Products

(2R,3S/2S,3R)-3-(4-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-2-butanol hydrochloride Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    • Product Name: (2R,3S/2S,3R)-3-(4-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-2-butanol hydrochloride Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: sales10@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications
    HS Code 336992
    Product Name (2R,3S/2S,3R)-3-(4-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-2-butanol hydrochloride Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable
    Chemical Name (2R,3S/2S,3R)-3-(4-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-2-butanol hydrochloride
    Molecular Formula C16H14Cl2F3N5O
    Molecular Weight 420.22 g/mol
    Appearance White to off-white crystalline powder
    Assay Purity ≥99.0% (HPLC)
    Grade Pharma Grade
    Dosage Forms Tablet, Capsule, Granule, Injection
    Routes Of Administration Oral, Injectable
    Solubility Soluble in water, methanol, ethanol, and DMSO
    Storage Conditions Store in a cool, dry place, protected from light and moisture, below 25°C
    Packaging Double polyethylene bags inside a fiber drum or as per customer requirement
    Shelf Life 24 months when stored properly
    Therapeutic Category Antifungal agent (triazole class)
    Mechanism Of Action Inhibits fungal cytochrome P450 14α-demethylase, disrupting ergosterol synthesis in cell membranes

    As an accredited (2R,3S/2S,3R)-3-(4-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-2-butanol hydrochloride Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Supplied as 25 kg pharma-grade API in double LDPE bags, heat-sealed inside an HDPE drum for oral and injectable use.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) 20′ FCL loading: palletized, sealed drums of this pharma-grade API, moisture-controlled, securely strapped, labeled, and inspected for oral/injectable use.
    Shipping Shipped as Pharma Grade API for tablet, capsule, granule, oral, and injectable formulations in sealed, light-resistant, moisture-barrier containers under GMP. Use ambient or temperature-controlled validated transport with monitoring. Include COA, MSDS, and regulatory documents. Label clearly; protect from heat, moisture, contamination, and comply with IATA/ADR/IMDG requirements.
    Storage Store in a tightly closed, light-resistant container under dry, cool conditions at controlled room temperature (20–25°C; excursions 15–30°C). Protect from moisture, heat, and light. Keep away from incompatible oxidizing agents. For injectable-grade handling, maintain aseptic conditions. Retain in original packaging until use. Do not freeze unless specified. Follow manufacturer’s label and pharmacopeial requirements. Store away from children. Ensure secure, labelled storage.
    Shelf Life Shelf life: typically 24–36 months in sealed, light-resistant containers at 20–25°C; protect from moisture. Verify with supplier stability data.
    Application of (2R,3S/2S,3R)-3-(4-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-2-butanol hydrochloride Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable

    In low-dose oral solid dosage manufacture, (2R,3S/2S,3R)-3-(4-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-2-butanol hydrochloride is characterized by laser diffraction according to USP <429>, with acceptance controlled to D90 ≤ 10 µm for direct compression blends containing 0.5–5.0% w/w active ingredient; blends below this loading exhibit content uniformity failure on high-speed rotary presses if agglomerates exceed 250 µm after screening through a 30-mesh sieve. The formulation addition ratio for a 50 mg strength tablet is typically 20–35% w/w of the hydrochloride salt in a 200 mg core, with microcrystalline cellulose and pregelatinized starch as filler-binders at 55–75% w/w, crospovidone at 2–5% w/w, colloidal silicon dioxide at 0.5–1.5% w/w, and magnesium stearate at 0.5–1.0% w/w. Direct compression is performed on a 16-station rotary tablet press with compression force between 8 kN and 18 kN, target tablet hardness 70–110 N, and friability not more than 1.0% per USP <1216>. The terminal dosage form is an immediate-release film-coated tablet; coating is applied in a 48-inch perforated pan to a weight gain of 2.0–4.0% w/w using an aqueous film-coating system, with inlet air temperature 60–75°C and pan speed 4–8 rpm. Industry compliance includes USP <905> uniformity of dosage units, USP <711> dissolution apparatus 2 at 50 rpm in 900 mL of 0.1 N HCl, ICH Q3B(R2) for unspecified degradation products at not more than 0.2%, and 21 CFR 211.165 for release testing. Because published data for this specific chlorinated pyrimidine hydrochloride configuration is limited, the moisture sorption profile should be determined by dynamic vapor sorption before committing to direct compression; if a stepwise mass gain above 60% RH is observed, the process boundary should preclude high-humidity granulation and require compression suites controlled at 40–50% RH.

    What Capsule Fill Parameters Prevent Segregation Risk in Low-Fill-Weight Blends?

    Hard-shell capsule manufacture with the hydrochloride salt is sensitive to the wide particle size distribution that remains after low-shear blending, because the active fraction can migrate to the bottom of the powder bed when the fill weight is less than 300 mg and the bulk density differential between the API and lactose exceeds 0.3 g/mL; therefore, blending is conducted in a 600 L bin blender at 12 rpm for 15 min, followed by density-conditioned transfer through a 1.0 mm conical mill at 500 rpm to reduce agglomerates without generating fines. The formulation addition ratio for a 200 mg capsule is 10–25% w/w API hydrochloride, with lactose monohydrate at 60–75% w/w, pregelatinized starch at 5–15% w/w, croscarmellose sodium at 2–4% w/w, and magnesium stearate at 0.25–1.0% w/w. Capsule filling on a dosator-type machine is run at 20,000–40,000 capsules/h with pin settings selected to maintain a fill weight relative standard deviation below 2.0%; the powder bed depth in the hopper is maintained at 30–50% of total capacity to avoid head pressure variation, and the encapsulation suite is controlled at 40–45% RH to prevent gelatin shell brittleness below 35% RH or shell softening above 55% RH. Compliance is governed by USP <905> for content uniformity, USP <711> with apparatus 2 at 75 rpm for dissolution, 21 CFR 211.84 for incoming gelatin or HPMC shell identity and microbiological limits, and ICH Q3B(R2) for degradation product thresholds. The terminal finished product is hard gelatin or HPMC capsule in 50 mg and 200 mg strengths, packaged in PVC/PVDC blisters with desiccant where stability data indicate moisture uptake above 0.5% w/w after 6 months at 40°C/75% RH.

    Wet granulation endpoint control in suspension granule manufacture

    During reconstitutable oral suspension manufacture, granules intended for final oral suspension must wet rapidly without forming a non-dispersible surface gel; therefore the hydrochloride salt is blended with sucrose and xanthan gum before high-shear granulation in a 300 L vertical granulator, using an impeller speed of 150–200 rpm and a chopper speed of 1,500–3,000 rpm. The formulation addition ratio in the dry powder is 3.0–5.0% w/w API hydrochloride to yield a reconstituted concentration of 40 mg/mL after 45 g of powder is diluted to 75 mL with water; sucrose or sorbitol constitutes 70–85% w/w, xanthan gum 0.2–0.5% w/w, sodium benzoate 0.1–0.3% w/w, colloidal silicon dioxide 0.5–1.0% w/w, and a buffer system maintains reconstituted pH at 4.0–5.0. The granulation endpoint is determined by impeller power draw rather than fixed time: the batch is terminated when power consumption rises by 25–35% from the dry-mix baseline and wet mass density reaches 0.55–0.75 g/mL; wet granules are passed through a 1.27 mm screen and dried in a fluid-bed dryer with inlet air at 55–65°C until loss on drying is below 2.0% w/w. Industry compliance includes USP <698> for deliverable volume, USP <905> for content uniformity of the dry powder, USP <711> with apparatus 2 and sinker at 50 rpm for dissolution, ICH Q3C residual solvent limits if an ethanol-water granulation solvent is used, and 21 CFR 211.111 for in-process sampling and time limits. The terminal product is a powder for oral suspension in 100 mL HDPE bottles with a child-resistant cap and an oral dosing syringe, intended for 14-day use after reconstitution when stored at 2–8°C.

    For lyophilized injectable presentation, pre-formulation pH solubility from pH 1.2 to pH 6.8 is required because the ionized triazole and protonated pyrimidine can produce a solubility cliff between pH 3.0 and pH 4.5; therefore the bulk solution is compounded at pH 3.0–4.0 using dilute hydrochloric acid and a tonicity adjuster. The formulation addition ratio in the pre-lyophilization solution is 2.0–10.0 mg/mL API hydrochloride, with mannitol at 20–40 mg/mL as bulking agent, disodium edetate at 0.01–0.05 mg/mL if metal-catalyzed degradation is observed, and water for injection to target osmolality 270–320 mOsm/kg after reconstitution. The solution is sterile-filtered through a 0.22 µm PVDF membrane at 20–25°C under a differential pressure not exceeding 1.0 bar, filled into 10 mL type I glass vials at 5.0 mL nominal fill volume, and lyophilized using a cycle that freezes to -45°C at 0.5°C/min, holds for 180 min, primary-dries at shelf temperature -20°C and chamber pressure 100 mTorr, and secondary-dries at 40°C for 6 h to residual moisture below 1.0% w/w. Compliance is governed by USP <788> for subvisible particulate matter, USP <790> for visible particulates, USP <85> for bacterial endotoxins at not more than 0.5 EU/mg, ICH Q3D(R2) for elemental impurities, 21 CFR 211.94 for container-closure suitability, and ICH Q3B(R2) for degradation products after reconstitution. The hydrochloride salt should not be compounded with strong oxidizing agents because the triazole ring can undergo oxidative degradation; if a closed transfer system is used, filter membrane adsorption should be tested. The terminal finished product is a lyophilized powder for intravenous infusion, reconstituted with 10 mL of sterile water for injection to 10 mg/mL and then diluted into 0.9% w/v sodium chloride or 5% w/v dextrose infusion bags to a final concentration not exceeding 2 mg/mL.

    When roller compaction replaces aqueous granulation for high-dose tablet cores

    Above a critical core mass of 200 mg active, tablet manufacture often exceeds the flow and compressibility limit of direct compression, but aqueous wet granulation of the hydrochloride salt may create a processing boundary if the dried granules undergo moisture-induced glass transition or salt disproportionation; roller compaction is therefore evaluated as a dry granulation route when the target core mass is 400–800 mg and the API fraction is 40–60% w/w. The formulation addition ratio for a 400 mg strength tablet is 45–55% w/w API hydrochloride, microcrystalline cellulose 30–45% w/w, crospovidone 3–5% w/w, colloidal silicon dioxide 0.5–1.5% w/w, and magnesium stearate 0.5–1.0% w/w; the pre-mix is forced through a roller compactor with roll pressure 5–12 kN/cm, roll speed 5–15 rpm, and gap 1.5–3.0 mm, then milled through a 1.0 mm screen to produce granules with target particle size D50 150–300 µm. Tableting is performed on a high-speed 45-station rotary press at 40–80 rpm, with compression force 12–25 kN to achieve tablet hardness 90–150 N and disintegration time below 15 min per USP <701>. Compliance includes USP <905> for content uniformity across the extended compression run, USP <711> dissolution apparatus 2 at 50 rpm, ICH Q3B(R2) for specified and unspecified degradation products, ICH Q3D(R2) for elemental impurities, and 21 CFR 211.110 for in-process blend and granule sampling. The terminal finished product is an immediate-release, high-dose film-coated tablet for oral administration, with a film-coating weight gain of 2.5–3.5% w/w; the roller-compacted granules may also be filled into stick-pack sachets if a granule dosage form is required for patients unable to swallow tablets.

    Free Quote

    Competitive (2R,3S/2S,3R)-3-(4-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-2-butanol hydrochloride Pharma Grade API for Tablet / Capsule / Granule / Injection, Oral & Injectable prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618963613625 or mail to sales10@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8618963613625

    Email: sales10@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    The hydrochloride addition salt of (2R,3S/2S,3R)-3-(4-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-2-butanol is a racemic pharmaceutical active ingredient for tablet, capsule, granule, oral liquid, and injectable formulations. The neutral free base has the empirical formula C16H13ClF3N5O; the monohydrochloride salt corresponds to C16H14Cl2F3N5O and has a calculated molecular weight of 420.24 g/mol. The stereochemical notation lists two enantiomers, (2R,3S) and (2S,3R); therefore, the product is a racemic mixture rather than a single enantiomer. This chiral identity must be confirmed by a validated enantiomeric method and cannot be inferred from optical rotation alone. The API is manufactured as a crystalline powder and should be assigned separate grades for non-sterile oral processing and sterile injectable use because the injectable grade requires additional controls for bacterial endotoxin, bioburden, particulate matter, and aseptic handling.

    Release testing should align with ICH Q6A and compendial methods

    Specifications should be designed using the ICH Q6A decision tree for new drug substances and the pharmacopoeial chapters relevant to salt identity, water content, residue on ignition, chromatographic purity, and particulate control. Table 1 lists the minimum release attributes to be included in a certificate of analysis when the material is intended for oral or injectable formulation. Because the compound is a hydrochloride salt, the drying endpoint should be evaluated not only by loss on drying but also by chloride content; nonstoichiometric HCl loss can generate free-base domains that may alter dissolution rate and stability under humid storage. For injectable use, the release panel should additionally include bacterial endotoxin per USP <85> and particulate matter per USP <788> or USP <787> where applicable to the finished formulation.
    Release attributes and reference procedures
    AttributeProcedure / standardControl boundary
    AppearanceVisual inspectionWhite to off-white crystalline powder, free from visible extraneous matter
    IdentificationUSP <197>; HPLC retention timeIR spectrum matches reference; retention time matches standard
    AssayHPLC per USP <621>98.0–102.0% on anhydrous, solvent-free basis
    Enantiomeric ratioChiral HPLC per USP <621>(2R,3S):(2S,3R) ratio 0.95–1.05 unless a single-isomer claim is filed
    Chloride contentUSP <221> or ion chromatographyConsistent with monohydrochloride stoichiometry
    Water contentKarl Fischer per USP <921>Limit based on stability data; typical hydrochloride salts require ≤0.5% for solid oral
    Residue on ignitionUSP <281>≤0.1%
    Residual solventsHeadspace GC per ICH Q3CClass 1 solvents not detected; Class 2 solvents within Option 2 limits
    Elemental impuritiesICP-MS per ICH Q3DPermitted daily exposure limits based on finished-product dose
    Bacterial endotoxinsUSP <85>Required for injectable grade; limit set by finished product
    Particle sizeLaser diffraction per ISO 13320:2020 / USP <429>d90 target determined by dissolution and blend uniformity studies
    Method qualification for the release tests should follow ICH Q2(R2) for specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, and range. The assay method should be linear over at least 80–120% of the nominal concentration, with accuracy demonstrated by spike recovery at 80%, 100%, and 120% levels. The racemic method should be validated for limit of detection and limit of quantitation for the minor enantiomer if the specification uses a ratio rather than an assay. If the API is released for injectable use, endotoxin method suitability should be demonstrated by inhibition and enhancement testing per USP <85>, and particulate matter limits should align with the final compounded solution. Direct compression and dry granulation require the powder characteristics of the hydrochloride salt to be matched to the process equipment. A production-scale rotary tablet press using 8–12 mm round concave tooling is normally screened in compression force ranges from 5 to 20 kN, with precompression below 2 kN for brittle formulations to reduce capping. For a drug load of 5–25% w/w, particle-size reduction to d90 below 100 µm by laser diffraction per ISO 13320:2020 can be a starting point, but the final d90 must be justified by dissolution and blend uniformity data. If a jet mill is used, grinding pressure from 0.7 to 1.2 MPa with nitrogen and a controlled dew point can reduce moisture uptake; micronized hydrochloride salts may retain static charge at relative humidity below 30%, causing poor die filling and blend segregation. In such cases, a low-shear bin blender at 50–65% fill volume and a blend uniformity assessment per USP <905> are used to establish mixing time and sampling points. Capsule filling with dosator machines requires bulk density and Carr index data; if the Carr index exceeds 25, a flow aid such as colloidal silicon dioxide at 0.1–0.5% w/w may be considered, but alkaline lubricants should be evaluated because local pH at the particle surface can influence salt disproportionation.

    What limits wet granulation and aqueous film coating for this racemate?

    Wet granulation is limited by the electron-deficient pyrimidine ring and the chlorine substituent under alkaline conditions. If water is used as the granulating fluid, the pH should be controlled on the acidic side through hydrochloric acid or citrate buffer; prolonged exposure to hydroxide can promote nucleophilic displacement of the 4-chloro group and generate a hydroxypyrimidine degradant. Process mapping should include granulation time, water amount, impeller speed, and inlet air temperature. For a high-shear granulator with bowl volume between 25 and 65 L, initial screening may set wet massing time from 2 to 6 min at impeller speeds below 300 rpm; published data for this specific configuration is limited, so these values are screening points rather than release limits. Drying should maintain product temperature below 60 °C, and the final granulation should be milled through a screen of 0.8–1.25 mm. Water content after equilibration should be verified by Karl Fischer per USP <921>. Aqueous film coating may be used if the tablet core retains a moisture-protective subcoat; otherwise, organic or hydroalcoholic coating systems should be tested for edge splitting and moisture ingress. In comparison with single-isomer (2R,3S)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-3-(5-fluoropyrimidin-4-yl)-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)butan-2-ol, the 4-chloro-5-fluoro-6-pyrimidinyl substitution in the racemic product increases the calculated base molecular weight from 349.31 g/mol to 383.57 g/mol and changes the attachment point from the 4-position to the 6-position of the pyrimidine ring. This alteration modifies hydrogen-bonding capacity, crystal packing, and chromatographic retention. Regulatory equivalence with single-isomer triazole antifungal monographs should not be assumed; the racemic designation and the chloro substitution require a product-specific reference standard and a stability-indicating method. Differences from other hydrochloride salts of fluorinated pyrimidinyl butanols should be documented by differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray powder diffraction, and moisture-sorption isotherms per USP <941>.

    If the finished presentation is a sterile injectable, aseptic processing enters a risk-based control strategy

    Injectable manufacture requires the API to meet microbiological and particulate specifications before formulation. Handling should follow EU GMP Annex 1 and FDA 21 CFR Part 211 with an environmental classification appropriate to the open-powder transfer step; an API dispensing room at ISO 14644-1 ISO Class 8 is commonly used, with local unidirectional airflow for open transfers. Dissolution in Water for Injection should be evaluated at the target concentration and pH; because the hydrochloride salt can depress solution pH, pH adjustment with hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide may be required before sterile filtration. Filter validation should include a bacterial retention study per ASTM F838-20 and a product-wetted integrity test using a 0.22 µm PVDF or PES membrane. Adsorption of the halogenated aromatic active to polysulfone or nylon should be evaluated because hydrophobic membrane binding can reduce assay recovery. For aseptic filling of vials, the sterilizing filter should be placed close to the filling needle, and the pre-filtration bioburden should be controlled at ≤10 CFU/100 mL per EU GMP Annex 1 guidance. Lyophilized products require freeze-drying microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry to determine the collapse temperature and glass transition temperature of the maximally freeze-concentrated solute; published data for this specific configuration is limited, so cycle design should not rely on surrogate thermograms from different hydrochlorides. Terminal sterilization may be considered only if aqueous stability and degradation kinetics support it; otherwise, aseptic filtration is the boundary condition for sterility assurance.

    Degradation markers and stability-indicating method readiness

    A stability-indicating HPLC method should be developed under ICH Q1A(R2) and ICH Q1B conditions to separate the two enantiomers, the free base, process impurities, and oxidative or hydrolytic degradants. Typical forced degradation conditions include 0.1 N HCl, 0.1 N NaOH, 3% hydrogen peroxide, dry heat at 80 °C, and photostability per ICH Q1B. The electron-deficient pyrimidine ring may generate the corresponding hydroxy displacement product under alkaline stress; therefore, the method should include a resolution check between the parent and the hydroxypyrimidine degradant. Mass balance across stress conditions should be reported and should fall within 90–110% unless co-elution is demonstrated. For a racemic API, chiral HPLC should be monitored on accelerated stability batches to verify that the enantiomeric ratio remains unchanged. System suitability for the chiral method should require resolution not less than 1.5, tailing factor not more than 2.0, and injection repeatability below 2.0% relative standard deviation per USP <621>. For oral liquid formulations, the hydrochloride salt should be dissolved at an acidic pH below the pKa-driven solubility minimum, and the solution should be protected from light if photolytic degradation is identified in ICH Q1B studies. A vehicle containing propylene glycol, glycerin, and purified water may be screened, but solubility and stability of the chloro-substituted pyrimidine ring in the presence of nucleophilic buffer species should be confirmed. Preservative efficacy should be tested per USP <51>, and antioxidant addition should be justified only after forced oxidation studies show a measurable peroxide sensitivity. The oral liquid grade is not automatically interchangeable with injectable grade; endotoxin and particulate controls differ, and the dissolution vehicle may expose the API to moisture for longer durations than solid oral forms. Dissolution testing for solid oral forms should be conducted in 900 mL of 0.1 N HCl at 37 °C using USP Apparatus 2 at 50 rpm for immediate-release products. The hydrochloric acid medium is preferred because the salt is likely to exhibit higher solubility under gastric pH; however, if the drug product is intended for modified release, a pH-shift method or USP Apparatus 4 may be required. Reported dissolution values should be tied to HPLC assay rather than UV alone because process impurities and the pyrimidine chromophore can interfere.

    Bulk packaging and controlled storage for the hydrochloride salt

    Bulk API should be double-bagged in low-density polyethylene inside an aluminum-laminated outer bag, with desiccant where moisture uptake exceeds 0.1% in open stability studies. A moisture-sorption isotherm per USP <941> should be generated at 25 °C from 10 to 90% RH; if water uptake exceeds 0.5% at 60% RH, the packaging should contain desiccant and the retest period should be shortened accordingly. Storage should be controlled at 15–25 °C with protection from light and humidity, unless the stability protocol supports wider excursions. Each container should be labeled with the batch number, gross and net weight, manufacturing date, retest date, and the racemic identity. Temperature-controlled shipping should be validated by a thermal mapping profile over the distribution route; if the material is used for sterile injectables, the supply chain should maintain chain-of-custody for microbiological attributes. Incompatibility with strong bases, oxidizing agents, and nucleophilic amines should be stated in the packaging insert because these agents can stress the pyrimidine ring and complicate release testing.
    Top