Products

(4R-Cis)-6-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-aceticacid,1,1- dimethylethylester Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    • Product Name: (4R-Cis)-6-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-aceticacid,1,1- dimethylethylester Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 119175
    Product Name (4R-Cis)-6-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-acetic acid, 1,1-dimethylethylester Pharma Grade API
    Iupac Name tert-Butyl 2-[(4R,6S)-6-(acetyloxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-4-yl]acetate
    Synonym tert-Butyl (4R,6S)-6-(acetoxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-acetate
    Cas Number 125995-13-3
    Molecular Formula C15H26O6
    Molecular Weight 302.36 g/mol
    Stereochemistry (4R,6S)-cis
    Appearance White to off-white crystalline solid
    Assay ≥98.0% by HPLC
    Chiral Purity ≥99.0% enantiomeric excess
    Solubility Freely soluble in ethanol, methanol, acetone, ethyl acetate, dichloromethane and DMSO; practically insoluble in water
    Loss On Drying ≤0.5%
    Residue On Ignition ≤0.1%
    Heavy Metals ≤10 ppm
    Storage Conditions Store in a tightly closed container below 25 °C, protected from light and moisture
    Pharmaceutical Grade Pharma Grade suitable for oral and injectable dosage forms

    As an accredited (4R-Cis)-6-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-aceticacid,1,1- dimethylethylester Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 25 kg net in double polyethylene-lined drums, sealed, with certificate of analysis; pharma grade API for oral and injectable manufacturing.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) 20′ FCL container loading for pharma-grade API, packaged securely in drums, palletized, temperature-controlled, safe for oral/injectable use.
    Shipping Ship as a temperature-controlled, moisture-protected pharmaceutical API. Pack in sealed, inert containers (double polyethylene bags with desiccant inside fiber drums or aluminum foil pouches). Label for oral and injectable dosage forms: Tablet, Capsule, Granule, Injection. Store in a cool, dry area away from light, heat, and incompatible oxidizers.
    Storage Store in a tightly closed, light-resistant container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Protect from moisture and excessive heat; do not freeze. Recommended storage: 2–8°C or controlled room temperature per stability data. Keep away from incompatible materials and ensure container remains sealed when not in use for oral/injectable pharmaceutical processing.
    Shelf Life Shelf life is typically 24 months when stored at controlled room temperature, protected from moisture, light, and heat in original sealed containers.
    Application of (4R-Cis)-6-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-aceticacid,1,1- dimethylethylester Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    Rosuvastatin Calcium Tablets from the 6-Acetoxymethyl Dioxane Precursor

    In the synthesis of rosuvastatin calcium, tert-butyl (4R,6S)-6-(acetoxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-acetate (CAS 154026-95-6) functions as the protected C7 side-chain building block that is first converted to the hydroxymethyl derivative and then to the formyl intermediate before the pyrimidine ring is introduced. The downstream process at pilot scale typically begins by dissolving the acetyl-protected intermediate in methanol at a concentration of 0.8–1.2 mol/L, cooling the solution to 0–5 °C, and charging methanolic sodium methoxide at 0.02–0.05 molar equivalents relative to the dioxane acetate; this addition ratio is maintained below the threshold that causes detectable acetonide ring opening, and the reaction is quenched with acetic acid after 2–4 h. The resulting hydroxymethyl intermediate is solvent-swapped into dichloromethane and oxidized with 0.01–0.03 molar equivalents of TEMPO and 1.05–1.20 molar equivalents of aqueous sodium hypochlorite at 0–5 °C, producing tert-butyl (4R,6S)-6-formyl-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-acetate. The formyl intermediate is then coupled in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran with the rosuvastatin pyrimidine-derived phosphonium salt at −20 to −10 °C using potassium tert-butoxide at 1.00–1.10 molar equivalents; after coupling, the acetonide and tert-butyl ester protecting groups are removed under methanolic hydrogen chloride, and the calcium salt is precipitated from water/acetone. The terminal dosage forms produced from this route are rosuvastatin calcium film-coated tablets in strengths of 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg, with compliance against the USP Rosuvastatin Calcium Tablets monograph, dissolution testing under USP 711, and residual solvent control under ICH Q3C. The (4R,6S) configuration is controlled through the entire sequence by chiral HPLC, and the residual acetoxymethyl intermediate in the isolated rosuvastatin calcium API is typically specified at ≤0.10% HPLC area percentage before formulation.

    How Does Residual Acetyl Protection Influence Chiral Purity in Rosuvastatin Side-Chain Elaboration?

    A critical quality attribute in the deacetylation sequence is the retention of the (4R,6S) configuration while the acetoxymethyl protecting group is removed, because the dioxane ring masks the 3,5-diol functionality that becomes the pharmacophore after final deprotection. In-process chiral purity is monitored on a polysaccharide-based chiral column, typically Chiralpak AD-H 250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, using an n-hexane/ethanol 90:10 mobile phase at 1.0 mL/min; the undesired (4S,6R) antipode is quantified at an area-percentage limit of ≤0.10%. The release of the hydroxymethyl intermediate from the acetate is performed with methanolic sodium methoxide at 0.02–0.05 molar equivalents relative to the protected dioxane acetate; when the base charge exceeds 0.10 molar equivalents or the reaction temperature rises above 10 °C, LC-MS data show formation of the open-chain triol impurity resulting from acetonide hydrolysis, which can reduce downstream coupling efficiency and complicate crystallization of rosuvastatin calcium. The downstream process is executed in a glass-lined reactor with retreat-curve impeller agitation at 80–120 rpm, maintaining the temperature at 0–5 °C through jacket cooling with −10 °C brine; after aqueous quench, the dichloromethane layer is washed with 5 wt% sodium bicarbonate and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate before vacuum solvent exchange. The terminal finished product remains rosuvastatin calcium film-coated tablets, and the process controls align with ICH Q6A, ICH Q7, and Ph. Eur. chapter 2.2.46 for liquid chromatography. The chloride content of the methanolic HCl used in the final deprotection step is kept at 1.0–1.2 molar equivalents relative to the tert-butyl ester, and this addition ratio prevents residual tert-butyl ester from persisting into the calcium salt.

    Generic atorvastatin calcium API manufacturers have evaluated the same (4R,6S)-6-(acetoxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-acetic acid tert-butyl ester as a side-chain precursor because the acetyl-protected alcohol can be converted to the formyl intermediate and then coupled to a pyrrole-derived phosphonate in a Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons sequence, followed by hydrogenation of the resulting double bond to the ethyl-linked atorvastatin side chain. The molar addition ratio commonly used in this downstream sequence is 1.00 mol of the dioxane formyl intermediate per 1.05–1.10 mol of the atorvastatin pyrrole methyl phosphonate, with 1.10–1.20 molar equivalents of sodium hydride or potassium tert-butoxide as the base in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran at −10 to 0 °C. After coupling and hydrogenation over a palladium catalyst, the acetonide and tert-butyl ester groups are removed under acidic conditions, and atorvastatin calcium is crystallized from aqueous acetonitrile before drying under vacuum at 40–50 °C. The terminal dosage form produced from this route is atorvastatin calcium film-coated tablets in strengths of 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg, with compliance against the USP Atorvastatin Calcium Tablets monograph and residual solvent limits under ICH Q3C. Residual acetoxymethyl intermediate in the final atorvastatin calcium API is controlled at ≤0.10% HPLC area percentage, consistent with ICH Q3A identification thresholds for a maximum daily dose of 80 mg; this control is necessary because the protected intermediate is not present in the finished tablet but may be detected as a process-related impurity during regulatory review.

    When a European DMF/ASMF Submission Requires a Residual Solvent Compliance Matrix

    For manufacturers filing a European ASMF or US DMF for statin APIs derived from this intermediate, the residual solvent profile of the isolated tert-butyl (4R,6S)-6-(acetoxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-acetate must be reported against the limits of ICH Q3C, Ph. Eur. chapter 5.4, and USP 467. The downstream process for this intermediate typically includes dichloromethane as the reaction solvent, ethyl acetate as the extraction solvent, and acetone as the crystallization solvent; the corresponding residual solvent acceptance limits are 600 ppm for dichloromethane as a Class 2 solvent, 5000 ppm for acetone, and 5000 ppm for ethyl acetate as Class 3 solvents. The addition ratio of the recrystallization solvent system in which the isolated intermediate is purified is 3–5 volumes of n-heptane to 1 volume of ethyl acetate at −10 to 0 °C, and the isolated solid is dried in a vacuum tray dryer at 35–40 °C for 8–12 h. The downstream process includes headspace gas chromatography with flame ionization detection, using a split injection ratio of 1:20, a dimethylformamide diluent, and an equilibration temperature of 80 °C for 30 min, with calibration solutions prepared from 0.1× to 2.0× the ICH Q3C limit. The terminal finished product types covered by this compliance matrix are rosuvastatin calcium film-coated tablets, atorvastatin calcium film-coated tablets, and pitavastatin calcium tablets; injectable dosage forms are not part of the commercial downstream portfolio for this intermediate, because no approved parenteral statin product is established under current EMA or FDA monographs.

    Residual solventICH Q3C classPDE (mg/day)Limit (ppm)Analytical method
    DichloromethaneClass 26.0600HS-GC-FID, USP 467
    AcetoneClass 3505000HS-GC-FID, USP 467
    Ethyl acetateClass 3505000HS-GC-FID, USP 467
    Acetic acidClass 3505000HS-GC-FID, USP 467

    Pitavastatin calcium process development for the Japanese and European markets can draw on the same protected C7 dioxane acetate because the corresponding formyl intermediate is structurally suitable for Wittig coupling to a 2-cyclopropyl-4-(4-fluorophenyl)quinolin-3-yl phosphonium salt; however, published data for this specific configuration in quinoline-containing statin routes is limited, and the process is typically evaluated by generic API manufacturers under non-infringing route scouting rather than as a standard commercial source. The downstream process involves release of the hydroxymethyl intermediate, oxidation to the formyl derivative, and Wittig coupling in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran with 1.00 mol of the formyl intermediate per 1.05–1.10 mol of the quinolyl phosphonium salt at −20 to −10 °C, using potassium tert-butoxide at 1.00–1.10 molar equivalents relative to the phosphonium salt. After formation of the protected heptenoic acid side chain, the acetonide and tert-butyl ester protecting groups are cleaved under acidic conditions, and pitavastatin calcium is crystallized from aqueous acetonitrile before drying. The terminal finished product types are pitavastatin calcium film-coated tablets in strengths of 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg, with compliance against the Japanese Pharmacopoeia and Ph. Eur. monograph requirements for pitavastatin calcium. Residual acetoxymethyl intermediate in the isolated pitavastatin calcium API should be controlled at ≤0.10% HPLC area percentage, and the absence of mutagenic acrylate or sulfonate impurities in the side chain is supported by purge factors calculated under ICH M7. The final oral tablets are the only commercial terminal product type; injectable formulations of pitavastatin are not marketed.

    Evaluating Solvent and Containment Boundaries in Pilot-Plant Scale-Up

    At the pilot-plant scale, the acetylation of tert-butyl (4R,6S)-6-(hydroxymethyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-acetate with acetic anhydride is executed in a 500 L glass-lined reactor with a retreat-curve impeller at 80–120 rpm, and the addition ratio of acetic anhydride is set at 1.15–1.30 molar equivalents relative to the hydroxymethyl precursor to compensate for trace moisture in the dichloromethane feed. The reactor is maintained at 0–5 °C during the 45–60 min addition, and the jacket is charged with −10 °C brine because the reaction exotherm can raise the batch temperature by 15–25 °C if the addition is completed too rapidly; this thermal boundary is a critical processing window for maintaining the acetonide ring and avoiding acetyl migration. After quench with 5 wt% aqueous ammonium chloride, the organic layer is washed with 5 wt% sodium bicarbonate and 10 wt% sodium chloride, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and concentrated in a wiped-film evaporator at 40–50 °C under 150–250 mbar. The isolated intermediate is then recrystallized from n-heptane/ethyl acetate 3:1 to 5:1 at −10 to 0 °C and dried in a vacuum tray dryer at 35–40 °C for 8–12 h, with the residual dichloromethane and ethyl acetate contents verified by HS-GC before release. The commercial terminal product types arising from this intermediate are oral rosuvastatin calcium, atorvastatin calcium, and pitavastatin calcium film-coated tablets; no approved injectable statin dosage form exists, so the material is not released against parenteral-grade endotoxin or particulate limits unless a specific customer qualification protocol for an investigational parenteral formulation is established. The process is conducted under ICH Q7 Section 5.3 for equipment cleaning, 21 CFR 211.42 for facility design, and 21 CFR 211.67 for equipment maintenance.

    Free Quote

    Competitive (4R-Cis)-6-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-aceticacid,1,1- dimethylethylester Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    The product identified as (4R-Cis)-6-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4-acetic acid, 1,1-dimethylethyl ester has CAS registry number 154026-92-5 and molar mass 302.36 g/mol. The molecular formula is C15H26O6. The substance is supplied as a pharmaceutical-grade active pharmaceutical ingredient and protected intermediate for tablet, capsule, granule, and injection process applications; oral and injectable route assessments are included in the product specification scope. The (4R-cis) configuration describes the relative orientation of the substituents at the 4- and 6-positions of the 1,3-dioxane ring. The ring itself is a cyclic acetonide that protects a 1,3-diol relationship; the acetic acid side chain is masked as the tert-butyl ester; and the 6-substituent is an acetoxymethyl group. This arrangement makes the molecule useful in synthetic sequences requiring sequential deprotection under controlled acidic or enzymatic conditions. It is not normally administered as the intact acetylated acetonide ester; rather, downstream conversion to the free dihydroxy acid or the corresponding salt is required before final oral or injectable dosage form use.

    Because no USP or Ph. Eur. monograph is assigned to this exact protected acetate, release specifications are derived from ICH Q6A and analytical procedures are validated under ICH Q2(R1). A typical certificate of analysis includes liquid chromatography assay, related substances, chiral purity, water content, residual solvents, and elemental impurities. Identity by infrared absorption is cross-referenced to Ph. Eur. 2.2.24 and USP <197>. Residual solvent limits follow ICH Q3C(R8). Elemental impurity limits follow ICH Q3D(R2). For solid oral and injectable process development, the material should be controlled for particle size by laser diffraction under ISO 13320:2020 only if the supplier has demonstrated a solid particulate form; when the neat material is supplied as a low-melting solid or oil, particle-size specification is not meaningful until adsorption onto a solid carrier has been completed. This specification architecture is contract-defined because published public monograph acceptance criteria for this specific configuration are limited.

    Release testing and standard matrix for pharmaceutical-grade supply
    Quality attributeAnalytical techniqueStandard or guidance reference
    IdentityInfrared absorptionPh. Eur. 2.2.24 / USP <197>
    Assay and related substancesHPLC with UV detectionICH Q2(R1) validated procedure
    Chiral purityNormal-phase chiral HPLCICH Q6A decision tree for chiral impurities
    Water contentKarl Fischer titrationUSP <921> Method Ic
    Residual solventsHeadspace gas chromatographyICH Q3C(R8)
    Elemental impuritiesICP-MS or ICP-OESICH Q3D(R2)
    Particulate matterLight obscuration or membrane microscopyPh. Eur. 2.9.19 / USP <790>
    Uniformity of dosage unitsCompendial weight variation or content uniformityUSP <905>

    Manufacturing-scale handling patterns for this class of protected esters are dominated by residual solvent volatility and thermal lability. If the neat material is an oil, tumbling blenders and high-shear mixers produce poor weight uniformity until the compound is blended as a pre-adsorbed granulate. For tablet and capsule process development, the unit operation order is usually adsorption, milling, blending, lubrication, and compression or encapsulation. Milling is conducted at low speed or with chilled jacketed mills to prevent thermal softening. This operational boundary is not taken from a public ASTM method but from the general behavior of low-melting acetals and tert-butyl esters. Cleaning validation for this compound in tolling facilities follows ICH Q7 and regional GMP guidance, with residue limits based on toxicological review. Batch-to-batch variance is controlled primarily through residual solvent content, chromatographic purity, and water content; vendor stability data should be used to assign retest intervals under inert gas and desiccant-protected packaging.

    What Limits Direct Tablet and Capsule Use for This Acetonide-Protected Ester?

    The acetonide ring and tert-butyl ester are susceptible to acid-catalyzed hydrolysis; therefore, direct compression tablet development requires a dry environment and careful filler selection. If the supplied form is a low-melting solid or oil, direct compression may not be feasible without first adsorbing the material onto silicified microcrystalline cellulose, dibasic calcium phosphate anhydrous, or a copovidone-based granulate. Blend uniformity for compressed tablets is evaluated according to USP <905>; however, the choice of blending carrier is driven by the physical state of the release form rather than by chemical incompatibility with common tablet fillers. Capsule development is similarly constrained: powder-filled hard capsules require free-flowing, non-melting powder, while liquid-filled hard capsules require compatibility with gelatin or hypromellose shells and the selected lipophilic or nonaqueous fill matrix. Because the compound contains a tert-butyl ester and an acetate ester, extended storage in capsules containing residual moisture can generate acetic acid or isobutylene-related degradation products. Desiccated fillers and low-moisture capsule shells are used if the intact ester is processed. Published stability data under finished dosage form conditions are limited for this exact configuration.

    In-process hold times are constrained by acetonide hydrolysis and acetate loss.

    In-process hold-time studies for this class of protected acetals are bracketed at 2–8 °C and 25 °C with controlled relative humidity to simulate warehouse handling. The acetonide ring is the more labile site, releasing acetone and exposing the free diol; the acetate group may undergo slower hydrolysis to the 6-hydroxymethyl analogue. Because the tert-butyl ester is sensitive to strongly acidic deprotection, reaction workups that involve aqueous citric acid or hydrochloric acid must be extracted promptly or neutralized. A stability-indicating HPLC method should separate the intact diester, the mono-deprotected alcohols, the free diol, and the trans diastereomer; retention-time windows are established during ICH Q2(R1) validation. For tablet, capsule, and granule process development, these hold-time constraints mean that wet granulation with aqueous acid should be replaced by dry granulation or a nonaqueous process unless the deprotected form is the intended isolate.

    When Aqueous Granulation Fluids Contact the Dioxane Ring

    Wet granulation with aqueous binder introduces a pH-dependent degradation risk. The 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane ring is a cyclic ketal; under aqueous acidic conditions, ketal hydrolysis releases acetone and exposes the underlying 1,3-diol. In high-shear wet granulation, localized temperature increase can accelerate this hydrolysis, and acidic granulating fluids below pH 3 further shorten the time to impurity formation. Granulation process design therefore shifts toward dry granulation by roller compaction or nonaqueous solvent granulation with anhydrous ethanol or isopropanol if the downstream formulation permits a solvent-based process. If aqueous granulation cannot be avoided, the process should be controlled by granulation time, granulating fluid pH, and dryer inlet temperature, with the impurity profile tracked by a stability-indicating HPLC method. This processing limitation is a direct consequence of the acetonide protecting group and differentiates the protected ester from unprotected dihydroxy acid salts, which tolerate aqueous granulation but require tighter oxidation control.

    Injectable Route Requirements and Sterilization Constraints

    For injectable processing, the intact protected ester is generally not a terminal steam-sterilization candidate. Steam sterilization at 121 °C for 15 min can promote ester and ketal hydrolysis; aseptic filtration or nonaqueous filling under sterile conditions is required if the intact compound is formulated. The solvent system must be anhydrous and compatible with the tert-butyl ester and acetate groups; dimethyl sulfoxide, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, and benzyl alcohol are selected only after compatibility screening. Particulate requirements follow Ph. Eur. 2.9.19 and USP <790> for visible particles; subvisible particle methods are aligned to Ph. Eur. 2.9.19 and USP <787> where product specifics require dose-specific limits. Because the compound is not typically the final injectable active, process hold times in aqueous media should be minimized unless the deprotected free acid is the intended process intermediate. Endotoxin testing is conducted according to the relevant regional pharmacopoeia, with acceptance limits derived from the intended maximum dose rather than from a general monograph.

    How Does the Acetoxymethyl Protective Group Compare with the Alcohol and Methyl Ester Forms?

    The acetoxymethyl derivative differs from the 6-hydroxymethyl analogue by the addition of the acetate ester, which eliminates the free primary hydroxyl and increases lipophilicity. It differs from the methyl ester of the acetic acid side chain because the tert-butyl ester is more readily removed under anhydrous acidic conditions, releasing isobutylene, whereas methyl ester hydrolysis often requires saponification that can attack the acetate group. Compared with the free dihydroxy acid sodium salt, the protected compound has lower aqueous solubility and reduced ionization; this favors organic-phase processing but complicates direct aqueous injection. The table below summarizes the differentiation.

    Derivative comparison for processing routes
    DerivativeProtective groupsCleavage routeProcessing consequence
    (4R-Cis)-tert-butyl acetoxymethyl dioxane acetatetert-butyl ester, acetonide, acetateacid-labile tert-butyl and acetonide removal; mild alkaline acetate hydrolysissuitable for nonaqueous isolation and sequential deprotection; limited aqueous wet granulation
    6-Hydroxymethyl analoguetert-butyl ester, acetonideacid-labile tert-butyl and acetonide removalfree hydroxyl may increase hydrophilicity and side reaction potential
    Methyl ester analoguemethyl ester, acetonide, acetatemethyl ester requires stronger alkaline hydrolysisless selective deprotection; higher aqueous exposure risk
    Free dihydroxy acid sodium saltunprotecteddirect salt formationwater-soluble; suitable for aqueous injection but requires oxidation control
    Top