| HS Code | 109346 |
| Productname | 4-[[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methyl]-phenol Pharma Grade API |
| Grade | Pharma Grade |
| Dosageforms | Tablet, Capsule, Granule, Injection; suitable for oral and injectable administration |
| Molecularformula | C13H10FNO |
| Molecularweight | 215.23 g/mol |
| Iupacname | 4-[[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methyl]phenol |
| Appearance | White to off-white crystalline powder |
| Odour | Characteristic |
| Assay | 98.0% to 102.0% on dried basis |
| Meltingrange | 188-194 °C |
| Solubility | Soluble in methanol, ethanol, DMF and DMSO; practically insoluble in water |
| Residualsolvents | Complies with ICH Q3C limits |
| Storage | Store in tightly closed container, protected from light and moisture, at controlled room temperature |
| Shelflife | 24 months |
As an accredited 4-[[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methyl]- phenol Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 25 kg net in double polyethylene-lined fiber drums with sealed aluminium bags, tamper-evident closure, labeled for Pharma Grade oral/injectable use. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL: This pharma-grade API packed in sealed, labeled drums, palletized, secured, moisture-proof; ideal for tablets, capsules, granules, oral/injectable forms. |
| Shipping | Ship as a regulated pharmaceutical API in sealed, light-protected containers under inert gas, with desiccant. Keep at controlled room temperature, away from moisture and oxidizers. Label as “4-[[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methyl]phenol, Pharma Grade, for Oral and Injectable Dosage Forms,” with safety documentation for non-hazardous, non-narcotic pharmaceutical handling. |
| Storage | Store Pharma Grade 4-[[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methyl]-phenol API in tightly closed, original containers under controlled room temperature (20–25°C). Protect from light, moisture, oxygen, and excessive heat. Keep away from oxidizing agents and incompatible materials. For oral and injectable dosage forms, maintain sealed, tamper-evident packaging under dry conditions to preserve purity, stability, and sterility until use. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life is 24 months when stored below 30°C, protected from light and moisture, in tightly sealed containers. |
Application routes for 4-[[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methyl]-phenol Pharma Grade API are assessed against compendial and current GMP requirements. No commercial monograph for this specific molecular entity has been identified in public pharmacopoeial databases. Formulation parameters are therefore reported as development starting ranges, not as licensed product specifications.
Moisture-controlled direct compression is evaluated first because the azomethine linkage in 4-[[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methyl]-phenol is sensitive to aqueous acidic processing and because the free phenol can interact with non-passivated metal surfaces under elevated humidity. A starting blend comprising 10–20 wt% micronized API, 55–65 wt% microcrystalline cellulose NF, 15–20 wt% anhydrous lactose NF, 2–4 wt% crospovidone USP/NF, 0.5–1.0 wt% colloidal silicon dioxide NF, and 0.75–1.25 wt% magnesium stearate NF is screened in a 316L stainless steel contact system. Each excipient lot is pre-conditioned at 25 °C and ≤40% RH. The API is passed through a 600 µm sieve. Blending is performed in a bin blender at 15 rpm for 15–20 min, with lubricant added separately for the final 3 min to prevent shear-induced agglomeration. Compression is run on a 27-station rotary tablet press with D-tooling. Press force is held at 10–25 kN depending on tablet diameter and fill depth. Tablet hardness is monitored at 60–100 N; friability is controlled to ≤1.0% after 100 revolutions according to USP <1216>. Disintegration is tested in 900 mL water at 37±2 °C under USP <701>. Content uniformity is assessed by HPLC with acceptance value AV≤15.0 under USP <905>. Elemental impurity risk is controlled per ICH Q3D and 21 CFR 211.166. The terminal product is an immediate-release uncoated tablet with development batch sizes from 50 kg to 300 kg. Process boundary: if ambient RH exceeds 60%, equilibrium moisture uptake reduces powder flow and may increase punch sticking; direct compression is then suspended and dry granulation is considered. Published data for this specific compound at commercial scale is limited.
Roller compaction is introduced when direct compression blend flow is insufficient or when the API particle size distribution creates segregation risk. Dry granulation avoids water exposure and is therefore compatible with the hydrolytically labile imine function. A starting intragranular blend contains 20 wt% API, 45 wt% microcrystalline cellulose NF, 20 wt% anhydrous dibasic calcium phosphate USP/NF, 3 wt% crospovidone USP/NF, 1 wt% colloidal silicon dioxide NF, and 1 wt% magnesium stearate NF. Extragranular components are 2 wt% crospovidone and 0.5 wt% sodium stearyl fumarate NF. The mixture is compacted on a production-scale roller compactor with 0.8–1.5 mm roller gap and roll pressure 4–12 kN/cm. Ribbon envelope density is maintained between 1.10 g/cm³ and 1.45 g/cm³; above this range, granule tabletability decreases and in vitro dissolution slows, while below this range, excessive fines reduce capsule filling consistency. Milling is performed through a 1.0 mm screen to produce granule size of 150–710 µm. Capsule filling uses a production-scale dosator or tamping pin machine targeting fill weight 200–250 mg for size 3 hard gelatin or HPMC capsules. Fill weight variation is checked with USP <905>. Powder flow is characterized using USP <1174>; Carr index below 25 and Hausner ratio below 1.25 are preferred. In vitro dissolution is performed with USP <711> apparatus 1 at 100 rpm in 900 mL phosphate buffer at pH 6.8±0.05. The terminal product is a hard capsule containing 25 mg or 50 mg API. Process boundary: re-compaction of recycled ribbons can raise fines below 15% but increases apparent density; the maximum recycle fraction is limited to 15–20 wt% of the total granulate. Published data for this specific configuration is limited.
The aqueous suspension route is treated as a separate stability case because the wetting step provides intimate water contact and the imine hydrolysis rate depends strongly on pH and dissolved oxygen. The micronized API is wet-milled or jet-milled to a controlled particle size with D90 ≤10 µm to reduce sedimentation. A preservative-free or preserved vehicle is prepared with xanthan gum 0.25–0.5 wt%, microcrystalline cellulose/sodium carboxymethylcellulose NF 1.0–2.0 wt%, sorbitol solution 10–20 wt%, methylparaben 0.1–0.2 wt%, and propylparaben 0.01–0.02 wt%. The pH is adjusted with sodium hydroxide or tromethamine to 6.8–7.2. API is incorporated as a slurry containing polysorbate 80 0.02–0.05 wt%. Homogenization is conducted at 1500–3000 rpm for 10–15 min. The suspension is filled into amber polyethylene terephthalate bottles under a nitrogen overlay to reduce dissolved oxygen below 0.5 mg/L. Antimicrobial effectiveness is evaluated under USP <51>; deliverable volume is checked under USP <698>; pH stability is monitored with a calibrated pH meter. The terminal product is an oral suspension at 5 mg/mL in a 60 mL bottle with a beyond-use date of 30 days under 2–8 °C storage. Process boundary: pH excursion below 5.0 is considered prohibitive because acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of the imine bond would generate 4-fluorobenzenamine and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde. Trace copper and iron must be controlled by using passivated equipment and, if needed, disodium edetate at 0.005–0.01 wt% to suppress metal-catalyzed degradation. Published data for this specific configuration is limited.
For parenteral administration, the phenol function is ionized to a soluble phenolate in Water for Injection. The starting solution contains API at 5–20 mg/mL, mannitol at 30–50 mg/mL, and tromethamine for pH adjustment to 7.4–8.0. Trehalose dihydrate at 20–40 mg/mL may be evaluated as an alternative cryoprotectant when mannitol crystallization causes cake collapse. The solution is prepared in a 316L stainless steel vessel under nitrogen sparging. Pre-filtration is performed through a 0.45 µm PVDF filter, followed by sterilizing filtration through a 0.22 µm PES filter. Filling is performed aseptically into Type I borosilicate glass vials with bromobutyl rubber stoppers. Lyophilization is initiated with shelf freezing at -40 °C for 2 h, followed by primary drying at -20 °C and chamber pressure 50–100 µbar, and secondary drying at 25 °C for 8–12 h. Residual water is controlled below 1.0% w/w by Karl Fischer titration. The terminal product is a lyophilized powder in a 10R vial reconstituted to 10 mL before administration. Terminal steam sterilisation is not applicable because the azomethine linkage is expected to hydrolyze under autoclave conditions; aseptic processing is therefore mandatory for this dosage form.
| Test | Standard | Release criterion | Equipment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sterility | USP <71> | No growth after 14 days | Membrane filtration isolator |
| Bacterial endotoxins | USP <85> | ≤0.5 EU/mg or dose-appropriate | Kinetic turbidimetric LAL |
| Particulate matter | USP <788> | ≥10 µm ≤6000/container; ≥25 µm ≤600/container | Light obscuration |
| Residual moisture | USP <921> | ≤1.0% w/w | Coulometric Karl Fischer |
Wet granulation is limited to non-aqueous or low-water binder systems for this compound. Anhydrous ethanol or isopropanol is used as the granulation fluid to minimize water activity. A starting formulation contains API 10–15 wt%, lactose monohydrate NF 60–70 wt%, microcrystalline cellulose NF 10–15 wt%, croscarmellose sodium USP/NF 2–4 wt%, and povidone K30 dissolved in anhydrous ethanol at 3–5 wt% solids. Granulation is performed in a high-shear granulator with impeller speed 200–400 rpm, binder addition rate 0.5–1.0 kg/min, and wet massing time 2–4 min. Drying is conducted in a fluid-bed dryer with inlet air temperature 50–60 °C and product temperature held at ≤45 °C. Loss on drying after granulation is controlled at ≤2.0% w/w. The dried granulate is milled through a 1.0 mm screen and compressed into tablets for film coating. Residual solvent is controlled under USP <467> and ICH Q3C; ethanol is limited as a Class 3 solvent at ≤5000 ppm. Tablet friability is assessed under USP <1216> and disintegration under USP <701>. The terminal product is a film-coated tablet with a hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based moisture barrier coating applied at 2–3 wt% weight gain. Process boundary: if water activity during drying exceeds 0.5, localized imine hydrolysis can occur; therefore drying endpoints are confirmed by Karl Fischer titration and not solely by outlet temperature. Published data for this specific configuration is limited.
Competitive 4-[[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methyl]- phenol Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
4-[[(4-Fluorophenyl)imino]methyl]phenol is supplied as a pharma-grade active pharmaceutical ingredient under the manufacturer’s reference code FIM-4F-PH-API. The chemical is unambiguously identified by CAS 3382-63-6, molecular formula C₁₃H₁₀FNO, and molecular weight 215.22 g/mol. The IUPAC designation is (E)-4-[(4-fluorophenyl)iminomethyl]phenol. The molecule is a para-hydroxyaryl Schiff base formed by condensation of 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde with 4-fluoroaniline. The para-fluoro substituent on the aniline ring modifies electron density at the azomethine carbon and increases lipophilicity relative to the unsubstituted phenylimino analog. The product is supplied as a non-sterile API for tablet, capsule, and granule operations and as a low-endotoxin, controlled-particle-size API for injectable formulation development. No therapeutic indication is assigned at the API stage; route-specific grades are defined by physical and microbial quality rather than by pharmacological claim.
Because no USP or Ph.Eur. monograph currently exists for this Schiff base, the release specification is established under ICH Q6A, ICH Q3A, ICH Q3C, and ICH Q3D. Manufacturing is controlled under ICH Q7, and pharmaceutical development follows ICH Q8(R2). The crystalline solid-state form is controlled by X-ray powder diffraction (Ph.Eur. 2.9.33). For oral applications, laser diffraction (Ph.Eur. 2.9.31) maintains D90 at or below 150 µm; for injectable applications, jet-milled or micronized material is controlled at D90 ≤20 µm. Published data for exactly defined particle-size distributions of this specific Schiff base is limited; the stated limits are assigned from site-specific process-capability studies rather than a public compendial standard.
The azomethine linkage undergoes reversible hydrolysis in aqueous media, releasing 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde and 4-fluoroaniline. Hydrolysis is acid-catalyzed and becomes more rapid below pH 4; neutral to mildly alkaline conditions are generally less aggressive, although strongly alkaline media promote nucleophilic addition and phenolic oxidation. The para-fluoro substituent has a Hammett σp of 0.06, compared with 0.00 for hydrogen, 0.23 for chlorine, and −0.27 for methoxy. This places the 4-fluoro derivative between the chloro and methoxy analogs in terms of imine carbon electrophilicity. The compound therefore exhibits a moderate stability window for pH-controlled aqueous formulations, but prolonged aqueous exposure is not recommended.
In tablet and capsule development, aqueous granulation with an acidic or prolonged dwell time can generate hydrolytic degradation products. When wet granulation is necessary, an anhydrous alcoholic binder system based on ethanol or isopropanol with polyvinylpyrrolidone K30 is preferred over aqueous starch paste. The free phenolic hydroxyl can form salts; however, salt formation with strong bases may elevate pH and destabilize the azomethine, and the resulting salt should be evaluated by forced-degradation studies before formulation. Preformulation screening indicates that the fluorinated derivative has higher lipophilicity than the unsubstituted phenylimino analog, while the electron-withdrawing effect remains below that of the chloro analog. This influences solvent selection, particularly for injectable vehicles.
The release specification is divided by intended route. Injectable-grade material adds bacterial endotoxin and subvisible particulate controls to the oral specification. The analytical methods are qualified under ICH Q2(R1), and the degradation-product thresholds are assigned from ICH Q3A.
| Test | Reference method | Acceptance limit |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Visual | Off-white to pale yellow crystalline powder |
| Identification | Ph.Eur. 2.2.24 | IR spectrum matches qualified reference standard |
| Assay, dried basis | USP <621> | 98.0–102.0% |
| Total impurities | USP <621> | ≤1.0% |
| Single unspecified impurity | USP <621> | ≤0.10% |
| Water | USP <921> Method Ia | ≤0.5% |
| Residual solvents | USP <467> | ICH Q3C limits |
| Sulfated ash | Ph.Eur. 2.4.14 | ≤0.1% |
| Elemental impurities | USP <232>/<233> | ICH Q3D limits based on permitted daily exposure |
| Particle size, oral | Ph.Eur. 2.9.31 | D90 ≤150 µm |
| Particle size, injectable | Ph.Eur. 2.9.31 | D90 ≤20 µm |
| Microbial limits, oral | USP <61>/<62> | TAMC ≤10³ CFU/g, TYMC ≤10² CFU/g, Escherichia coli absent |
| Bacterial endotoxins, injectable | USP <85> | Calculated from maximum clinical dose; not a fixed limit |
The HPLC method for assay and related substances is validated for specificity against the starting materials 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde and 4-fluoroaniline. The reporting threshold for an unspecified impurity is 0.05% when the daily dose is 0.5 g. Residual solvents are analyzed by headspace gas chromatography; Class 1 solvents are absent, and Class 2 solvents are controlled to ICH Q3C Option 1 limits. Elemental impurities are tested by ICP-MS per USP <233>; because the synthesis may involve metal-mediated coupling, palladium, nickel, and copper are included in the ICH Q3D risk assessment.
For injectable use, the API is not sterilized at release. Downstream processing uses aseptic filtration through a 0.22 µm membrane or terminal sterilization after compatibility is demonstrated. Finished-product subvisible particulate matter is controlled by USP <788> for parenteral formulations or USP <787> where applicable. The bacterial endotoxin limit is calculated from the maximum intended dose under USP <85> and is not a fixed release value across all products.
Processing in facilities with relative humidity above 60% requires pre-drying of the API and excipients. Direct compression with microcrystalline cellulose, anhydrous dibasic calcium phosphate, and sodium starch glycolate is preferred; lactose monohydrate is not used because hydrolytically released 4-fluoroaniline can form Maillard reaction products with reducing sugars, and released 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde can cross-link gelatin capsule shells. If granulation is required to improve content uniformity, roller compaction is selected over aqueous high-shear granulation. Granule moisture is maintained below 0.5% by Karl Fischer titration. Tablets are compressed on a rotary press with precompression to minimize capping; hardness and friability are formulation-specific and are established by design-of-experiments rather than by monograph.
For capsule filling, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose capsule shells are preferred over gelatin when water activity exceeds 0.6. Moisture-barrier packaging consists of double polyethylene bags inside a triple-laminate aluminum pouch under nitrogen. The recommended storage temperature is 15–25°C, with shipping excursions controlled below 30°C. Re-test period is assigned from ICH Q1A(R2) long-term, intermediate, and accelerated stability data.
Forced-degradation evaluation uses acid (0.1 M HCl, 60°C, 24 h), base (0.1 M NaOH, 25°C, 24 h), oxidative (3% H₂O₂, 25°C, 24 h), photolytic ICH Q1B Option 2, and thermal conditions. Mass balance should be ≥95%, and degradation products above the ICH Q3A reporting threshold must be identified. Phenolic oxidation to quinoid species is possible under alkaline oxidative conditions; this is controlled by nitrogen purging and antioxidant selection where applicable.
Parenteral formulation commonly uses a non-aqueous vehicle because aqueous storage can hydrolyze the azomethine. The API is dissolved in polyethylene glycol 400, propylene glycol, or dimethylacetamide with a small aqueous cosolvent if required; the solution pH is maintained in the weakly acidic to neutral range. The solution is filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane and filled aseptically. If terminal sterilization at 121°C for 15 min is evaluated, related substances must remain within ICH Q3B thresholds; otherwise, aseptic filtration is selected. The API is incompatible with strong oxidizing agents and with primary amines, which can cause transimination.
| Para substituent | Hammett σp | Qualitative imine hydrolysis tendency in aqueous media | Processing implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| H | 0.00 | Reference | Lower lipophilicity than the 4-fluoro analog; may require different solubilizer |
| F | 0.06 | Slightly acid-catalyzed; more stable than the chloro analog | Non-aqueous or pH-controlled parenteral; avoid reducing sugars |
| Cl | 0.23 | Stronger acid-catalyzed hydrolysis | Lyophilization or non-aqueous vehicle; higher lipophilicity |
| OCH₃ | −0.27 | Reduced acid-catalyzed hydrolysis via resonance | Potential crystallinity and particle-size control challenges |
Compared with the unsubstituted phenylimino derivative, the 4-fluoro derivative provides increased lipophilicity without the high imine electrophilicity of the 4-chloro analog. Compared with the 4-methoxy analog, it avoids the strong resonance donation that can reduce imine carbon electrophilicity and potentially complicate crystallinity. These differences are evaluated during preformulation using forced degradation, powder X-ray diffraction, and aqueous solubility screening; published data for this specific configuration is limited, so formulation decisions are based on site-specific experimental matrices.