| HS Code | 929599 |
| Chemical Name | Dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride |
| Cas Number | 23150-66-3 |
| Molecular Formula | C7H14ClNO4 |
| Molecular Weight | 211.64 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Melting Point | 107-109 °C |
| Solubility | Soluble in water, methanol, and ethanol |
| Optical Rotation | [α]D20 = +2.5° to +4.0° (c=2, water) |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, sealed container |
| Purity | >98% |
| Sensitivity | Hygroscopic |
| Inchi Key | XXZQNLJPBXURJK-LURJTMIESA-N |
As an accredited Dimethyl L-glutamate Hydrochloride factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Dimethyl L-glutamate Hydrochloride is supplied in 1 kg sealed aluminum bags, packed in sturdy cartons with proper labeling and safety documentation. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL container loading: 20-foot full container load, palletized drums/fiberboard boxes, secured for safe transit of Dimethyl L-glutamate Hydrochloride. |
| Shipping | Dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride is a hygroscopic solid requiring careful shipping. Pack in sealed, moisture-proof containers, preferably under inert gas. Store in a cool, dry area during transit. Handle with gloves and eye protection as it may cause irritation. Ensure packaging is labeled correctly and complies with all applicable transport regulations for chemical shipments. |
| Storage | Store Dimethyl L-glutamate Hydrochloride in a tightly sealed container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Protect from moisture, humidity, and direct light. Keep away from heat sources, strong oxidizers, and incompatible chemicals. Ensure the container is clearly labeled and stored out of reach of unauthorized personnel. Maintain stable room temperature, ideally between 2–8°C if long-term storage is required. |
| Shelf Life | Store in a cool, dry, well-sealed container, protected from moisture and light; shelf life typically 2-3 years. |
In solution-phase synthesis of methotrexate and related 4-amino-10-methylfolic acid analogues, dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride is introduced as the protected L-glutamate C-terminal fragment because the α- and γ-carboxyl groups are both masked as methyl esters during amide bond formation, and the crystalline hydrochloride provides a stable, storage-stable form that can be neutralised immediately before use. For coupling to the p-aminobenzoylglutamate moiety, the salt is suspended in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide at jacket-controlled 0–5 °C, and N-methylmorpholine is metered at 2.0–2.3 molar equivalents relative to the hydrochloride; the free amine is generated in situ and is not isolated. Condensation is carried out with the pteroic acid derivative activated as the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester or as a mixed anhydride formed with isobutyl chloroformate. The heterogeneous suspension produced by N-methylmorpholine hydrochloride precipitation is a critical mixing constraint. In glass-lined reactors equipped with retreat-curve impellers, agitation is maintained at 80–120 rpm to keep the precipitated salt in suspension without inducing vortex formation; at lower speeds the precipitate accumulates below the agitator hub and causes localised pH excursions. Reaction completion is monitored by reverse-phase HPLC under USP <621> using a 250 × 4.6 mm C18 column and a mobile-phase gradient of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water to 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile. Because dimethyl L-glutamate lacks a strong chromophore, detection is typically set at 210 nm or a charged aerosol detector is used for trace-level quantification. Residual water in the hydrochloride is controlled to ≤0.5% by USP <921> Method Ia before anhydrous coupling, because batch records from glass-lined reactor campaigns show that water ingress above this threshold accelerates hydrolysis of the activated ester and decreases conversion without producing new identifiable impurities. When the process is run under ICH Q3C residual solvent limits, N,N-dimethylformamide residues must be demonstrated below the permitted concentration in the downstream methotrexate intermediate. After coupling, the methyl esters are hydrolysed under aqueous sodium hydroxide at 20–25 °C while pH is maintained at 11.5–12.0; this saponification is the final deprotection step before methotrexate isolation. Published data for exact conversion and yield of this specific hydrochloride in methotrexate production campaigns is limited, and process robustness therefore requires laboratory-scale verification for each batch.
Direct introduction of dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride into fragment condensation on solid support creates an acid-base conflict in the coupling activation cycle. The protonated α-amino group is unreactive toward activated carboxylates, and the hydrochloride counterion can protonate the tertiary amine base required for carbodiimide or uronium-type activation. In automated peptide synthesizers configured for fragment condensation, the hydrochloride is therefore dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide and treated with N,N-diisopropylethylamine at 2.0 molar equivalents for 5–10 min before addition to the resin-bound protected peptide acid. In situ neutralisation protocols with 1-hydroxybenzotriazole and N,N'-diisopropylcarbodiimide are used when the hydrochloride is to be coupled directly to a resin-bound carboxylate; however, excess base above 2.2 equivalents promotes α-carbon racemisation through oxazolone formation when the activated carboxylate is a urethane-protected peptide acid. The operational window is therefore narrow: enough base must be present to liberate the amine from the hydrochloride, but the residual tertiary amine must remain low enough to avoid deprotonating the α-carbon of activated Fmoc-protected residues. Pre-drying of the salt is required because water above 0.5% by USP <921> Method Ia hydrolyses uronium reagents and reduces coupling efficiency. In bulk peptide synthesizer lines, the hydroscopic tendency of the salt is managed by dry nitrogen purging of transfer lines and by pre-drying in a vacuum oven at 40 °C under 10 mbar for 12 h; thermal exposure above 60 °C is avoided because methyl ester hydrolysis and intramolecular cyclisation to pyroglutamate derivatives can occur. Coupling completion is assessed with the Kaiser test or by FTIR monitoring for residual resin-bound amine, and failed couplings are re-subjected to a second neutralisation-coupling cycle rather than extended reaction time, which may increase pyroglutamate formation. This process boundary explains why direct coupling without prior neutralisation is not practiced in standard Fmoc/tert-butyl fragment condensation.
| Neutralisation system | Observed process behaviour | Recommended equipment |
|---|---|---|
| DMF / N-methylmorpholine | Fine hydrochloride precipitate; moderate mixing requirement | Retreat-curve impeller at 80–120 rpm |
| DCM / N,N-diisopropylethylamine | Salt partially suspended; slower neutralisation | High-shear mixer or ultrasonic agitation |
| Water / sodium bicarbonate | Complete dissolution; pH 8.0–8.5 | Not suitable for moisture-sensitive couplings |
| THF alone | Poor solubility of hydrochloride | Not suitable |
Poly(γ-benzyl L-glutamate) and related polyglutamate platforms require conversion of the protected diester to the N-carboxyanhydride monomer before ring-opening polymerisation. The hydrochloride salt is first converted to free L-glutamic acid or to the γ-methyl monoester by controlled alkaline hydrolysis, because the N-carboxyanhydride route requires a free α-amino acid. Demethylation is performed in aqueous methanol with sodium hydroxide at 0–5 °C, maintaining pH 10.5–11.0 to prevent racemisation. After neutralisation and crystallisation, the free amino acid is suspended in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran and treated with triphosgene at 0–5 °C; the reaction is run under a dry nitrogen atmosphere and followed by FTIR for disappearance of the amino acid carbonyl band and appearance of the anhydride carbonyl stretching modes. The resulting N-carboxyanhydride is moisture-sensitive and must be transferred under inert conditions to the polymerisation vessel. Ring-opening polymerisation is initiated with primary amines such as n-hexylamine in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide at 20–25 °C. Molecular weight control is achieved by the monomer-to-initiator ratio, typically in the range of 20:1 to 100:1, with polydispersity assessed by size-exclusion chromatography calibrated against poly(methyl methacrylate) standards. The use of dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride as the starting material introduces one additional hydrolysis step compared with direct free L-glutamic acid, but the protected salt is preferred when plant logistics require a less moisture-sensitive crystalline storage form. Nevertheless, the hydrochloride also requires controlled humidity storage and should not be exposed to ambient air for extended periods. Published data for continuous-flow N-carboxyanhydride synthesis starting from this specific hydrochloride is limited; batch-mode glass reactors with overhead stirring and subsurface nitrogen sparging are therefore the more documented configuration.
γ-Substituted glutamic acid derivatives, including γ-ethylamides and glutamine analogues, are prepared from dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride by exploiting the steric and electronic differences between the α- and γ-methyl ester functions. The hydrochloride is dissolved in anhydrous methanol at 0–10 °C, and the free amine is generated with 1.0 molar equivalent of sodium methoxide or triethylamine. The nucleophile is then added slowly below the solvent surface. Primary alkylamines attack the less hindered γ-methyl ester preferentially when the reaction is kept below 10 °C; at higher temperatures or with longer residence times, the α-ester also undergoes aminolysis, producing non-crystalline gums that complicate isolation and reduce batch yield. The selectivity window must be verified for each amine because published data specific to dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride in γ-selective aminolysis is limited. Monitoring is performed by thin-layer chromatography on silica gel GF254 with ninhydrin visualisation and by reverse-phase HPLC under USP <621>; the α-ester hydrolysis by-product is tracked as the major impurity. If α-ester scrambling is detected, the reaction is quenched by cooling to −5 °C and acidifying to pH 4.5–5.0 with citric acid, which protonates the unreacted amine and retards further aminolysis. The intermediate is isolated as the hydrochloride by addition of anhydrous hydrogen chloride in methanol and precipitation with diethyl ether. This isolation sequence converts the free amine to a crystallisable salt while retaining the α-methyl ester, which can be hydrolysed later under mild alkaline conditions to give the final γ-substituted glutamic acid derivative. For scale-up, jacketed reactors with tilted paddle stirrers are preferred over magnetic stirring because the methoxide neutralisation is exothermic and forms fine solids that adhere to reactor walls; batch-to-batch variation in colour has been observed when the neutralisation exotherm is not controlled below 5 °C. The process is incompatible with water-saturated methanol because the free amine is regenerated and methyl esters are hydrolysed by residual hydroxide.
Dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride appears in methotrexate and related folate analogue manufacturing as a starting material, protected intermediate, and potential process impurity; analytical control therefore requires a pharmacopoeially aligned impurity marker strategy. A working standard is qualified by non-aqueous titration for assay, USP <781> optical rotation, USP <921> Karl Fischer water determination, USP <221> chloride limit test, and USP <281> residue on ignition. For HPLC methods used in release testing, system suitability is demonstrated under USP <621> with resolution between dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride and the free base or monomethyl ester degradation products of not less than 2.0. The reference solution is prepared in mobile phase at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL and stored at 2–8 °C in amber glass because exposure to ambient light over 24 h has been observed to generate oxidative degradation peaks. In-process control samples from methotrexate coupling reactors are quenched into cold 0.1 M hydrochloric acid to stabilise the hydrochloride and stop ester hydrolysis before HPLC injection. When used as an impurity marker, the relative response factor is established against the API or intermediate reference standard rather than assumed to be 1.0, because the lack of a strong UV chromophore causes concentration-dependent detector response variability at low wavelengths. The control strategy includes the following pharmacopoeial and quality system elements.
| Quality attribute | Test method | Typical control bound |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Visual inspection | White to off-white crystalline powder |
| Assay | Non-aqueous titration | ≥98.0% on anhydrous basis |
| Water | USP <921> Method Ia | ≤0.5% |
| Chloride | USP <221> | Matches theoretical chloride content within ±0.5% |
| Residue on ignition | USP <281> | ≤0.10% |
| Optical rotation | USP <781> | To match qualified reference standard |
| HPLC purity | USP <621> | ≥99.0 area% at 210 nm |
The release limits are applied under a quality management system certified to ISO 9001:2015; when the material is used in an API intermediate for the US market, current good manufacturing practice under 21 CFR 210 and 211 applies to analytical documentation and batch traceability. Elemental impurities are controlled according to ICH Q3D; because the hydrochloride is synthesised from fermentation-derived L-glutamic acid, the main residual elements of concern are palladium and copper from hydrogenation or coupling steps. Absence of residual methanol and dichloromethane is demonstrated by headspace gas chromatography with limits aligned to ICH Q3C. The material should not be released solely on titration assay without chromatographic purity, because process-related ester hydrolysis products may not be differentiated by non-aqueous titration under routine conditions.
Acylation of dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride with lauroyl chloride or cocoyl chloride under Schotten-Baumann conditions produces protected glutamate surfactant intermediates after methyl ester hydrolysis. The salt is dissolved in demineralised water at 0–5 °C, and aqueous sodium hydroxide is metered to maintain pH 8.5–9.5 while the fatty acid chloride is added over 2–3 h. Acetone is used as a co-solvent at 10–20% by volume to maintain dispersion of the acid chloride without extracting the intermediate. The reaction is run in a jacketed reactor equipped with a pH-stat and high-shear rotor-stator mixer operating at 1500–3000 rpm; this prevents localised acid chloride pooling and minimises hydrolysis of the acyl chloride to the corresponding fatty acid. After acylation, the methyl esters are hydrolysed with additional sodium hydroxide at pH 11.0–11.5 and 20–25 °C to yield the glutamate-based surfactant sodium salt. Residual fatty acid is removed by acidification to pH 2.5–3.0 with citric acid, followed by phase separation; the aqueous phase is then neutralised and dried. The process is incompatible with hard water because calcium and magnesium ions precipitate the anionic surfactant and reduce yield; demineralised water of conductivity ≤1.0 μS/cm is therefore specified. Batch-to-batch fibre colour in the isolated solid has been reduced by adding the fatty acid chloride below the liquid surface and by controlling exotherm below 5 °C during the first 30 min of addition. Since dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride contains methyl-protected carboxylates, surfactant synthesis requires an additional saponification step compared with direct use of L-glutamic acid; however, the protected salt allows selective acylation of the amino group while keeping the carboxyl functions blocked. Published data for this specific intermediate in cocoyl glutamate production is limited, and process validation at pilot scale is required before transfer to continuous loop reactors.
Competitive Dimethyl L-glutamate Hydrochloride prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Industrial sourcing of dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride begins with the CAS registry identity 23150-65-4 and the linear structure CH3OCOCH2CH2CH(NH2)COOCH3·HCl, corresponding to the molecular formula C7H14ClNO4 and a molecular weight of 211.64 g/mol. The compound is most commonly listed as dimethyl (2S)-2-aminopentanedioate hydrochloride or L-glutamic acid dimethyl ester hydrochloride. Ordering model codes used by commercial suppliers are normally derived from the CAS index entry rather than an ISO or ASTM model designation, and no single harmonized model number exists for this intermediate. The purchaser therefore references the CAS number, the enantiomeric descriptor, and the ester chain length to distinguish the product from diethyl, dibenzyl, di-tert-butyl, or mixed-ester analogues. Commercial catalogues may present the product under a base catalogue number followed by package-size suffixes, with grade designations such as technical, synthetic, or GMP intermediate; these designations are not harmonized and must be mapped to the certificate of analysis. The material is supplied as a white to off-white crystalline powder. The hydrochloride salt is selected over the corresponding free amine because it provides a defined stoichiometric counterion, higher melting point, reduced odor, and improved solid handling in ordinary warehouse conditions.
Typical application fields include liquid-phase peptide synthesis, chiral pharmaceutical intermediate preparation, and synthesis of glutamate-derived specialty reagents. In these routes the product functions as a protected L-glutamic acid building block: the two methyl ester groups are installed as carboxyl protections, while the free α-amino group is regenerated in situ by neutralization of the hydrochloride. This structural arrangement differs from L-glutamic acid diethyl ester hydrochloride and L-glutamic acid di-tert-butyl ester hydrochloride primarily in deprotection chemistry and solubility profile. Methyl esters generally undergo alkaline saponification more readily than ethyl esters and are cleaved by hydrolysis rather than acidolytic deprotection, unlike tert-butyl esters, which are removed with trifluoroacetic acid or hydrogen chloride in organic solvent. These differences determine process selection in multi-step syntheses where the final glutamate carboxyl groups must be unmasked without disturbing acid-labile protecting groups on other residues.
No harmonized pharmacopeial monograph covers dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride as a raw material, so release specifications are supplier-defined and should be verified against the certificate of analysis. A representative industrial specification set includes appearance, assay by high-performance liquid chromatography, specific optical rotation, loss on drying, residue on ignition, and chiral purity. Test methods commonly align with general compendial chapters: USP <621> for chromatographic system suitability, USP <781> for optical rotation, USP <731> for loss on drying, and USP <281> for residue on ignition. Where water content is critical to a downstream anhydrous process, Karl Fischer titration under USP <921> or ISO 760 is substituted for loss on drying. For materials designated as GMP intermediates, batch records, change control, and impurity profiling should follow ICH Q7 principles. Table 1 lists acceptance criteria that appear in typical commercial documentation; because no harmonized monograph fixes the limits, each batch should be evaluated against the supplier’s current release limits and the process impurity profile.
| Parameter | Typical acceptance criterion | Method alignment |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | white to off-white crystalline powder | visual inspection |
| Assay by HPLC area% | ≥98.0 % | USP <621> |
| Specific optical rotation | +24.0° to +26.0° (c=1, methanol, 20 °C) | USP <781> |
| Loss on drying | ≤0.50 % | USP <731> |
| Residue on ignition | ≤0.20 % | USP <281> |
| Chiral purity | ≥99.0 area% for L-enantiomer by chiral HPLC | validated chiral HPLC, USP <621> |
Supplier certificates frequently report a melting range of 89–93 °C, although the observed value varies with heating rate, residual solvent, and particle size. The crystalline powder is generally non-hydroscopic under short-term weighing conditions, but moisture uptake can occur when the material is exposed to ambient air above 60 % relative humidity for extended periods. In analytical release, the most common process-related impurities are the free acid and the monomethyl ester from partial hydrolysis. These impurities are separated on a C18 column with gradient elution, and their retention behavior depends on mobile phase pH and the degree of ion pairing. No universal limit is assigned to a specific impurity without supplier-specific qualification data.
In peptide synthesis, dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride is generally neutralized in situ with 1.0–1.2 equivalents of N-methylmorpholine or diisopropylethylamine in dichloromethane, dimethylformamide, or N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone. The neutralization step is thermally controlled because the free amine can abstract the Cα proton under excess base or elevated temperature, leading to racemization. At production scale, a typical coupling sequence is executed in a 50-L glass-lined reactor with bottom drain, nitrogen purge, and jacket temperature control. The hydrochloride is charged, solvent is added, and the tertiary amine is introduced at 0–5 °C. After 10–15 min, a coupling reagent such as N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride with 1-hydroxybenzotriazole is added, followed by the carboxyl component or amine component according to the route. The batch is held at 0–5 °C during activation, then warmed to 20–25 °C for 8–16 h. Conversion is monitored by HPLC using USP <621> system suitability criteria, and residual dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride is tracked as an unreacted starting material peak.
This process window is narrow at the activation stage because temperatures above 25 °C can increase racemization, while temperatures below 0 °C slow coupling and may increase solvent viscosity enough to reduce mass transfer in the agitated vessel. Batch-to-batch variation in specific optical rotation has been observed on manufacturing lines when the tertiary amine addition rate is not controlled; rapid diisopropylethylamine addition produces local pH excursions and measurable increases in D-isomer content. The final product is isolated by extraction, distillation, or crystallization depending on downstream solubility. The product is also employed as a chiral starting material for γ-lactam or glutamine derivatives. In these routes, the two methyl ester groups are not always equivalent; selective monohydrolysis of the α-ester can be attempted under controlled alkaline conditions because the α-carbon electronic environment differs from the γ-ester. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, and process development should confirm regioselectivity by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance or ion chromatography of the resulting monoacid. The hydrochloride salt is generally preferred when the downstream reaction is an amide coupling or reductive amination because the salt can be converted to the free base in situ without isolation, reducing losses from aqueous workup of a low-molecular-weight free amine.
The methyl ester groups of dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride are removed by alkaline saponification, typically with sodium hydroxide or lithium hydroxide in aqueous methanol or tetrahydrofuran-water. Deprotection proceeds with formation of methanol, which is compatible with common solvent-recovery systems and does not require a separate phase separation. In contrast, the diethyl analogue releases ethanol and typically requires longer reaction time or higher hydroxide concentration for complete removal. The di-tert-butyl analogue is not removed by alkaline saponification under ordinary process conditions and is instead cleaved by acidolysis with trifluoroacetic acid or hydrogen chloride in dichloromethane or ethyl acetate. This difference is decisive when a multi-step route contains acid-labile protecting groups: a methyl ester can be removed under mildly basic conditions that leave tert-butoxycarbonyl or trityl groups intact, whereas a tert-butyl ester would require acid conditions that may prematurely remove acid-labile groups.
Solubility also differs. Dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride is readily soluble in methanol, water, dimethylformamide, and dimethyl sulfoxide, but poorly soluble in diethyl ether, hexane, and toluene. The free base is more hydrophobic and may be extracted into dichloromethane or ethyl acetate after neutralization. The ethyl ester hydrochloride has a more lipophilic profile, and the tert-butyl ester hydrochloride has greater steric hindrance at the carboxyl carbon and is more resistant to nucleophilic attack during coupling. Table 2 summarizes the structural and processing distinctions.
| Property | Dimethyl L-glutamate HCl | Diethyl L-glutamate HCl | Di-tert-butyl L-glutamate HCl |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAS registry number | 23150-65-4 | 1118-89-4 | supplier-specific |
| Carboxyl protecting group | methyl ester | ethyl ester | tert-butyl ester |
| Deprotection route | alkaline hydrolysis; enzymatic hydrolysis possible | alkaline hydrolysis; acid hydrolysis | acidolysis with TFA or HCl |
| Deprotection by-product | methanol | ethanol | isobutylene |
| Typical coupling solvent | DMF, DCM, NMP | DMF, DCM | DCM, ethyl acetate |
| Solubility profile | polar aprotic and protic solvents | moderately lipophilic | strongly lipophilic |
| Main process advantage | rapid methyl ester removal; easy solid handling | lower volatility of ethanol by-product | orthogonal acid/alkaline deprotection sequence |
The product differs from N-protected dimethyl L-glutamate derivatives, such as N-Boc-L-glutamic acid dimethyl ester or N-Cbz-L-glutamic acid dimethyl ester, in that the amino group is present as the hydrochloride. This allows direct amidation without a separate hydrogenolysis or acid deprotection step. Conversely, if the downstream route requires selective coupling at the α-carboxyl group before the γ-carboxyl group, the dimethyl diester may not be suitable without selective monohydrolysis because both methyl esters are electronically similar. In such cases, mixed-ester derivatives or N-protected glutamic acid α-benzyl γ-methyl esters are specified. The use of dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride is therefore best restricted to routes in which both carboxyl groups are ultimately deprotected, or where selective α-ester hydrolysis can be controlled by pH and temperature. These limitations should be evaluated with pilot-scale selectivity data rather than assumed from laboratory bench results.
Some routes require the free amine rather than the hydrochloride salt, especially when the coupling reagent is water-sensitive or when the hydrochloride counterion interferes with a Lewis acid catalyst. Under these conditions, dimethyl L-glutamate hydrochloride is neutralized with a stoichiometric amount of aqueous sodium bicarbonate or aqueous potassium carbonate, and the free base is extracted into dichloromethane or ethyl acetate. The extract is dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure at bath temperatures not exceeding 30–35 °C because the free amine is more volatile and more prone to self-condensation than the salt. The neutralized free base should be used immediately or stored as a solution in dry solvent under nitrogen at 2–8 °C; prolonged storage of the neat free amine is not recommended because of moisture absorption and amine-carbonate formation from atmospheric carbon dioxide. In production-scale equipment, the neutralization is best performed in a stirred extractor rather than a simple batch vessel when the amine partition coefficient is low, although published data for this specific configuration is limited. The use of free base instead of the hydrochloride modifies the stoichiometry of the downstream coupling by removing one equivalent of acid that would otherwise require additional tertiary amine.
The hydrochloride salt is packaged in sealed polyethylene or polypropylene containers under nitrogen or inert gas. In warehouses where relative humidity exceeds 60 %, the material should not be left open for extended periods because the powder can absorb surface moisture and form lumps without altering chemical identity. Pre-drying is recommended for water-sensitive reactions: the material is dried in a vacuum oven at 40–50 °C and 10–20 mbar for 4–12 h, depending on initial water content and intended batch size. The dried material should be cooled and dispensed under nitrogen. The compound is incompatible with strong bases, which liberate the free amine; in bulk storage, contact with amine-based additives should be avoided unless neutralization is part of the intended process. Strong oxidizing agents such as concentrated hydrogen peroxide or potassium permanganate should be segregated because the amino acid ester can undergo oxidative degradation. The solid is a skin and eye irritant; local exhaust ventilation and nitrile or butyl rubber gloves meeting EN 374 or equivalent are appropriate. Release to the environment is controlled under local wastewater permits; the product is not classified as a persistent organic pollutant, but the high water solubility may allow effective biological treatment in an industrial wastewater facility.