|
HS Code |
540106 |
| Chemical Name | Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate |
| Cas Number | 140-93-2 |
| Molecular Formula | C7H14OS2Zn |
| Appearance | Yellowish powder |
| Odor | Characteristic, unpleasant sulfur odor |
| Molecular Weight | 259.7 g/mol |
| Solubility In Water | Insoluble |
| Density | 1.3 g/cm³ |
| Main Application | Rubber accelerator for latex and dry rubber compounds |
| Storage Conditions | Cool, dry, well-ventilated area, away from moisture |
| Decomposition Temperature | Decomposes above approximately 100°C |
| Hazard Classification | Harmful if swallowed, causes skin and eye irritation |
| Synonyms | ZIPX, Zinc O-isopropyl dithiocarbonate |
| Package Type | Bags or drums, typically 25 kg |
As an accredited Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) is packaged in 25 kg net weight, sealed fiber drums with inner polyethylene liners for protection. |
| Shipping | Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) should be shipped in tightly sealed, clearly labeled containers, protected from moisture and sources of ignition. Store and transport in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Comply with applicable regulations regarding hazardous materials, as it may be classified as dangerous goods. Use personal protective equipment when handling. |
| Storage | Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from direct sunlight, heat, and moisture. Keep the container tightly closed and store separately from acids, oxidizers, and foodstuffs. Use non-sparking tools and ground all equipment. Proper labeling and secondary containment are recommended to prevent accidental exposure or environmental contamination. |
|
Purity 98%: Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) with 98% purity is used in rubber vulcanization processes, where it ensures fast curing and enhances cross-link density. Particle size <75 μm: Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) with particle size below 75 microns is used in latex compounding, where it provides uniform dispersion and consistent vulcanizate properties. Melting point 128°C: Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) with a melting point of 128°C is used in tire manufacturing, where it supports stable processing and prevents premature activation. Moisture content ≤0.5%: Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) with a maximum moisture content of 0.5% is used in cable insulation production, where it reduces risk of scorch and improves shelf life. Stability up to 80°C: Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) stable up to 80°C is used in industrial rubber molding, where it ensures reliable performance during extended processing cycles. Apparent density 0.45 g/cm³: Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) with an apparent density of 0.45 g/cm³ is used in footwear soling compounds, where it allows easy incorporation and enhances processing efficiency. 油分含量≤0.1%: Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) with oil content ≤0.1% is used in conveyor belt manufacturing, where it minimizes contamination risks and improves vulcanizate quality. |
Competitive Accelerator ZIP (Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615365186327 or mail to sales3@ascent-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615365186327
Email: sales3@ascent-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Anyone who’s worked with the ins and outs of rubber compounding knows that every part of the recipe matters. Accelerator ZIP, or Zinc Isopropyl Xanthate, steps into this blend as a sulfur-based accelerator that’s built a solid place, especially in the making of latex products and specialty rubbers. Over the years in the industry, I’ve seen plenty of options come and go, but ZIP holds its own because of its dependability and tailored fit for specific production challenges.
Every compounder has run into the problem of delayed cure times or unpredictable results. ZIP answers to that need for predictability. The model most folks see—technical grade or industrial grade ZIP—offers a yellowish powder that actually gets things moving quickly during vulcanization. Having spent years mixing and matching accelerators, I’ve noticed ZIP helps cut down the time it takes for rubber to cure, which keeps production lines humming and waste trimmed.
Unlike other accelerators like ZMBT or ZDBC, ZIP delivers a quick reaction without losing the sharpness needed for crisp, consistent results. Its action kicks in at low concentrations. For latex production—think surgical gloves, balloons, medical tubing—this kind of lightning-fast onset changes the game. You don’t get gummy, under-cured patches like with some thiazole or dithiocarbamate options. And because the isopropyl side group keeps the chemistry focused, ZIP plays nicely with a range of polymers and doesn’t make a mess with excessive bloom or byproducts. You put it in, run the batch, and can trust your output to hit the numbers most days.
The technical talk boils down to this: ZIP appears as a yellow to pale yellow powder, usually standardized at about 90% active ingredient. Less dust, easier to handle, and stable under most shop floor conditions. It’s lightweight but packs its punch in a low dose, rarely more than a percent in any master batch. Storage in sealed drums away from moisture helps avoid clumping, which keeps dosing consistent. Over the years, I’ve seen that housekeeping matters—a minor spill of xanthate powder shouldn’t mean a headache down the line, but it’s best to treat it with the respect it deserves.
People sometimes ask about the smell. Xanthates carry a sulfuric, almost tangy scent, and ZIP fits that profile. Experience on the ground tells me: good ventilation and straightforward controls for airborne dust keep everyone happy. Plant managers appreciate that ZIP is less fussy than alternatives that need specialty handling or exotic clean-up routines.
Making a latex glove isn’t just about dipping a mold into rubber milk. The accelerator controls how fast the glove sets, how quickly it pops off the former, and even how much shelf life you get on the final box. ZIP enables uniform, reliable curing. Operators in glove factories want to avoid clots and pinholes, which crop up from slow or uneven vulcanization. By using ZIP, you gain a kind of insurance—every dip, every batch, predictable and smooth. I’ve talked to engineers in medical supply who swear that swapping in ZIP for standard thiazoles cut their defect rates in half.
There’s also less risk of nitrosamine formation compared with some other fast accelerators. In my book, that’s not just a regulatory checkbox, but a real contribution to safer workplaces and healthier end users. For anyone trying to serve industries like healthcare or food, reducing chemical residues has stopped being a “nice to have”—it’s now non-negotiable. ZIP supports that without asking you to overhaul the rest of your formula.
Look at the typical choice between ZIP and something like ZDEC or MBT. The dithiocarbamates and thiazoles have their fans, and I won’t pretend they don’t work in most applications. The rub? Dithiocarbamates like ZDEC ramp up curing speed but can leave behind more odor, and sometimes lead to migration issues in thin goods. MBT, on the other hand, can act slow under certain pH profiles or latex concentrations, causing those process bottlenecks everyone wants to avoid.
ZIP slips right into the middle—strong enough to boost throughput, but not so aggressive that it blows past quality checks. Its chemistry means fewer free amines released during curing, lowering the chance of ghosting nitrosamines. Practical experience has taught me this matters more with every passing regulation. I’ve also noticed over years in the lab: ZIP improves dispersion in latex and rubber, reducing the “chunky batch” syndrome.
In the last big audit run by clients, the ZIP-containing lots consistently outperformed comparable ZMBT and ZDBC runs, both in tensile retention after aging and in the level of safe extractable residues. From my view, that builds the case for switching, because raw numbers and hands-on results line up.
Folks in manufacturing tend not to trust new ingredients until they’ve seen them perform on the line. ZIP has made its mark precisely because of its track record. I still remember a trial run in a Southeast Asian latex plant—two lines running head-to-head, one with ZIP and one with a popular dithiocarbamate. ZIP kept cycle times about 10% shorter, and the reject bin quiet. Less sticky residue, easier strip-off on the formers, and better elasticity in the finished goods. Nobody likes to throw money away, so the cost savings from that improved yield turned plenty of skeptics into fans.
Roll this out to tire plants, and ZIP finds its place in compounds where split-second curing boosts productivity. The staff on the shop floor noticed fewer scorch marks and more tolerance for slight process upsets. All told, the compound handled better both in the mixer and during extrusion—more manageable, more stable, less prone to hot spots. For line workers, simple improvements like this reduce headaches during routine cleanups and maintenance rounds.
Every chemical brings responsibility. ZIP doesn’t stray far from standard accelerator rules: avoid dust inhalation, keep stocks dry, and label storage areas. Having seen a couple of incidents where minor spills led to confusion, I always stress the training piece—it goes a long way. In practice, ZIP ranks as less hazardous than some accelerators loaded with heavy metals or complex organic residues. Those in charge of compliance value this, especially as the bar for environmental and occupational health keeps rising.
From a regulatory angle, European and North American requirements push for traceability, clear labeling, and chemical inventories. Plants using ZIP report fewer headaches staying in the good graces of watchdogs compared to more controversial additives. It checks out with most updated toxicological studies, and its profile in global regulatory frameworks looks solid for the time being. Transparency about the compound’s source, supply chain, and batch history helps everyone—manufacturers, workers, and end users—feel more secure about what goes into their gloves or rubber parts.
Any chemical, ZIP included, should be stored with respect—a dry, cool warehouse and the right bins go a long way. The fewer variables between storage and the mixer, the fewer surprises during production. I’ve seen outfits falter after cutting corners; it never pays off. It’s not hard to integrate ZIP into an existing workflow thanks to pretty straightforward compatibility with most latex and dry rubber systems.
Rubber processing isn’t static. Each year brings new pressure points—faster production cycles, greener chemistry, and relentless attention to product safety. ZIP’s strong suit has always been its reliability under speed. For rapid-turn goods like examination gloves, where the market keeps speeding up and tolerances keep tightening, the rapid onset that ZIP delivers feels like a real advantage. Nobody gets a repeat order if the first box is full of irregular gloves, and production managers care about that more than ever.
In sectors aiming to shrink their environmental footprint, ZIP stands out for creating less dust and fewer risky byproducts. There’s less cleanup at the end of a shift, and operators feel more confident running ZIP on automated or semi-auto systems. Automation doesn’t tolerate unexpected conditions—a plug, a blockage, or runaway cure can ruin a whole batch. ZIP behaves in a way that aligns with tighter control charts and greater automation, slashing downtime and wasted effort.
I’ve sat through my share of technical sales calls, and the green question always comes up. ZIP, compared to many sulfur-based accelerators, does not stick around as a persistent organic pollutant nor as a bioaccumulative toxin. While not exactly an eco-poster child, it strikes a better balance than accelerators with heavy metal backbones or exotic leaving groups. Manufacturing teams working toward ISO 14001 or similar norms often report smoother audits after moving toward a ZIP-based package.
With global logistics constantly under pressure—container shortages, port congestion, regulatory delays—it’s worth thinking about the sourcing and supply of something like ZIP. Reliable producers maintain short lead times and robust packaging. The material travels well, with its shelf life holding up under standard shipping conditions. Disruptions in supply chains can throw plant schedules off balance fast; a steady ingredient that arrives as promised deserves attention. Some rubber factories hedge by stocking a couple of months’ worth, but more stable supply markets now make just-in-time deliveries more realistic.
The transition from other accelerators to ZIP often runs smoothly. The learning curve isn’t harsh; most operators adapt in days. Routine process controls like temperature, mixing time, and addition order do even better with ZIP than with some less predictable products. As companies diversify sites and ramp up production globally, ingredients like ZIP that don’t need too much babying free up energy to focus where it counts—on output and quality.
The final test for any accelerator isn’t in the drum; it’s the way it makes itself known in finished goods. I’ve fielded calls from procurement and QA teams who want to nail down traceability, consistency, and improvement on end-product specs. They want fewer complaints, more satisfied repeat customers, and a smooth track from raw material to finished part. ZIP, by delivering strong curing performance and minimizing unwanted residuals, helps companies face those user-facing challenges head on.
Over the last decade, major latex and synthetic rubber processors adopted ZIP as a mainstay partly because it fits well into global narratives of improved safety, trace metals control, and streamlined processing. These aren’t just talking points—they shape real business choices. Big buyers in pharma, automotive, and electronics keep raising technical standards. ZIP’s history of reliable performance meets those expectations with less need for off-the-wall retooling or endless process tweaks.
No rubber ingredient is perfect. ZIP’s downsides? A strong smell if care slips during blending, and a tendency to clump if exposed to humid warehouse conditions. Older storage methods—open bags, loose piles—don’t cut it. Drum seals, lined sacks, and organized dunnage solve much of this, but discipline on the shop floor makes the difference. Managers who build clear routines around ZIP’s use see fewer process upsets down the line.
The other real risk is overuse. More of a good thing can swing the cure too far, making batches brittle or sticky instead of strong and flexible. I learned early to double-check scales and keep close tabs on inventory turns—lazy dosing leads to rework, which nobody wants. Supervisors benefit from simple batch testing and regular calibration checks, especially during high-output runs. Skipping steps lets mistakes slip through, which hurts customer trust far more than any line stoppage.
Manufacturers build their edge by constant tuning. ZIP doesn’t make a plant foolproof, but it does reward thoughtful process control. Operators experimenting with blending times and temperatures often find that ZIP gives a little extra margin for error, letting them dial in against subtle production swings. By tracking cure curves, tensile retention, and defect frequencies, plant engineers shape a more reliable output over time. Managing raw material chains and rotating storage provides a rhythm that supports consistent, top-notch parts rolling off the line.
Feedback loops matter the most. I’ve seen successful companies set up simple communication between production staff and R&D—the folks who handle the batch hear from the ones running the tests, ironing out sticking points before they hit customers. ZIP’s reputation relies not just on the molecule’s chemistry, but on the people using it well. Regular review sessions, short training boosts, and clean, accessible workspaces make handling ZIP less of a chore, more of a routine part of quality-driven production.
Avoiding over-complication stays key. There are always flashier, newer chemistries chasing the headlines, but the working world needs ingredients that show up and deliver. ZIP’s “old reliable” status doesn’t mean it’s stagnant. Ongoing tweaks in manufacturing mean cleaner batches with less impurity drift and tighter spec windows. For companies aiming to keep pace with rising regulatory and customer standards, having a tried-and-true accelerator that meets modern expectations gives valuable breathing room.
Trust comes down to lived experience and repeated positive outcomes. On the factory floor and in test labs, ZIP’s appeal boils down to this: it does the job without extra worries. Even engineers new to rubber compounding soon learn to rely on ZIP’s forgiving window and consistent results. By sticking with established supply partners and double-checking batch consistency, teams get the kind of predictability that matters most to end buyers.
The world doesn’t slow down for anybody. Rubber factories today run up against tighter specs, high output goals, and shrinking margins for error. Accelerator ZIP may look like just another powder on the shelf, but its track record, safety edge, and adaptability give it lasting power in a crowded market. As new performance demands and stricter oversight take root, solutions that balance speed, safety, and reliability move from “nice to have” to mission-critical. In my own time bridging the lab and the plant floor, ZIP stands out—not for flashy claims, but for steady work and fewer surprises. More than ever, that kind of realism matters.