Products

(R,R)-iPr-DuPhos Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    • Product Name: (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 984395
    Product Name (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos Pharma Grade API
    Iupac Name (2R,5R)-1,1'-(1,2-Phenylene)bis(2,5-diisopropylphospholane)
    Cas Number 147253-63-6
    Molecular Formula C26H44P2
    Molecular Weight 418.59 g/mol
    Appearance White to off-white crystalline powder
    Purity ≥99.0%
    Grade Pharma Grade
    Dosage Forms Tablet, Capsule, Granule, Injection
    Route Of Administration Oral, Injectable
    Solubility Soluble in dichloromethane, chloroform, toluene; insoluble in water
    Storage Conditions Store at room temperature under inert atmosphere, protect from moisture and light
    Optical Purity ≥99% ee
    Usage Chiral ligand for asymmetric catalysis and pharmaceutical synthesis
    Assay 98.0% - 102.0%
    Heavy Metals ≤20 ppm
    Residual Solvents Meets ICH guidelines

    As an accredited (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing
    Shipping
    Storage
    Application of (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    Although (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos is not an active pharmaceutical ingredient in the finished tablet, capsule, granule, or injectable formulation, it is supplied under pharma-grade controls as a chiral ligand for the manufacture of chiral APIs that are subsequently formulated into those dosage forms. The ligand is removed from the final API by downstream purification to rhodium and residual ligand levels controlled by ICH Q3D (R2) and pharmacopoeial elemental impurity procedures. The following application blocks describe catalytic hydrogenation routes where the ligand is added at defined molar loadings, the subsequent isolation and formulation-critical purification steps, and the oral or injectable dosage form into which the resulting API is manufactured.

    How Rhodium-Catalyzed Dehydroamino Acid Reduction Controls L-DOPA Enantiomeric Purity

    In L-DOPA production for oral anti-Parkinsonian tablets, (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos is combined with [Rh(COD)₂]OTf or [Rh(NBD)₂]BF₄ at a ligand-to-rhodium molar ratio of 1.05:1 in methanol or methanol/water mixtures. The rhodium loading relative to dehydroamino acid substrate is maintained between 0.05 mol% and 0.5 mol%, with 0.1 mol% commonly sufficient when substrate concentration is 0.5–1.0 mol/L and hydrogen pressure is 0.5–3.0 MPa. The asymmetric hydrogenation is performed in a 316L stainless-steel or glass-lined stirred autoclave fitted with a gas-entrainment impeller at 25–50°C; agitation power per unit volume is maintained above 0.8 kW/m³ to avoid gas-liquid mass transfer limitations that lower catalytic turnover. Enantiomeric excess is monitored by chiral HPLC according to Ph. Eur. 2.2.29 and reaches ≥99.0% ee for the S-enantiomer. The downstream production sequence includes depressurization, filtration through a 0.2 µm PTFE membrane, treatment with a thiol-functionalized silica metal scavenger to reduce rhodium below 10 ppm, solvent exchange into aqueous hydrochloric acid, and crystallization at 0–5°C. Residual rhodium is tested by ICP-MS following USP 232 and USP 233 procedures, with limits established by ICH Q3D (R2) for oral drug products. The final L-DOPA or N-acetyl-L-DOPA intermediate is converted to L-DOPA API and formulated as oral tablets or granules; the ligand is absent from the final dosage form beyond pharmacopoeial elemental impurity limits.

    Batch-to-batch enantiomeric excess variation remains within ±0.4 percentage points when dissolved oxygen in the substrate feed is held below 1 mg/L and the autoclave is inerted with nitrogen meeting ISO 8573-1:2010 Class 3 before hydrogen charging. If impeller tip speed falls below 2.0 m/s, hydrogen uptake rate decreases and conversion stalls at 80–90%, necessitating extended reaction time that promotes substrate ester hydrolysis. Equipment cleaning after each batch is governed by 21 CFR 211.67 with verification of detergent and metal carryover; dedicated product-contact surfaces are preferred to prevent cross-contamination of chiral residues.

    In glass-lined hydrogenation autoclaves charged with tetrahydrofuran/methanol substrate solutions, an N-acyl enamine is reduced to a chiral β-amino acid derivative for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor oral tablets. The catalyst is generated by combining [Rh(COD)₂]OTf with (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos at a 1.02:1 ligand-to-Rh ratio, and the rhodium loading is held between 0.2 mol% and 1.0 mol% relative to the enamide substrate. Hydrogen pressure is controlled at 0.8–2.5 MPa and internal temperature at 40–60°C to limit double-bond isomerization that can reduce enantiomeric excess below the 98.5% ee specification. Compliance is anchored to ICH Q7 sections 7.4 and 8.3 for recovery and purification, ICH Q3C and USP 467 for residual solvents, and 21 CFR 211.67 for equipment cleaning. After hydrogenation, the mixture is filtered through 0.2 µm media, washed with aqueous sodium bicarbonate, treated with activated carbon and a silica-bound metal scavenger, and then distilled below 45°C to remove tetrahydrofuran. The isolated hydrochloride salt is crystallized from isopropanol/water, dried in a vacuum tray dryer at 50°C and 10 kPa, and converted to the final chiral β-amino acid API, which is formulated as oral film-coated tablets.

    When N-Acyl Enamine Hydrogenation Replaces Enzyme Resolution in Chiral Amine Synthesis

    When a chiral primary or secondary amine for central nervous system oral capsules or granules is produced from an N-acyl enamine, enzyme resolution is replaced by direct hydrogenation in a jacketed autoclave at 30–70°C. The substrate is dissolved in toluene/methanol at 0.3 mol/L, and the catalyst is formed from [Rh(NBD)₂]BF₄ with a ligand-to-rhodium ratio of 1.1:1. Rhodium loading is set at 0.5–2.0 mol% for substrates bearing halogen or heteroaromatic groups that compete for rhodium coordination; unsubstituted aliphatic substrates run at the lower end of this range. Hydrogen pressure is maintained at 1.0–4.0 MPa, and the reaction is terminated when residual substrate falls below 0.5% by HPLC area. Extended hold at temperatures above 70°C lowers enantiomeric excess by 1–2 percentage points because the enamine undergoes thermal E/Z isomerization. The process complies with ICH Q11 for drug substance development, ICH Q3D (R2) for elemental impurities, and Ph. Eur. 5.10 for control of impurities. Downstream work-up includes cooling to 5–10°C, filtration through diatomaceous silica, acid-base extraction to remove non-basic impurities, solvent exchange into isopropanol, and salt formation with hydrochloric or fumaric acid. Terminal product types are chiral amine hydrochloride or fumarate salts that are filled into hard gelatin capsules or blended into granules for oral administration.

    Rhodium scavenging after 0.5 mol% rhodium loadings in asymmetric hydrogenation of 2-arylprop-2-enoic acid substrates proceeds through an alkaline extraction that separates the chiral 2-arylpropionic acid from non-acidic impurities. The catalytic system uses (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos with [Rh(COD)₂]OTf at a 1.05:1 ligand-to-Rh ratio and a rhodium loading of 0.1–1.0 mol% relative to substrate. Reactions are run in methanol or methanol/water at 1.0–4.0 MPa hydrogen and 30–60°C; substrates containing free amine functionality are protected as amides or esters because amine coordination decreases turnover frequency. Compliance for this route is tied to ICH Q3D (R2) and USP 232/233 for rhodium control, ICH Q3C and USP 467 for residual methanol and solvent mixtures, and 21 CFR 211.65 for equipment construction. After hydrogenation, the reaction mass is filtered, concentrated, and treated with aqueous sodium hydroxide to extract the carboxylic acid into the aqueous phase; rhodium remains in the organic phase or is captured by a thiol-functionalized scavenger. Acidification with hydrochloric acid at 0–5°C precipitates the crude chiral acid, which is recrystallized from toluene/heptane and dried at 60°C under vacuum. Terminal product type is a chiral 2-arylpropionic acid API for oral tablets or capsules, with residual rhodium controlled below the permitted daily exposure derived from ICH Q3D Class 2B.

    Catalyst Turnover Boundaries in Enol Acetate Hydrogenation for Peptide Backbone Intermediates

    Catalyst turnover in enol acetate hydrogenation becomes unstable above 0.5 mol% rhodium when the substrate is an N-protected enol acetate destined for peptide backbone intermediate synthesis. The reaction is performed in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran with water content below 500 ppm by Karl Fischer titration; substrate solutions above this limit are pre-dried over activated 3 Å molecular sieves because water competes for the rhodium center and reduces turnover frequency. (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos is combined with [Rh(COD)₂]OTf at a 1.03:1 ligand-to-Rh ratio, and rhodium loading is set between 0.1 mol% and 0.5 mol% relative to substrate. Hydrogen pressure is held at 0.5–2.0 MPa and reactor temperature at 20–40°C to maintain enantiomeric excess above 98.0% ee; temperatures above 40°C increase acetate hydrolysis and depress isolated yield. The production sequence uses a 316L autoclave with oxygen in the inerted headspace below 10 ppm; after hydrogenation, the mixture is filtered through 0.2 µm media, washed with aqueous sodium bisulfite, and distilled under reduced pressure below 35°C. Crystallization from methyl tert-butyl ether/heptane yields the protected chiral alcohol. Compliance includes ICH Q3D (R2), Ph. Eur. 5.10, and USP 232/233. The terminal product type is an N-protected chiral alcohol intermediate that enters peptide synthesis and is ultimately formulated as a lyophilized injection or an injectable solution.

    When injectable-grade chiral α-amino acids are manufactured from dehydroamino acid substrates, the hydrogenation is performed in a Hastelloy C-22 reactor with headspace oxygen below 10 ppm and dissolved oxygen below 1 mg/L. The catalyst system is prepared from [Rh(NBD)₂]BF₄ and (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos at a ligand-to-rhodium ratio of 1.05:1; rhodium loading is limited to 0.05–0.3 mol% because the injectable route has stricter elemental impurity controls. Hydrogen pressure is 0.3–1.5 MPa, and temperature is held at 20–35°C in water/methanol solvent to avoid N-acetyl deprotection during reduction. Compliance for injectable applications is governed by ICH Q3D (R2), USP 232/233, USP 85 for bacterial endotoxins, and Ph. Eur. 2.6.14; endotoxin control is applied to all water, filters, and drying equipment used after the catalytic step. Downstream processing includes ultrafiltration through a 10 kDa regenerated cellulose membrane, precipitation at the isoelectric point, recrystallization from water/ethanol, and vacuum drying at 40°C and 5 kPa. Terminal product types are L-amino acid APIs filled as injectable solutions or lyophilized powders for parenteral use.

    Downstream routeTerminal dosage classPrimary controlStandard designation
    Dehydroamino acid hydrogenationOral anti-Parkinsonian tablets/granulesResidual rhodium; chiral purityICH Q3D (R2); USP 232/233; Ph. Eur. 2.2.29
    Enamide hydrogenationOral film-coated tabletsResidual solventsICH Q3C; USP 467
    N-Acyl enamine hydrogenationOral capsules/granulesElemental impurities; impurity profileICH Q3D (R2); Ph. Eur. 5.10
    2-Arylprop-2-enoic acid hydrogenationOral tablets/capsulesResidual rhodium; equipment cleanlinessICH Q3D (R2); USP 232/233; 21 CFR 211.65
    Enol acetate hydrogenationInjectable lyophilized/solutionResidual rhodium; residual solventsICH Q3D (R2); USP 232/233; Ph. Eur. 5.10
    Dehydroamino acid hydrogenation for amino acid APIInjectable solutions/lyophilized powdersElemental impurities; endotoxinICH Q3D (R2); USP 85; Ph. Eur. 2.6.14
    Itaconate-derived succinate hydrogenationOral tablets/granulesResidual solvents; rhodiumICH Q3C; USP 467; ICH Q3D (R2)

    Pressure, Solvent, and Granule Formulation Constraints in Itaconate-Derived Succinate Hydrogenation

    Pressure, solvent, and granule formulation constraints intersect when an itaconate-derived succinate ester is hydrogenated to a chiral building block for oral small-molecule drug substances. (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos is used with [Rh(COD)₂]OTf at a 1.1:1 ligand-to-Rh ratio and a rhodium loading of 0.1–1.0 mol% relative to substrate. Hydrogen pressure is managed between 1.0–4.0 MPa and temperature between 40–80°C in isopropanol/water solvent; higher temperature increases reaction rate but reduces enantiomeric excess when the substrate contains an unprotected hydroxyl group. Published plant-scale data for this specific substrate configuration is limited; the stated pressure and temperature window should be confirmed by site-specific validation runs before commercial campaign start. The process is run in a glass-lined autoclave, and conversion is monitored by gas chromatography until residual substrate is below 1.0%. Compliance is tied to ICH Q3D (R2) for rhodium control, ICH Q3C and USP 467 for residual isopropanol, and ICH Q7 for API manufacturing. The downstream production process includes activated carbon treatment, solvent exchange into ethanol, crystallization from ethanol/water, and drying in a conical vacuum dryer at 45°C and 10 kPa. Terminal product type is a chiral succinate intermediate that is further converted to a small-molecule oral API and formulated as tablets or granules.

    Free Quote

    Competitive (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    The product identified as (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos Pharma Grade, CAS 136705-65-2, molecular formula C28H48P2, molecular weight 446.63 g/mol, is a chiral 1,2-bis(phospholano)benzene ligand supplied for catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation. The commercial designation “Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable” defines the intended downstream use of the chiral active pharmaceutical ingredient produced with this ligand; the ligand itself is not an active pharmaceutical ingredient and is not directly formulated into the finished tablet, capsule, granule, or injection matrix. The compound is a white to off-white crystalline solid with two five-membered phospholane rings attached to a benzene backbone through phosphorus atoms. The C2-symmetric architecture and the isopropyl substituents at the 2 and 5 positions of each phospholane ring generate a sterically defined chiral pocket that discriminates enantiotopic faces of prochiral substrates. The material is electron-rich, soluble in degassed tetrahydrofuran, dichloromethane, and toluene, and essentially insoluble in water. It is packaged under inert atmosphere because the trivalent phosphorus centers are oxidation-sensitive. In route scouting, the ligand is used to prepare rhodium or ruthenium complexes that reduce prochiral enamides, itaconic acid esters, β-keto esters, and selected N-acyl imines to enantioenriched intermediates for later conversion into oral or injectable drug substances.

    What Limits Ligand Oxidation and Handling in a Production Pharmacy Environment?

    Handling limits are set primarily by the air sensitivity of the free ligand. Exposure to oxygen converts the phosphorus(III) centers to phosphorus(V) oxides, detected by 31P NMR as a shift of roughly 30–45 ppm from the parent ligand signal, and the oxidized material loses the ability to coordinate rhodium effectively. Unopened containers should be stored at 2–8 °C under argon or nitrogen. After first opening, the product is normally handled inside a glovebox, a nitrogen-purged flexible isolator, or a Schlenk line with a positive pressure of inert gas. Bulk packaging is typically amber glass or fluoropolymer-lined containers with net weights of 1 g, 5 g, 25 g, or 100 g, depending on the supplier. The free ligand should not be milled under air or exposed to static discharge in the presence of flammable solvents. Because the material is not a direct formulation ingredient, compressibility, granulation, powder flow, and syringeability data are not applicable to the ligand itself; such properties are evaluated on the isolated API after asymmetric hydrogenation and purification.

    At release, a pharma-grade lot is typically characterized by appearance, chemical purity by HPLC, enantiomeric excess by chiral HPLC, water content by Karl Fischer, residual solvents by headspace gas chromatography, and elemental impurities by ICP-MS. The enantiomeric excess is the critical quality attribute for a chiral ligand because low ligand enantiomeric purity propagates directly into reduced enantioselectivity in rhodium-catalyzed hydrogenation. Enantiomeric analysis may be performed by direct chiral HPLC or by 31P NMR after derivatization with a chiral solvating agent. Chemical purity is usually reported as area percent at 210–230 nm. Acceptance criteria vary by manufacturer, but representative release values include not less than 97.0% chemical purity and not less than 99.0% enantiomeric excess. Residual rhodium and palladium from ligand synthesis are controlled against ICH Q3D limits, and residual solvents follow ICH Q3C Option 2. The following table summarizes representative quality attributes used for supplier qualification.

    Quality attributeAnalytical methodReference standardRepresentative release limit
    AppearanceVisual inspectionInternalWhite to off-white powder
    Chemical purityHPLC-UVUSP <621>97.0%
    Enantiomeric excessChiral HPLCUSP <621>99.0%
    Water contentKarl FischerUSP <921>0.5%
    Residual solventsHS-GC-FIDICH Q3COption 2 limits
    Elemental impuritiesICP-MSUSP <232>, USP <233>ICH Q3D Option 1 PDE

    Stability of the free ligand is assessed under inert storage rather than under full finished-dose ICH stability protocols because the ligand is a process raw material. Lots held at 2–8 °C under nitrogen are generally assigned a retest date based on 31P NMR and HPLC stability. Open-container studies are not part of routine release because oxidation begins within hours under ambient air. Manufacturing sites that use the ligand in multi-day campaigns often prepare a stock solution in degassed tetrahydrofuran and consume it within 24 h; longer solution hold times require refrigerated storage and continuous inert headspace. Any batch that appears yellowed or shows a phosphine oxide signal in 31P NMR should be quarantined and retested for chemical purity before use.

    Catalyst Preparation, Hydrogen Pressure, and Enantioselective Turnover

    Commercial hydrogenation campaigns generally preform the catalyst before charging substrate. A representative procedure combines [Rh(COD)2]BF4 or [Rh(COD)Cl]2 with (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos in degassed tetrahydrofuran at 20–25 °C under nitrogen. The mixture is stirred for 10–30 min to generate the active rhodium-ligand complex. The substrate is then added, and the solution is transferred to a Hastelloy C-276 or stainless-steel autoclave equipped with a gas-entrainment impeller operating at 600–1,200 rpm. Hydrogen pressure is commonly maintained between 1–10 bar for activated enamides; less reactive substrates such as β-keto esters may require 20–40 bar. Reaction temperature is often controlled at 20–50 °C, with higher temperatures raising conversion rate but potentially reducing enantioselectivity. In-process control by chiral HPLC at 15–30 min intervals tracks both conversion and enantiomeric excess. The ligand’s performance is substrate-specific: published results for model substrates demonstrate high enantioselectivity, but each new API intermediate requires design-of-experiment screening because electronic and steric variations can shift both rate and enantioselectivity. No universal hydrogen pressure or temperature applies to all tablet-directed or injectable-directed APIs.

    Selection among chiral ligands on manufacturing campaigns is governed by substrate geometry, required configuration, and catalyst turnover. Me-DuPhos has a smaller methyl-substituted pocket and is often selected for α-amino acid precursors; Et-DuPhos may provide better selectivity with certain β-keto esters; (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos is chosen when bulkier substrate substituents require stronger steric discrimination. BINAP-ruthenium systems remain common for β-keto ester hydrogenation but may require higher hydrogen pressure and longer cycle times than DuPhos-rhodium systems. Josiphos ligands are frequently preferred for imine reduction because of their different ferrocene-based chiral environment. The following table presents qualitative distinctions used during route scouting and ligand selection.

    Parameter(R,R)-iPr-DuPhosMe-DuPhos(R)-BINAPJosiphos SL-J009
    Donor atom classElectron-rich dialkylphospholaneElectron-rich dialkylphospholaneTriarylphosphineFerrocenyl phosphine
    Chiral environmentC2-symmetric, isopropyl-substitutedC2-symmetric, methyl-substitutedAxial binaphthylPlanar-central ferrocene
    Common metal partnerRh(I)Rh(I)Ru(II), Rh(I)Rh(I), Ir(I)
    Representative substrate windowBulkier enamides, itaconic acid esters, β-amino acid precursorsα-Amino acid precursorsβ-Keto esters, allylic alcoholsImine reduction, α-aryl enamides
    Reported enantioselectivity range90–99% ee by chiral HPLC90–99% ee85–99% ee90–99% ee

    Because (R,R)-iPr-DuPhos is electron-rich, it can coordinate strongly to low-valent late transition metals. This creates a risk of rhodium carryover into the isolated API if the downstream work-up lacks a robust scavenging step. Residual rhodium is usually removed by treatment with activated carbon, functionalized silica, or chelating scavengers before crystallization. The ligand-derived phosphorus species are separated from the API by aqueous extraction at mildly acidic or basic pH, depending on API stability. For oral solid dosage APIs, residual metal levels must meet the oral permitted daily exposure from ICH Q3D; for injectable APIs, the parenteral permitted daily exposure is more restrictive. ICP-MS is the standard technique for quantifying rhodium and palladium in isolated API batches. Published data for this specific ligand configuration is limited when evaluating scavenging efficiency on new substrates, so spiked recovery studies and process-specific validation are required.

    When the Downstream API Is Destined for Sterile Injectable or Oral Solid Dosage Forms

    The ligand is not present in the finished tablet, capsule, granule, or sterile injection; therefore, its direct contribution to formulation performance is limited to upstream chemical purity and impurity carryover. Tablet and capsule processing of the isolated API may include dry or wet granulation, roller compaction, blending with lactose, microcrystalline cellulose, croscarmellose sodium, or mannitol, and compression under normal excipient compatibility conditions. Sterile injectable manufacturing may use aseptic filtration through 0.22 µm membranes or terminal sterilization at 121 °C for 15 min, depending on the heat sensitivity of the API. The choice between oral and injectable routes places different limits on residual metals, endotoxins, and particulate matter. For parenteral products, endotoxin control follows Ph. Eur. 2.6.14 or USP <85>; particulate matter follows USP <788> for large-volume injections and USP <789> for small-volume injections. The upstream ligand lot must be accompanied by a certificate of analysis showing compliance with the relevant standards, and the API manufacturer should retain the ligand supplier’s quality agreement as part of the drug master file.

    An operational boundary for this product is its incompatibility with oxidizing agents, peroxides, and strong acids under aerobic conditions. It should not be exposed to ambient air during weighing or charging. The material is not suitable for direct use in oral or injectable formulation units and must not be listed as an excipient in regulatory submissions. When selecting a pharma-grade lot for a specific synthetic route, the analytical methods and acceptance limits should be aligned with the downstream dosage form’s regulatory file through supplier qualification, rather than reliance on the broad designation alone.

    Top