|
HS Code |
608062 |
| Chemical Name | Carbon Disulfide |
| Molecular Formula | CS2 |
| Molar Mass | 76.14 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to faintly yellow liquid |
| Odor | Ether-like, sweet odor |
| Boiling Point | 46.3°C |
| Melting Point | -111.5°C |
| Density | 1.263 g/cm³ at 20°C |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Flash Point | -30°C (closed cup) |
| Autoignition Temperature | 102°C |
| Vapor Pressure | 353 mmHg at 20°C |
| Refractive Index | 1.627 at 20°C |
| Cas Number | 75-15-0 |
| Flammability | Highly flammable |
As an accredited Carbon Disulfide factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Carbon Disulfide is packaged in a 500 mL amber glass bottle, tightly sealed, with a clear hazard label indicating flammability and toxicity. |
| Shipping | Carbon disulfide is shipped in steel cylinders, drums, or tank cars approved for hazardous materials. It should be stored and transported in cool, well-ventilated areas, away from heat, sparks, and open flames. Proper labeling is essential due to its flammability and toxicity. Shipping complies with DOT regulations for hazardous chemicals. |
| Storage | Carbon disulfide should be stored in a cool, well-ventilated area away from sources of ignition, heat, and direct sunlight, as it is highly flammable. Containers must be tightly sealed and made of compatible materials like steel or glass. It should be kept away from oxidizers, acids, and bases, and clearly labeled to prevent accidental misuse. Proper grounding is necessary to avoid static discharge. |
|
Purity 99.5%: Carbon Disulfide with Purity 99.5% is used in the synthesis of cellophane films, where high purity ensures consistent film transparency and strength. Boiling Point 46.3°C: Carbon Disulfide with Boiling Point 46.3°C is used in solvent extraction processes, where low boiling point facilitates efficient solvent recovery by distillation. Molecular Weight 76.13 g/mol: Carbon Disulfide with Molecular Weight 76.13 g/mol is used in rubber vulcanization, where precise molecular weight contributes to controlled cross-linking reactions. Stability Temperature 30°C: Carbon Disulfide with Stability Temperature 30°C is used in laboratory reagent preparation, where stable handling conditions minimize decomposition risks. Density 1.263 g/cm³: Carbon Disulfide with Density 1.263 g/cm³ is used in pesticide formulation, where accurate density allows for precise blending of active ingredients. Sulfur Content 84.2%: Carbon Disulfide with Sulfur Content 84.2% is used in the production of carbon tetrachloride, where high sulfur content ensures optimal reaction yields. Refractive Index 1.627: Carbon Disulfide with Refractive Index 1.627 is used in optical lens manufacturing, where high refractive index enables the creation of specialized optical components. Low Water Content <0.01%: Carbon Disulfide with Low Water Content <0.01% is used in pharmaceutical synthesis, where minimal moisture content prevents unwanted hydrolysis. |
Competitive Carbon Disulfide prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: sales3@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Carbon disulfide has become a staple in many industrial processes due to its unique chemical properties. Unlike more common chemicals such as acetone or toluene, carbon disulfide carries a sharp, sweet odor reminiscent of chloroform mixed with slight sulfur notes. For some, that scent triggers safety memories from time spent in labs or around old rayon factories. My first real encounter with carbon disulfide involved a hands-on demonstration in a textile research facility, where I learned to respect both the potential and the real risks this chemical carries.
Industry utilizes different models or grades of carbon disulfide, based on purity and byproducts from production. You typically see grades labeled as technical or chemical, with technical-grade running at about 99.5% purity and chemical-grade reaching above 99.9%. Chemical-grade carbon disulfide usually comes with a certificate listing measured sulfur and water content. In my time working with laboratory suppliers, I noticed that the smallest impurities left in technical-grade carbon disulfide often affected sensitive syntheses in specialty labs, especially those dealing with pharmaceuticals.
Getting the right match between model and job isn’t just a matter of cost; it can mean the difference between clean and dirty runs. Rayon plant engineers I worked with years ago swore by more refined product when chasing higher production standards. Some felt technical-grade sufficed for most sulfur compounds, but chemical-grade made a big jump in output quality, especially with fewer side reactions.
Carbon disulfide’s physical form is clear and liquid at room temperature, boiling at just below 47 degrees Celsius, so you don’t need much warmth to turn it into a vapor. The density hovers around 1.26 g/cm³, offering a little more weight in liquid form compared to water. I’ll never forget draining a drum and realizing how fast the fumes started filling the space — a telling sign of its high volatility.
The vapor pressure of carbon disulfide sits high enough that an open container left unattended can empty itself in no time. Unlike thicker solvents, it escapes into the air easily, which becomes a real concern in enclosed workspaces. The flammability often comes as a surprise to those who haven’t handled it. Once, I watched a confusion between carbon disulfide and carbon tetrachloride lead to a dramatic evacuation, when a stray spark found its way to a container in an old dye facility.
In industry, carbon disulfide often pops up as a solvent. The rubber sector uses it for producing viscose rayon and cellophane, playing a major role in extracting and processing raw plants into threads or films. I spent some time with a team analyzing its effect on the quality of rayon fibers. Our experiments backed what others had seen — a slower, more controlled flow of carbon disulfide led to stronger, more uniform filament formation.
Agricultural chemical synthesis relies on carbon disulfide for making pesticides and fungicides, particularly dithiocarbamate compounds. The link between improved yield and better control of pests wouldn’t be possible without this chemical somewhere in the mix. Modern farm chemistry often traces back to a batch of carbon disulfide, blended and reacted under strict temperature controls.
Lab workers and commercial chemists prefer this compound for making carbon tetrachloride, xanthates, and thiuram compounds. Electronics field labs use carbon disulfide in specialized cleaning routines for certain optical fiber coatings, primarily because few other solvents tackle complex polysulfide residues as efficiently.
Comparing carbon disulfide to similar chemicals like acetone, chloroform or even carbon tetrachloride, you see both performance advantages and serious safety tradeoffs. Volatility and non-polarity let carbon disulfide dissolve rubber, sulfur, phosphorous, fats, resins, and many oils far better than water-based or more polar alternatives. This means you get a thorough, deep-reaching reaction zone in the production of sensitive materials.
I’ve watched operators rely on acetone for basic cleaning tasks, only to switch to carbon disulfide for stuck-on resins that resisted everything else. Cost comes in higher—raw carbon disulfide isn’t cheap to purify or stabilize—but the performance edge is clear in specialty plants. Its low polarity puts it in a different league than solvents like ethanol, making it capable of acting where others fall short.
Downsides always demand respect. Unlike most common lab solvents, carbon disulfide’s exposure risks reach both short- and long-term health. Acute effects develop quickly — headaches, dizziness, even nerve effects if inhaled in moderate quantities, a scenario that’s sadly all too common in cramped shops without good venting. Chronic exposure risks range from mood swings and trembling fingers to heart disease, making this one of the few industrial solvents tracked beyond simple flammability concerns. Occupational physicians in larger plants regularly screen workers for subtle signs of neurotoxicity.
Carbon disulfide brings a steep learning curve in safe handling. The first time I worked an old textile tanker line, the site supervisor made sure no one ever handled the chemical alone — not just because of the fire risk, but also how quickly fumes numb the senses. Ventilation stands at the core of every good setup. Effective airflow and real-time gas detection systems are as essential as protective gloves and goggles.
Some teams go further, adding spark-proof tools or isolating pumping systems with dedicated spill trays. Even small leaks demand immediate attention. No other solvent I’ve used reacts so severely with a forgotten open valve or unsealed fitting. Fire safety officers at a workshop I attended didn’t mince words: “No shortcuts; one slip fills three city blocks with headaches.”
Chemical storage rules reflect the compound’s danger. Only steel drums with sealed closures make the cut. Proper labeling and regular inspection mean you don’t get caught off guard by corrosion, a hidden crack, or accidental mixing with oxidizing agents. After a near-miss in a poorly maintained storage room, I learned firsthand that water or damp air quickly causes runaway reactions — especially when older drums start to rust from the inside.
More public attention now turns toward carbon disulfide’s environmental footprint. In my own professional circle, regulatory pressure ramped up after several high-profile contamination incidents in Asia and Europe. Release of vapor into open air can contribute to local smog levels, while spills in water systems disrupt aquatic life. Even short pulses in wastewater knock out key microorganisms, damaging local treatment plant performance.
Major rayon factories have reduced unfiltered releases thanks to improved scrubbing systems. Legislation in the European Union and the United States sets tough discharge limits, and most companies must now use closed-loop recovery setups. I witnessed one pilot project convert nearly 90% of lost vapor back into reusable chemical feedstock, driven by a blend of regulatory pressure and cost-saving incentives. The results reduced both workplace fumes and overall emissions, creating a better balance between production profits and safety.
Still, developing countries often lag behind. Fast-growing textiles or rubber plants sometimes operate with outdated equipment and little oversight, raising concerns not only for worker health, but also downstream effects on irrigation and air quality. Only wider adoption of stricter standards and enforcement promises any real long-term solution.
Some industrial researchers seek to replace carbon disulfide in high-risk processes. Water-based or less volatile solvents enter regular trials, particularly in synthetic fiber production. One group in northern Europe claimed modest yields using dimethyl sulfoxide, but their costs and quality lagged behind traditional results. I watched a team in North America experiment with novel enzymatic baths trying to cut out harsh chemicals altogether. So far, results barely scratch the promise of carbon disulfide — especially in regions sensitive to final product feel, strength, or shine.
Producers continue tweaking internal recycling methods rather than giving up on the chemical. Advanced condensation and purification technologies now recover over 95% of vapor generated in well-equipped rayon plants. Real-time monitoring systems trigger shutdowns before leaks become dangerous. This tech-forward approach offers a bridge for industries reliant on carbon disulfide, at least until a real substitute emerges.
Education plays a crucial role. The gap between an accident-free year and a chemical disaster often shrinks to a moment’s oversight or one missed training update. Seasoned workers who’ve seen near-misses stay vigilant, enforcing safety drills and buddy systems. Regular medical screenings allow early detection of chronic exposure’s subtle effects, while better personal protective equipment keeps risks lower than even twenty years ago.
Community health programs around major industrial hubs now monitor air and water near large plants. Data collected from these efforts has led to tighter zoning regulations, preventing residential neighborhoods from spreading too close to high-risk solvent storage. In my hometown, advocacy groups now meet quarterly with factory safety officers, sharing both complaints and best practices.
Product labeling changed markedly in recent years. Clear pictograms, QR links to online safety dashboards, and real-time alerts by SMS all help raise awareness even before a drum leaves the shipping dock. These developments signal a shift toward more open, participatory frameworks, involving everyone from logistics drivers to local emergency responders.
Solvents like carbon disulfide stand as double-edged tools, enabling progress in synthetic materials, chemistry, and agriculture, while always shadowed by real hazards. Drawing on the collective experience of operators, engineers, emergency professionals, and public health advocates, the industry gets closer to wise, responsible usage each year.
Laboratory research continues hunting for less hazardous substitutes while producers strive for better recovery systems, cleaner effluents, and smarter worker protections. In the end, responsible consumption, transparent safety culture, and ongoing innovation remain the keys to keeping this vital chemical as safe as it is indispensable.
My work and time alongside colleagues in multiple regions taught me to see both the benefits and pitfalls of using carbon disulfide. It’s not just another lab supply — it shapes the quality of textiles, expands the toolkit of agricultural chemists, and links together sectors often overlooked by the wider public. Used carelessly, it brings risks to workers and communities; used wisely, with attention to recovery and safety, it fuels some of industry’s most valuable progress.
Choosing the right model, respecting storage and handling, and pushing for transparent, accountable practices lifts both worker safety and environmental responsibility. The lessons of past decades echo in every drum shipped — vigilance, adaptation, and respect lay the groundwork for a chemical legacy that works not just for profits, but for all who rely on the safety and output it shapes.