|
HS Code |
383219 |
| Chemicalname | Ethyl Chlorothionoformate |
| Casnumber | 541-41-3 |
| Molecularformula | C3H5ClOS |
| Molecularweight | 124.59 |
| Physicalstate | Liquid |
| Color | Colorless to pale yellow |
| Boilingpoint | 124-126°C |
| Density | 1.272 g/cm3 at 25°C |
| Meltingpoint | -60°C |
| Solubility | Decomposes in water |
| Refractiveindex | 1.4880 at 20°C |
| Flashpoint | 49°C (closed cup) |
| Odor | Pungent |
| Vaporpressure | 8 mm Hg at 20°C |
| Unnumber | 2744 |
As an accredited Ethyl Chlorothionoformate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Ethyl Chlorothionoformate is packaged in a 500 mL amber glass bottle with a secure, chemical-resistant cap and caution labeling. |
| Shipping | Ethyl Chlorothionoformate should be shipped as a hazardous chemical in compliance with regulations. It must be packed in airtight, chemical-resistant containers, clearly labeled, and cushioned to prevent leakage or breakage. Transport should be by authorized carriers, with documentation and Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) provided, avoiding exposure to heat, moisture, and incompatible substances. |
| Storage | **Ethyl Chlorothionoformate** should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, away from heat, sparks, and sources of ignition. Keep the container tightly closed and protected from moisture. Store separately from incompatible substances such as bases, oxidizing agents, and water. Use corrosion-resistant containers due to its potential to release corrosive or toxic gases upon contact with water or moisture. |
Applications of Ethyl Chlorothionoformate in Industrial ManufacturingAs a direct chemical raw material producer, we supply Ethyl Chlorothionoformate to industry-leading manufacturers across select synthesis sectors. This material serves specialized roles in key chemical transformation processes, each with application-specific requirements on formulation, compliance, and downstream integration. Explore how established industries incorporate Ethyl Chlorothionoformate in their workflows and finalized products. 1. Agrochemical Intermediate SynthesisEthyl Chlorothionoformate is widely utilized as a key thionating and esterifying agent in the synthesis of selected carbamate pesticide and fungicide actives. Agrochemical manufacturers integrate it in multi-step sequences, specifically during the intermediate formation of O-ethyl and S-ethyl thiono derivates. In these applications, precise handling and dosing is required to ensure transformation efficiency while meeting global crop protection quality specifications. Process engineers often optimize addition levels based on target molecule structure and overall batch yield. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
2. Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Intermediate PreparationWithin the pharmaceutical sector, Ethyl Chlorothionoformate finds application in sulfur-based coupling reactions for the manufacture of select API precursors, including certain cephalosporin or penem thiono analogues. The compound enables functional group transformation under GMP-compliant processes, with its addition carefully validated through process development to minimize residual impurities. Drug manufacturers regulate the addition through validated batch protocols to ensure downstream compliance, particularly regarding impurity profile and trace elemental analysis in final actives. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
3. Dithiocarbamate ProductionSpecialty polymer and rubber additive industries use Ethyl Chlorothionoformate in dithiocarbamate synthesis, where it acts as a chlorothionylating reagent to convert amines to key dithiocarbamate salts. Downstream manufacturers add it during aqueous or solvent-based reaction steps after the base amine stage, with dosage fine-tuned to control the sulfuration level and product solubility. The resulting products enhance thermal stability and processability in elastomer compounding and specialty plastics, with supply chain management focused on batch tracking and measurable residue level compliance. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
4. Synthesis of Organic Thionating Agents for DyesIn the dye and pigment industry, Ethyl Chlorothionoformate is selectively applied as a thionating agent to introduce sulfur functionalities into aryl and alkyl core structures during the production of high-performance thio-organic pigments. Coloring material producers integrate it at intermediate synthetic stages, particularly for metal-complex dyes requiring sulfur bridges. The compound’s integration is closely monitored for reaction completeness, and dosage is tailored to substrate absorption properties and targeted pigment coloration grade. Industry compliance standards
Typical usage ratio
Downstream process integration
Final product types
|
Competitive Ethyl Chlorothionoformate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Ethyl chlorothionoformate (commonly called ethyl chlorothiocarbonate, CAS number: 2524-04-1), stands out as a versatile reagent with a unique position in the landscape of organic and agrochemical synthesis. As the company responsible for its day-in and day-out production, the patterns and practical challenges in manufacturing and handling this compound inform how we talk about its value.
Chemists often categorize thionoformate esters along lines that split them from classic chloroformates. Ethyl chlorothionoformate carries a sulfur atom in place of one oxygen in the core ester group, which brings properties that matter in catalysis, synthesis, and end-use performance—especially when compared to ordinary ethyl chloroformate or methyl chlorothionoformate. This subtle difference opens a new field of reactivity and selectivity.
The industry typically works with technical grade ethyl chlorothionoformate at 98% or higher purity. It takes careful separation, monitoring, and validated procedures to reach consistent batches. We monitor byproduct formation, particularly disulfide content and moisture levels, because thionoformates react readily with water or protic impurities, producing hydrogen chloride and toxic gases if mishandled.
Our regular production model targets 1-liter, 5-liter, and bulk drum quantities, always sealed against moisture with lined steel or dark HDPE drums. Subtle impurities, even in low ppm ranges, influence reactivity in downstream chemistry—especially pharmaceutical and pesticide intermediate syntheses where yields or stereochemical purity can show a step change from poorly stabilized raw material.
Stability under ambient storage becomes an issue only with substandard packaging or careless formulation. Quality control teams test every batch for hydrolyzable chloride, acid value, specific gravity, and GC-area purity. These benchmarks, built on experience rather than textbook protocols, ensure users know the variability they’re working with is minimal.
In our own synthesis workshops, we see ethyl chlorothionoformate bring reagent-grade selectivity in reactions for agrochemical actives, pharmaceuticals, and specialty dispersants. Common users leverage its ability to transfer the thio-ester group into complex molecules—efficiently introducing the thiocarbonyl function. In sulfenylation of amines or phenols, for instance, ethyl chlorothionoformate achieves high conversion where harsher reagents risk over-chlorination or unwanted oxidation.
The sulfur atom in its structure increases nucleophilicity compared to its oxygen-substituted relatives, which helps make selective thionation steps more reliable. Agrochemical innovators use this difference to design crop protectants that resist photo-oxidation longer. Certain triazole and thiazolidine ring syntheses can’t proceed without this specific reactivity; alternate compounds end up producing excessive byproducts or need harsher conditions that degrade sensitive payloads.
One area where our large-scale clients exploit ethyl chlorothionoformate involves the preparation of isothiocyanates. Isothiocyanate intermediates show up across nematicide and herbicide formulations, and the efficiency of their formation with ethyl chlorothionoformate avoids side-product accumulation, which would foul reactor geometry or complicate solvent workups downstream. This kind of real-world problem—caked or sticky residues, excess neutralization washes, or filter blockages—comes up less when a well-produced thionoformate gets used in the mix.
Chemists unfamiliar with the distinction might expect similar behavior from ethyl chlorothionoformate and ordinary ethyl chloroformate, since the molecular difference is only a sulfur-for-oxygen switch. In load-and-go synthesis, we’ve found that this minor change rewrites the script. Thionoformates introduce softer, sulfur-rich character, which couples selectively with soft nucleophiles—especially useful for compounds incorporating sulfur bridges or thioesters in their final structure.
This selectivity matters for downstream safety, too. Chlorothionoformates, for example, tend to offer cleaner reactions in water-sensitive steps because they do not introduce additional carbonyl impurities that are common with simple chloroformates. Synthetic steps that involve strong nucleophiles, such as amines or mercaptans, run with higher yield and less polymerization risk. Regulatory inspectors looking at impurity profiles trace these advantages straight back to raw material quality and source.
In our years producing both the classic ethyl chloroformate and the thiono variant, we’ve fielded countless customer questions about cost differences, shelf life, and batch-to-batch consistency. The answer usually lands on experience: well-made ethyl chlorothionoformate costs a bit more per kilo due to higher raw material and handling costs, and the need for double-checking residual thionyl chloride or exhaust ventilation standards during manufacturing. The trade-off comes in the form of less hazardous operations downstream, purer product, and reduced environmental treatment costs—especially relevant when wastewater streams carry higher sulfur or organochloride loads.
Making ethyl chlorothionoformate at commercial scale involves thionyl chloride, ethanol, and controlled reaction atmospheres. As a manufacturer, everyday improvements rest on understanding the quirks of each feedstock batch, seasonal humidity shifts, and even minor pressure differences at high throughput. We’ve had to troubleshoot sulfur dioxide scrubber backups, tighten our gas phase leak detection, and replace liners after a single shipper load showed moisture ingress during monsoon months.
Storage in our facility prioritizes moisture exclusion and regular drum rotation. In-house, we watch out for signs of darkening or odor shift, indicators that hydrolysis or decomposition has kicked off due to trace leaks. Employees run inspections more frequently during high summer, using portable IR analyzers and colorimetric chloride checkers. These checks prevent a small patch of corrosion or a missed valve gasket from turning a manageable inventory problem into a three-shift decontamination project.
Shipping logistics require more than adequate labeling. Stability data based on years of domestic and international sales guides us on transit temperature limits and drum stacking rules. Minor knocks and temperature excursions can change pressure inside a sealed drum, so we equip containers with pressure-release plugs and temperature-sensitive seals when sending overland or by sea. Customers who received off-spec product due to transport damage, even once, tend to tighten their supplier lists rapidly.
Ethyl chlorothionoformate demands practitioners who respect its volatility. We learned early that casual training on PPE or vapor containment often leads to near-miss incidents. Every quarter, safety teams run drills for both minor and catastrophic release scenarios; real stories from our shop floor about minor splashes or vapor inhalation serve as better reminders than a bulletin on a wall. Chemical burns, if they happen, escalate due to delayed reaction in the skin—this costs time, damages morale, and leads us to review protocols without delay.
Beyond facility-level compliance, we stay current with REACH, TSCA, and client-driven audit requests by logging production modifications, change-control events, and waste stream outcomes for each lot. Auditors and client quality systems often ask not for generic certificates, but for recent records of root cause investigations, training attendance, or the history of critical instrument calibrations. Our engineering department invested in secondary containment, improved ventilation, and schedule-driven replacement for carbon filters to cut risk at source, not just at the user site.
Comparisons with similar sulfur compounds show not all organizational systems prioritize these fundamentals. Several years ago, we inherited customers from a failed regional maker who cut corners on scrubber maintenance as a cost-saving measure; we spent months restoring contaminated process lines and replacing leaky storage tanks because residual sulfur dioxide and hydrochloric acid had already attacked coatings. Not all incidents appear in excipient impurity profiles or on audit checklists, but they impact customer trust and downstream process reliability—factors that take years to rebuild after a slip.
Raw material supply volatility calls for more than inventory padding. Over decades, we’ve worked through disruptions in thionyl chloride and ethanol supply, regulatory limits on chlorinated intermediates, and shifting demand from European, US, and Asian pesticide makers. Scrap rate analysis, supplier approval lists, and transparent communication with key clients became the foundation of sustainable delivery. Clients relying on just-in-time supply sometimes underestimate how easily an upstream shortage cascades, turning a minor plant delay into international shipment misses.
Our approach leans on continuous dialogue with both end-users and upstream suppliers. Practical changes—like earlier purchase order timelines, local warehousing, and safety stock sharing—grew out of necessity, not policy mandates. The same attitude guides process improvement: incremental upgrades to reaction quench systems, in-house filtration tweaks, and batch analytics. No automation or document system substitutes for the collective recall of shift supervisors managing hundreds of metric tons yearly.
Loss experience with upstream supply interruptions, container damage in port, or even import detentions by authorities, all left a mark on planning cycles. Older staff remember the time a customs holdup in a major port led to a backlog of unsold product that challenged our storage permits, sparked insurance claims, and created a fire safety review lasting months. We moved to multi-country sourcing and finished product staging after that event, adding flexibility to the supply web.
Changing attitudes toward sulfur and chlorine compounds drive distinct challenges for all stakeholders. While regulatory agencies encourage green chemistry and less persistent compounds, many high-selectivity synthetic steps still require ethyl chlorothionoformate to achieve both quality and sanitation standards—especially in the context of high-purity actives for pharmaceuticals or tightly regulated pesticide actives.
We respond to this by refining processes for higher yield, reduced energy input, and lower solvent footprints. Pilot programs target sub-column recycling of byproducts, and further integration of heat exchangers aims to recover process energy. Not all investments pay off immediately, but long-term buyers reward transparency and the readiness to invest in reductions in environmental impact. This includes wastewater treatment upgrades, improved on-site neutralization, and engagement with community air quality monitors, which help us both comply and establish community trust.
Environmental risk assessments include not only waste and emissions, but also the fate of residues on emptied drums and spent filter cartridges. We work with downstream recyclers and spend as much time tracking the custody of empty packaging as on the product itself. Years of incident data prove that careful stewardship saves both environmental fines and unplanned downtime.
Those who use ethyl chlorothionoformate on the bench scale or in full-scale plants depend on informed, responsive communication. Being an actual manufacturer, not a repackager, demands direct attention to long-term batch integrity, storage problems in client warehouses, and on-the-ground troubleshooting. Clients have come to trust prompt, honest answers about compatibility with solvents, risks of mixing errors, or the significance of a faint yellow tinge in a delivered drum. These conversations often lead to material improvements, not just business transactions.
Clients who treat us as collaborators—reporting back even marginal lab incident data, shipping damage photos, or unusual product responses—help us evolve safer packaging, clarify real versus perceived contamination, and support staff with targeted training. Such relationships routinely outperform anonymous bulk orders routed through distant distributors, as product feedback cycles into stronger, more predictable supply chains.
We learn as much from the factory floor experimentation of our long-term buyers as we do from our own pilots. Common fixes, patches, and process “patch notes” borrowed from partners who run similar lines translate into performance tweaks, recirculation setup changes, or improved on-site emergency drills. Not every advantage or concern ends up in a journal article, but serious manufacturers listen closely to the unfiltered reality shared by trusted users.
Through all stages—from raw material authentication and process optimization, to safety, logistics, and client troubleshooting—the role of the chemical manufacturer differs sharply from further down the supply chain. Decision-making rests on recognizing early-warning signals inside the plant, prioritizing hands-on worker feedback, and never underestimating the cumulative impact of tiny batch deviations.
For ethyl chlorothionoformate, experience confirms the real value lies in batch-to-batch reliability and openness between producer and user. Our technical teams, equipped with both theoretical insight and practical troubleshooting stories, serve users when not every variable can be controlled on paper. As process scale, market regulations, and environmental priorities continue to evolve, so too does the approach to both wide-area supply and deeply personalized technical support.
For many specialty chemicals, and especially for those as structurally and functionally distinct as ethyl chlorothionoformate, a manufacturer’s commitment to know-how, steady improvement, and honest feedback matters as much as the pure analytical data on any one certificate.