| HS Code | |
| Productname | Ethanol |
| Chemicalformula | C2H5OH |
| Casnumber | 64-17-5 |
| Molecularweight | 46.07 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear, colorless liquid |
| Odor | Characteristic alcoholic odor |
| Boilingpoint | 78.37 °C |
| Meltingpoint | -114.1 °C |
| Density | 0.789 g/cm³ at 20 °C |
| Flashpoint | 13 °C (closed cup) |
| Autoignitiontemperature | 363 °C |
| Solubilityinwater | Miscible |
| Vaporpressure | 5.95 kPa at 20 °C |
| Viscosity | 1.074 mPa·s at 20 °C |
| Refractiveindex | 1.3611 at 20 °C |
| Ph | 7.0 (neutral) |
As an accredited Ethanol factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Ethanol supplied in 500 mL amber glass bottle, leak-resistant cap, flammable liquid warning label, UN1170, packed in protective carton. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | Ethanol loaded in a 20′ FCL: palletized 200L drums, securely braced, marked flammable UN1170, with MSDS and dangerous goods documents. |
| Shipping | Ethanol is shipped as UN 1170, Class 3 flammable liquid, Packing Group II. Use UN-approved, sealed packaging with flammable-liquid labels, placards, and shipping papers. Store and transport away from heat, sparks, and oxidizers; ensure ventilation, grounding/bonding, and emergency response information. Follow applicable ADR/IATA/IMDG/49 CFR rules. |
| Storage | Store ethanol in a cool, dry, well-ventilated, fire-resistant area away from heat, sparks, open flames, and oxidizing agents. Keep containers tightly closed, properly labeled, and grounded when transferring. Use flammable-liquid storage cabinets or approved safety cans. Protect from direct sunlight and ignition sources. Follow local regulations and maintain spill kits and appropriate fire extinguishers nearby. |
| Shelf Life | Ethanol has an indefinite shelf life when stored tightly sealed, cool, dark, and away from ignition sources; avoid evaporation/contamination. |
Continuous esterification of ethanol with glacial acetic acid over sulfonated polystyrene-divinylbenzene cation-exchange resin in a fixed-bed reactor is conducted at 70–80°C and atmospheric pressure, with a molar feed ratio of ethanol to acetic acid held between 1.1:1 and 1.5:1 to shift equilibrium toward ethyl acetate while conserving anhydrous ethanol inventory. The ester-rich crude stream is transferred to a three-column distillation train with 15–25 theoretical stages per column and a decanter arranged for heteroazeotropic water removal; the ethyl acetate-water-ethanol ternary azeotrope is stripped overhead, condensed, and phase-separated, with the aqueous phase returning to the esterification reactor as reflux. Ethanol-rich raffinate is recycled through a molecular sieve or membrane dehydration skid, reducing water content below 0.05 wt% to avoid catalyst deactivation and column flooding. Production-scale bottlenecks include resin fouling by low-grade fermented ethanol containing residual fusel oils and organic acids; this is mitigated by pre-distillation and by limiting sodium to ≤10 mg/kg and aldehydes to ≤100 mg/kg, respectively, as measured by gas chromatography. Flammability limits for ethanol demand closed-loop handling; ethanol vapour lower explosive limit is 3.3% v/v and upper explosive limit 19% v/v, so reactors, decanters, and distillation condensers are inerted with nitrogen to maintain oxygen below 5% v/v.
Compliance for the resulting industrial ethyl acetate is anchored to ASTM D4614-05(2020) for urethane-grade and general solvent grades, with additional supply-chain controls under REACH (EC) 1907/2006 and classification and labelling under CLP (EC) 1272/2008. Residual ethanol in the final ethyl acetate is controlled to ≤0.5 wt% depending on grade because excess alcohol shifts evaporation profiles in laminating adhesives and can soften nitrocellulose films. The terminal finished products obtained from this ethyl acetate are industrial solvents, coatings, printing inks, adhesives, and nail-care removers. The main operational boundary is that the esterification unit should not be fed with denatured alcohol containing methanol, ethyl vinyl ether, or ketone denaturants, because these species form low-boiling azeotropes that accumulate in the decanter loop and reduce final ester purity below the 99.5% minimum required for urethane-grade material.
In solvent-based flexographic printing on polyethylene and paperboard, anhydrous or 96% v/v ethanol is used as a letdown solvent at press side, with addition ratios typically 5–25 wt% of the supplied ink weight depending on plate cell volume and ambient humidity. The formulated ink concentrate itself may contain 40–60 wt% ethanol, 10–20 wt% n-propyl acetate or ethyl acetate, and 15–25 wt% nitrocellulose or polyamide resin; press-side ethanol addition adjusts viscosity to 18–25 s on a Zahn #2 cup at 25°C. Chambered doctor blade systems on central-impression flexographic presses running at 150–300 m/min expose the low-boiling ethanol phase to forced-air dryers, making water retention the critical defect: residual water above 0.5–1.0 wt% in the letdown solvent causes re-solubilisation of nitrocellulose coatings, pinholing on film, and hazing on cold-seal paper substrates.
Compliance is governed by EU 2023/2006 good manufacturing practice for food-contact materials when printed packaging is intended for dry or fatty foods, with migration control under EU 10/2011 for plastic food-contact layers and REACH (EC) 1907/2006 for solvent registration. Ethanol used in non-food packaging inks is not required to meet pharmacopoeial purity, but copper, iron, and lead concentrations are held below 1 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 0.1 mg/kg respectively to prevent catalyst residues from discolouring metal-complex pigments. Terminal finished goods include flexible polyethylene bread bags, paperboard frozen-food cartons, aluminium foil lids, and label stocks; these are printed with alcohol-dilutable inks, overprint varnishes, and primers. The main operational boundary is closed-loop solvent recovery: ethanol vapour from the press dryers is captured in activated carbon beds at air-to-solvent ratios between 10:1 and 20:1, because ethanol-air mixtures within the flammable range require dryer LFL monitoring with infrared sensors set at 25% LFL for interlock shutdown.
Following nitrogen purge and flash-point verification below 20°C, ethanol 96% v/v is batch-blended with fragrance oils, film-forming polymers, and cationic conditioning agents in 316L stainless steel vessels fitted with counter-rotating mixers and nitrogen blanketing; the addition ratio in eau de toilette and eau de parfum ranges from 75–90 wt%, while pump hairsprays and aerosol hairsprays incorporate 20–70 wt% ethanol depending on volatile organic compound limits and polymer solubility. The downstream compounding sequence is cold: the polymer phase is dispersed under high shear at 1,500–3,000 rpm, then ethanol is charged below 20°C to prevent viscosity inversion and to suppress static charge accumulation in the vessel headspace. Oxidation-sensitive fragrance materials are protected by blanketing with food-grade nitrogen, with dissolved oxygen maintained below 0.2 mg/L and peroxide value below 5 mg/kg.
Compliance for cosmetic use is anchored to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and its Annex III restricted substances, with ethanol classified under CosIng by CAS 64-17-5 and ethanol denat. permitted when denaturing complies with the national excise framework. Impurity limits for cosmetic-grade alcohol follow Ph. Eur. Ethanol (96%) or USP Alcohol, with methanol not exceeding 200 ppm v/v in the concentrate and acetaldehyde not exceeding 10 ppm; benzene is controlled below 2 ppm under the Cosmetics Regulation trace criteria. Terminal products are fine fragrances, body splashes, hair volumisers, and deodorant sprays. Production-scale failure modes include ethanol evaporation during top-charging to open bins, which shifts fragrance headspace and may drop flash point below 13°C; therefore closed transfer is specified for ethanol tanks and loading arms, and all receiving vessels are earthed to a resistance below 10 Ω.
Liquid antiseptic hand rubs manufactured to the WHO-recommended formulation use ethanol 96% v/v as the sole microbicidal active, with the final concentration adjusted to 80% v/v for the ethanol-based formula. Compounding is performed in 316L stainless steel vessels with bottom-mounted agitators, not high-shear dispersers, because entrained air degrades hydrogen peroxide and raises peroxide residues. Ethanol is charged first to the closed blending vessel, followed by hydrogen peroxide, glycerol, and purified water; the mixture is agitated for 15–30 min at 20–25°C, then held for 72 h before release to allow sporicidal action of hydrogen peroxide and equilibration of peroxide decomposition residues. Filling is conducted under local exhaust ventilation with continuous lower explosive limit monitoring at 10–20% LFL; product is filled into HDPE bottles with flip-top closures, and hold-up volume in the filler is minimised to reduce ethanol evaporation.
| Component | Final concentration | Volume per 10 L |
|---|---|---|
| Ethanol 96% v/v | 80% v/v | 8.333 L |
| Hydrogen peroxide 3% w/v | 0.125% v/v | 417 mL |
| Glycerol 98% | 1.45% v/v | 145 mL |
| Purified water | Quantum satis | Top up to 10.0 L |
Compliance is anchored to Ph. Eur. monograph 05/2024: Ethanol (96%), USP Alcohol, ICH Q3C for residual ethanol class 3, EN 1500 for hygienic handrub efficacy, and EN 1040 / EN 1275 for basic bactericidal and fungicidal activity. Terminal finished products are WHO-compliant liquid hand rubs, hospital antiseptics, travel-size hand sanitizers, and gel hand rubs produced by adding carbomer at 0.2–0.5 wt% after neutralization. The main operational boundary is that water quality must meet purified water specifications; hardness ions above 10 mg/L as CaCO3 can destabilise the carbomer gel structure and produce syneresis in filled product.
Countercurrent extraction of botanicals for food-flavour and nutraceutical intermediates uses ethanol-water blends between 40% v/v and 95% v/v at solvent-to-plant-material ratios of 3:1 to 10:1 m/m, with the ethanol fraction adjusted by target analyte polarity. Fresh and dried plant matrices are charged into 500–5,000 L jacketed stainless steel percolators or carousel extractors, and the menstruum is recirculated at 20–60°C for 2–24 h, depending on seed coat hardness and essential oil volatility. The miscella is filtered through 0.45–1.0 µm membrane or plate-and-frame systems and concentrated in falling-film evaporators under vacuum 60–200 mbar at jacket temperatures not exceeding 60°C to prevent thermal degradation of labile glycosides.
Ethanol is recovered by fractional distillation and returned to the extractor, with residual solvent in the extract controlled below 0.1 wt% for oil-soluble products and below 50 mg/kg for spray-dried extracts intended for food use. Compliance for food-use extraction is anchored to 21 CFR 184.1293 for ethyl alcohol as a GRAS direct food substance, Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 for flavourings, and USP botanical extract monographs where applicable. End products include vanilla oleoresin, paprika colour extracts, green tea polyphenol intermediates, herbal tinctures, and natural flavour emulsions. Production-scale failure modes include fine particle bed compaction and channelling in percolators; this is controlled by maintaining a maximum bed pressure drop below 0.5 bar and by preceding extraction with a 60–70% v/v ethanol pre-wet to allow uniform penetration.
When ethanol is introduced as a polar co-solvent in emulsifiable concentrate formulations for crop protection, it replaces a portion of the aromatic hydrocarbon diluent to improve active ingredient solubility at low temperatures and to reduce the final formulation’s relative density and viscosity. The addition ratio of ethanol in such systems is commonly 5–20% w/w, with a typical emulsifiable concentrate also containing 10–30% w/w aromatic solvent, 5–15% w/w nonionic-anionic emulsifier blend, and the technically pure active ingredient at 10–25% w/w; however, published data for ethanol-specific registrations is limited, and reformulation from xylene to ethanol-based systems must be validated against CIPAC MT 36, MT 39, and MT 46 test methods.
The downstream blending process is conducted in closed 316L vessels with bottom-mounted marine-propeller agitation, charging the active ingredient predissolved in the aromatic or polar aprotic solvent first, followed by the ethanol co-solvent, then the emulsifier blend under low shear at 20–30°C; high-shear mixing is avoided because ethanol addition to water-sensitive emulsifiers can cause phase inversion and viscosity stratification before the final dilution check. After blending, the product is passed through 5 µm cartridge filters and transferred to fluorinated HDPE or epoxy-lined metal packaging under nitrogen padding, with flash-point testing conducted by ASTM D56 or ISO 13736 Tag closed-cup method because the addition of ethanol lowers the flash point of the formulation below 20°C in many commercial recipes. Compliance obligations derive from Regulation (EC) 1107/2009 for plant protection product authorisation, Regulation (EU) 284/2013 data requirements, REACH (EC) 1907/2006 for co-solvent registration, and FAO/WHO JMPS specifications where the product is exported under international tender. Terminal finished products are emulsifiable concentrates of pyrethroid insecticides, organophosphate insecticides, and aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides, each requiring field dilution in water at 0.1–2.0% v/v before spray application. Operational boundaries include avoiding high-density polyethylene storage at temperatures above 30°C for more than 90 days because ethanol permeation through HDPE increases weight loss and may alter the closed-cup flash point; fluorinated HDPE or epoxy-lined steel is specified for long-term storage.
Competitive Ethanol prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618136850665 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8618136850665
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Ethanol (ethyl alcohol, CAS 64-17-5; molecular formula C₂H₆O; molar mass 46.07 g/mol) is supplied as fermentation-derived absolute alcohol, synthetic absolute alcohol, 190 proof and 200 proof pharmacopoeial grades, denatured solvent grades, and denatured fuel ethanol. The product has a normal boiling point of 78.3 °C at 101.3 kPa, a closed-cup flash point near 13 °C, and complete miscibility with water, ketones, esters, and many aromatic solvents. These properties separate it from methanol, which has a lower boiling point of 64.6 °C and a higher vapor pressure of 12.9 kPa at 20 °C, and from isopropanol, which has a lower polarity index of 3.9 and a higher boiling point of 82.6 °C.
The manufacturing route changes the trace-impurity profile. Synthetic ethanol produced by ethylene hydration may retain acetaldehyde, diethyl ether, and light aldehydes; these are reduced by catalytic hydrogenation and distillation. Fermentation-derived ethanol may contain fusel alcohols, esters, and aldehydes that are separated by rectification and carbon treatment. The product is not a single commodity: pharmacopoeial material is non-denatured and assay-controlled, while industrial material may be denatured under 27 CFR 21.35 or supplied as ASTM D4806-21 fuel ethanol.
Anhydrous ethanol is hygroscopic and forms a minimum-boiling azeotrope with water near 95.6 mass% ethanol at 78.2 °C. Ordinary distillation cannot yield 200 proof material; dehydration requires pressure-swing adsorption over 3A molecular sieves or azeotropic distillation. In moisture-cure urethanes and water-sensitive organometallic reactions, even 0.1 mass% water can alter reaction stoichiometry. One mole of water consumes one mole of isocyanate groups, generating one mole of carbon dioxide and amine intermediates; this changes network density, foam morphology, and viscosity in cast polyurethane operations. Process control uses ASTM E203 Karl Fischer titration at the point of use, with bulk product exceeding 0.3 mass% water diverted away from anhydrous service.
Material transfer is an operational boundary. Ambient air at 50% relative humidity can be drawn into storage tanks during liquid level changes; desiccant breathers with 3A molecular sieve or nitrogen padding keep headspace moisture below an equivalent dew point of −30 °C. Stainless steel 316L and polytetrafluoroethylene are preferred for continuous contact. Natural rubber and some polyurethane elastomers exhibit swelling or extraction when exposed to 190 proof or 200 proof ethanol; seal materials should be evaluated under ASTM D471.
In disinfectant manufacturing, ethanol is compared directly with isopropanol. WHO Formulation 1 uses 96% ethanol adjusted to a final concentration of 80% v/v with 0.125% v/v hydrogen peroxide and 1.45% v/v glycerol; efficacy is tested to EN 1500. Isopropanol-based handrubs commonly use 75% v/v isopropanol. Ethanol has a higher polarity index of 5.2 versus 3.9 for isopropanol, and a higher vapor pressure of 5.8 kPa at 20 °C. On high-speed filling lines, the density of ethanol at 0.789 g/mL is used for weight-based fill calibration under ISO 3675; vapor concentration in exhaust air is maintained below 10% of the lower flammable limit by dedicated local exhaust ventilation.
| Property | Ethanol | Isopropanol | Methanol | Ethyl acetate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical formula | C₂H₆O | C₃H₈O | CH₄O | C₄H₈O₂ |
| Molar mass | 46.07 g/mol | 60.10 g/mol | 32.04 g/mol | 88.11 g/mol |
| Boiling point | 78.3 °C | 82.6 °C | 64.6 °C | 77.1 °C |
| Density at 20 °C | 0.789 g/mL | 0.785 g/mL | 0.791 g/mL | 0.902 g/mL |
| Flash point closed cup | 13 °C | 12 °C | 11 °C | -4 °C |
| Vapor pressure at 20 °C | 5.8 kPa | 4.4 kPa | 12.9 kPa | 10.1 kPa |
| Residual solvent class | Class 3 | Class 3 | Class 2 | Class 3 |
Ethanol differs from methanol in cleaning and laboratory use because methanol is an ICH Q3C class 2 solvent with a permitted daily exposure of 30 mg/day, while ethanol is class 3 with 50 mg/day. Methanol has a lower boiling point and higher vapor pressure, making it faster-drying but more volatile. In flexographic ink dilution, ethanol provides slower evaporation than methanol and is less polar, but it is not a direct substitute for methyl ethyl ketone or ethyl acetate because hydrogen-bonding solvents interact differently with nitrocellulose and polyamide binders. The Hansen solubility parameters for ethanol are approximately δD 15.8 MPa½, δP 8.8 MPa½, and δH 19.4 MPa½; methanol has a higher polar parameter of δP 12.3 MPa½ and a higher hydrogen-bonding parameter of δH 22.3 MPa½.
Substitution of ethanol for methanol in vapor degreasing and bench cleaning changes drying and flammability conditions. Ethanol has a closed-cup flash point of 13 °C, methanol 11 °C; both require electrical area classification and static control under NFPA 77. Ethanol’s lower vapor pressure slows evaporation, which can reduce drying defects on glass and metal but extends dry-to-use time in uncontrolled ambient conditions. Methanol is a more aggressive polar solvent for some inorganic salts; ethanol is weaker and may require longer soak times or additive packages in cleaning formulations.
Denatured ethanol grades are segmented by denaturant. SDA 3A consists of 100 parts ethanol denatured with 5 parts isopropanol under 27 CFR 21.35. SDA 40B contains tert-butyl alcohol and a bittering agent; it is not interchangeable with USP alcohol or ACS reagent alcohol because the denaturant produces residue, odor, and UV absorbance. For analytical high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection below 240 nm, denatured material is generally unsuitable; anhydrous USP dehydrated alcohol is specified instead.
| Grade | Controlling standard | Ethanol content | Water or denaturant control | Typical restriction or use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USP Alcohol 190 proof | USP Alcohol monograph | 94.9–96.0 vol% at 15.56 °C | No denaturant; strength defines water balance | Pharmaceutical oral liquids, topical preparations |
| USP Dehydrated Alcohol | USP Dehydrated Alcohol monograph | ≥99.2 vol% | No denaturant; residual solvents per USP <467> | Injectable preparation steps, analytical standards |
| SDA 3A | 27 CFR 21.35 | Base alcohol strength not separately fixed; formula fixed | 5 parts isopropanol per 100 parts ethanol | Cosmetic and industrial solvent use; not for pharmacopoeial use |
| Denatured fuel ethanol | ASTM D4806-21 | ≥92.1 vol% | Water ≤1.0 vol%; methanol ≤0.5 vol%; sulfur ≤30 mg/kg; solvent-washed gum ≤5 mg/100 mL; pHe 6.5–9.0 | Gasoline blending for spark-ignition engines |
For fuel applications, ethanol raises the vapor pressure of low-level gasoline blends and increases water tolerance, but the phase separation boundary shifts with ethanol content, aromatic content, and temperature. In terminal blending, in-line analyzers calibrated under ASTM D4815 are used to verify oxygenate content, while the lower heating value of ethanol near 26.8 MJ/kg remains below gasoline values of approximately 42–44 MJ/kg. That energy-density difference must be accounted for in blend design and fuel metering because a given volume of E10 contains less energy than the gasoline it replaces.
The ethanol-water azeotrope occurs at approximately 95.6 mass% ethanol and 78.2 °C at atmospheric pressure; further water removal is the main cost in manufacturing anhydrous alcohol. Pressure-swing adsorption with 3A molecular sieves is the predominant industrial method. Water molecules, with a kinetic diameter near 2.8 Å, enter the zeolite pores while ethanol is largely excluded. Adsorption is exothermic, and regeneration requires heating the bed to 200–300 °C under vacuum or hot inert gas. In operation, the limiting variable is feed water concentration; a feed above 190 proof water content loads the bed faster, shortens cycle time, and can cause breakthrough. Breakthrough is detected by in-line Karl Fischer or near-infrared analyzers; product water content above 0.5 mass% is diverted back to the rectification column. Published data for specific column dimensions in ethanol plants is limited, but vendor designs commonly use a feed water content of 4–5 mass% and a product water specification below 0.2 mass% for 200 proof material.
Pressure-swing adsorption does not remove denaturants or dissolved salts. If the feed ethanol contains low-volatile acidic impurities, the molecular sieve can experience premature coking in the regeneration cycle; activated carbon beds or ion-exchange polishing are installed before dehydration in high-purity plants. This is a known failure mode: poor feed polish increases regeneration frequency and raises energy use per liter of anhydrous product. The energy input for dehydration is separate from the distillation energy and is a major variable in the price difference between 190 proof and 200 proof product.
Pharmaceutical and analytical applications specify non-denatured ethanol. Under ICH Q3C, ethanol is a class 3 residual solvent with a permitted daily exposure of 50 mg/day; this classification permits its use as a crystallization solvent and tablet granulation fluid provided the finished product meets residual solvent limits. In nucleic acid precipitation, ethanol differs from isopropanol because it requires a higher volume ratio but produces pellets with lower salt coprecipitation; typical ethanol-to-aqueous ratios are 2:1 to 2.5:1 for DNA precipitation, while isopropanol uses 0.6:1 to 1:1. The material boundary is strict: denatured ethanol, fuel ethanol, and solvent-grade alcohol are not acceptable for pharmacopoeial or analytical use because their denaturants and uncontrolled residues interfere with detection, crystallization, or finished-product impurity profiles.
Operational boundaries include flammability, hygroscopicity, and incompatibility with strong oxidizing agents, acid chlorides, and anhydrides. Ethanol is not a direct substitute for isopropanol in every sanitation application when wetted contact time must be extended, and it is not a direct substitute for methanol in certain polar salt extractions. Product choice therefore depends on the controlling specification: pharmacopoeial monographs for drug use, ASTM D4806-21 for fuel blending, and 27 CFR denaturant formulas for industrial solvent use.