worked each link in the process—from raw material handling to analytical chem labs, through to customer Q&A—we believe addressing myths should be based on verifiable facts and field experience, not abstract reassurance. For example, talk often surfaces about Triclosan promoting hormone disruption or bioaccumulating in water supplies; as a manufacturer, we have worked with accredited external labs to measure and confirm clearance rates in standard effluent streams, providing real numbers to regulators and nongovernmental organizations. Where claims about user allergies or skin sensitivity arise, customer-facing teams keep case-by-case logbooks with supporting clinical findings. In each case, transparency and evidence carry more weight than marketing gloss.
At our facility, producing Triclosan is not only about maintaining batch consistency but about understanding that every lot reflects both scientific progress and accumulated practical knowledge. Skilled operators and senior chemists train new hires not just to follow SOPs, but to notice and report subtle cues—an equipment hum that’s a bit off, a powder batch that looks denser or fluffier than usual, a moisture test that comes in just outside the expected band. Our most reliable output didn’t result from automating away expertise, but from fostering a staff culture that trusts both data and sensory judgment. This dedication keeps our output aligned with the evolving demands of modern hygiene, personal care, dental, and industrial customers, whose credibility rests on ingredient traceability as much as final product performance.
In a field where standards and reputations shift rapidly, we never treat Triclosan as a finished story. Each cycle of customer feedback, scientific discovery, and regulatory change informs the next modification or process update. Our teams routinely review plant data for cues that could be translated into tighter controls or cleaner output: a spike in impurity in a single precursor prompts root cause analysis, not tolerance. Management stays personally involved with operator safety, community impact projects, and technical outreach with industry groups and researchers. It’s this constant readiness to adapt processes, share findings, and support innovation that sets apart real manufacturers from those content to move pallets. As new markets emerge—whether for niche medical applications, large-scale disinfection, or advanced material preservation—the knowledge accumulated from years of direct Triclosan manufacture and application gives us the clarity and confidence to support customers whatever their next challenge might be.