|
HS Code |
783671 |
| Cas Number | 3710-30-3 |
| Molecular Formula | C6H11NO5 |
| Molecular Weight | 177.15 g/mol |
| Iupac Name | 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)iminodiacetic acid |
| Appearance | White to off-white powder |
| Solubility In Water | Freely soluble |
| Melting Point | 220-225°C (decomposes) |
| Ph Of 1 Solution | 2.0-3.0 |
| Boiling Point | Decomposes before boiling |
| Synonym | HEDTA |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | Approximately 1.47 g/cm³ |
| Stability | Stable under recommended storage conditions |
| Application | Chelating agent |
As an accredited Hydroxyethyliminodiacetic Acid factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Hydroxyethyliminodiacetic Acid, 25 kg packed in a high-density polyethylene drum with secure lid, labeled for industrial chemical use. |
| Shipping | Hydroxyethyliminodiacetic Acid should be shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from moisture and incompatible materials. Store and transport in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, following all applicable local, national, and international regulations. Label containers properly and ensure suitable packaging to prevent leakage or contamination during transit. |
| Storage | Hydroxyethyliminodiacetic Acid should be stored in a tightly sealed container in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area. Protect from moisture, direct sunlight, and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers. Store at room temperature, away from heat sources. Label containers clearly, and ensure they are kept out of reach of unauthorized personnel. Follow all local and institutional chemical storage guidelines. |
Competitive Hydroxyethyliminodiacetic Acid prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: sales3@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Hydroxyethyliminodiacetic Acid has become a mainstay for manufacturers looking for reliable chelating agents, especially across water treatment, textile, and detergent production lines. From our experience on the shop floor, the real difference in output isn't just about the purity in the drum—it's about consistency and how each batch holds up when customers turn the tap or fire up their reactors. Known in the trade as HEIDA, this compound’s success relies not only on its unique chemical structure but on careful, continuous process control during synthesis. Every manufacturer touts their percentage of active chelating groups, but the real measure shows in applications, under real-world conditions.
In our operations, maintaining a minimum purity—typically above 99%—is non-negotiable. The path to that figure passes through several checkpoints: raw material selection, in-line process analytics, and end-of-line chromatography. We don’t cut corners here. Over the past decade, operational tweaks have shifted parameters, but the commitment to purity remains absolute because trace impurities quickly undermine downstream utility. For HEIDA, slight differences in impurity profiles dramatically affect chelating strength and selectivity. Many users in specialized water systems notice increased system scaling and fouling after switching to lower-grade imports; this comes straight from field reports our team has gathered over the years.
HEIDA granulate, powder, and aqueous solution each serve unique roles, and we see the demand tilt between these formats depending on our customers’ plant setups. For textile dyeing, the solid, dust-controlled powder provides better shelf life and easier measurement, especially in humid settings. In large-scale liquid detergent production, concentrated aqueous solutions integrate directly through automated dosing systems. What sets our hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid apart from less-refined options in the market involves tight particle size distribution, moisture content held below 0.5%, and rapid solubility with minimal residue. Even small changes here translate to fewer clogged pumps and cleaner product lines for our clients.
In textile finishing, plant trials have shown certain chelators can interfere with dye stability under specific pH ranges. Through repeated batch tests and process feedback loops, our HEIDA turns out less prone to introduce unexpected color shifts thanks to a well-controlled by-product profile. Years spent collecting dyehouse operator feedback informed tweaks to our production: a slightly slower reaction phase favored by some users results in a cleaner end product, and we've implemented this approach in specific lots.
Municipal water treatment systems demand nothing short of reliability. We've partnered with operators of groundwater remediation projects, where trace metals routinely spike during spring runoff. They’ve highlighted how consistent HEIDA quality means less needed for the same effect—important when regulators track every microgram of heavy metal in tap water. When we increased batch traceability and strengthened documentation, we removed doubts about residue or contaminant buildup downstream, gaining trust from plant managers who rely on transparent chains of custody.
Many purchasing teams ask us to explain the practical difference between HEIDA and more widely used chelators like EDTA or NTA. Unlike EDTA, HEIDA’s structure enables selective binding to certain transition metals without the persistent environmental footprint. Because of rapid biodegradability, our customers working in closed-loop water systems face less regulatory hassle, helping plants avoid the costs associated with effluent fines and additional post-processing. Some competitors push alternative chelators with similar backbone strengths, but process engineers have reported stronger foaming and more waste sludge—issues that haven’t cropped up in repeated trials with properly manufactured HEIDA.
Issues with formulation compatibility can make or break a detergent batch. A low impurity profile in HEIDA means less interaction with surfactants, which prevents unwelcome cloudiness during blending. We saw some users initially switch to NTA-based systems for cost reasons, only to face increased cleaning shutdowns as hard-to-remove precipitates formed in pipelines. After revisiting our HEIDA variants, these facilities reported smoother operation because our material’s lower ionic ash prevents those build-up events. This is no theoretical argument—factory maintenance logs and root-cause analyses from customer facilities back up this trend.
Our plant’s commitment to worker safety influences how we manufacture and handle HEIDA. Early on, plant operators raised concerns about airborne solid exposure. We invested in closed transfer systems with vacuum loading and used finer filtration for dust control. Customer feedback has been proactive here; end users prefer a uniform, free-flowing product that doesn't cake or form hazardous clumps in storage bins. This led to investments in climate-controlled warehousing before shipping. After these changes, the number of reported handling incidents dropped measurably, which mattered to both our operation and our downstream partners with ambitious safety goals.
On the environmental front, we’ve kept a close eye on effluent discharge data from our facility. By optimizing our reaction steps and waste collection protocols, the Chemical Oxygen Demand figures observed at our discharge points have been below regulatory thresholds for three consecutive years. Some competing processes for other chelators generate streams with challenging halide or phosphate loads. Through close collaboration with environmental engineers, we've ensured our process design keeps such secondary impacts in check and supports responsible industry stewardship.
Production managers emphasize process uptime just as much as raw material cost. We tuned our HEIDA formulation to allow for high-speed dispersal in automated metering systems, which means less downtime for maintenance and calibration. Customers producing industrial cleaners on a 24/7 cycle have praised the drop in downtime from cleaning dosing heads and storage tanks. Over years, we mapped the cost impacts attributable to each recurring production issue—scrapped lots due to clogging, unplanned shutdowns for recalibration, labor hours lost de-caking hoppers. Each tweak to our manufacturing process has tracked back to hard-won increases in throughput and cost stability.
Chemical buyers often look only at per-kilogram pricing, but seasoned production foremen usually want to see the full delivered solution cost—waste, cleaning time, and product loss included. In scaled facilities, even a one-tenth percent improvement in yield translates to real savings when processed over millions of liters of water or hundreds of thousand kilograms of detergent base. We’ve kept open channels with users who detail comparison runs in their own plants, which strengthens our repeat business and keeps our technical support honest and connected to their daily needs.
Every batch of HEIDA faces routine tests for pH, color, and chelating value, but in the trenches, other problems crop up that don’t appear on lab reports. In some seasons, supply fluctuations in starting ethylenediamine or monochloroacetic acid have meant scrambling for alternative suppliers while preserving batch consistency. We’ve built up reserves and partnered with logistics teams to keep steady flow, but more than once a late rail shipment forced late-night maintenance or creative scheduling on weekend shifts. Our teams have learned to anticipate trouble by tracking supply chain stress signals, so customers don’t feel those bumps in their own production lines.
Scaling up from laboratory synthesis to full reactor volumes introduces issues most chemistry textbooks skip over—stirrer torque, bubble entrainment, thermal gradients that create hot spots. We have invested in continuous-flow reactors that keep residence times tightly controlled, which means critical reaction exotherms don’t spiral out of control. New engineers spend months shadowing seasoned operators to understand things like why a certain stir speed avoids foaming, or how specific impeller geometries prevent crust buildup on vessel walls. Mistakes from these oversights lead to wasted product, so we focus heavily on out-of-spec event capture before final packaging.
Direct feedback from operators running our HEIDA-laden water softening towers or textile dye baths often triggers targeted improvements. Users were early to flag granule inconsistencies that led to variable dispersal rates, so we retooled our drying stages for even particle size. In another case, changeover to a denser grade helped detergent plants halve dosing equipment recalibration intervals. Our site teams have even visited customer warehouses after they reported subtle product caking in winter. By walking the floor and talking to the staff facing these issues, we tracked storage temperature swings as the culprit—prompting us to invest in better packaging and insulation. These efforts build lasting trust, beyond what any lab certificate can provide.
Plant trials sometimes uncover unexpected performance edges. In a large-scale cooling tower retrofit project, users found our HEIDA stabilized system pH better than an EDTA blend, and biofilm build-up dropped by nearly 30%. Based on that field result, customers pushed us to document our batch traceability in greater detail, so we developed new digital tracking routines. Each step along the supply and application chain now leaves a record, so larger operation managers can pinpoint performance back to specific lots—vital when running critical infrastructure.
High-quality hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid demands more than adherence to a standard specification sheet; hands-on laboratory experience counts. Throughout the year, we run regular cross-checks between production and analytical teams. Chemists compare results from on-site testing with blind samples sent to independent laboratories, verifying that our numbers hold up. Final packaging happens only after every batch clears a full profile—total chelating value, impurity analysis, and visual inspection.
Product recalls stemming from quality drift not only erode market confidence, but reverberate through entire supply chains—sometimes taking months to rebuild trust. Lessons learned from early incidents pushed us toward a rigorous, data-driven process. Instead of chasing the lowest cost, we invested in training operators to recognize early warning signs. This hands-on approach with regular skills updating creates a self-checking loop—every employee on the line has both a stake and a say in upholding the brand reputation.
Modern supply chains demand more than just a certificate of analysis. Auditors and regulators want to see traceable production records, documented process controls, and environmental compliance. Over time, we've developed an integrated digital system that links batch numbers to individual processing parameters and raw material origins. This level of detail gives both customers and regulators confidence they can trace a delivered drum of HEIDA back through its entire history, identifying production timestamps, handling teams, and even supporting laboratory logbooks.
Standards move quickly—regulatory agencies periodically update limits for heavy metal and organic residue levels in commodity chemicals. We keep ahead by participating in industry initiative groups, sharing performance data from our own batch records, and adjusting both synthesis and waste handling as new science emerges. This proactive approach has shielded our clients from last-minute disruptions; during a regional crackdown on non-biodegradable chelators, documented test runs with our HEIDA allowed major customers to demonstrate compliance during audit season and avoid expensive production halts.
The demand landscape for chelating agents keeps evolving, with manufacturers, municipal operators, and environmental agencies each bringing new performance and stewardship targets. As chemical makers, we have consistently seen operational needs push innovation, long before market hype catches up. By keeping direct lines open to technical end users, plant operators, and purchasing teams, we spot problems and opportunities early. Whether it’s meeting a stricter regulatory hurdle, scrubbing down a new set of impurities, or pushing for faster batch cycles, our team looks for concrete ways to build on-the-floor experience into lasting product improvements.
Large utility providers have shared water use and disposal goals for the next decade, and their expectations will only rise. Real collaboration with these forward-thinking buyers means our process engineers get to the heart of both immediate problems—limescale buildup, unpredictable dye results—and longer-term concerns like energy use and waste reduction. We take those conversations back to our own line operators and lab teams, using real operational feedback to steer the next round of process upgrades. This cycle, repeated year after year, allows our plant to put real chemical know-how into every kilogram of hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid that leaves our warehouse.
In the wide arena of specialty chemicals, not every batch faces the reality check of a full-scale industrial run. Our approach as direct manufacturers has always held that every kilogram deserves the same scrutiny as a critical infrastructure component. While others may rely on abstract metrics, we see the real test play out in mixing tanks, dye kettles, and municipal pipelines. At every stage, our focus remains clear: turn field experience, practical science, and operator know-how into trusted, reliable hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid for every application. By listening to users, investing in process improvement, and never sacrificing on quality, we’re more than suppliers—we’re partners in every solution built, one batch at a time.