Products

N,N-Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    • Product Name: N,N-Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 758929
    Product Name N,N-Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline Pharma Grade API
    Chemical Name 1,1,1-Trifluoro-N-phenyl-N-[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]methanesulfonamide
    Synonyms N,N-Bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)aniline; N-Phenylbis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide); N-Phenyl-bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide); Phenyl triflimide; N-Phenyltriflimide
    Cas Registry Number 37595-74-7
    Molecular Formula C8H5F6NO4S2
    Molecular Weight 357.25 g/mol
    Appearance White to off-white crystalline powder
    Assay Purity ≥98.0% (HPLC)
    Grade Pharma Grade
    Dosage Forms Tablet, Capsule, Granule, Injection, Oral, Injectable
    Solubility Soluble in dichloromethane, acetonitrile, DMF, THF; practically insoluble in water
    Melting Point 95-99 °C
    Boiling Point 305.3 °C at 760 mmHg (predicted)
    Flash Point 138.4 °C
    Density 1.7 g/cm³ (predicted)
    Storage Conditions Store at room temperature in a dry, well-ventilated area; protect from moisture, light, and heat
    Hazard Classification May cause skin, eye, and respiratory irritation

    As an accredited N,N-Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing
    Shipping
    Storage
    Application of N,N-Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    When a vinyl triflate intermediate is required for a late-stage Suzuki-Miyaura coupling in a kinase inhibitor API, pharma-grade N,N-bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline is charged as the triflyl donor to a pre-formed lithium enolate stream. The reaction is run in a jacketed stainless-steel reactor with a PTFE-lined charge line, using anhydrous tetrahydrofuran containing less than 50 ppm water by Karl Fischer titration. The enolate is generated by addition of lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (1.00–1.10 mol eq) to the ketone at −70 °C to −60 °C; the reagent is then charged as a 0.8 M THF solution at 1.05–1.15 mol eq over 45–90 min. The temperature window is maintained below −55 °C; published process data for this exact substrate configuration is limited, and the thermal stability of the isolated vinyl triflate must be characterized before scale-up. After reaction completion is confirmed by HPLC area-percent at ≥ 98.0%, the batch is quenched into 10% aqueous ammonium chloride at 0–5 °C, and the aqueous layer is extracted twice with ethyl acetate. The isolated organic phase is concentrated at jacket temperature ≤ 35 °C to obtain the vinyl triflate intermediate, which is used without isolation in the subsequent palladium-catalyzed coupling step. Compliance for this intermediate stage is governed by ICH Q3A reporting thresholds for unknown impurities (0.05%), and residual aniline derived from reagent degradation is controlled under ICH Q3A as an unspecified impurity; if any reagent-derived impurity is classified as mutagenic, the control follows ICH M7 and a threshold of toxicological concern of 1.5 µg/day for the final API. The terminal finished dosage forms are oral tablet and capsule presentations of the kinase inhibitor after four to six downstream synthetic steps, with injectable lyophilized presentations manufactured when the final isolated salt is a hydrochloride or mesylate that meets USP <1> particulate matter limits for parenteral products.

    Why Is Stoichiometric Control the Central Parameter in N-Triflylating Secondary Amine Feedstocks?

    The central parameter in selective N-triflylation of secondary amine feedstocks is charge stoichiometry, not reaction temperature. The reagent is held at 0.95–1.00 mol eq relative to the amine; excess reagent above 1.05 mol eq produces over-triflylation products that are not removed by standard silica gel filtration and that co-elute with the desired N-triflyl secondary amine on a conventional C18 column. The addition is conducted in dichloromethane at 0–5 °C with diisopropylethylamine at 2.0 mol eq as acid scavenger, adding the reagent as a 0.5 M dichloromethane solution over 30–60 min. After aqueous sodium bicarbonate wash, the organic layer is dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated to 5 volumes, and the crude product is crystallized from n-heptane/ethyl acetate (3:1 v/v). The downstream manufacturing process proceeds to a telescoped amide coupling before final salt formation. Terminal product types include oral immediate-release tablets and film-coated tablets; a granule intermediate for pediatric dosing is prepared by wet granulation with povidone K30 in a high-shear granulator when the final API particle size D90 is controlled to ≤ 250 µm. Compliance includes Ph.Eur. 2.2.46 for chromatographic separation and ICH Q3C for residual dichloromethane, where the limit for the final API is ≤ 600 ppm as a Class 2 solvent. Batch records additionally document Karl Fischer water content below 500 ppm in the dichloromethane charge because water accelerates reagent hydrolysis and raises aniline-containing by-product levels in scale-down runs. If the relative humidity of the charging area exceeds 60%, pre-drying of the reagent at 40 °C under vacuum for 4 h is required before the batch is released for production.

    Where a thermolabile tertiary alcohol is present on the substrate, N,N-bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline is employed for aryl triflate formation because the exotherm associated with triflic anhydride addition can dehydrate the tertiary alcohol. The reaction is run in acetonitrile at 40–50 °C using cesium carbonate (1.5–2.0 mol eq) and the reagent at 1.2–1.5 mol eq relative to the phenolic site. The phenol is dissolved in 10 volumes of acetonitrile, cesium carbonate is charged as a solid in 3 portions to control off-gassing, and the reagent is added in a single portion under nitrogen. The suspension is agitated for 12–24 h until HPLC conversion exceeds 97%. The downstream process for the resulting aryl triflate includes a Buchwald-Hartwig amination with a primary amine, using Pd(OAc)2 at 0.5–1.0 mol% and BINAP at 0.75–1.5 mol% in toluene at 80–90 °C. The isolated aryl amine advanced intermediate is then coupled to a carboxylic acid and crystallized as a sodium salt. Terminal finished dosage forms are oral capsules and injectable lyophilized vials for an anti-infective API, with the injectable route requiring the final API to pass USP <1> particulate matter limits and an endotoxin limit of ≤ 0.50 EU/mg for parenteral use. The compliance standard for the triflate intermediate is ICH Q3A, and the phenolic starting material is controlled for residual aniline-derived impurity under ICH Q3A; if a compound-specific impurity is classified as mutagenic, the control follows ICH M7 at a limit derived from the 1.5 µg/day threshold. The operating boundary for moisture is ≤ 60% RH in the charging area; above this humidity, the reagent assay loss accelerates, and the batch conversion variability is controlled by pre-drying the reagent at 40 °C under vacuum for 4 h when Karl Fischer water exceeds 0.10%.

    If the Final API Is a Freeze-Dried Injectable Salt, the Downstream Route Must Control Reagent-Derived Aniline Below the Parenteral Threshold

    For a methanesulfonate or hydrochloride API intended for freeze-dried injection, residual aniline arising from the reagent must be tracked through the last three synthetic steps because the parenteral route delivers the entire administered dose without first-pass loss. In the upstream N-triflylation step, the reagent is charged at 1.0–1.1 mol eq relative to the amine substrate. In the final API, aniline is quantified by LC-MS/MS in selected reaction monitoring mode on a C18 column with a mobile phase of 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile, using a limit of quantitation of 0.05 ppm and a reporting threshold of 0.10 ppm. The method is validated according to ICH Q2(R2) for accuracy, precision, specificity, and linearity over the range 0.05–5.00 ppm. For the API intermediate, a control limit of ≤ 25 ppm aniline is set before salt formation, and a purge factor of 5–10 is demonstrated through the recrystallization and lyophilization steps. The downstream process includes salt formation in ethanol/water (4:1 v/v), polishing filtration through a 0.2 µm polyvinylidene fluoride membrane, and freeze-drying using a primary drying shelf temperature of −20 °C for 36 h followed by secondary drying at 25 °C for 12 h. Terminal product types are single-dose vials of sterile lyophilized powder for reconstitution and, in some registrations, a ready-to-use injectable solution after pH adjustment to 3.0–4.0 with dilute hydrochloric acid. Compliance standards include 21 CFR 210/211 for manufacturing, ICH Q3A for impurity thresholds, and ICH Q3D for elemental impurities where palladium is controlled to ≤ 10 µg/g in the API. Reagent-derived aniline is controlled as a process impurity; if it is later classified as mutagenic under ICH M7, the threshold of toxicological concern of 1.5 µg/day applies. Batch-to-batch variance in aniline content is observed when the aqueous workup of the triflate intermediate is delayed beyond 4 h after reaction completion, so production batch records specify a maximum hold time of 3 h at 0–5 °C.

    Residual control limits by terminal dosage form
    Finished dosage formAnalytical parameterLimitStandard / method
    Oral immediate-release tabletReagent-derived aniline≤ 0.05% reporting threshold in APIICH Q3A
    Oral granule-filled hard gelatin capsuleUnknown impuritiesindividual ≤ 0.10%, total ≤ 0.50%ICH Q3A
    Oral granule-filled hard gelatin capsuleResidual dichloromethane≤ 600 ppmICH Q3C
    Injectable lyophilized vialAniline≤ 0.10 ppm reporting thresholdICH Q2(R2) LC-MS/MS
    Injectable lyophilized vialBacterial endotoxins≤ 0.50 EU/mgPh.Eur. 2.6.14 / USP <85>

    A process-scale oral granule campaign for a cardiovascular API extends the reagent-derived aniline purge study to the finished granule, not only the API. The reagent is charged at 0.98–1.02 mol eq to a secondary amine in tetrahydrofuran at 0–5 °C, and the resulting N-triflyl amide is isolated by distillation of tetrahydrofuran and replacement with ethyl acetate. The downstream production process uses 5% palladium on carbon at 0.5% w/w under hydrogen at 1–3 bar for 6 h at 25–30 °C to remove a benzyl protecting group, followed by salt formation with fumaric acid. Terminal product type is an oral granule filled into hard gelatin capsules after blending with lactose monohydrate and croscarmellose sodium; the granule particle size is specified as D50 150–250 µm after dry granulation. Compliance standards include Ph.Eur. 2.9.40 for uniformity of dosage units for granules and ICH Q3A for impurity thresholds; the individual unknown impurity limit for the API is ≤ 0.10% and total impurities ≤ 0.50%. Palladium content in the API is controlled to ≤ 10 µg/g according to ICH Q3D. Because aniline is volatile, the granulation wet mass drying step is run at inlet air temperature ≤ 60 °C, and the final granule is tested for residual aniline at a reporting threshold of 0.10 ppm.

    Aryl Triflate Intermediate Control in Continuous Flow Processing

    Continuous flow processing of the triflylation step uses a perfluoroalkoxy tube reactor with an internal diameter of 0.8 mm and a total residence volume of 10 mL. The reagent and the substrate solution are delivered by syringe pumps at a combined flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, giving a residence time of 10 min at 25 °C; a back-pressure regulator maintains 6.9 bar to prevent outgassing. The addition ratio is set at 1.2 mol eq relative to the phenolic substrate, with triethylamine at 2.0 mol eq in dimethylformamide. The downstream process is an in-line quench with 5% aqueous acetic acid followed by membrane-based liquid-liquid separation, producing the aryl triflate intermediate in a continuous stream that feeds directly into a telescoped palladium-catalyzed coupling. Terminal product types are oral tablets and injectable solution forms of the final API, where the injectable route uses the same intermediate quality specification as the batch route. Compliance standards include ICH Q3C for residual dimethylformamide in the final API at ≤ 880 ppm as a Class 2 solvent, and ICH Q3A for unknown impurities. Published data for this specific configuration is limited to lab-scale feasibility studies with similar triflimide reagents; full production-scale validation requires demonstration of steady-state conversion and impurity purge across at least 3 residence volume turnovers.

    Free Quote

    Competitive N,N-Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    N,N-Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline is handled as a neutral, non-salt solid for pharmaceutical formulation screening under model designation BTA-PG-07. The molecule has the formula C8H5F6NO4S2, CAS 37595-74-7, and a relative molecular mass of 357.25 g/mol. The pharma grade is a white to off-white crystalline powder with an assay specification of ≥99.0% by HPLC area at 210 nm. Identity is confirmed by ¹H NMR, ¹⁹F NMR, and LC-MS molecular ion matching. Residual water by Karl Fischer titration is controlled to ≤0.10% for use in non-aqueous injectable processing. The material is supplied in double polyethylene bags inside a tamper-evident aluminium-laminated drum. Each lot is assigned a retest date supported by real-time stability data under 25 °C ± 2 °C / 60% RH ± 5% RH storage.

    Unlike the corresponding aniline hydrochloride or sulfate salts, the bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) substitution removes the basic secondary-amine centre and confers non-ionizable character in the pH range 1.2–6.8. This structural feature influences dissolution testing: the compound does not show a pH-dependent salt-solubility inflection, and dissolution media containing 0.1 N HCl, acetate buffer pH 4.5, or phosphate buffer pH 6.8 are screened with added surfactant when aqueous solubility is below the dose/sink threshold. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; formulation screens therefore use a pre-saturation solubility protocol under USP ⟨1039⟩ principles rather than fixed BCS assumptions.

    Why does a non-salt sulfonimide require tighter residual solvent control in injectable formulation screening?

    For an injectable-grade candidate, the absence of a salt counterion does not eliminate the need for strict residual solvent control because the final lyophilization or terminal sterilization cycle can concentrate higher-boiling solvents in the amorphous fraction. The release specification applies ICH Q3C(R8) Class 2 limits: dichloromethane ≤600 ppm, acetonitrile ≤410 ppm, and dimethylformamide ≤880 ppm, with any Class 1 solvent below 2 ppm. Residual solvent analysis is performed by headspace gas chromatography using a flame ionization detector per USP ⟨467⟩. In-process milling for injectable use is followed by a Type I borosilicate glass compatibility study under 25 °C and 40 °C for 72 h. Endotoxin content is controlled to ≤0.10 EU/mg using USP ⟨85⟩; particulate matter after reconstitution is assessed by light obscuration per USP ⟨788⟩ with acceptance limits of ≤6,000 particles ≥10 µm and ≤600 particles ≥25 µm per container for small-volume parenterals.

    Oral and injectable grades are differentiated by particle size, bioburden, and endotoxin specifications rather than by chemical identity. The oral grade permits a slightly broader particle size distribution with D90 ≤45 µm, while the injectable grade is wet-milled in a closed-loop bead mill with 0.3 mm yttrium-stabilized zirconia beads to D90 ≤10 µm. The injectable-grade milling medium is removed by depth filtration through a 0.45 µm membrane before final sterile filtration. Microbial enumeration limits are ≤100 CFU/g total aerobic microbial count for oral grade and ≤10 CFU/g for injectable grade per USP ⟨61⟩; specified organisms are absent in 1 g per USP ⟨62⟩. Endotoxin control is not required for oral grade but is mandatory for injectable grade. The two grades are not interchangeable because injectable-grade lots have lower residual solvent and moisture limits and undergo additional solid-state characterization by X-ray powder diffraction to confirm the same crystalline form after milling.

    Release criteria and stability-indicating methods

    Parameter Specification Method / Standard
    Appearance White to off-white crystalline powder Visual inspection
    Identification Positive for fluorine and sulfur; NMR match to reference ¹⁹F NMR, ¹H NMR
    Assay on dried basis 99.0–101.0% HPLC per USP ⟨621⟩
    Total related substances ≤0.50% HPLC area normalization
    Single unspecified impurity ≤0.10% HPLC area normalization
    Water content ≤0.10% Karl Fischer per USP ⟨921⟩
    Residual solvents Class 2 solvents within ICH Q3C(R8) limits; Class 1 ≤2 ppm Headspace GC per USP ⟨467⟩
    Sulfated ash ≤0.10% Ph.Eur. 2.4.14
    Elemental impurities Risk-based control per ICH Q3D(R2) ICP-MS
    Particle size distribution Oral: D90 ≤45 µm; Injectable: D90 ≤10 µm Laser diffraction
    Microbial enumeration TAMC ≤100 CFU/g oral; ≤10 CFU/g injectable USP ⟨61⟩, USP ⟨62⟩
    Bacterial endotoxins ≤0.10 EU/mg injectable grade USP ⟨85⟩

    For tablet and capsule grade, particle size is controlled by jet milling to a D90 of ≤45 µm and D50 of ≤15 µm. A bimodal distribution is avoided because the high aspect ratio of the crystalline powder increases interparticulate friction during die filling. On a compaction simulator operated at 10 kN compression force, the material exhibits brittle fracture without extensive plastic flow; this behaviour matches its non-salt crystalline lattice and supports direct compression only when at least 70% of the formulation consists of a plastic diluent such as microcrystalline cellulose or spray-dried lactose. For capsule filling, the powder is blended in a 50 L bin blender at 15 rpm for 20 min with 0.5 wt% colloidal silicon dioxide. The silicon dioxide addition is critical at relative humidity above 60%, because the unformulated powder can develop electrostatic adhesion to stainless steel contact surfaces. Granulation is reserved for formulations requiring content uniformity below 2 mg unit dose; wet granulation is avoided where possible due to the high energy input required to dry the dense particles below 0.5% loss on drying.

    For granule-filled sachets, the API is embedded in a ready-to-use granule via fluid-bed spray granulation using a 5% w/w povidone K30 binder solution and 60 °C inlet air temperature. The granulation endpoint is controlled by moisture balance: loss on drying must fall between 1.0% and 2.5% immediately after spraying, with subsequent drying to ≤0.5% before sachet filling. Granule flow through a 10 mm dosing nozzle is measured by a ring shear cell to provide a flow function coefficient above 4, which indicates easy flow for automated sachet machines. Because the API is hydrophobic, the binder solution includes 0.1% w/w sodium lauryl sulfate to improve wetting; this surfactant level is kept below the threshold at which foam formation in the spray nozzle becomes process-limiting. The final granule is sieved through 1.4 mm and 0.5 mm screens, and the fraction below 0.5 mm is limited to ≤20% to prevent dusting during sachet sealing.

    When roller compaction replaces wet granulation for moisture-sensitive capsule blends

    Roller compaction is selected over wet granulation when the capsule formulation contains a disintegrant that hydrolyses above 2% water activity. On a roll compactor with 120 mm roll diameter and 5 kN/cm specific roll force, the milled granules are screened through 1.0 mm and 0.5 mm screens. The resulting granule size distribution must contain less than 15% fines below 75 µm to avoid die-fill weight variation above 2.0% RSD on a 12-station rotary tablet press. Lubrication is performed with 0.75 wt% sodium stearyl fumarate instead of magnesium stearate when the blend is intended for long-term stability under accelerated conditions, because the fluorine-rich surface can interact with metallic stearates and delay disintegration. Process analytical technology checks use near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy calibrated against HPLC assay and moisture by Karl Fischer. Blend uniformity acceptance criteria follow USP ⟨905⟩: mean 90–110% label claim with acceptance value L1 ≤15.

    Injectable processing trials use the product as a non-buffered lyophilization intermediate. The compound is dissolved in a co-solvent system composed of tert-butanol and water in a 70:30 v/v ratio before sterile filtration through a 0.22 µm PVDF membrane. Because the molecule contains no ionizable group, terminal pH adjustment is not used; osmolality is instead adjusted with sodium chloride to 280–320 mOsm/kg. Lyophilization is performed with a primary drying shelf temperature of −25 °C and chamber pressure 150 µbar for 24 h. The absence of a salt counterion reduces the risk of vial glass delamination caused by high chloride content, but the high fluorine content requires evaluation of butyl rubber stopper extractables after 3 months at 40 °C / 75% RH. No published data for this specific configuration is available; the compatibility programme therefore follows USP ⟨1663⟩ extraction-study design rather than a fixed leachable acceptance profile.

    Comparative product difference profiles for the bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline form are established against corresponding aniline salts and common sulfonamide counterion forms. The non-salt structure eliminates the free amine proton that would otherwise participate in salt disproportionation or nitrosamine formation under acidic granulation. It also removes the chloride counterion associated with corrosion of lower-grade tablet press tooling; this is relevant when a manufacturing site runs 316L stainless steel contact surfaces without electro-polishing. Against mesylate or besylate salt forms, the molecule has higher octanol-water distribution, and the predicted logP exceeds the salt forms by an estimated 1.5–2.5 log units when measured by the shake-flask method at pH 7.4; this shifts dissolution from a rapid salt-mediated profile to a surface-wetting-controlled profile. Against the parent aniline, the two trifluoromethylsulfonyl groups decrease aqueous solubility and increase molecular weight from 93.13 g/mol to 357.25 g/mol, which requires reformulation of low-dose oral products to maintain content uniformity. The compound does not contain a carboxylic acid or sulfonic acid salt; therefore, the tablet hardness response to moisture is less than that of sodium carboxylate APIs but greater than that of hydrochloride salts under 60% RH open-pan exposure.

    Attribute N,N-Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aniline Aniline hydrochloride Mesylate salt analogue
    Counterion None Chloride Methanesulfonate
    Relative molecular mass 357.25 g/mol 129.59 g/mol Typical 190–260 g/mol
    Aqueous solubility at pH 6.8 Low; surfactant may be required High; pH-dependent Moderate; counterion effect
    Nitrosamine risk from free amine Reduced; no N–H centre Present as secondary amine Structure-dependent
    Chloride content Below 0.05% Stoichiometric Below 0.05%
    Tooling corrosion risk Low Elevated above 60% RH Low
    Lyophilization glass delamination risk Low Elevated with high chloride Low
    Dose/sink threshold surfactant screening Needed at low aqueous solubility Not usually needed Moderate

    The compound is stored in its original sealed drum at 15–25 °C with desiccant. Before weighing in an open processing suite above 60% RH, the material is pre-dried in a vacuum tray dryer at 40 °C for 4 h under ≤10 kPa to reduce adsorbed surface water. The powder is not micronized with high-pressure nitrogen alone when ambient humidity exceeds 55% RH, because electrostatic charging increases retention on the classifier wheel. Incompatible processing conditions include direct contact with strong reducing agents and prolonged heating above 120 °C, where thermal discolouration may occur. The material should not be co-milled with basic excipients such as magnesium oxide or amines because surface-mediated degradation products may appear as unknown peaks above the 0.10% single-impurity limit. If the API is intended for terminal sterilization, the preferred cycle is moist heat at 121 °C for 15 min only after confirming by differential scanning calorimetry that the crystalline form remains stable; published data for this specific configuration is limited.

    Top