|
HS Code |
551455 |
| Chemical Name | Ethanol |
| Molecular Formula | C2H6O |
| Molar Mass | 46.07 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless liquid |
| Boiling Point Celsius | 78.37 |
| Melting Point Celsius | -114.1 |
| Density G Per Cm3 | 0.789 |
| Solubility In Water | Miscible |
| Odor | Characteristic, alcoholic |
| Flammability | Highly flammable |
| Cas Number | 64-17-5 |
| Iupac Name | Ethanol |
| Vapor Pressure Mmhg | 44.6 at 20°C |
| Autoignition Temperature Celsius | 363 |
| Refractive Index | 1.361 at 20°C |
As an accredited Ethanol factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Ethanol is packaged in a 2.5-liter amber glass bottle, featuring a screw cap and a hazard label indicating flammability and volume. |
| Shipping | Ethanol is shipped in approved containers such as drums, tanks, or bottles, depending on quantity. It is classified as a flammable liquid (UN1170), requiring proper labeling and documentation. During transit, it must be kept away from heat, sparks, and open flames, with appropriate ventilation and safety precautions to prevent leaks or spills. |
| Storage | Ethanol should be stored in tightly closed containers, away from heat, sparks, flames, and direct sunlight, in a cool, well-ventilated area. It is highly flammable, so keep away from oxidising agents and incompatible substances. Proper grounding and bonding are recommended to prevent static buildup. Use approved storage containers, and label them clearly with hazard warnings and content information. |
|
Purity 99.9%: Ethanol 99.9% purity is used in pharmaceutical synthesis, where high purity ensures consistent active ingredient quality. Viscosity 1.2 mPa·s: Ethanol with viscosity 1.2 mPa·s is used in ink formulation, where low viscosity enables smooth inkjet printing. Stability Temperature 20°C: Ethanol stable at 20°C is used in laboratory reagent storage, where it maintains solvent integrity for reliable results. Purity USP Grade: Ethanol USP grade is used in hand sanitizer production, where compliance with pharmacopeia standards assures safe antimicrobial efficacy. Anhydrous (Water content <0.1%): Anhydrous Ethanol is used in fuel blending, where extremely low water content prevents engine corrosion. Boiling Point 78.37°C: Ethanol with a boiling point of 78.37°C is used in distillation processes, where predictable volatility supports efficient component separation. Molecular Weight 46.07 g/mol: Ethanol with molecular weight 46.07 g/mol is used in molecular biology protocols, where defined molecular characteristics ensure reproducibility. Food Grade: Food grade Ethanol is used in flavor extraction, where certified safety standards guarantee suitability for consumption. Particle Size N/A (Liquid Homogeneity): Homogeneous Ethanol is used in surface disinfection, where uniform distribution provides consistent antimicrobial coverage. Azeotropic Mixture: Ethanol in azeotropic mixture is used in water removal applications, where it enables efficient dehydration of organic solvents. |
Competitive Ethanol prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: sales3@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Ethanol, known to most as the molecule found in beer or whiskey, deserves more credit for its reach into daily life. Over the years, my experience with sustainable technologies in agribusiness, automotive maintenance, and even public health has showed me ethanol’s wide appeal and its further reaching impact. The model used most often in commercial and fuel blends is simple: two carbons, six hydrogens, and a pair of oxygens. When I first handled 99.5% pure ethanol in a research lab at college, its clarity was almost poetic—a reminder that some solutions don’t need complexity to be powerful. Today, from gas stations in Nebraska to cosmetic counters in Seoul, ethanol’s presence feels unavoidable.
Ethanol’s simplicity is its greatest asset. Unlike many fossil-fuel-based additives, this alcohol can be fermented from feedstocks like corn, sugarcane, and cellulosic plants—whatever happens to grow best in local conditions. While plenty of fuels rely on drilling or fracking, ethanol gives farmers new markets and consumers a renewable choice. Gas with an E10 or E15 blend owes its smooth burn and lower carbon footprint to ethanol. As I watched Midwest farmers debate their livelihoods in community halls, the introduction of corn ethanol to the fuel industry changed the conversation—a shift from depending on distant crude supplies to something homegrown.
In production, specifications matter. Every liter of ethanol comes measured in purity—fuel blends typically fall near 95% for automotive use, since absolute dryness isn’t required. Beverage-grade or medical ethanol must exceed 99%, free of toxic residues and contaminants. I recall the first time we compared pharmaceutical samples at a quality control lab; the difference had nothing to do with chemical properties and everything to do with what hitchhiked along for the ride. Clean ethanol means fewer impurities when used in sanitizers or beauty formulas, which pays big benefits for product safety.
On the other end, industrial ethanol doesn’t chase flavor or skin-friendliness. Its role comes down to dissolving oils, acting as a cleaning agent, and sometimes serving as a raw material for vinegar or ethyl acetate. What stands out is that, across all these forms, ethanol’s boiling point, volatility, and solubility make it irreplaceable. I’ve worked on home energy audits where adding ethanol to gasoline resulted in better combustion, smoother startups, and less toxic tailpipe soot—a clear win for lungs and engines alike, even if many folks only notice when their fuel cap mentions “contains up to 10% ethanol.”
Blending ethanol into gasoline never feels like a footnote for anyone around tailpipes and smog. Back in 2010, I visited São Paulo, a city of more than twelve million people, where every taxi ran on either neat ethanol or an ethanol-heavy flex-fuel mix. Air quality wasn’t perfect, but old-timers remembered the days when the air bit their lungs just walking down the street. Ethanol burns cleaner than plain gasoline, producing less carbon monoxide and fewer particulates. Lower greenhouse gases from tailpipes might sound abstract on paper, but for those living along highways or in dense urban areas, the difference isn’t theory but breathing easier day after day. Ethanol’s volatility means it evaporates faster than longer-chain hydrocarbons, so it helps prevent cold-start issues in winter as well.
Ask anyone who’s tried to start a car in deep winter—fuels without ethanol gel up faster and place stress on starter motors. When I worked in a fleet garage scraping ice from windshields at dawn, we relied on ethanol blends for smoother engine cranking. Unlike traditional additives, ethanol mixes readily with gasoline and can absorb some moisture, helping curb dreaded fuel line freeze-ups. These small mechanical advantages really stack up across millions of engines operating in tough conditions.
Ethanol also doesn’t come with benzene, toluene, or other aromatics often found in traditional fuel additives. These chemicals play a role in smog and carry significant health risks. In policy meetings, city officials don’t argue about the dangers of benzene—they’re just tired of the cancers and childhood asthma rates linked to city air. Ethanol sidesteps these issues, giving regulators one less headache and drivers a slightly greener alternative for their internal combustion engines.
Set aside transportation for a minute. My time helping with local distilleries and hand-sanitizer drives during disease outbreaks broadened my view of ethanol’s uses. Hand sanitizers rely on concentrations above 60% ethanol to actually kill viruses and bacteria—below that, they don’t do much more than smell like vodka. Pharmacies and cosmeceutical labs use pharmaceutical-grade ethanol for tinctures, perfumes, and home medicines. During 2020, when sanitizer supplies dried up, I saw breweries shift overnight to ethanol production for local clinics. Since then, flexibility in ethanol’s infrastructure feels like a powerful insurance policy for public health.
In cosmetic factories, workers favor ethanol-based solvents for extracting flavors from botanicals. A skilled distiller will tell you the difference a pure, neutral alcohol makes in the end product—smooth hand feel in lotions, clarity in perfumes, and safe preservation in herbal tinctures. Medical labs, too, prefer ethanol for preserving tissue samples, sterilizing equipment, and preparing chemical reagents. There’s no other commonly available solvent that hits the same balance of safety, effectiveness, and supply.
In household chemicals, ethanol blends clean glass, dissolve soap scum, and banish musty odors without leaving toxic residue. Cleaning supplies made from ethanol can work wonders on greasy stovetops, mildewed tile, or garage grime. For families watching labels for “low VOCs,” ethanol-based cleaners bring welcome peace of mind. The stuff evaporates quickly, so there’s no sticky after-feel and far less chance of lingering fumes.
Market rumors used to claim ethanol pits food against fuel. After walking corn fields and meeting farmers, the story rarely plays out so simply. Most U.S. corn grown for ethanol comes from varieties no human wants on the table—feed-grade, spent kernels, leftover silage. Simultaneously, ethanol plants spin off dried distillers grains, used to feed livestock, supporting another side of rural economies. Watching the economic ripple when a new ethanol plant opens—it’s not just jobs at the facility. It supports seed suppliers, truckers, equipment sales, and every diner serving breakfasts to shift workers. In Brazil, sugarcane-based ethanol gives growers new leverage without sending food prices into chaos. When projects support second-generation ethanol, using crop residues or switchgrasses, conflicts over land use grow weaker.
Ethanol’s critics point to water and land, and they’ve got a real point. Early ethanol expansions drew heavily on deep aquifers and prime farmland. In my own county, neighbors grumbled when irrigation wells dropped after new plants opened. Over time, technology answered. Water reuse systems, low-input prairie grasses, and drought-tolerant crop breeding changed the equation drastically. There’s still room for smarter choices—like switching to rain-fed biomass sources and using waste from municipal sources.
Efficiency also draws fire. Measuring net energy in ethanol involves counting every step—the diesel in plows, gas for hauling, energy for fermentation or distillation. In the late 1990s, estimates sometimes suggested ethanol gave back little more energy than what went in. Through the 2010s and beyond, better farming, smarter enzymes, and low-carbon electricity improved these numbers. Modern studies from America’s Department of Energy put the net energy return for corn-based ethanol at about 1.3 to 1.5 units out for every one in. Sugarcane-based ethanol can do even better. Still, this is an area where research and honest accounting matter more than headline claims.
Ethanol carries logistical challenges. Pure ethanol draws water from the air with an enthusiasm that surprises many fuel station managers. On hot days, moisture creeps into poorly sealed tanks, and at certain levels, ethanol and water separate out from gasoline. When I helped convert old underground tanks for ethanol blends, we swapped out rubber lines and gaskets that gasoline handled fine—ethanol swelled or cracked them. This need for compatible materials means more upfront expense and ongoing monitoring. But these are problems you can solve—you just need to plan and invest accordingly.
Older engines, especially small tools or vintage cars, can complain about ethanol-blended fuels. In my father’s old lawnmower, E10 fuel gummed up the carburetor after only one summer. Since then, small engine manufacturers have released new models designed for ethanol blends, and additive companies came up with stabilizers to keep fuel fresh over long winters.
Across the world, no two ethanol stories run the same way. In the U.S., subsidies and policy targets created a surge in grain ethanol. In Brazil, sugarcane set the pace and flex-fuel cars became an everyday sight. China saw rapid expansion, then sudden slowdowns due to government resets on crop use. The European Union balanced between food and non-food crops, experimenting with wheat, beets, and even waste-derived ethanol. Everywhere, supply chains flexed to suit local crops, weather, and politics.
Through it all, the promise remains: homegrown energy, new rural jobs, and lower tailpipe emissions. Ethanol shares shelf space with biodiesel, biogas, and electric batteries—a lineup of solutions, not a single answer. What matters is not which technology “wins,” but how communities build out systems that value local resources, clean air, and job security over the status quo.
Over the last decade, consumer and legislative debates shaped how ethanol made it to market. In the U.S., Renewable Fuel Standard quotas dictated how much ethanol fuel blenders must use. Critics claimed these mandates distorted markets, while supporters argued they brought stability for farmers and cleaner burning fuels for drivers. Politically, the conversation kept circling back to two main themes: rural resilience and urban health. In public forums, it became clear many people don’t know what’s actually in their fuel. Few realize blending ethanol with gasoline is not brand new—it’s been happening for almost a century. Prohibition-era “gasohol” powered vehicles through shortages, and the oil shocks of the 1970s reignited interest in homegrown alternatives.
Regulation should reward genuine innovation and environmental wins, not just compliance box-checking. Many countries now provide tax breaks, blending mandates, or research funding to support next-generation ethanol projects using agricultural residues, municipal waste, or even algae. Progress thrives on honest reporting of carbon footprints, a willingness to acknowledge tradeoffs, and a drive to invest in improvements where early answers fall short.
For a lot of drivers, ethanol’s impact feels vague. Commuters notice prices at the pump, but not the octane boost ethanol provides to modern engines. My mechanic friends recognize cars tuned for higher blends kick out more horsepower and run cooler. In cooking and home use, folks debate whether a cleaning agent labeled “ethyl alcohol” is safer, or whether flavored tinctures using real ethanol beat mass-market extracts.
Common myths say ethanol always spoils engines, or that it’s just a way to subsidize big agriculture. Reality’s messier. Older carbureted engines suffer with higher blends, but flex-fuel engines and modern injectors adjust on the fly. For public health, ethanol’s volatility matters—it dissipates quickly and leaves less residue than mineral spirits or acetone. Skeptics worried ethanol would drive food prices unsustainably high, but most studies found energy prices and raw speculation have a much bigger impact on grocery bills than ethanol mandates.
Despite ethanol’s benefits, alternatives contend for market share: biodiesel, renewable natural gas, and, overwhelmingly, batteries for electric transport. Some homes in Europe burn bioethanol stoves for space heating—a simple use that avoids complicated burner designs. In the long run, electric vehicles will take a bigger slice of transportation energy, especially in cities with strong grids.
Still, anything with a liquid-fuel need—a combine, trans-oceanic ship, or jet—won’t flip to batteries anytime soon. For these, advanced ethanol blends and nextgen biofuels fill a crucial gap. In my time talking with logistics providers, the question isn’t whether to move away from petroleum, but how to keep systems flexible so choices exist when old technology grows too dirty or expensive.
No single product bridges both food and fuel, health and home, quite like ethanol. Its rapid renewal cycle—months, not millions of years—sets it apart from petroleum. Its supply chain extends deep into communities, not just along pipelines from a handful of drilling rigs. Unlike fossil options, ethanol puts power in varied hands: a family running a farm co-op, a chemist mixing up pharmaceuticals, a student scrubbing beakers, or a city dweller breathing in healthier air. For anyone weighing long-term impact, thinking about the difference ethanol makes means looking at resource flows, community benefit, and the power to adjust quickly in the face of crises or shifting needs.
Ethanol’s future won’t be won by scale alone. Small refiners can thrive on local waste streams, especially as solar and wind bring down distillation costs. Policymakers could support flexible blending rules so consumers and businesses pick what works best. Engineers should keep pushing for engines capable of adapting to many fuels, ensuring maximum efficiency. Urban planners can guide infrastructure changes—better tank linings, modern pumps, robust testing for leaks—keeping the network responsive. Researchers benefit from open, honest collaboration: sharing crop genetics, fermentation designs, or digital monitoring tools. Health agencies could help clear up confusion about safe handling, medical uses, or cleaning protocols. Supporting ongoing education about ethanol’s real impacts helps clear away the fog of partisan debate.
Ethanol never solves every problem, but I’ve seen how it weaves together global trade, rural resilience, city air, and home necessities in ways few products manage. Whenever people work across disciplines—farmers, city workers, chemical engineers—ethanol’s story grows stronger and its benefits land closer to home. Rather than seeing it as a stopgap or distraction, it helps to recognize how adaptation and innovation can unlock better, cleaner, and more flexible energy and material choices for almost everyone.