|
HS Code |
272780 |
| Product Name | Liquiritoside |
| Chemical Formula | C21H22O9 |
| Molecular Weight | 418.4 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellowish powder |
| Solubility | Soluble in water and ethanol |
| Purity | ≥98% (HPLC) |
| Cas Number | 551-15-5 |
| Storage Temperature | 2-8°C |
| Source | Glycyrrhiza uralensis (licorice root) |
| Usage | Research, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals |
| Synonyms | Liquiritin |
| Melting Point | 200-202°C |
| Ph | Neutral (7.0 in solution) |
| Stability | Stable under recommended storage |
As an accredited Liquiritoside factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Liquiritoside, 100mg, supplied in a sealed amber glass vial with tamper-evident cap, labeled with product name, quantity, and CAS number. |
| Shipping | Liquiritoside is shipped in a tightly sealed container, protected from light and moisture, and compliant with all relevant chemical transport regulations. Packaging ensures minimal risk of breakage or contamination. Appropriate hazard labeling and documentation are included to facilitate safe and legal handling during transit, whether domestic or international shipping. |
| Storage | Liquiritoside should be stored in a tightly closed container, kept in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, away from direct sunlight and sources of ignition. The storage environment should be free from moisture and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers. Ideally, maintain the compound at 2-8°C (refrigerated) to preserve its stability and prevent degradation. |
Competitive Liquiritoside prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: sales3@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Liquiritoside doesn’t just arrive by the drum or carton. Each batch marks the result of months spent refining extraction, testing for purity, and listening to chemists working on formulas at their benches. In our plant, the story of Liquiritoside starts with raw licorice roots selected for consistency and active component content. This means hands in the dirt, suppliers held to standards sharpened through decades of partnership, and real-time feedback on crop variability. The extract isn’t an anonymous yellow-brown powder. To us, it’s the careful profile we call Model LQ-200, shaped by feedback and performance in the field and in the lab. We orient every step to meet the realities we’ve witnessed—where even small impurities can disrupt a formulation or unexpectedly darken a product.
Chemists in skin care, food science, and pharmaceuticals notice different things in the ingredients they source. An off-smell or slight color shift can torpedo a new launch. Over years of scaling up Liquiritoside, we learned that avoiding batch-to-batch headaches isn’t simply about using “higher technology.” We maintain all-in process logs, verifying every extraction, purification, and drying run. Specifications like 98% HPLC assay by content, 0.2% moisture max, and elemental impurities below the tightest pharmacopoeia cutoffs are not theoretical—the QC team has rejected entire runs for failing these despite commercial pressure. Chemists inside our own team run the same methods we share in every COA. Any deviation carries straight into conversations at the user’s bench. By holding to numbers we ourselves rely on, we sidestep costly guesswork for customer R&D partners forced by lesser-quality supplies to run blind.
Having a front-row seat to the global supply chain, we’ve seen shortcuts lead to problem lots—off flavors, suspicious hues, and strange results in endpoint assays. We do not blend away substandard batches into bulk sales. Our machinery never runs mixed-source extractions; process lines are shut down between different root origins to avoid the cross-contamination that can undermine clinical trials and formula registrations. Most suppliers can list general specifications. Very few can demonstrate year over year that their “standard” lines up to their premium claims. This is where our technical director’s door stays open, collaborating on failed spot tests, consulting about matrix interactions, or advising on application-specific solvent compatibility, especially for high-purity Liquiritoside destined for pharmaceutical or food contact products.
Most customers come to Liquiritoside for one of two reasons: they need a reliably potent glycoside for cosmetic brightening/anti-inflammatory effects, or they need a trusted sweetener for sensitive foods and nutraceutical blends. In the field, we’ve seen chief formulators come up empty handed when switching between lots sourced from lower-cost blenders. One account, aiming for a stable, clear beverage, found product instability and flavor drift until switching to single-source, unblended LQ-200. Another group, engineering a topical for post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, cited persistent color leaching and ingredient separation before cross-checking with our technical sheets and 12-month stability data. With direct access to both synthesis and application staff, we cut troubleshooting loops by half, often saving customers from drawn-out downstream retesting. Every claim we make about solubility (greater than 10 g/L in water), color (consistent pale yellow as scored on Lovibond), and pH (5.5-7.5 in solution) tracks back to internal lot library testing—not marketing speculation.
A paper spec sheet covers only the tip of what shapes our product. Consider the particle size—fine enough for both rapid dissolution and smooth blending, but not so ultrafine that dusting and handling hazards rise at scale. Our team calibrates drying equipment and mills through weekly calibration and particle retention checks. At this scale, minor slips in downstream handling cascade; a drum that has caked or shows hydroscopic bloating on arrival leads to rejections and headaches, not to mention formulation failures. Our packaging line submits finished product through dynamic weighing and double-layer vacuum sealing. This keeps Liquiritoside powder flowing and prevents costly rework at blending operations. Our chemical engineers have walked enough packing lines in finished goods plants to know where a minor lapse can sideline an entire week’s production.
Our production approach isn’t rigid or caged by outdated GMP practices. Every audit cycles lessons learned into process revision; our equipment teams pair with analytical chemists to catch and mitigate particulate issues before order fulfillment. Over the past year, we’ve seen several cosmetic companies return for full traceability documentation. They lean on our stability studies, which run for up to 24 months under variable humidity and temperature conditions—mirroring real-world storage. This level of transparency is possible only because decision-makers walk the lines themselves. We harvest direct product performance data from our customers’ actual manufacturing results and end-user feedback, not laboratory-only studies. This has helped us pinpoint critical control points where purity, moisture, or trace metals can tip a batch into a regulatory gray area or prompt a recall.
The closest partnerships resemble collaborations more than transactions. Feedback from one beverage client revealed that minor solvent residues produced flavor “shadowing,” leading to costly product re-runs. Their QA visit to our facility led both teams to dial back solvent usage in the final stage. That practical insight has kept similar issues from arising for companies requiring food-grade declarations. We do not claim Liquiritoside covers every use case. Sometimes, a customer needs a more hydrophilic profile or higher fusion with other flavonoids—something our proprietary fractionation can address by adjusting column parameters or eluent conditions. Customer-specific trials tell us more than any pile of literature: we see how real-world formulations behave under their bottling or extrusion conditions, not just in micro-scale lab mixes. Learning moves in both directions; customers’ post-market surveillance data regularly spark targeted improvements or re-testing to iron out rare, low-level issues.
No manufacturer finds regulatory hurdles simple. Standrd food contact status, INCI declaration for cosmetics, or listing on pharmacopoeia reference monographs brings more than a box-ticking exercise. Customers worry about invisible contaminants, evolving REACH or FDA positions on phyto-actives, and public scrutiny of ingredient claims. To address these hurdles from the ground up, we keep final documentation clear, tie batch release to full upstream traceability, and align with the latest APHA and ChP Liquiritoside monographs. We submit models such as LQ-200 for frequent independent re-validation, collecting certificates that track not only purity and residuals but also contaminants now on the regulatory horizon, like pesticide drift or emergent trace elements. When code reviews at major skincare brands turn up questions, our documentation stack answers right down to the field and operator level.
Inflated claims in the supply world drift wide of the immediate challenges faced by chemists and production managers. We see the strongest relationships not when we promise “highest” this-or-that, but when our team helps a partner actually get a stubborn run to clarity, consistency, or flavor bench-marking that survives scale-up. We won’t claim LQ-200 solves every formulation problem, but performance gaps shrink dramatically when users can pick up a phone and talk direct with someone who both understands extraction quirks and has run stability on finished cosmetics and beverages. Our technical and commercial decisions anchor on field data: if a leading beverage or clinical trials program stumbles after switching to a lower-quality powder, our team works through the palate, color, and stability points needed to bring the product back to its intended profile. This is the actual competitive edge—not just purity on a page, but actual, granular support up and down the value chain.
Many formulators looking for sweetening, brightening, or anti-inflammatory effects find themselves weighing glycoside variants, both synthetic and plant-derived. Flavonoids such as glabridin appear in similar usage scenarios, yet often fail to match the solubility and application flexibility of Liquiritoside extracted under controlled, pharmaceutical-grade conditions. Synthetic glycyrrhizin analogs hit purity marks but show batch instability, off-tastes, or inconsistent safety data. Sourcing should never be about lowest price for products bearing health or cosmetic claims; we’ve watched too many launches stumble on the unreliability of single-source runs or “bargain” blends. Our ability to guarantee supply continuity, demonstrating not only repeatable purity but batch-to-batch uniformity in performance characteristics, gives formulators room to innovate instead of chase down recurrent troubleshooting. We maintain ongoing comparisons between our LQ-200 and the nearest competitive lots, regularly publishing chromatographic profiles and bioactivity benchmarks to foster transparency and informed selection.
In practice, solutions for customers rarely boil down to swapping ingredients. Sometimes it’s a line stoppage caused by caked powder, a delayed product launch held up by failed stability, or regulatory pushback after spot QA discovers heavy metal spikes or unknown residues. We answer each of these by bringing actual factory and laboratory experience together for a solution—not just a replacement shipment. Our process control and in-house analytics mean any flagged issue gets investigated from the molecular to the shipping scale. Lessons learned lead to both better product and more robust documentation. New clients often come with histories of repeated, small failures: formulation drift, background bitterness, haze in clear beverages, or stickiness in powder blends. Our willingness to open our process not only resolves those immediate issues but builds trust that underpins durable supply relationships. Reliable technical dialogue keeps both teams out of firefights and focused on market advantage.
Our boots-in-the-soil experience leads to a hard stance on raw material: not all licorice roots stack up equally for Liquiritoside extraction. The desired glycoside fraction drops off fast when using roots grown on over-fertilized fields or picked at too early an age. This causes not only lower overall yield but unstable co-extract profiles—troublesome for pharmaceutical or cosmeceutical companies held to strict compositional standards. By tracking harvests from field to factory, and maintaining a pool of approved farmers committed to regenerative cultivation, we beat the harvest-to-harvest drift that disrupts many “pure” glycoside brands. Processing discipline doesn’t mean high cost—each root load is tested and segregated for yield, then processed only if it hits our minimum content preset. This pattern of quality management matters far more than promised spec sheets in preventing downstream surprises.
Our routine includes not only quantitative HPLC and GC-MS validation but emerging test methods that uncover contaminants or analog impurities invisible by classic checks. We invest both in instrumentation and specialist staff, not simply in compliance, but in protecting our partners’ brands. For instance, we regularly scan for traces of pyrrolizidine alkaloids and other potential disruptors. It’s not uncommon for 1 in 100 root batches on the global market to quietly exceed the new maximum residue limits quietly adopted by premium food brands—and it’s impossible to catch these with spot testing alone. We build proactive testing into batch and lot systems, meaning no pouch or drum heads for blending unless it clears final sign-off. Down times and failed regulatory checks end careers—by baking preemptive checks into our process, we do more than meet today’s rules, we anticipate the next wave.
More than one customer has suffered through product spoilage or performance drift from bad packaging—an all-too-common oversight as sales volumes scale. Our product handling experience taught us that every additional transfer stage, even within the plant, adds risk of moisture uptake, airborne contamination, or plain physical lumping. Early runs in our history saw waste from powder compaction in basic liners. Now, we double-bag every batch in gas-flushed, heavy-gauge liners, with robust outer drums designed for both ambient and cold storage. Each label is scandal-proof: lot numbers, full chain of custody, and production signatures. If storage or transport issues ever arise, our chain of custody data closes the loop within hours, not days.
Direct input from the field has driven unexpected improvements over time. For example, a nutraceutical powder manufacturer noted stratification in mixes—a subtle but costly flaw leading to dose miscalculation. Our suggestion, based on powder flow studies, eliminated static charge by introducing a specific anti-caking handling technique and slightly adjusted micronization, leading to zero reported stratification in follow-ups. Another large personal care partner struggled with lather and residue issues linked not to the active, but to extraneous particulates picked up during one step in final drying—a step now carefully monitored through both online particle counters and direct operator oversight. Field failures don’t trigger blame; they trigger action, revising processes and closing the gap between theoretical QC and production floor reality.
Consistency between shipments defines trust for any major operation using glycoside extracts. Through independent holidays, disrupted transit, or country-specific import checks, we maintain repeatable output without dipping into spot purchasing or off-profile blending. For clients, this means fewer batch-to-batch verification headaches, reduced documentation overhead, and fewer trials needed to validate each shipment. By focusing on incremental process improvement and tying every output back to traceable production routines, we insulate customers from the volatility and unpredictability others endure when they rely on less integrated, multi-sourced powders. Every barrel shipped bears the marks of controlled discipline—nothing re-caps or dilutes out-of-spec powder, and non-conforming batches get documented, destroyed, or reprocessed until compliant.
Manufacturing Liquiritoside means answering for environmental impact as well. Water, waste byproducts, and energy use require accountable stewardship. We have moved to solvent recovery and regenerative cleaning cycles to keep the plant footprint under control. Where downstream customers need documentation on sustainability, we pull logs from raw root sourcing, water management, and solvent accounting—not only to meet demands but because each link in the chain matters to both product quality and future-proofing operations. Sustainability isn’t a bolt-on metric; it’s integrated directly into supplier selection, wastewater handling, and even end-of-life packaging design, with the goal of reducing total landfill impact and supporting a circular economy in bulk ingredient handling. These practices turn quality assurance into a shared value, not just a manufacturer’s concern.
In the end, Liquiritoside stands as more than a white-paper molecule or a spec-driven “component.” Every process, checkpoint, and improvement tells the real story—one where good staff, disciplined sourcing, and open customer lines put actual reliability at the front of the supply. The pathways from licorice root, to refined LQ-200 in a controlled drum, to a finished product that wins on both quality and safety, trace straight back to decisions and hands-on experience gathered at each step. No short-cuts, no speculative ad claims. Just the value that comes when the producer owns both the product and the outcome in every field, lab, and factory willing to trust in what Liquiritoside can deliver.