|
HS Code |
565853 |
| Chemical Name | Hexachloroethane |
| Chemical Formula | C2Cl6 |
| Appearance | Colorless, crystalline solid |
| Cas Number | 67-72-1 |
| Melting Point Celsius | 185 °C |
| Boiling Point Celsius | 187 °C (decomposes) |
| Density G Cm3 | 2.09 |
| Solubility In Water | Insoluble |
| Odor | Camphor-like |
| Vapor Pressure Mmhg 20c | 0.003 |
| Flammability | Non-flammable |
| Synonyms | Ethane, hexachloro- |
| Stability | Stable under recommended storage conditions |
As an accredited Hexachloroethane factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Hexachloroethane is packaged in 500g sealed, HDPE bottles with hazard labels, safety information, and chemical identification prominently displayed. |
| Shipping | Hexachloroethane is shipped as a hazardous material due to its toxicity and environmental risks. It should be packed in tightly sealed, corrosion-resistant containers, clearly marked with appropriate hazard labels. Transport must comply with local and international regulations (such as DOT, IATA, IMDG), ensuring it is kept away from incompatible substances and securely contained to prevent leaks. |
| Storage | Hexachloroethane should be stored in tightly closed containers, away from moisture, heat, and sources of ignition. Store the chemical in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area, preferably in a secure chemical storage cabinet. Keep separate from incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers and reducing agents. Clearly label containers and ensure proper secondary containment to prevent leaks or spills. |
|
Purity 99%: Hexachloroethane with purity 99% is used in smoke composition formulations, where it ensures efficient and dense smoke generation. Melting Point 187°C: Hexachloroethane with a melting point of 187°C is used in metal degassing applications, where controlled phase transition promotes effective removal of entrained gases. Particle Size <50 microns: Hexachloroethane with particle size less than 50 microns is used in military signaling devices, where fine dispersion guarantees rapid and consistent signal production. Moisture Content <0.2%: Hexachloroethane with moisture content below 0.2% is used in pyrotechnic mixtures, where low water content prevents premature ignition and enhances storage stability. Stability Temperature 120°C: Hexachloroethane with a stability temperature of 120°C is used in aluminum foundries, where thermal stability enables safe usage under high-temperature processing conditions. Low Volatility: Hexachloroethane with low volatility is used in refrigerant manufacturing, where reduced evaporation minimizes product loss and environmental impact. Chlorine Content 90%: Hexachloroethane with 90% chlorine content is used in chemical synthesis, where high halogenation supports effective halide transfer reactions. Refractive Index 1.527: Hexachloroethane with a refractive index of 1.527 is used in optical calibration, where consistency in optical properties allows precise instrument adjustment. |
Competitive Hexachloroethane prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: sales3@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Once you look past basic materials, you find a handful of substances filling very specialized roles. Hexachloroethane stands out in that group—a chlorinated hydrocarbon that serves purposes most people never consider, yet industries can’t easily substitute. As someone who’s worked with chemical sourcing, I’ve recognized, time and again, how products that seem niche on paper prove irreplaceable on the ground. Let’s step back and examine this compound—the model users refer to as C2Cl6—and see where it fits in the balance of cost, utility, and technical demand.
Hexachloroethane’s story doesn’t begin on the shop shelf. Its synthesis from chlorine and carbon sources yields a colorless solid with a sharp, distinctive odor—instantly recognizable to anyone familiar with chlorine chemistry. C2Cl6’s molecular structure gives it a density and melting point far above average. In practical terms, this means a stable compound under many industrial conditions. In older roles—like certain smoke compositions—hexachloroethane earned a reputation for reliability. Unlike more volatile or reactive alternatives, it holds up under stress without transforming or breaking down.
Most chemical buyers sort products into bulk commodities or specialty items. Hexachloroethane falls clearly in the latter group. On aluminum and magnesium foundry sites, it has become well known for its use in degassing. The experienced metallurgist can tell you: gas removal matters. Tiny bubbles ruin mechanical properties. Pass a mixture of hexachloroethane through a molten bath at the right moment and gas content drops—metal purity rises. There’s no flashy trick here: just proven, repeatable performance.
On another track, pyrotechnicians draw on this compound for smoke composition. The reaction of C2Cl6 with zinc produces a thick, white, non-toxic smoke valued for signaling. This has put hexachloroethane into emergency flares, military training rounds, and safety beacons. No one can forget a live-fire demonstration—the clear billows cut through any weather, giving visual cues where other signals fail. In these applications, consistency and dependability trump price. You need a chemical you can trust to perform exactly the same way every time.
Some readers might wonder—why not switch to a more modern, maybe “greener” alternative? Here’s where experience, not theoretical benefit, calls the shots. Many manufacturers tried. The less chlorinated options break down under high temperatures. Organic choices don’t produce clean separation or leave behind residue that contaminates the melt. Hexachloroethane just works: it reacts at a predictable rate, doesn’t add trace metals, doesn’t foam or spit, and handles the job with minimal fuss.
I’ve seen the impact of switching away from tested compounds. Production lines stop until engineers recalibrate. Finished parts fail inspection and must be scrapped. Cost savings disappear down the drain. Reliable operation and clean outcomes, over years of use, often save more than any marginal change to the bill of materials. The benefits of C2Cl6 track with the values a good foreman respects: stability, repeatability, ease of handling in the field, proven implementation.
Every user wants purity, but for some industries, “good enough” means something strict. Purity of 99% or higher isn’t just a marketing line for degassing bricks—trace contamination translates to lost value in high-spec alloy production. The crystalline granule size, the tolerance for moisture, and the packaging style all demand close management. Take aluminum magnesium foundries—an increase in water in the product increases the risk of violent reactions, so reputable suppliers keep moisture limits on the label.
On the pyrotechnics side, repeat particle size matters much less than stability and safe handling. Fine powder ignites too quickly and can endanger workers. Granulated or pressed tablets, matched to the right environment, give safe ignition and even dispersal. Distribution methods also differ. Bulk rolls or loose powder often serve industry, while soldiers carrying smoke grenades need pre-measured, tightly sealed units. Each sector asks for the same molecule—what they buy, handle, and use looks different, shaped by these critical details.
People sometimes group hexachloroethane alongside other degassing or smoke-producing agents. Looking at true alternatives—hexachloroethane offers unique trade-offs that chemistry alone doesn’t capture. These differences have big consequences on the shop floor or in the field.
Traditional degassing blends work only for a narrow band of alloys. Some contain powders that react aggressively, leading to foaming or metal loss. Others lack the chemical punch to scavenge stubborn dissolved gases. Hexachloroethane bridges the gap: it cleans efficiently, but doesn’t risk a runaway exothermic reaction. Operational safety scores points here—not just for the workers near the pot, but also for anyone downstream relying on quality parts.
On the smoke side, a handful of substitutes exist, like red phosphorus or sulfur-based mixes. Their profiles rarely match the predictability of the reaction between zinc and C2Cl6. Red phosphorus poses an obvious hazard—both flammable and toxic when handled incorrectly. White phosphorus (now rare) falls under international control. Designers can create substitutes, but most give up something critical: immediate dispersion on activation, color density, or safety in long-term storage. For field signals—with lives on the line—few take the risk of unproven materials.
No honest evaluation of hexachloroethane leaves safety or regulation out of the conversation. It’s true: hexachloroethane is not without hazards. Exposure to vapors or prolonged skin contact triggers health concerns. Regulatory frameworks, especially those guiding worker exposure and disposal, have tightened over years in many countries. I have seen a definite shift in standard operating practice. More users lean on best-in-class personal protective equipment, process monitoring, and waste controls to minimize risk.
Some will argue against any use of persistent chlorinated compounds. These concerns come from cases where legacy usage led to contamination. I understand the impulse—no one wants to inherit old mistakes. Modern practice, though, involves strict tracking of every gram, closed systems to manage vapor, and robust training for operators. Compare that with the much looser era that created problems still being cleaned up today. For most industrial users, strict adherence to controls brings the risk profile down to a level acceptable in critical production environments.
Raw material cycles and supply chain reliability give any specialty chemical a shifting landscape. Hexachloroethane lives in a spot between commodity and rare good. Rush periods in the metals sector or new military contracts have triggered global prices to spike. On one occasion, I watched as a price quote for a foundry consumable doubled inside six months due to a supply bottleneck pinned on upstream chlorine availability. When buyers have tight tolerance needs, switching to substitutes on short notice isn’t realistic. For big manufacturers, that’s a call to keep safety stock and nurture relationships with proven suppliers.
Over the past decade, environmental rules forced a handful of producers to close or re-tool their plants. This didn’t remove the need for C2Cl6 overnight. Instead, it squeezed availability and poured pressure onto remaining sources to deliver clean, reliable product. Experienced buyers don’t chase the lowest number; they stick with suppliers who can guarantee purity, steady documentation, and rapid response to regulatory changes. In a field where slight errors in process lead to thousands in scrapped product, the choice of supplier and stock isn’t a small thing.
Discussions about hexachloroethane’s future often circle back to innovation. Academics pitch new degassing technologies, or alternative signaling compounds, as the eventual replacement. There’s reason to invest in research—manufacturing always evolves, and anything that combines lower toxicity, better performance, and reduced cost ought to win in the long run. Yet, from firsthand involvement in process qualification, I know that change takes time. The jump from small-batch demonstration to full-scale implementation requires years of trials, new safety studies, and reluctant process changes.
Process engineers and safety managers have their eyes on compliance. Before swapping in any “green” version, they want to see tests: are corrosion and gas content reductions repeatable? Do new chemicals generate their own, unforeseen environmental headaches? The inertia here is not stubbornness—someone’s job, even their company’s reputation, rides on the outcomes of these decisions. Where feasible, pilot programs and dual-track approaches offer an answer. With regulators also watching, careful, stepwise transition builds trust and avoids a cascade of new problems.
Operators and managers accept the responsibility that comes with handling hexachloroethane. The best results stem from disciplined practice. Ensuring storage conditions—dry, sealed, away from heat—prevents degradation and cuts down on the risk of accidental release. Anyone loading a hopper or preparing batches uses gloves, goggles, and chemical-resistance aprons. Simple habits enforce safety: regular audits, clear labeling, and up-to-date safety protocols guard the shop floor from complacency.
Disposal isn’t taken lightly. Waste containing hexachloroethane can’t just go out with ordinary trash or down a drain. Regulations in many regions direct this stream to licensed hazardous waste processors, who burn or neutralize it under controlled conditions. This may cost more, but it clears the path for continued, safe use of the product where needed. For long-term users, partnering with disposal firms that offer clear documentation and transparent processes closes the regulatory risk loop and protects the entire supply chain.
Based on my interactions with buyers, technicians, and process engineers, two things stand clear—first, real-world usage shapes the reputation of chemicals far more than academic speculation ever could. Second, changes in key materials ripple outwards, touching everything from product quality to worker safety. I recall a period of supply disruption following a plant shutdown in East Asia; shops that had clear alternatives lined up weathered the storm, while those that assumed endless supply saw downtime and scrambled purchases.
Professionals in fields that use hexachloroethane don’t take its continued availability for granted. Their stories tell how tough it can be to replace the old workhorses. Lessons handed down in production meetings—keep stocks dry, check for caking, buy only from trusted sources—grow from bitter experience. No one wants to relive a failed batch or a field exercise marred by poor smoke performance. In that context, C2Cl6 retains its spot in the toolbox, both for reliability and peace of mind.
The big stories in materials science rarely make front-page news. Yet, every car, bridge, and radio beacon on a rescue boat owes its function, at least in part, to these carefully chosen compounds. Hexachloroethane doesn’t win awards for flash or glamour, but it soldiers on, proven and preferred by those who shape metal, signal for safety, and demand exact outcomes for every process. A handful of alternatives work for some uses—none, in my experience, capture the balance of effectiveness, predictability, and ruggedness rooted in C2Cl6.
Future developments will continue to push for reduced hazards, greater efficiency, and minimal environmental impact. Smart companies invest in these improvements, but always lean on the wisdom gained from decades of field testing. Whether as a degassing cornerstone in alloys or the bright edge of a smoke signal, hexachloroethane’s legacy endures. The next wave of improvement will come—built not on wishful thinking, but on the difficult lessons of getting things right, batch after batch, day after day.