| HS Code | 813211 |
| Productname | 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene Pharma Grade API |
| Synonyms | 3,4-DGE; 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene |
| Casnumber | 67746-34-3 |
| Molecularformula | C6H8O4 |
| Molecularweight | 144.13 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow viscous liquid or solid |
| Purity | ≥95.0% (HPLC) |
| Grade | Pharma Grade |
| Dosageforms | Tablet, Capsule, Granule, Injection |
| Routesofadministration | Oral, Injectable |
| Solubility | Soluble in water, methanol, ethanol |
| Storageconditions | Store at -20°C, protected from light, moisture, and oxygen |
| Shelflife | 12 months under recommended storage conditions |
| Packaging | Amber glass vials sealed under inert gas |
| Chemicalclass | Reactive dicarbonyl compound; glucose degradation product |
| Reactiveproperties | Reactive with amines, thiols, and proteins |
| Handlingprecautions | Use PPE, avoid inhalation, skin contact, and eye contact |
| Regulatorystatus | For pharmaceutical manufacturing use only |
As an accredited 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | |
| Shipping | |
| Storage |
| Control layer | Reference | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Degradation product identification in oral and injectable finished products | ICH Q3B(R2) Section 3.2 | Decision threshold for unknown peaks exceeding reporting or identification limits |
| Validation of HPLC/LC-MS/MS marker methods | ICH Q2(R2) Sections 4.1–4.8 | Specificity, accuracy, range, precision, LOQ evidence |
| Accelerated storage conditions for solid dosage form stress studies | ICH Q1A(R2) Section 2.1.3 | 40 °C / 75% RH chamber validation output |
| Dissolution test for capsule shell cross-linking | USP ‹711› | Apparatus 2 paddle speed and medium volume control |
| Water activity limits for reducing sugar fills | USP ‹1112› | Fill water activity below 0.60 Aw |
| Laboratory competence for analytical data generation | ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Clause 7.2 | Method validation and QC sample acceptance |
Quantification of 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene in injectable glucose matrices is heavily dependent on derivatization pH because the compound exists as an equilibrium mixture of hydrated and enolized dicarbonyl forms that react with o-phenylenediamine at different rates. Methods intended for routine quality-control use typically buffer the spiked sample at pH 6.0–6.5 using 50 mM phosphate buffer, hold the mixture at 60 °C for 60 min, and extract the resulting quinoxaline derivatives with ethyl acetate before reversed-phase chromatography. Below pH 5.5, derivatization recovery decreases because the enolization step becomes rate-limiting; above pH 7.0, side reactions with other matrix aldehydes produce fused peaks that interfere with the marker. When LC-MS/MS is used, a C18 column with sub-2 µm packing operated at 40 °C and a mobile phase of 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile is selected; the precursor-to-product ion transition is validated against an isotopically labeled internal standard if available because glucose injection fluids generate substantial ion suppression in the electrospray source. The validation protocol referenced is ICH Q2(R2), with specificity proven by confirming that blank glucose matrix does not co-elute with the spiked marker at the retention time obtained from independent standard injection. Recovery across the working range of 0.05–2.00 µg/mL should remain within 85–115%; relative standard deviation from six replicate injections should not exceed 10% at the lower limit of quantitation. 3,4-DGE should not be co-dissolved with primary or secondary amine buffers before derivatization; such combination leads to uncontrolled Schiff-base formation and biases recovery.
In forced-degradation protocols for oral solid dosage forms that pair amine-bearing active pharmaceutical ingredients with reducing carbohydrate fillers, spiked 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene serves as a reaction product peak marker in HPLC impurity profiles. A pre-mix of lactose or dextrose monohydrate with the marker is prepared in a low-shear V-blender operated at 25 rpm for 20 min; the resulting blend is compacted into flat-faced tablets at 10–25 kN compression force on a rotary press running at 30–60 rpm turret speed. Simultaneously, unspiked placebo tablets are manufactured under identical parameters to isolate excipient-derived peaks from the marker retention window. The stressed tablets are stored at 40 °C / 75% RH for 6 months in high-density polyethylene bottles with induction-sealed closures. Sample preparation includes tablet sonication in 50 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer pH 6.8 for 15 min, followed by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 10 min and filtration through a 0.22 µm PVDF syringe filter. The marker peak is quantitated against an external standard at 320 nm; system suitability requires resolution not less than 2.0 from the nearest excipient peak. This spike-and-purge approach separates drug-related degradation from sugar-related Maillard products and avoids misclassification of unrelated peaks in stability data.
Direct-compression development work that includes dextrose monohydrate as a filler requires a deliberate spike-and-purge experiment with 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene because the low-moisture environment does not eliminate the possibility of solid-state Maillard chemistry at elevated storage temperatures. In a rotary press configured with D-tooling and a compression force of 12–18 kN, the marker is spiked at 0.1% w/w into pre-blended placebo granules, compacted, and then stored in sealed glass vials at 50 °C / 75% RH for 28 days. Subsequent extraction with 50 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate pH 6.8 and sonication for 15 min releases the marker from the compacted matrix; recovery after compaction is compared with the uncompacted spiked blend to correct for adsorptive losses on tablet tooling. A loss of more than 15% between blend and tablet is considered evidence of marker adsorption or conversion, and triggers examination of lubricant level and mixing order. The procedure is run in parallel with an unspiked batch to isolate excipient-derived peaks from the marker retention window; co-eluting peaks are resolved by adjusting the gradient slope or changing the detection wavelength to a secondary shoulder at 228 nm. If magnesium stearate levels exceed 0.75% w/w, the spiked marker recovery may decline because colloidal fatty acid salts increase surface adsorption of polar low-molecular-weight dicarbonyls during compression. Direct-compression batches that fail the recovery check are reworked only after analytical confirmation that the marker is absent in the final tablet matrix.
Hard gelatin capsule fills that contain reducing sugars and high levels of reactive dicarbonyls are evaluated using pharmacopoeial dissolution apparatus because cross-linked gelatin membranes delay rupture and suppress drug release in 0.1 N hydrochloric acid at early timepoints. 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene is used here as a model dicarbonyl stressor; it is spiked into a capsule fill at 50–200 ppm relative to fill weight, filled into size 1 hard gelatin capsules, and subjected to accelerated storage at 40 °C / 75% RH for 12 weeks. Dissolution testing per USP ‹711› with Apparatus 2 at 50 rpm in 900 mL of pH 6.8 phosphate buffer is then used to detect delayed release; a difference in the amount dissolved at 15 min of more than 10% between spiked and control batches is interpreted as a cross-linking risk threshold. If this threshold is exceeded, the formulation is reformulated by replacing the reducing sugar with mannitol or by reducing the water activity of the fill below 0.60 Aw. Analytical confirmation of cross-linking is obtained by FTIR spectroscopy of capsule shell fragments, where a decrease in the amide II band relative to the amide I band indicates modification of lysine residues. The water activity control is aligned with USP ‹1112›; capsule shells are preconditioned at 25 °C / 40% RH for 24 h before dissolution to avoid static-charge-related variability during shell opening.
Wet granulation processes that use sucrose or dextrose syrups as binders produce 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene during drying if the product bed temperature remains above 55 °C while residual moisture content is above 5% w/w. Fluid-bed dryers with inlet air temperature set to 70 °C and exhaust air temperature maintained at 45–50 °C are monitored by taking granule samples at 15 min intervals; each sample is immediately quenched in ice-cold methanol to arrest dicarbonyl formation, then analyzed after solid-phase extraction. The marker concentration is normalized to loss-on-drying measured at 105 °C for 5 min to avoid false-positive differences caused by moisture variation. In-process control limits are typically set at a normalized peak area ratio not exceeding 1.5 relative to a reference granule dried under vacuum at 35 °C; batches exceeding this ratio are reworked only after confirmation that the marker is absent in the final tablet matrix. Drying endpoint is considered acceptable when residual moisture is below 2.0% w/w and the 3,4-DGE peak area ratio falls below the predetermined limit. The analytical method used for this in-process control is qualified under ICH Q2(R2) and requires system suitability injection of a reference solution containing 2.0 µg/mL 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene to produce a signal-to-noise ratio not less than 10:1. Published data for this specific dryer configuration is limited; the limits described are process-specific and require re-qualification when the dryer type, load size, or inlet air dew point is changed.
Competitive 3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
3,4-Dideoxyglucosone-3-ene Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable is released as a pharmaceutical-grade active ingredient for oral solid-dose manufacture and injectable compounding. The molecule carries a C-3/C-4 unsaturated bond adjacent to a dicarbonyl array, which differentiates it from fully hydroxylated hexose APIs and from 3-deoxyglucosone derivatives: the loss of two stereocentres in the C-3/C-4 domain removes positions otherwise available for hydrogen bonding, and the α-dicarbonyl/alkene combination increases sensitivity to nucleophilic addition, hydration, oxidation, and pH-dependent rearrangement. Consequently, the release specification must control not only chromatographic purity but also colour, residual solvents, residual catalysts, elemental impurities, water content, and—when the campaign is intended for injectable use—bacterial endotoxins. Published data for this exact molecular configuration is limited; processing decisions therefore rely on the known behaviour of unsaturated α-dicarbonyl APIs and on product-specific forced degradation data generated under ICH Q1A(R2).
The commercial designation “Pharma Grade API” does not carry an additional model number; the route-oriented grade is differentiated by the residual solvent and endotoxin control strategy. For oral tablets, capsules, and granules, the API is controlled for particle size distribution, bulk density, flow, and compactability. For injections, the same molecule is controlled for bioburden, endotoxin, clarity, subvisible particulates, and pH. The product is differentiated from non-pharmaceutical carbohydrate reagents by the absence of unqualified high-molecular-weight coloured impurities and by a qualification report for specified related substances according to ICH Q3A(R2).
The API is released against a specification framework that combines pharmacopoeial general methods with ICH impurity guidelines. Identification is performed by infrared absorption spectrophotometry and reversed-phase HPLC, using Ph. Eur. 2.2.24 and Ph. Eur. 2.2.29. The assay is usually determined by mass balance or external-standard HPLC; the related-substances profile is determined by gradient RP-HPLC. Water content by Karl Fischer titration is executed under Ph. Eur. 2.5.12 or USP <921>. Residual solvents are measured by headspace GC according to Ph. Eur. 2.4.24 or USP <467> and are classified under ICH Q3C(R8). Elemental impurities are assessed by ICP-MS or ICP-OES following Ph. Eur. 2.4.20 or USP <232>/<233>, with limits based on the permitted daily exposure values in ICH Q3D(R2). For oral dosage forms, microbial limits follow Ph. Eur. 2.6.12/2.6.13 or USP <61>/<62>; for injectable campaigns, bacterial endotoxin testing is performed by Ph. Eur. 2.6.14 or USP <85>, and subvisible particulate matter is evaluated under Ph. Eur. 2.9.19 or USP <788>.
| Quality attribute | Measurement method | Control objective |
|---|---|---|
| Identification | Ph. Eur. 2.2.24; Ph. Eur. 2.2.29 | Confirm identity against qualified reference standard |
| Related substances | Ph. Eur. 2.2.29; ICH Q3A(R2) | Report, identify, and qualify degradation and process impurities at dose-dependent thresholds |
| Residual solvents | Ph. Eur. 2.4.24; USP <467>; ICH Q3C(R8) | Limit Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 solvent residues |
| Elemental impurities | Ph. Eur. 2.4.20; USP <232>/<233>; ICH Q3D(R2) | Control catalyst metals and environmental elements below PDE values |
| Water content | Ph. Eur. 2.5.12; USP <921> | Limit residual moisture to prevent hydrolysis and hydrate formation |
| Microbial limits | Ph. Eur. 2.6.12/2.6.13; USP <61>/<62> | Control total aerobic count, yeast/mould, and specified pathogens |
| Bacterial endotoxins | Ph. Eur. 2.6.14; USP <85> | Apply K/M route-specific endotoxin limits for injectable grade |
| Particulate matter | Ph. Eur. 2.9.19; USP <788> | Control subvisible particles in reconstituted or finished injectable solutions |
Impurity thresholds for related substances are dose-dependent. Under ICH Q3A(R2), for a maximum daily dose above 2 g/day, the reporting threshold is 0.05%, the identification threshold is 0.10%, and the qualification threshold is 0.15% or 1.0 mg/day intake, whichever is lower. At maximum daily doses below 10 mg/day, the percentage thresholds are higher but the absolute intake limits are lower. Residual solvents follow ICH Q3C(R8): Class 1 solvents such as benzene are limited to 2 ppm, carbon tetrachloride to 4 ppm, and 1,2-dichloroethane to 5 ppm in the tested substance. Published data specific to 3,4-dideoxyglucosone-3-ene do not override these standard thresholds; they determine which related substances appear and which solvents are actually used in synthesis.
The chromatographic method used for release must be stability-indicating; the mobile phase pH may need to be held below the pKa of the carbonyl enol to sharpen peak shape. When gradient elution is used, column loading studies should confirm that impurities eluting near the main peak do not coelute. For a reactive α-dicarbonyl, derivatisation with o-phenylenediamine may be used in analytical detection, but the derivatised method must be validated for accuracy and precision under ICH Q2(R2). Production-scale batch data for the exact molecule is limited; therefore, initial specification limits are justified by clinical trial batch results and tightened as manufacturing experience accumulates.
With the C-3/C-4 alkene adjacent to a dicarbonyl group, premature chemical change may occur during wet processing, high-shear mixing, or terminal steam sterilisation. The double bond is susceptible to acid-catalysed hydration and to alkaline isomerisation; the dicarbonyl pair can form Schiff bases with primary amine functions. For this reason, oral wet granulation should be avoided unless product-specific forced degradation data confirm that water, binder, and temperature do not reduce assay or increase specified impurities. High-shear granulator trials with an aqueous binder should include sampling before and after wet massing, with the wet mass held for 10 min, 30 min, and 60 min to detect time-dependent degradation. If degradation appears, dry granulation by roller compaction or direct compression is preferred. Injectable formulation should avoid primary-amine buffers such as tromethamine and amino acid-based tonicity modifiers unless compatibility studies show no adduct formation. Because published data for this exact molecule is limited, these restrictions reflect the known behaviour of α-dicarbonyl compounds and do not replace product-specific stress testing under ICH Q1A(R2).
Forced degradation studies are used to define the pH and thermal boundaries. Standard screening includes exposure to 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH, 3% hydrogen peroxide, aqueous heat at 80 °C, solid-state heat at 80 °C, and light under ICH Q1B conditions. The resulting mass balance and peak purity data determine whether an impurity is process-related or hydrolytic, oxidative, thermal, or photolytic. Where mass balance falls below 95%, the degradation pathway may involve coloured polymeric products that require orthogonal detection. The equipment used for such studies is typically a forced-air stability chamber with humidity control and a photostability cabinet meeting ICH Q1B Option 2 requirements.
Oral tablets and capsules are manufactured from a blend that must be characterised by blend uniformity, flow, compactability, and ejection force. The API is usually pre-delumped through a 500 μm sieve, then blended with filler, binder, disintegrant, and lubricant. Direct compression is feasible when the API has acceptable flow; the flow properties are measured under Ph. Eur. 2.9.36 or USP <1174>, with the Carr index and Hausner ratio derived from bulk and tapped density measured by Ph. Eur. 2.9.34. A Carr index below 25% and a Hausner ratio below 1.25 are generally associated with free-flowing powders, but these values are not product-specific acceptance criteria. For dry granulation, roller compaction is performed with controlled roll pressure, roll speed, and gap; the granulate is then milled through 0.8 to 1.5 mm screens. The re-compaction potential of the granules is assessed on an instrumented tablet press by measuring tablet hardness and disintegration time.
The unsaturated dicarbonyl API presents a lower compatibility margin with high-moisture excipients. Gelatin capsule shells contain 13–16% water by weight and may transfer moisture at 40 °C/75% RH; HPMC capsules, typically 3–7% water, are less likely to hydrate the API but still require confirmation. If capsules are filled, use of desiccant canisters and cold-form aluminium blister packaging may be specified when stability data show moisture sensitivity. Tablets produced by direct compression may require low-moisture fillers such as anhydrous dibasic calcium phosphate, mannitol, or pregelatinised starch with controlled loss-on-drying. Croscarmellose sodium and sodium starch glycolate can retain water and should be included only after compatibility studies.
In tablet manufacture, batch-to-batch variability in the API particle size distribution can shift blend flow and content uniformity. API milling through a pin mill or jet mill may be necessary to reduce D90, but jet milling can increase surface energy and aerosolisation, creating containment challenges for operators. If the API is milled, amorphous content may increase, as measured by differential scanning calorimetry or dynamic vapour sorption, and can lower the glass transition or increase moisture uptake. The milled API should be recrystallised or annealed only if justified, because thermal treatment may catalyse the same degradation pathways observed during forced degradation. Production-scale powder handling in a contained high-shear mixer is preferred; the mixer should be validated for cleanability according to the cleaning validation plan described in EU GMP Annex 15.
Granule specifications include loss on drying, particle size distribution, tapped density, and angle of repose. For moisture-sensitive APIs, loss on drying limits are often set below 3% but must be product-specific. Granules produced by roller compaction tend to have lower moisture than wet-granulated granules, eliminating the need for a post-granulation drying step. If a fluid-bed dryer is used for any wet granulation, the inlet air dew point should be maintained at -20 °C or lower for reactive α-dicarbonyl APIs; actual stability data must confirm no hydration at the C-3/C-4 double bond.
| Dosage form | Preferred processing route | Critical physical/chemical input | Route-specific risk and control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tablet | Direct compression or roller compaction | PSD D50/D90, flow, compactability, low-moisture excipients | Avoid aqueous wet granulation; monitor ejection force and tablet hardness |
| Capsule | Lubricated blend filled into HPMC or gelatin shells | Bulk density, angle of repose, moisture transfer from shell | Confirm shell compatibility; use desiccant if moisture-sensitive |
| Granule | Dry granulation or low-solvent granulation | Ribbon density, milled granulate PSD, re-compactability | Control roll pressure and screen size to limit fines/hard granules |
| Injection | Aseptic filtration or terminal sterilisation if stability permits | Endotoxin, bioburden, pH, clarity, subvisible particulates | Avoid primary-amine buffers; derive endotoxin limit from route and dose |
Injectable grade API is not the same as oral grade. The product should be manufactured in dedicated equipment with validated cleaning to prevent cross-contamination, and the final API is crystallised or dried in an environment meeting EU GMP Annex 1 requirements for sterile medicinal products when the final product is aseptically processed. If terminal sterilisation is desired, the thermal stability of the α-dicarbonyl/alkene system must be established. The standard steam sterilisation cycle at 121 °C for 15 min may generate degradation products if the API is thermolabile; alternative cycles or aseptic filtration through a 0.22 μm filter may be required. For aseptic filtration, filter compatibility studies are required because nucleophilic filter membrane components may bind to reactive carbonyl centres. The filtered solution should be tested for pH, osmolality, visible particles, and subvisible particulates under Ph. Eur. 2.9.19 or USP <788>.
Endotoxin limits for the injectable API are derived from the maximum human dose according to the K/M formula. For intravenous administration, K is assigned as 5 EU/kg/h; other parenteral routes require route-specific K values. The resulting API limit must be low enough to permit formulation without exceeding the finished-product limit. If the formulated injection is intended for large-volume parenteral infusion, the finished product must meet the USP <788> light obscuration counts of not more than 6000 particles per container at ≥10 μm and not more than 600 particles per container at ≥25 μm. Osmolality is typically adjusted to 270–320 mOsm/kg with sodium chloride or mannitol; pH is selected from forced degradation pH-rate profiles to balance solubility and chemical stability.
For injectable manufacturing, the API may be dissolved in water for injection at a controlled temperature, usually 20–25 °C for thermolabile substances, and the solution is held for the shortest possible time before filtration. Light protection may be necessary during fill-finish if photostability data show absorbance. If the API is light-sensitive, amber glass vials or opaque overwrap are used. The vial headspace may be flushed with nitrogen if oxidative degradation is observed in hydrogen peroxide stress tests. Residual oxygen in the final container should be controlled and measured by electrochemical or paramagnetic oxygen analysers; for an α-dicarbonyl API, nitrogen overlay is a standard risk-reduction step.
Production-scale observations from general α-dicarbonyl APIs indicate that filter fouling during aseptic filtration can occur if the API contains low levels of oligomerised material. Pre-filtration through a 0.45 μm filter before sterile filtration can prevent premature pressure rise across the 0.22 μm sterilising membrane. The maximum allowable differential pressure is specified by the filter manufacturer and must not be exceeded. If the product stream contains visible particles after dissolution, the dissolution temperature and pH should be re-examined; particle formation may indicate enolisable degradation products or local pH excursions. For oral granulation, high-shear mixer temperature should be monitored, and the final blend should be discharged at below 30 °C to avoid heat-induced colour change.
The differences between this API and 3-deoxyglucosone or glucosone APIs are primarily due to the C-3/C-4 double bond. Fully hydroxylated hexoses have higher aqueous solubility and more hydrogen-bonding capacity, which can improve compactability but increase hygroscopicity and microbial growth potential. 3-Deoxyglucosone lacks the C-3/C-4 alkene and may display a different degradation profile in alkaline conditions. The unsaturated dicarbonyl API is expected to require lower processing temperatures and stricter moisture control; it is not interchangeable with non-pharmaceutical 3,4-dideoxyglucosone-3-ene preparations that are sold as research reagents or chromatographic reference standards. Pharma-grade material is released under GMP with traceability of raw materials, validated analytical methods, and batch records maintained according to ICH Q7 for active pharmaceutical ingredients.
Storage and packaging specifications are set after the same stress studies. The oral API is typically packed in double low-density polyethylene liners inside an aluminium-laminated drum, with storage at 2–8 °C and relative humidity below 40% if the molecule is hygroscopic or moisture-sensitive. The injectable-grade API should be held under controlled temperature until dissolution, with a defined hold-time after container opening. Incompatibilities are not limited to formulation excipients: product-contact surfaces during milling, granulation, and filling should be 316L stainless steel or equivalent, and prolonged contact with copper or iron equipment should be avoided unless elemental-impurity risk assessment demonstrates otherwise.