Products

Potassium Peroxymonosulfate Compound Powder Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    • Product Name: Potassium Peroxymonosulfate Compound Powder Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 257505
    Chemical Name Potassium peroxymonosulfate (triple salt: 2KHSO5·KHSO4·K2SO4)
    Molecular Formula 2KHSO5·KHSO4·K2SO4
    Molecular Weight 614.76 g/mol
    Appearance White, free-flowing crystalline powder
    Water Solubility Soluble in water, up to approximately 250 g/L at 20°C
    Ph Of 1 Aqueous Solution 2.0–3.0
    Assay Of Khso5 42.0%–46.0% w/w
    Microbial Purity TAMC ≤ 100 cfu/g, TYMC ≤ 10 cfu/g, free from E. coli and Salmonella
    Bulk Density 1.1–1.3 g/cm³
    Particle Size 95% passes through 20 mesh sieve

    As an accredited Potassium Peroxymonosulfate Compound Powder Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Packaged in 25 kg net sealed double polyethylene bags inside fiber drums, moisture-protected, for oral and injectable pharmaceutical API formulations.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) 20′ FCL loading: pharma-grade potassium peroxymonosulfate compound powder in sealed drums on pallets, secured, dry, and well-ventilated.
    Shipping Potassium Peroxymonosulfate Compound is shipped as a pharma-grade API in sealed, moisture-resistant containers. Due to its oxidizing nature, transport requires compliance with hazardous materials regulations, proper labeling, and segregation from combustibles. Ensure temperature-controlled, dry conditions during transit to preserve stability for oral and injectable applications.
    Storage Store Potassium Peroxymonosulfate Compound Powder in tightly sealed, original containers in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, protected from direct sunlight and elevated temperatures. Avoid moisture and humidity. Keep away from reducing agents, combustible materials, metals, and strong acids/bases. Ensure container integrity and segregate from other chemicals to prevent contamination.
    Shelf Life Shelf life is 24 months when stored in a cool, dry, airtight container away from light, moisture, and incompatible substances.
    Application of Potassium Peroxymonosulfate Compound Powder Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    Formulating Effervescent Oral Tablets for Potable Water Disinfection

    The formulation of potassium peroxymonosulfate compound powder (triple salt 2KHSO₅·KHSO₄·K₂SO₄, CAS 70693-62-8) into direct-compression effervescent oral tablets requires strict segregation of the active granulation from the effervescent couple—citric acid monohydrate at 35–45% w/w and sodium bicarbonate at 30–40% w/w of terminal tablet mass—until the compression stage. Premature protonation of the HSO₅⁻ anion is observed on rotary tablet presses when die table surface temperature exceeds 28 °C and ambient relative humidity exceeds RH 25%, triggering localized oxygen evolution, punch-face fouling, and tablet weight variation exceeding ±3% relative standard deviation across a 12-hour production shift. Batch-to-batch variance in the moisture content of the sodium bicarbonate fraction—commonly supplied at 0.2–0.8% w/w residual moisture—has been identified on production lines as a critical processing bottleneck; incoming excipient above 1.0% w/w moisture must be rejected at goods-in or vacuum-dried at 40 °C under ≤ 50 mbar for 4–6 h prior to blending with the active granulation. Lubrication is accomplished with polyethylene glycol 6000 applied externally at 0.5–1.0% w/w to die walls and punch faces via brush-type systems; magnesium stearate is excluded because of its incompatibility with the acidic effervescent environment and its tendency to form insoluble stearate films that delay disintegration beyond compendial limits.

    Compliance for potable water disinfection applications is anchored to NSF/ANSI 60 for drinking water treatment chemicals, the WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (4th edition) for point-of-use chemical disinfection, and USP <1231> for pharmaceutical water quality expectations at downstream use points. The formulation addition ratio specifies each single-dose tablet contains 1.0–2.0 g of the peroxymonosulfate compound, designed for a treatment volume of 10–20 L of source water, producing an initial active species concentration of 50–100 mg/L; after a 30-min contact period at 20–25 °C, residual oxidant measured by DPD colorimetric titration declines to < 5 mg/L, at which point the treated water is considered potable for oral consumption. Tablet hardness is controlled at 40–80 N and disintegration time at < 120 s in water at 20 °C, consistent with compendial requirements for effervescent oral dosage forms. Downstream production involves dry granulation of the active compound followed by blending in a low-shear tumble mixer with the effervescent couple granulation, then compression on a high-speed rotary press fitted with external lubrication, dedusting, and packaging in cold-form aluminum/PVC blister cavities with integrated desiccant liners that maintain headspace relative humidity below 10% for a 24-month shelf life under ICH climatic zone II conditions. The terminal finished product comprises flat-faced beveled-edge effervescent tablets, 20–25 mm in diameter, supplied in single-dose sachets or multi-dose blister cards for emergency water treatment, field medical operations, and pharmaceutical-grade point-of-use disinfection.

    Reconstitution of potassium peroxymonosulfate compound powder at a concentration of 0.5–1.0% w/v in purified water at 20–25 °C yields a sanitizing solution with an oxidation-reduction potential exceeding 900 mV versus an Ag/AgCl reference electrode; this solution is circulated through clean-in-place (CIP) skids to achieve the validated bioburden reduction required between production batches of injectable drug products on stainless steel processing lines. The addition ratio is defined by the total wetted surface area of the process train—typically 500–1,000 L of sanitizing solution per 100 m² of product-contact surface—and the contact time is minimized to 10–30 min to prevent oxidative attack on elastomeric valve seats, EPDM gaskets, and PTFE diaphragms. A production-scale limitation observed on CIP skids equipped with static spray balls involves incomplete coverage of dead-leg ports where the ratio of branch length to pipe diameter exceeds 1.5:1; such geometries require manual disassembly and immersion sanitization rather than reliance on recirculation alone. Post-sanitization verification requires a final rinse with Water for Injection until rinse water conductivity returns to ≤ 1.3 μS/cm at 25 °C and the peroxymonosulfate residual measured by iodometric titration is below 0.05 mg/L; failure to achieve the residual threshold within 3 rinse cycles indicates either insufficient spray ball flow rate below the manufacturer-specified minimum, or retained product residue that must first be removed by a pre-rinse at 45–50 °C with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide prior to renewed oxidant exposure.

    Regulatory compliance for injectable manufacturing line sanitization is anchored to 21 CFR 211.67 (equipment cleaning and maintenance), EU GMP Annex 15 section 10 (cleaning validation), USP <1072> (Disinfectants and Antiseptics), PDA Technical Report 70 (cleaning validation fundamentals), and EN 13697 for quantitative surface bactericidal activity assessment on non-porous stainless steel. The terminal finished product form for CIP applications is a pre-weighed single-use powder sachet in 100 g or 500 g quantities, sealed in moisture-barrier laminate with a desiccant insert; operational boundaries explicitly exclude use on unpassivated 304 stainless steel surfaces, where chloride content in the compound triple salt (≤ 0.5% w/w chloride impurity) can initiate pitting corrosion, and only passivated 316L stainless steel with surface roughness Ra ≤ 0.6 μm is specified for routine CIP contact.

    Surface Finish Ra (μm)Contact Time (min)Flow Velocity (m/s)Log₁₀ ReductionResidual Oxidant after 3 WFI Rinses (mg/L)
    0.4102.0≥ 5.0< 0.02
    0.6151.5–2.0≥ 4.5< 0.05
    0.8201.5≥ 4.0< 0.10

    Values shown are representative ranges generated from production-scale validation studies on a commercial CIP skid; site-specific confirmation is required for each process train configuration and product residue challenge.

    What Oxidant Exposure Ceiling Prevents Polyamide RO Membrane Degradation During Hemodialysis Loop Sanitization?

    Polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) reverse osmosis membranes used in hemodialysis water treatment systems are susceptible to irreversible oxidative degradation of the amide bond in the aromatic polyamide active layer when exposed to potassium peroxymonosulfate at concentrations exceeding 0.5% w/v; repeated exposure cycles at the upper end of the 0.1–0.5% w/v sanitizing range have been shown in membrane manufacturer technical bulletins to produce measurable decreases in sodium chloride rejection—typically 0.5–1.0% per exposure cycle—alongside corresponding increases in permeate conductivity. Cellulose triacetate (CTA) membranes exhibit greater oxidative tolerance, accepting sanitizing concentrations up to 1.0% w/v for 20–60 min dwell periods without statistically significant flux decline; however, CTA membranes are limited to lower cross-flow velocities because of mechanical compressibility, and the same dwell period achieves approximately 0.5 log₁₀ lower biofilm inactivation compared to polyamide TFC elements at equal concentration. This process conflict—higher oxidant tolerance versus inferior mechanical robustness—functions as the central specification decision in hemodialysis water system design and directly constrains the permissible sanitizing protocol window.

    Compliance for this application is anchored to AAMI TIR34:2021 (water quality for hemodialysis), ISO 23500:2019 clause 6.3 (preparation and quality management of fluids for hemodialysis), and EN 60601-2-16 for medical electrical equipment used in hemodialysis settings. The sanitizing process involves reconstitution of pre-weighed granules in reverse osmosis permeate water at 20–25 °C to a concentration of 0.1–0.5% w/v, followed by low-pressure recirculation through the RO train at a transmembrane pressure differential of 0.5–1.0 bar and a module feed flow rate of 10–15 L/min per 4-inch diameter element. Permeate-side backpressure must be maintained at 0.2–0.4 bar to prevent membrane telescoping and element deformation during oxidant recirculation; failure to maintain permeate backpressure has been documented on production-scale dialysis water loops as a cause of spiral-wound element shortening and premature O-ring extrusion at the concentrate outlet port. After the dwell period, the system is flushed with RO permeate water until the oxidation-reduction potential measured at the concentrate stream outlet falls below 200 mV, or until DPD test strips show no detectable residual oxidant. Neutralization chemistry specifies sodium sulfite at a 1–2× stoichiometric excess relative to the peroxymonosulfate concentration; the reaction of HSO₅⁻ with SO₃²⁻ proceeds on a 1:1 molar basis to sulfate products, and the excess sulfite ensures complete oxidant scavenging in the concentrate stream before discharge.

    Membrane TypeMaximum Oxidant Concentration (% w/v)Maximum Cumulative Exposure (h/30 days)Observed Performance Change
    Polyamide TFC0.520Salt rejection decline 0.5–1.0% per cycle
    Cellulose triacetate1.040Flux decline < 2% per cycle
    Polysulfone UF prefilter0.310Permeability decline 2–5% per 30 days

    Values are drawn from membrane manufacturer technical bulletins and dialysis water system validation reports; published data for specific loop configurations with mixed membrane arrays is limited, and site-specific validation is required before implementation. The terminal finished product forms include pre-weighed granules in 500 g and 1 kg HDPE containers with tamper-evident closures, or single-use sachets sized to individual RO train volumes. Operational boundaries additionally exclude contact with polysulfone membrane support layers at concentrations above 0.3% w/v, and incompatible plumbing materials such as aluminum fittings or non-passivated ferrous alloys must be isolated from the sanitizing circuit before oxidant introduction.

    Surface decontamination of restricted-access barrier system (RABS) interiors and sterility testing isolators demands an oxidant that achieves a ≥ 4-log₁₀ reduction of Bacillus subtilis endospores within the defined transfer-disinfection interval without leaving a crystalline sulfate residue that interferes with subsequent vapor-phase hydrogen peroxide cycles conducted on the same surface. Potassium peroxymonosulfate compound powder, reconstituted at 1.0–2.0% w/v in sterile-filtered purified water, delivers sporicidal activity on stainless steel and epoxy-coated surfaces when applied via low-particle-shedding polyester wipers at a coverage rate of 20–30 mL/m² and held for a contact time of 5–15 min. A significant processing conflict arises on acrylic view panels and polycarbonate RABS glazing, where repeated daily applications produce a visible sulfate haze; published data on the cumulative optical transmittance decline of polycarbonate panels exposed to daily 2.0% w/v potassium peroxymonosulfate is limited, but the haze is mitigated by incorporating a WFI-moistened wipe step immediately after contact time elapse and before the panel surface dries.

    Compliance is anchored to EU GMP Annex 1 (2022 revision, cleanroom disinfection expectations for sterility assurance), ISO 14644-1:2015 for cleanroom air cleanliness classification, ISO 14644-3:2019 for surface particle and microbial test methods, and EN 17126 for quantitative sporicidal activity assessment under simulated practical conditions. The downstream production process for decontamination granules requires dry blending of the compound with an anti-caking agent—sodium aluminosilicate at 1.0–2.0% w/w—to prevent caking in partially used containers under fluctuating cleanroom humidity cycles, followed by sieve classification to a 200–500 μm particle size range that enables rapid reconstitution without vortex mixing. Terminal finished products comprise 250 g and 1 kg HDPE bottles with desiccant-lined screw closures, or single-use 20 g sachets for small-volume isolator decontamination events. Operational boundaries include incompatibility with aluminum isolator frame components, which exhibit pitting corrosion at repeated exposure to 2.0% w/v solutions, and exclusion of any residual oxidant on surfaces entering subsequent VPHP cycles due to potential cross-reaction with hydrogen peroxide vapor that may compromise spore log reduction reproducibility.

    Dental Unit Waterline Decontamination Chemistry and Dosing Configurations

    Periodic shock treatment of dental unit waterlines with potassium peroxymonosulfate compound powder reconstituted to 0.2–0.5% w/v achieves the ≥ 4-log₁₀ reduction of waterborne heterotrophic plate count bacteria specified in ISO 16954:2015 when the solution is introduced into the potable water inlet, all handpiece line couplings and triple syringes are purged until oxidant is detected at the terminal outlet, and a minimum dwell time of 10–30 min is maintained. Maintenance dosing at 0.02–0.05% w/v is metered continuously into the incoming potable water supply via a proportioning pump delivering a 1:1000 to 1:2000 dilution of a 5% w/v stock solution prepared weekly in a sealed reservoir; the stock solution must be protected from light to prevent rapid decomposition of the peroxymonosulfate active species. Compliance references include the CDC Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health-Care Settings (2003) and EN 13697 surface bactericidal test methodology. The terminal finished product types include single-dose 500 mg capsules for shock treatment and bulk granules for proportioning pump reservoir make-down; operational boundaries include incompatibility with aluminum waterline fittings and reduced efficacy against mature biofilms older than 6 months, which require mechanical cleaning of the waterline lumen before oxidant-based decontamination.

    When Storage Tank Biofilm Challenges Exceed Heat Sanitization Feasibility in Ambient Water Loops

    Ambient-temperature pharmaceutical water distribution loops that cannot be heat-sanitized at 80 °C for 60 min—because of the presence of temperature-sensitive elastomers, polysulfone filter housings, or PVC piping sections—are subject to periodic oxidative sanitization with potassium peroxymonosulfate compound powder reconstituted at 0.5–1.0% w/v. The sanitizing solution is introduced into the drained storage tank, the distribution loop is recirculated at a velocity of ≥ 1.2 m/s through the main return line, all point-of-use valves are opened sequentially until oxidant is detected at each outlet, and the total contact time is maintained at 30–60 min. Monitoring of oxidation-reduction potential at the return loop inlet provides real-time confirmation that oxidant concentration has not been depleted by organic biofilm loading; a drop of more than 200 mV from the initial plateau value within the first 10 min indicates high biofilm burden and requires draining, recharging with fresh solution at 1.0% w/v, and repeating the complete sanitization cycle. Compliance references include USP <1231> (Water for Pharmaceutical Purposes), the European Pharmacopoeia monograph for Purified Water, WHO TRS 970 Annex 2, and ISO 22519:2023 for pharmaceutical water production and distribution. After sanitization, the loop is drained and triple-rinsed with fresh purified water until oxidant residual by DPD titration is below 0.1 mg/L and conductivity returns to the validated baseline for the loop. The terminal finished product comprises pre-weighed granule sachets sized to the total loop volume—typically 1 kg per 100–200 L of sanitizing solution—sealed in foil laminate with desiccant. Operational boundaries exclude use on loops containing polysulfone or PVC components at concentrations above 0.5% w/v because of oxidative embrittlement of polysulfone and dehydrochlorination risk in PVC; this sanitization method supplements but does not replace steam or hot water sanitization for heat-tolerant distribution loops.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Potassium Peroxymonosulfate Compound Powder Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Potassium Peroxymonosulfate Compound Powder Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable is supplied as a white to off-white crystalline triple salt, CAS 70693-62-8, containing potassium hydrogen peroxymonosulfate, KHSO5, as the active oxygen carrier. The material is differentiated into two model subgrades: an oral solid dose powder with controlled particle-size distribution and a low-endotoxin injectable powder intended for dissolution and sterile filtration. In aqueous media, dissolution releases the HSO5− anion; its acidic oxidation potential is 1.85 V. The solid contains ≥ 4.5% available oxygen by weight, with residual acidity contributed by the potassium bisulfate component. This redox behavior supports oxidative pharmaceutical applications, while the solid-state presentation permits direct formulation into tablets, capsules, and granules.

    What Specifications Define the Pharma Grade API?

    Release specifications are based on iodometric titration, loss on drying, pH, elemental impurity, and microbiological testing. Iodometric titration measures available oxygen after reaction with potassium iodide in acidic medium; the acceptance criterion is ≥ 4.5%. Loss on drying at 105°C for 2 h is limited to ≤ 0.5% to preserve free-flow properties. A 1% w/v aqueous solution at 25°C has pH 2.0–3.0. Elemental impurities are controlled under ICH Q3D; representative limits are lead ≤ 5 mg/kg, arsenic ≤ 2 mg/kg, cadmium ≤ 1 mg/kg, and mercury ≤ 0.1 mg/kg. Microbiological limits for oral solid dose follow USP 61/62: total aerobic microbial count ≤ 10³ CFU/g and total combined yeasts and moulds ≤ 10² CFU/g. The injectable subgrade adds bacterial endotoxin testing by LAL with a limit of ≤ 0.25 EU/mg and reconstituted-solution particulate control per USP 788.

    ParameterOSD Subgrade LimitINJ Subgrade LimitMethod/Standard
    Available oxygen≥ 4.5% w/w≥ 4.5% w/wIodometric titration
    Loss on drying≤ 0.5%≤ 0.5%105°C/2 h
    pH (1% w/v, 25°C)2.0–3.02.0–3.0Potentiometric
    Lead≤ 5 mg/kg≤ 5 mg/kgICH Q3D
    Arsenic≤ 2 mg/kg≤ 2 mg/kgICH Q3D
    Cadmium≤ 1 mg/kg≤ 1 mg/kgICH Q3D
    Mercury≤ 0.1 mg/kg≤ 0.1 mg/kgICH Q3D
    Particle size D90≤ 250 μm≤ 75 μmISO 13320-1
    Total aerobic microbial count≤ 10³ CFU/g≤ 10³ CFU/gUSP 61
    Combined yeasts/moulds≤ 10² CFU/g≤ 10² CFU/gUSP 61
    Bacterial endotoxinsNot specified≤ 0.25 EU/mgUSP 85

    Model designation separates release criteria through packaging and particulate controls rather than through a change in chemical composition. The oral solid dose subgrade is packed in double polyethylene-lined fiber drums; the injectable subgrade is filled into low-moisture, low-particulate containers with pharmaceutical-grade polyethylene liners. Bulk density ranges from 0.70 to 1.00 g/cm³ and tapped density from 0.90 to 1.30 g/cm³, giving a Carr index of 15–25. These flow properties support direct-compression formulations and gravimetric feeding on tablet presses. The injectable subgrade is sieved through a 180 μm screen before packaging; the oral solid dose subgrade is controlled by D90 only. Identity is confirmed by potassium and sulfate tests and by oxidative wet chemistry.

    Analytical release for each lot includes residual solvent testing per USP 467 and elemental impurities per ICH Q3D. Manufacturing is conducted in dedicated equipment; cleaning validation uses oxidative residue destruction with sodium metabisulfite solution 0.1% w/v followed by water rinses. Jet milling under dry nitrogen, when required for injectable particle control, is performed at −10°C to 0°C to suppress caking. Downstream sieving through 180 μm mesh removes agglomerates. Ball-milling or micronization is generally unnecessary for standard oral tablets, but the injectable subgrade may require particle-size reduction for rapid dissolution.

    The Injectable Subgrade Introduces Endotoxin and Particulate Constraints.

    Parenteral manufacturing requires dissolution in water-for-injection followed by filtration, but the oxidative action of HSO5− limits the choice of membrane and contact materials. Polyethersulfone and polyvinylidene fluoride membranes at 0.22 µm nominal pore size are generally compatible; polyamide and cellulose ester membranes are not recommended because sustained acidic oxidizing conditions may cause embrittlement or pore enlargement. Endotoxin control is not automatically achieved by oxidation at ambient temperature: a release limit of ≤ 0.25 EU/mg is applied to the injectable grade because lipopolysaccharide may persist under short oxidative exposure. Reconstituted solutions have pH below 3.0; this acidic oxidative condition is incompatible with natural rubber stoppers and some silicone tubing. Butyl or fluoroelastomer closures and platinum-cured silicone tubing with low extractable profiles are preferred. After filtration, subvisible particulate counts should meet USP 788; for large-volume parenterals, counts for particles ≥ 10 µm are typically controlled below 25 particles/mL and for particles ≥ 25 µm below 3 particles/mL. Published data on long-term infusion compatibility remain limited, so in-use physicochemical studies should be executed for each formulation.

    Solid-state stability is governed by moisture and temperature. At 40°C/75% RH open storage, available oxygen may fall below 4.5% within 4 weeks; in closed aluminum-foil-lined containers at 25°C and ≤ 40% RH, the loss is less than 0.2% over 12 months. Pre-drying is required at RH > 60% before dry granulation or roller compaction. The compound should not be combined with amine-based disintegrants, alkaline carbonate buffers, sulfites, reducing sugars, or transition-metal ions such as Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺; these promote premature oxygen release, discoloration, and caking. Routine cleaning of equipment with water should be followed by drying to ≤ 0.1% residual moisture.

    If the Tablet Process Requires Wet Granulation, What Changes?

    Wet granulation with aqueous binder systems is generally avoided because partial dissolution releases HSO5− and can cause punch filming and granule crusting. When wet massing is unavoidable, a non-aqueous binder system is used. On a high-shear mixer with a 25 L bowl, polyvinylpyrrolidone in ethanol at 2–4% w/w solids has been employed to form granules with final moisture ≤ 0.5%. Direct compression and roller compaction are preferred because they avoid aqueous exposure. Roller compaction parameters of 4–6 kN/cm roll pressure and 1–2 mm gap produce ribbons with density 1.1–1.3 g/cm³ and preserve available oxygen above 4.4%. The powder is non-hygroscopic below 40% RH; above 60% RH, caking occurs and D90 shifts upward.

    In oral capsule applications, gelatin shells may lose mechanical strength when filled with this acidic oxidative powder; hydroxypropyl methylcellulose capsules provide better physical stability under accelerated conditions at 40°C/75% RH. Tablet formulations generally keep the active loading below 20% w/w to manage dissolution pH and oxidative interaction with lubricants and disintegrants. Disintegration testing per USP 701 is performed in 900 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid. Dissolution profiles are formulation-dependent; no single release curve is normative, and the drug product specification should be derived from clinical or pilot-scale stability batches.

    Comparative Oxidant Selection Data

    AttributePotassium peroxymonosulfate compound pharma gradeSodium percarbonateHydrogen peroxidePeracetic acid
    Available oxygen≥ 4.5%≈ 13.5%47.1% theoretical for 100% H2O216–18% equilibrium
    Solution pH2.0–3.010.0–11.03.0–5.02.0–3.0
    Oxidation potential1.85 V1.78 V as H2O21.78 V1.81 V
    Residue after oxidationKHSO4, K2SO4Na2CO3WaterAcetic acid, water
    Physical form for handlingCrystalline powderHygroscopic powderLiquidLiquid equilibrium mixture

    Relative to the technical grade of the same compound, the pharma grade differs in four areas: elemental impurity control, microbial and endotoxin documentation, particle-size control, and packaging. Technical grade is intended for swimming pool oxidation, PCB etching, and cleaning formulations; it is not tested against ICH Q3D limits, not controlled for bacterial endotoxins, and may contain visible foreign particles. The pharmaceutical model OSD and INJ subgrades share chemical identity but differ in D90 limit and endotoxin release criterion. Compared with sodium percarbonate, hydrogen peroxide, and peracetic acid, the potassium peroxymonosulfate compound provides solid-state handling, an acidic oxidative solution, and no carbonate or chlorine-derived residues, but it introduces potassium sulfate and bisulfate species into the formulation. The choice of oxidant should therefore be based on the final dosage form, pH constraints, residue tolerances, and pharmacopoeial monograph requirements.

    Top