Products

O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate

    • Product Name: O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate
    • Alias: Bromophos
    • Einecs: 259-984-2
    • Mininmum Order: 1 g
    • Factroy Site: Yudu County, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
    • Price Inquiry: admin@ascent-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications

    HS Code

    183714

    Chemical Name O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate
    Molecular Formula C13H10BrCl2O2PS
    Appearance White to off-white solid
    Cas Number 29591-95-1
    Boiling Point Decomposes before boiling
    Solubility Slightly soluble in organic solvents
    Storage Conditions Store in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight
    Hazard Classification May be harmful if swallowed or inhaled
    Synonyms Bromodichlorophenyl phenyl phosphorothioate
    Uses Intermediate in chemical synthesis

    As an accredited O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing The packaging is a sealed, amber glass bottle containing 50 grams of O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate, labeled for laboratory use.
    Shipping O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate should be shipped in tightly sealed containers, protected from moisture, heat, and direct sunlight. Ensure appropriate hazard labeling and comply with relevant transportation regulations. Handle with care, using suitable protective equipment, and ship via licensed chemical carriers, following all local, national, and international safety guidelines.
    Storage O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-dichlorophenyl) phenyl phosphorothioate should be stored in a tightly sealed container, away from moisture and direct sunlight, in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated area. Keep it away from incompatible materials such as strong oxidizers. Properly label the container and store it in a designated chemical storage cabinet to prevent accidental exposure or contamination.
    Application of O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate

    Applications of O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate in Industrial Manufacturing

    O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate finds specialized use primarily in high-value agricultural and industrial chemical sectors where reliable performance, compliance, and traceability are essential. The following application scenarios outline established downstream markets, relevant regulatory standards, integration in customer processes, and real-world end product formats.

    1. Crop Protection Active Ingredient Synthesis

    This compound serves as a targeted intermediate in the production stream of premium organophosphorus-based crop protection agents. Its halogenated aromatic structure enables the downstream synthesis of select insecticidal actives that require both high chemical stability and precise molecular functionality. Most manufacturers adopt it at the coupling stage, where fine control over purity prevents downstream formation of persistent organic pollutants and meets strict residue limits for modern agricultural markets.

    Industry compliance standards

    • FAO/WHO Guidelines on Pesticide Active Ingredients
    • REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (EU)
    • US EPA PRN 98-10 requirements
    • China GB 2763–2021 Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticide

    Typical usage ratio

    • Usually 0.6–1.2 molar equivalents relative to target active ingredient precursors; adjusted for impurity profiles and process scale

    Downstream process integration

    • Charged after initial substrate halide activation in the synthesis of phosphorothioate insecticide cores
    • Participates in chlorination or bromination quench steps to cap selectivity and limit byproducts

    Final product types

    • Concentrated insecticidal technicals for emulsifiable concentrates
    • Wettable powder and granule formulations for field application
    • Export-grade active ingredient stock for contract tolling partners

    2. Seed Treatment Formulation and Coating

    Leading agrochemical formulators use this material in the manufacture of advanced seed treatment actives. The compound’s lipophilic profile supports strong binding to seed coats, ensuring selective delivery and minimizing off-target environmental runoff. Proper process management at milling and blending stages remains critical to meet coating homogeneity targets and global limits for total organophosphate load.

    Industry compliance standards

    • OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals: Section 6 (Seed Treatment)
    • ISO 16140-3:2021 (Seed treatment quality process)
    • Japan Agricultural Standard (JAS) for pesticide residues
    • GlobalG.A.P. Farm Assurance Standard

    Typical usage ratio

    • Routinely 1.0–2.5% w/w in seed coating mixes; levels revised based on seed type, germ size, and residue MRLs

    Downstream process integration

    • Added during the final wet-mixing phase before drum coating or fluidized bed application on seeds
    • Follows carrier preparation to ensure uniform distribution and adherence

    Final product types

    • Ready-to-sow treated seeds (maize, wheat, soy)
    • Packed seed lots for commercial distribution under third-party IP rights
    • Bulk treated grain batches for contract farming operations

    3. Synthesis of Industrial Biocidal Agents

    Major specialty chemical producers utilize this material as a key intermediate in the multi-step synthesis of organophosphorus biocides used in coatings, wood preservation, and plastic additives. Its dual halogen substituents enhance biocidal potency, while stringent quality control at this stage ensures final products meet required migration, extractable, and leaching limitations in downstream applications.

    Industry compliance standards

    • BPR Regulation (EU) 528/2012 for Biocidal Product Authorization
    • ASTM D5573-18 (Standard Practice for Marine Antifouling Coatings)
    • US EPA Title 40, Part 158 (Biochemical Pesticide Data Requirements)
    • JIS K 1577:2014 (Test Methods for Biocidal Activity on Wood)

    Typical usage ratio

    • Customized at 0.8–1.1 mole basis relative to amine or hydroxy precursors; batch scale influences overall charge

    Downstream process integration

    • Introduced after in-situ deprotection and prior to key phosphorus-sulfur bond formation stages
    • Serves as a coupling partner in microwave-assisted or high-shear reactions to ensure full conversion

    Final product types

    • Liquid concentrate biocides for marine coatings and ship hull paints
    • Wood treatment solutions for export-grade lumber
    • Stabilized industrial plasticizers with integrated pest control functionality

    4. Manufacture of Antiparasitic Veterinary Intermediates

    Veterinary pharmaceutical developers source this chemical for the synthesis of phosphorothioate backbone intermediates in selected systemic and topical antiparasitic agents for livestock. Its unique reactivity enables stepwise coupling with nitrogen-containing heterocycles, where precise control at this stage directly impacts final batch purity and pharmacological performance. Adhering to international veterinary GMP and tight residue control remains mandatory throughout production.

    Industry compliance standards

    • VICH GL3 (GMP for veterinary pharmaceutical products)
    • EU Regulation (EU) 2019/6 on Veterinary Medicinal Products
    • United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Veterinary Compendium
    • China GMP for Veterinary Drugs 2020 (Decree 27)

    Typical usage ratio

    • Generally 0.75–1.30 molar equivalents per end-use pharmaceutical batch; final ratio refined after pilot-scale QA release

    Downstream process integration

    • Reacted with heterocyclic amines in batch or continuous stirred reactors directly after solvent exchange and base deprotonation
    • Managed to minimize residual phosphorus species before downstream crystallization

    Final product types

    • Injectable and oral antiparasitic veterinary formulations for swine and cattle
    • Pour-on and spot-on parasite control treatments
    • Intermediate technical concentrates for further on-site synthesis

    5. Synthesis of High-Performance Industrial Lubricant Additives

    Lubricant formulation companies employ this raw material to synthesize anti-wear and extreme-pressure (EP) additive intermediates for industrial and automotive lubricating oils. The electron-rich, sulfur-phosphorus functional group, introduced via controlled coupling, enhances thermal stability and surface protection of the derived additives. Strict adherence to global chemical registration and materials safety regulations governs both synthesis and additive blending steps in this segment.

    Industry compliance standards

    • SAE J183 (Engine Oil Performance and Chemical Limits)
    • API 1509 (Lubricant Base Oil Interchange and Viscosity-Grade Engine Testing)
    • REACH Substance Registration for Lubricant Components
    • OECD Test Guidelines for Chemicals (Section 3: Degradation and Accumulation)

    Typical usage ratio

    • Intermediate use at 1.2–2.0 molar ratio; final additive inclusion in formulated oil generally 0.05–0.18% by mass, tailored to application load limits

    Downstream process integration

    • Charged after polyalkenyl substrate feed and prior to phosphorus-sulfur condensation
    • Followed by precision distillation to remove trace volatiles and unreacted materials

    Final product types

    • AW/EP additive packages for industrial gear and hydraulic oils
    • Automotive engine oil additive concentrates
    • Grease performance booster additives for heavy equipment maintenance

    Free Quote

    Competitive O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615365186327

    Email: admin@ascent-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate: A Manufacturer’s Perspective

    Harnessing Chemistry for Real-World Performance

    Every batch of O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate that leaves our facility carries a direct imprint of experience gained on the production floor. From the sourcing of raw materials, through the control of reaction temperature and purity, to long hours logged maintaining steady output, we know this molecule inside and out. That matters a great deal: in the field of specialty agrochemical intermediates, reliability doesn’t just support performance—it underpins the entire end-use process. We’re driven by what happens once the product gets to work on real farms and in real synthesis, not the theoretical output defined in a laboratory.

    What O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate Brings to Advanced Chemistry

    This compound stands apart for its fine balance of reactivity, thermal stability, and compatibility in aggressive synthesis routes. Our product undergoes continuous scrutiny for consistency in molecular weight, color-value, and lack of volatile impurities. Through years blending reaction know-how with hard data, we’ve minimized side-reaction byproducts that complicate downstream purification, something our partners have demanded because even small trace impurities skew final product quality or introduce unforgiving variability in yield.

    Conversations with formulation chemists and process engineers have shown us that the right phosphorothioate intermediate saves time, energy, and waste costs at scale. This molecule often comes up in organophosphorus chemistry, notably as a key bridge in the synthesis of insecticides that call for both steric hindrance and precise electron-withdrawing substituents. Its profile, shaped by the unique 4-bromo and 2,5-dichloro substitution pattern, supports target selectivity when synthesized into higher order compounds.

    Model, Purity and Handling: Insights From the Shop Floor

    Our teams classify and quality assure every lot of O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate by standard chemical nomenclature, sometimes cross-referencing internal model codes for production runs, but the real benchmark is purity. Production batches run through a robust purging and vacuum-drying regime to drive out water and low-boiling residues. Final hydrogen, nitrogen, and halide content are kept well within industry norms, and every drum gets a certificate based on actual spot-checking and analysis, not just a box-check on a sheet.

    We continue to focus on avoiding trace contaminants and inconsistent melting points. Seasoned staff have seen how even tiny variations in drying or upstream solvent cleanliness show up in customer applications. So, systems are set in place, not for the sake of protocol, but to lock in that repeatability. The feedback loop with technical users is real and ongoing. For those using automated dispensing or pilot-scale synthesis, our powder flow and packaging are built to reduce settling, clumping, or airborne dust—all substantial practical hurdles when scaling up.

    Real-World Usage Patterns and Developed Practices

    O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate is a tool that rarely sees direct use in its raw form outside advanced labs. Most technical users value it as a key intermediate, primarily in the performance pesticide and crop protections sector. Downstream, molecules constructed upon this core scaffold often target tough-to-manage pests because the chlorinated-bromo structure brings potent activity. Our customers, including process development teams and pilot plants, rely on it as a springboard to more active or specialty analogues.

    Synthesizing this compound at industrial scale doesn’t just mean running the same flask procedure “bigger”. The plant setting deals with heat migration, agitation issues, and raw material dosing precision that are unseen in the bench-scale literature. Our best production improvements have come through working directly with downstream users who run into clogged lines, inconsistent purity gradients, or troublesome residual solvent profiles. Skills honed from these fixes reappear in every subsequent production campaign.

    In laboratory studies and pilot plant feedback, this phosphorothioate delivers steady reactivity with organophosphorus catalysts, behaving predictably across a range of temperatures. Bench-level research points to fast conversions in aryl-phosphorothioate rearrangements, without intractable tar formation or brown oil residues that can slow purification steps. The real test for us is in the actual mass-balance: does all the phosphorus find its intended target, without leaks into byproduct formation or costly downstream scrubbing?

    Tracking Differences: What Sets Our Product Apart

    Many labs can make small lots of this compound—doing so with reproducible clarity and low impurity tails at tonnage scale takes commitment and more than a little patience. We have invested in continuous distillation equipment custom-matched for this product’s sensitivity. Early on, solvent choice and crystallization timing generated enough scrap and off-spec material that process teams ran monthly post-mortems. Over time, detailed root-cause tracking—especially on color, fines, and filterability—produced a tighter, lower-waste workflow.

    Not all market offerings meet the same bar. Inconsistent color or obvious solids stratification tip us off to rushed or under-designed filtration. Many third-party products feature a broader tail on their impurity chromatograms, usually stemming from heat spikes or solvent system mismatch. By comparison, our bulk lots undergo both in-process spectral checks as well as targeted impurity deconvolution. Analysis by gas chromatography or HPLC is not just periodic compliance; results feed back into equipment calibration and operator checklists.

    Some newcomers to this molecule in the supplier world skip the time- and energy-intensive task of thorough moisture control. Our experience shows any residual water or high-boiling solvent cuts into downstream reaction yield and fouls crystalline byproducts. Our drying “hold-point” is based on running the crystallized intermediate down to a moisture content below levels we know have caused old-batch grief. Even equipment cleaning has been modified so that residue from prior campaigns cannot cross-contaminate sensitive intermediates.

    Lessons Learned: Tackling Manufacturing and Supply Chain Challenges

    Over years of direct manufacturing, lessons learned often come the hard way. We’ve faced disruption from both upstream and downstream supply cycles—raw material purity fluctuations, energy price spikes, shipping embargoes, or weather events causing batch delays. We’ve found it crucial to maintain clear forward communication not only internally, but also with customers who build their project timelines on our deliveries.

    Process engineers refined protocols not by chasing marginal cost savings, but by solving bottlenecks that cost end-users time and money. For O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate, solid reliability hinges on controlling impurity drift, staying ahead of moisture migration in packaging, and preemptively addressing color changes tied to trace oxidation. We tackled these issues with targeted upkeep schedules, adjusted purge velocities, and refinements in in-process filtration, so the logistics team could ship material that met downstream technical needs without excess buffer time on project-critical orders.

    Even decades in, unforeseen challenges remain: labor shortages, macroeconomic inflation, or rapid regulatory changes knock on effect through every input. We respond by maintaining flexibility in equipment scheduling and keeping a blend of experienced hands combined with new staff eager to learn the intricacies of the molecule. Bringing people together on the production line, troubleshooting, and acting on feedback remain non-negotiable facets of real reliability.

    Supporting Global and Regional Regulatory Demands

    Compliance in the chemical industry moves at a brisk pace. O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate is no exception—a single change in restriction or permitted level in one region ripples through the whole logistics and documentation stream. Our regulatory team stays current with regional REACH updates, Asia-Pacific harmonized codes, and North American chemical inventory requirements. This level of vigilance supports partnerships spanning developed and emerging markets. Experience tells us that proactive dialogue with customers and competent authorities saves everyone time down the line. We continually revise technical dossiers and share learnings from completed audits, sharing outcomes with process partners who need to pass their own internal compliance hurdles.

    End-users building advanced actives or intermediates need quick access to declaration documents and up-to-date impurity profiles. From our vantage, withholding this information only causes project stalls and technical friction. By keeping full transparency over lot release criteria, audit trails, and environmental, health, and safety documentation, we’ve supported successful customer registrations both for industrial-scale and lower-volume pilot trials in multiple jurisdictions.

    Direct User Feedback and Collaborative Problem Solving

    Regular contact with technical and purchasing teams working “at the coalface” gives us insights that are hard to gain from trade shows or secondary market data. Several partnerships started from a bottleneck—clogged lines, recurring color “off-spec”, missing reactivity—fixed through open discussion and roundtable troubleshooting. Manufacturers on the sharp end of timelines want more than generic support; they need changes implemented swiftly when something doesn’t fit their process.

    Our batch campaign records show adjustments made not based on abstract targets, but on technical feedback from user benches and pilot plant operators. For example, during a period of repeated dustiness in downstream use, we implemented new granulation and antistatic steps, leading to less airborne particulate loss and easier handling. Similar interventions tackled colored impurity tracks and addressed solubility mismatches during attempted scale-ups. Each challenge added to cumulative expertise, sharpening protocols for future production runs.

    Our approach never assumes silence is seamless operations. Direct outreach—phone calls, site meetings, technical site visits—help us catch friction before it becomes a shutdown. Over time, these relationships foster quick solutions: modified packaging matched to line-feed systems, or adjusted crystalline content based on shifting customer process needs. No solution is imposed in a vacuum. Iterative improvement wins out over one-size-fits-all claims.

    Environmental and Operator Safety in Daily Practice

    No one on a chemical production line needs reminding: operator and environmental responsibilities are more than “tick the box” exercises. We engineered plant procedures to contain, recover, and treat all waste byproducts and solvent streams, tackling both emissions and occupational exposure head-on. Years of operational audits and real-world practice drive improvements in scrubber efficiency, reaction vessel seals, and PPE standards, not after the fact, but as a daily routine.

    By running regular drills and technical reviews with plant staff, workplace safety stays front-of-mind, reducing downtime from avoidable incidents and maintaining an environment people trust. On the environmental front, solvent recovery initiatives don’t just shrink waste—they translate into measurable cost savings and reduced regulatory scrutiny. As new global standards for trace residue emerge, continuous attention to tail-gas management anchors credibility for responsible production.

    Our experience shows that investments in standalone vapor and liquid containment systems are not optional in the world of phosphorothioates—they form the infrastructure upon which production reliability and staff welfare rest. This applies as much at small-batch pilot scale as when turning out drums weekly for established global partners.

    Vision for Continuous Improvement

    Stagnation in process chemistry isn’t an option. Each production cycle is a learning ground for tighter parameter control, greener chemistry, and fewer manual interventions. We’re driving toward less solvent use, smarter energy flows, and more detailed tracking of impurity fingerprints—because long-term partners demand both sustainability and cost efficiency in equal measure.

    For O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate, these objectives have sharpened into measurable improvements: reduced waste generation per batch, more stable delivery schedules even as demand fluctuates, and shorter customer feedback loops back to our technical teams. We continually benchmark process upgrades against real-world customer experiences, avoiding changes that complicate process reliability in exchange for quick wins.

    Our next generation of process innovation leans on automation and digital tracking not for show, but for accountability and traceability customers can see at every shipment. This transparency becomes another check on quality. Decades in, the lesson stays the same: keep technical rigor high, keep direct line communication open, and treat customer pain points as signposts for the next manufacturing breakthrough.

    Shared Experience: From Factory Gate to End Product

    O-Methyl-O-(4-Bromo-2,5-Dichlorophenyl) Phenyl Phosphorothioate, produced by hands-on chemical engineers, weighs on us as more than a line item in an order sheet. Its journey from raw input through the intricacies of organophosphorus synthesis marks every stage of manufacturing. Each lesson earned, fix implemented, and partnership formed shapes the intermediate people across the industry build upon.

    Real-world chemical production resists shortcuts. Attentiveness to detail and reliance on feedback loops, rather than generic protocol, deliver product that meets evolving needs. Regulatory shifts, customer process evolution, and environmental responsibility all tie back to one principle: stay present in the full lifecycle of the chemical, from line operator to technical end-user.

    Those who count on this phosphorothioate deserve more than a theoretical product—they receive the outcome of decades of mistakes, problem-solving, and practical wisdom. That’s the bond uniting chemical manufacturer and partner: not just at the start, but through every batch and every outcome. This grounding in continuous improvement, transparency, and collaboration sustains trust, ensures product integrity, and keeps critical production moving forward where it matters most.

    Top