| HS Code | 330793 |
| Iupac Name | 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-oxocyclohexyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]pentanediamide |
| Molecular Formula | C15H28N2O3 |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Solubility | Slightly soluble in water; soluble in ethanol and DMSO |
| Boiling Point | Decomposition before boiling |
| Melting Point | Approx. 120-130°C (estimate) |
| Density | 1.13 g/cm³ (estimated) |
| Logp | Approx. 0.3 (estimated) |
| Pka | Estimated pKa of hydroxy group ~14 |
| Storage Conditions | Store at -20°C, protected from light and moisture |
| Stability | Stable under recommended storage conditions |
| Synonyms | None widely established |
As an accredited 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-Oxocyclohexyl)-2-Hydroxyethyl]Pentanediamide factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | A sealed amber glass bottle containing 25 grams of 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-Oxocyclohexyl)-2-Hydroxyethyl]Pentanediamide, labeled with safety and handling instructions. |
| Shipping | **Shipping Description:** 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-Oxocyclohexyl)-2-Hydroxyethyl]Pentanediamide is shipped in tightly sealed, chemical-resistant containers to prevent contamination and degradation. Packages are clearly labeled and accompanied by appropriate safety documentation. Transport complies with local and international chemical regulations, ensuring temperature-controlled storage if required and protection from moisture, extreme temperatures, and physical damage. |
| Storage | Store 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-Oxocyclohexyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]pentanediamide in a tightly sealed container, kept in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated place away from direct sunlight and sources of heat or ignition. Protect from moisture and incompatible substances such as strong acids or oxidizers. Label the container clearly, and ensure access is limited to trained personnel wearing appropriate protective equipment. |
Competitive 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-Oxocyclohexyl)-2-Hydroxyethyl]Pentanediamide prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to admin@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: admin@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Chemical manufacturing has shifted significantly in the past few decades. Many compounds once considered academic curiosities now carry real-world demand as industries expand into increasingly specialized fields. Our product, 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-Oxocyclohexyl)-2-Hydroxyethyl]Pentanediamide, reflects this change. As the actual producer, not just another link in the supply chain, every batch tells the story of our attention to consistency, purity, and real-world needs.
A compound like 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-Oxocyclohexyl)-2-Hydroxyethyl]Pentanediamide brings together the practical needs of research laboratories, coatings, and specialized synthesis projects. Its structure, centered around the dimethyl-substituted cyclohexanone group, offers reactivity uncommon in off-the-shelf intermediates. Manufacturing this molecule involves precise control over temperature, moisture, and pH. As the manufacturer, we measure not only purity by HPLC but also monitor residual solvent profiles, so end-users experience consistent results from batch to batch.
Our experience has shown that feedback from direct users tends to focus on solubility, chemical stability, and synthetic flexibility. To address these, we keep specifications stringent: moisture content remains below 0.2%, and liquid chromatography guarantees a single major peak matching the target structure. The whole process starts with selected raw materials—each batch begins with cyclohexanone derivatives that have cleared our in-house trace metal and particulate screens.
As chemists who produce this compound, we’ve learned that details such as melting point, spectral pattern, and impurity content affect outcomes in downstream synthesis. For this reason, we maintain a measured melting point range and provide NMR traces upon request, so experienced researchers can confirm batch suitability before even opening the drum. Every lot ships with corresponding certificates, directly linked to the run operators who signed off on the process. If a deviation occurs, our quality team can trace it back to the last barrel filled.
Handling a product of this class, whose amide and hydroxyl groups interact in nuanced ways, means giving attention to stability. We store final product in airtight aluminum-lined containers under controlled humidity. If you work with advanced intermediates, you know that an overlooked desiccation step leads to short shelf life, off-colors, and unexpected side reactions. Regular moisture checks and mass balance testing avoid that.
We have worked with customers using 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-Oxocyclohexyl)-2-Hydroxyethyl]Pentanediamide in specialty coatings, custom adhesives, and pharmaceutical research. Lab notes from end-users sometimes highlight its utility as a coupling agent, especially when a reaction calls for a cyclohexanone base with dual reactivity—hydrophilic at one end and sterically hindered at the other. The subtle effect of the dimethyl cyclohexanone ring has helped several teams broaden the range of compatible substrates.
In our own field trials, we have tested the compound in UV-curable coatings. Its backbone confers both rigidity and limited crosslinking, leading to films with improved abrasion resistance compared to linear diamide analogs. Some pharmaceutical clients adapt it as a scaffold for further synthetic modification, leveraging its predictable reactivity profile and lower toxicity compared to aromatic analogues. We attribute this to the benign nature of the aliphatic groups, which metabolize predictably in standardized in vitro models.
Our history as producers has put us in direct contact with many similar amides and hydroxyethyl analogues. Compared to linear pentanediamides or cyclohexanone-free structures, 3-[2-(3,5-Dimethyl-2-Oxocyclohexyl)-2-Hydroxyethyl]Pentanediamide offers better thermal stability. Standard flame tests in our plant demonstrate that this compound resists degradation at temperatures that would break down comparable molecules.
One noticeable distinction lies in solvent interaction. During pilot production, samples exposed to common polar and non-polar solvents held up far better than matched pairs on the analysis bench. Chemists looking for intermediate flexibility tend to prefer our compound because it dissolves steadily in ethanol, acetone, and certain glycol ethers. This effect supports its use in projects requiring both protic and aprotic media, unlike some N-substituted amides, which clump or precipitate out if you switch solvents mid-process.
From a downstream chemistry perspective, the steric shielding by the 3,5-dimethyl groups minimizes unwanted side reactions—an observation made not only by us but confirmed in customer-side trials. Some other pentanediamide derivatives lack this bulk and exhibit byproduct formation, especially under acidic conditions. In contrast, this molecule shows outstanding selectivity, in part due to reduced nucleophilic attack on potential electrophilic centers.
Making a high-purity functionalized amide like this presents a challenge beyond simple mixing and heating. Early in the development process, we discovered that even trace acids introduced by certain stainless steel reactor types caused unpredictable hydrolysis. Solving this required a switch to glass-lined vessels and a strict maintenance regime that included regular passivation of exposed metal. Operators learned to watch for subtle signs—an uncharacteristic odor or color shift signals a contamination risk. This attention to detail means that we catch issues before product leaves our warehouse.
Waste minimization stands out as a practical concern in large-scale synthesis. Off-spec product and spent solvents used to pose a disposal challenge, especially since strong amides can be tough to degrade. We now rely on an in-house recycling loop for solvents, and distillation recovery nets us more than ninety percent usable solvent each run. What once left the facility as hazardous waste now cycles back into the next batch.
Batch-to-batch reproducibility has improved since we introduced digital temperature monitoring on all reaction lines, replacing analog thermometers that lagged or stuck. Technicians pull daily in-process samples and analyze by FTIR, catching deviations hours before they can affect final yields. These practices come directly from lessons on the production floor—not from management handbooks, but from trial and error as we scaled bench runs to multi-kilo lots.
Over dozens of technical forums and industry events, we have listened to chemists describe daily frustrations. Slow melt times, trace impurities, and batch inconsistencies often top the list. Our own testing procedures grew out of these conversations. For example, we started running long-term storage tests at multiple temperature ranges after hearing about sticky residues forming in summertime shipments. Now, each container carries recommended storage instructions based on real-world climate data, not just lab conditions.
Another concern: trace metals. Many downstream syntheses, especially in pharma or custom polymerization, cannot tolerate nickel, chromium, or iron above sub-ppm levels. While source materials often claim purity, they rarely account for what happens inside a reactor. Our batches are routinely checked for these contaminants by ICP-MS, and any spike triggers a process review. Technicians isolate the cause, down to the gasket or stirrer blade if necessary, and make corrections before resuming production. Experience shows that this level of diligence pays off not in marketing, but in reduced client complaints and rework orders.
Every now and then a formulation challenge crops up: end users ask about compatibility with additives, dyes, or plasticizers. We test samples with common ingredients—phthalates, azo dyes, stabilizers—and share those findings. For example, certain stabilizers used in clear coatings can catalyze hydrolysis of related diamide products, causing clumping and settling. Our testing found that this compound remains stable in typical concentrations, but we still advise full pilot trials before committing to production, and happily provide reference samples for these checks.
Being both producer and tester keeps us humble. Each year new synthetic routes and applications trickle in from academic and industrial chemists alike. We remain open to modifying process steps or even the core synthesis if it means better outcomes in yield, safety, or environmental impact. Recent efforts focus on further lowering the environmental footprint—such as switching from traditional chlorinated solvents to safer, more readily recovered alternatives. Preliminary trials using green solvents, including some derived from renewable alcohols, look promising.
On the technical front, improved crystallization and filtration equipment added in the last year boosted throughput and reduced off-spec production. Continual training for our operators means hands-on knowledge passes from one shift to the next, pairing experience with new methodologies. We review tech sheets, academic papers, and process notes every quarter, adapting as needed. Keeping a direct feedback loop with users helps shape our improvements—not by top-down directives, but organically from hands-on experience.
As workers who handle this product daily, we do not treat safety as an afterthought. Automated handling has replaced much of the direct transfer, closing the exposure route for both operators and product. Air quality in the plant sits well below regulatory VOC limits, not just by engineering control but because we overbuilt venting based on worst-case scenarios calculated after real plant incidents, not simulations.
Down the supply chain, we know our choices matter. We design our packaging with multilayer protection to prevent accidental release and keep moisture out. Every container includes a tamper-evident seal, a decision made after an end-user in a high-humidity region once reported pressure buildup. This hands-on learning, shared through site visits and troubleshooting calls, teaches us new ways to safeguard both product and handler. Feedback loops close the circle, especially after any reported incident, and we continuously revisit best practices based on actual outcomes.
Running a modern chemical plant means facing questions no one cared about a generation ago. Waste and emissions standards are tighter than ever, and rightfully so. Over the years, we have revamped everything from our solvent recycling processes to our wastewater treatment system. Plant washouts with spent amide solutions once drained into neutralization ponds; now, we capture and recycle forty percent, using in-house catalytic reduction followed by carbon filtration. Results show downstream environmental load cut by better than half in just a few years.
At the sourcing end, our raw material screening focuses on suppliers who can show sustainable practices—renewable inputs, closed-loop processing, or certified low-carbon transportation. For customers aiming to achieve green chemistry certification, we readily supply full lifecycle data, including greenhouse gas and energy use per batch, drawing from our own monitoring rather than generic calculators.
Old habits do not change overnight; we continue to identify and address emissions hotspots or wasteful steps. That might mean changing to a different washing protocol, or re-tuning reactor temperature ramps for improved thermal efficiency. These choices matter since end-users downstream increasingly face accountability for upstream environmental impact. Ultimately, it is both business sense and personal responsibility—not an abstract corporate goal, but a day-to-day operational priority.
One of the privileges of being the original manufacturer is seeing firsthand how users innovate. Our technical team stays connected through regular lab visits, joint process reviews, and open Q&A sessions. The feedback is invaluable, exposing new trends or emerging applications that highlight the versatility—or limitations—of the compound.
We know that making a compound is only half the battle; helping end-users adapt it successfully makes the rest. For developmental projects or scale-up support, senior plant chemists make themselves available for troubleshooting, drawing on years of process knowledge and an instinct honed in thousands of runs. Sometimes it takes stepping onto another company’s floor and observing their actual workflow to supply the right answer, rather than sending another technical bulletin from afar.
Chemistry keeps moving, and specialty compounds like this one will continue to find new avenues beyond what we imagine now. From early-stage pharmaceutical work to robust performance in advanced coatings, we see more demand for highly functionalized, low-toxicity intermediates. End-users want reliability—batch after batch, order after order. That reliability comes only from a tight control over every stage of production.
As both makers and troubleshooters, we keep one foot in the laboratory and another on the production floor. Every improvement, every procedural detail, every response to an end-user’s dilemma comes from lived experience with the product. In a world filled with middlemen and generic supply, true manufacturing insight makes the difference—because only by owning each stage in the process can we deliver the quality, transparency, and confidence users demand.