Products

D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride

    • Product Name: D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 856724
    Product Name D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride
    Synonyms D-Glutamic acid diethyl ester hydrochloride; H-D-Glu(OEt)-OEt hydrochloride
    Cas Number 40997-18-6
    Molecular Formula C9H17NO4·HCl
    Molecular Weight 239.70 g/mol
    Appearance White to off-white crystalline powder
    Melting Point 110-112 °C
    Specific Optical Rotation +8.0° (c=1, H2O)
    Solubility Soluble in water, methanol, and ethanol; practically insoluble in ether
    Purity ≥98% (TLC/HPLC)
    Storage Conditions Store in a cool, dry place, under inert gas, protected from moisture

    As an accredited D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing Packaged in 25 kg net fiber drums with double polyethylene liners, sealed, labeled, and stored in dry conditions.
    Container Loading (20′ FCL) D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride is loaded in sealed drums onto pallets, securely stowed in a 20′ FCL container for safe transport.
    Shipping D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride should ship in sealed, moisture-proof containers at ambient temperature, away from strong oxidizers and acids. Clearly label as an irritant, secure against leakage, and ensure handlers use gloves and eye protection. Follow all hazardous chemical transport regulations.
    Storage Store D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride in a tightly sealed container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, protected from moisture, direct sunlight, and excessive heat. Keep away from strong oxidizers and incompatible materials. Ensure the workspace is clean and temperature-controlled; avoid prolonged exposure to air. Follow all safety and handling guidelines.
    Shelf Life Store in a cool, dry place, protected from light and moisture. Typical shelf life is two years under recommended conditions.
    Application of D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride

    D-diethyl glutamate hydrochloride is handled as a protected chiral amine in solution-phase peptide coupling when the target sequence contains a D-glutamic acid residue. The hydrochloride salt must be neutralised before coupling because the protonated α-amine does not participate in carbodiimide-mediated activation. In a production-scale protocol, the salt is suspended in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide and treated with N,N-diisopropylethylamine at 0–5 °C. The free base is generated in situ and is processed without isolation. Coupling is carried out with 1.0 equiv of the carboxyl component, 1.05 equiv of HATU, 1.0 equiv of HOAt, and a further 1.0 equiv of N,N-diisopropylethylamine. The ethyl ester groups remain intact during amide bond formation, which prevents premature carboxylic acid activation. Reaction progress is monitored by reversed-phase HPLC at 210 nm until the free amine is consumed or the endpoint specified in the batch record is confirmed. The most frequent process failure on scale-up is water uptake by the hygroscopic hydrochloride, which hydrolyses the uronium coupling reagent before activation. Pre-drying is therefore required when the Karl Fischer water content exceeds the acceptance limit for anhydrous coupling. After coupling, the ethyl esters are removed with lithium hydroxide in tetrahydrofuran-water at 0 °C, and the D-configuration is confirmed by chiral HPLC against a racemised reference. This sequence is applicable to peptide fragments, peptidomimetic linkers, and carboxyl-modified amino acid derivatives, but it is not suitable for sequences containing base-labile side-chain protecting groups.

    Which Protection Sequence Preserves Both Carboxyl Differentiations in the D-Glutamate Diester?

    Selective differentiation of the α- and γ-carboxyl groups is required when the D-glutamate skeleton is used as a branched linker rather than a single terminal residue. The amine is first converted to the tert-butoxycarbonyl derivative by treating the hydrochloride with di-tert-butyl dicarbonate in dichloromethane in the presence of N,N-diisopropylethylamine at 20–25 °C. The addition is exothermic during the initial charge, and the pH is maintained between 7.5 and 8.5 by controlled amine feed to limit carbamate formation at the ester oxygen. After aqueous workup and concentration, N-Boc-D-glutamic acid diethyl ester is obtained as a viscous oil that solidifies at 4 °C. The hydrochloride counterion is removed in the same step, which eliminates chloride contamination in downstream organometallic transformations. Monohydrolysis of the diethyl ester is carried out under controlled basic conditions with either lithium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide in tetrahydrofuran-water mixtures. Selective α-ester cleavage is more documented for the L-series because the N-Boc group electronically activates the α-carbonyl; the D-series requires the same chiral HPLC monitoring to stop the reaction at the monoacid stage. Published data for the D-specific α/γ selectivity in this exact diester configuration is limited. When γ-selective hydrolysis is required, an alternative route is complete deprotection to D-glutamic acid followed by re-esterification with an orthogonal protecting group. The process is not compatible with solvent streams containing primary amines, which deprotect the Boc group and form amide impurities. Residual N,N-diisopropylethylamine must be removed below the gas chromatography specification before hydrolysis because it can accelerate racemisation at the α-carbon.

    When Lithium Aluminium Hydride Reduction Generates (R)-2-Aminopentane-1,5-diol

    Both ethyl ester groups can be reduced to primary alcohols with lithium aluminium hydride to give (R)-2-aminopentane-1,5-diol, a chiral amino diol used as a precursor for N,O-bidentate ligand frameworks. The hydrochloride is added in portions to a suspension of lithium aluminium hydride in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran under nitrogen. The addition is strongly exothermic when the salt dissolves and releases the free base; a jacketed reactor with an internal thermocouple is specified, and the feed rate is controlled to keep the batch below 10 °C during the first half of the addition. A slight stoichiometric excess over the four-electron reduction requirement is maintained, and the mixture is subsequently allowed to warm to 20–25 °C until gas chromatographic monitoring shows disappearance of the starting diester. The workup follows the Fieser protocol with sequential water, 15% sodium hydroxide, and water at 0 °C; the ratio is 1 mL water, 1 mL sodium hydroxide solution, and 3 mL water per gram of lithium aluminium hydride used. The resulting amino diol is water-soluble and is usually isolated as the hydrochloride after concentration of the organic layer. The two terminal primary alcohols permit selective activation; cyclic carbamate formation at the C1 hydroxyl is a documented pathway, while C5-selective protection requires bulky protecting groups or tin-mediated activation. These transformations are used to prepare chiral oxazolidinone and oxazoline intermediates, although published data for this specific D-configured amino diol is limited compared with the L-series. The reduction is incompatible with protic solvents and with carbonyl-containing workup solvents such as acetone, which form aldol condensation by-products during the quench.

    Enantiomeric Purity Reference Standards for L-Glutamate-Containing Drug Substance Intermediates

    In chiral purity method validation, D-diethyl glutamate hydrochloride is used as the (R)-enantiomer reference marker for the corresponding L-glutamate-derived intermediates. The D-isomer is spiked into methanolic or mobile-phase solutions of the L-isomer at known ratios, and the resulting solutions are injected onto a chiral HPLC system to establish resolution, linearity, and detection limits under ICH Q2(R1). The method is used to demonstrate that the D-enantiomer does not co-elute with the major L-enantiomer peak, and that integration of the minor peak is not affected by the tailing of the major peak. Validated methods are required when the L-glutamate intermediate is used in an active pharmaceutical ingredient, because pharmacopoeial monographs for substances for pharmaceutical use require control of specified impurities in line with ICH Q3A. Chiral separation modes include ligand-exchange chromatography with a copper-complexed chiral selector, or pre-column derivatisation with a chiral derivatising agent followed by conventional C18 chromatography. The latter approach is preferred when the sample contains two free carboxyl groups after hydrolysis, because underivatised amino acid diesters give poor chromophore response at low UV wavelengths. Specificity is confirmed by recording the retention time of the D-diethyl glutamate hydrochloride reference solution and by forced racemisation with aqueous sodium hydroxide at elevated temperature. This compound is not used as a primary pharmacopoeial reference standard unless it has been characterised by quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance, mass balance, and trace-water assignment; published data for this specific configuration is limited to individual certificate of analysis summaries.

    In custom synthesis and contract manufacturing supply chains, D-diethyl glutamate hydrochloride is released against a certificate of analysis that includes assay, chiral purity, residual solvent content, and water content. The test panel is selected according to the intended downstream use; a pharmaceutical intermediate order requires pharmacopoeial or ICH-aligned methods, whereas a laboratory-scale chiral building block order may be released with HPLC area percent and optical rotation only. The following table lists the standard analytical methods applied to this material when it is qualified as a chiral pharmaceutical intermediate.

    Quality attributeMethod designationMeasurement objective
    IdentificationUSP <197>, Ph. Eur. 2.2.24Fourier-transform infrared spectral match
    AssayPh. Eur. 2.2.20Potentiometric titration of the hydrochloride
    Chiral purityICH Q2(R1) chiral HPLCEnantiomeric excess and resolution from the L-isomer
    Water contentUSP <921>, Ph. Eur. 2.5.12Karl Fischer coulometric titration
    Residual solventsUSP <467>, ICH Q3CHeadspace gas chromatography for process solvents
    Elemental impuritiesUSP <233>, Ph. Eur. 2.4.20Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

    Handling boundaries are defined by the hydrochloride form. The salt is hygroscopic and should be stored tightly closed under nitrogen at 2–8 °C for long-term use; repeated ambient openings increase water uptake and reduce the effective amine assay. The material is incompatible with strong oxidising agents, which can degrade the amino ester to carbon dioxide and volatile nitrogen oxides. Contact with acid chlorides and sulfonyl chlorides should be avoided unless the free amine has been liberated and the desired amide or sulfonamide formation is intentional. The free base generated in aqueous media is unstable to prolonged standing at pH above 9, where ester hydrolysis and racemisation compete. No single storage condition is universally suitable for all downstream processes; the release panel must be harmonised with the specific coupling, reduction, or deprotection chemistry selected by the user.

    Free Quote

    Competitive D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    D-Diethyl Glutamate Hydrochloride (CAS 100157-62-0) is the crystalline hydrochloride salt of D-glutamic acid diethyl ester, with molecular formula C9H18ClNO4 and molecular weight 239.70 g/mol. The product is manufactured in three common grades: an anhydrous research grade with assay ≥ 99.0%, a pharmaceutical intermediate grade with assay ≥ 98.0%, and a technical grade for route scouting with assay ≥ 95.0%. Manufacturing sites typically hold ISO 9001:2015 certification. Release under a certificate of analysis includes identity by infrared spectroscopy, assay by HPLC, chiral purity by chiral HPLC, water content, sulfated ash, heavy metals, and residual solvents. Packaging is foil-lined low-density polyethylene drums with nitrogen headspace for industrial quantities; smaller aliquots are shipped in amber glass with desiccant. The material is a white to off-white crystalline powder at 25 °C. Long-term storage at 2–8 °C is recommended for pharmaceutical intermediate grade. The free base is a mobile oil, whereas the hydrochloride salt is a crystalline solid that permits gravimetric charging on production lines.

    ParameterTypical release valueMethod
    AppearanceWhite to off-white crystalline powderVisual inspection
    Assay98.0%HPLC area normalization at 210 nm
    Chiral purity98.0% eeChiral HPLC, polysaccharide stationary phase
    Water content0.5%Karl Fischer titration, Ph. Eur. 2.5.12
    Sulfated ash0.1%Ph. Eur. 2.4.14
    Heavy metals10 ppmPh. Eur. 2.4.8
    Residual ethanol0.5% w/wHeadspace GC, ICH Q3C Class 3

    How Does the Hydrochloride Salt Form Affect Handling and Solubility?

    The protonated amino ester is dispensed more reproducibly than the oily free base because the crystalline lattice slows autocatalytic ester hydrolysis and reduces atmospheric carbon dioxide absorption. For amide coupling, the salt is neutralized in situ with a tertiary amine. Batch charge calculations use 1.05–1.10 molar equivalents of N-methylmorpholine or diisopropylethylamine relative to the hydrochloride; the initial 0.05 equivalent is consumed by hydrogen chloride liberated from the salt. Qualitative solubility screening indicates that the unneutralized salt has limited solubility in dichloromethane and tetrahydrofuran, while the neutralized amino ester dissolves readily in methanol, ethanol, DMF, and DMSO at typical reaction concentrations of 0.1–0.5 M. Processes requiring a single-phase charge in dichloromethane should add the solid to a pre-mixed base solution in dichloromethane; reverse addition can produce a transient oily free base layer that adheres to vessel walls. On pilot-plant vessels, this addition sequence is enforced by a solids addition hopper and jacket temperature set point of 5 °C.

    In dipeptide and tripeptide synthesis, the neutralized amino ester is coupled to N-protected amino acids using carbodiimide or uranium reagents. A standard pilot-scale activation uses EDC·HCl with hydroxybenzotriazole in DMF at 0–5 °C, followed by warming to 20–25 °C over 6–12 h. Workup with aqueous sodium bicarbonate removes the auxiliary and liberates the free amino ester product. On glass-lined reactors, exothermic neutralization is controlled by jacket circulation at 5 °C, and the amino ester hydrochloride is added over 30–45 min. Batch records from kilo-scale campaigns indicate that adding solid salt to a pre-cooled mixture of base, solvent, and coupling agent suppresses the pH excursions that hydrolyze the ethyl ester. The D-configuration at the α-carbon does not substantially alter carbodiimide coupling rate, but it changes the diastereomeric product ratio when the electrophile is a racemic N-protected amino acid chloride. The product is also used in solution-phase syntheses of D-glutamate-containing fragments for solid-phase peptide assembly, where the ethyl ester survives Fmoc removal with piperidine. Residual water above 0.3% quenches carbodiimide activation and should be controlled by pre-drying or azeotropic solvent drying.

    When Process Chemists Select D-Glutamate Diethyl Ester Hydrochloride over L-Glutamate Diethyl Ester Hydrochloride

    The D-enantiomer is selected when the target sequence must resist protease cleavage or when the glutamate side chain must be presented in a mirror-image topology. The L-isomer is used for native sequence fragments, while the racemic form is normally limited to chiral resolution route studies. The D-isomer does not require changes to coupling reagents or protecting groups relative to the L-isomer, but analytical release must include the L-enantiomer as the specified chiral impurity. In solid-phase synthesis of retro-inverso peptides, the D-configuration maintains the all-D residue pattern and reduces backbone hydrolysis by common serine proteases. For GMP intermediate qualification, the D-isomer requires a dedicated chiral impurity method because compendial or supplier methods for L-glutamate diethyl ester may not resolve the enantiomer without modification.

    AttributeD-diethyl glutamate HClL-diethyl glutamate HClRacemic diethyl glutamate HCl
    CAS100157-62-01118-89-4Not harmonized in single-lot supply
    Chiral configurationDL1:1 D/L
    Primary applicationProtease-resistant peptidomimetics and mirror-image scaffoldsNative sequence peptide fragmentsChiral resolution method development
    Critical impurity focusL-enantiomer and des-ethyl glutamateD-enantiomer and des-ethyl glutamateDiastereomeric salt formation during workup
    Handling riskHydrolysis above pH 8Hydrolysis above pH 8Same plus resolution burden

    Chiral Purity and Analytical Verification Under EP/USP Aligned Methods

    Enantiomeric excess is determined by direct chiral HPLC on a polysaccharide-type stationary phase or by derivatization with a chiral auxiliary. Detection at 210 nm is typical because the glutamate ester chromophore is weak. Release specifications for pharmaceutical intermediate grade require assay ≥ 98.0%, enantiomeric excess ≥ 98.0%, and total related impurities ≤ 1.0%. The sum of L-enantiomer and des-ethyl glutamic acid derivatives is typically controlled at ≤ 0.5%. Water is measured by Karl Fischer titration per Ph. Eur. 2.5.12, sulfated ash per Ph. Eur. 2.4.14, and heavy metals per Ph. Eur. 2.4.8. Residual ethanol and methanol are quantified by headspace GC using ICH Q3C Class 3 limits; for anhydrous coupling campaigns, ethanol is usually tightened to ≤ 0.5% w/w. Mass confirmation by electrospray ionization shows the [M+H]+ ion of the free base at m/z 204.1. Chloride content can be confirmed by ion chromatography against a chloride standard.

    Moisture protection at relative humidity above 60% is required for prolonged storage. The crystalline hydrochloride slowly sorbs water and can form a hard cake that complicates dispensing; published sorption isotherms for this exact D-isomer are limited, so the threshold is derived from handling data for analogous amino ester hydrochlorides. Vacuum tray drying at 35–40 °C and 5–10 mbar for 8–12 h is adequate for bed depths ≤ 3 cm; deeper beds require tray inversion or extended cycles because mass-transfer limitations slow ethanol and water removal. The salt is incompatible with strong aqueous alkali and with prolonged contact with primary or secondary amines, which deprotonate the α-ammonium group and accelerate ethyl ester hydrolysis. Milling or micronization in high-humidity environments is not recommended because amorphous surface generation increases moisture uptake and reduces flowability in automated solid dispensing systems.

    Residual Ethanol Content Is the Main Process Variable in Anhydrous Coupling Campaigns

    Residual ethanol from esterification and hydrochloride salt formation is the primary solvent observed by headspace GC. Lot-to-lot variation is influenced by the final recrystallization solvent composition and by drying time. Released lots intended for anhydrous coupling typically show ethanol ≤ 0.5% w/w, methanol ≤ 0.1%, and ethyl acetate ≤ 0.1%. Pre-drying is applied when water content exceeds 0.3% or when the downstream coupling uses water-sensitive carbodiimide activation. In double-cone vacuum dryers with nitrogen purge at 35 °C and 5–10 mbar, batch-to-batch residual ethanol variation narrows after 4 h. Published data for near-infrared drying endpoint monitoring specific to this D-isomer is limited; therefore, cycle termination is typically based on elapsed time and confirmed by headspace GC.

    Compared with D-glutamic acid dimethyl ester hydrochloride, the diethyl ester offers slower alkaline hydrolysis, a lower activation rate in base-catalyzed transesterification, and a different steric profile in enzymatic resolution. The ethyl ester remains a common carboxy-protecting group when the target fragment must survive Fmoc removal with piperidine and hydrogenolytic benzyl ester cleavage. In contrast, the tert-butyl ester is removed by trifluoroacetic acid and is selected when acidic deprotection is orthogonal to the N-protecting group strategy. The methyl ester is more labile under basic conditions and is preferred when the protecting group must be removed quickly with alkali. Selection among these esters is governed by downstream deprotection orthogonality rather than by chiral identity. Published comparative process data for the D-diethyl ester versus L-diethyl ester is limited; however, filtration and drying behavior is usually equivalent for the two enantiomers under standard conditions. The hydrochloride salt of the D-diethyl ester should not be combined with amine-based additives during storage because free amine impurities can initiate premature ester hydrolysis, leading to des-ethyl glutamic acid by-products that are difficult to purge by recrystallization.

    Top